Trends of pre-treatment drug resistance in antiretroviral-naïve people with HIV-1 in the era of second-generation integrase strand-transfer inhibitors in Taiwan.

BACKGROUND: Monitoring the trends of pre-treatment drug resistance (PDR) and resistance-associated mutations (RAMs) among antiretroviral-naïve people with HIV (PWH) is important for the implementation of HIV treatment and control programmes. We analysed the trends of HIV-1 PDR after the introduction of second-generation integrase strand-transfer inhibitors (INSTIs) in 2016 in Taiwan, when single-tablet regimens of non-nucleoside reverse-transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI-) and INSTI-based antiretroviral therapy became the preferred treatments. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this multicentre study, we included newly diagnosed, antiretroviral-naïve PWH who underwent tests for RAMs between 2016 and 2022. Pre-treatment genotypic resistance testing was performed, along with HIV-1 subtyping and determinations of plasma HIV RNA load and CD4 lymphocyte counts. RAMs were analysed using the Stanford University HIV Drug Resistance Database and only RAMs conferring at least low-level resistance were included. RESULTS: From 2016 to 2022, pre-treatment blood samples from 3001 newly diagnosed PWH, which constituted 24.3% of newly diagnosed PWH in Taiwan during the study period, were tested. Of the PWH with analysable gene sequences, the HIV-1 PDR prevalence to NNRTIs, nucleoside reverse-transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs), first- and second-generation INSTIs and PIs was 10.0%, 2.1%, 2.5%, 0.6% and 0.4%, respectively. While the trends of PDR remained stable for NRTIs, INSTIs and PIs, there was a significantly increasing trend of PDR to NNRTIs from 6.0% in 2016% to 13.1% in 2022 (P = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: After the introduction of second-generation INSTIs in Taiwan, the trends of HIV-1 PDR to NRTIs and INSTIs remained low. Furthermore, there was no significant decrease of the prevalence of PDR toward NNRTIs between 2016 and 2022.

HCV Microelimination for High-risk Special Populations.

The World Health Organization has set tremendous goals to eliminate viral hepatitis by 2030. However, most countries are currently off the track for achieving these goals. Microelimination is a more effective and practical approach that breaks down national elimination targets into goals for smaller and more manageable key populations. These key populations share the characteristics of being highly prevalent for and vulnerable to hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection. Microelimination allows for identifying HCV-infected people and linking them to care more cost-effectively and efficiently. In this review, we discuss the current obstacles to and progress in HCV microelimination in special populations, including uremic patients undergoing hemodialysis, people who inject drugs, incarcerated people, people living in hyperendemic areas, men who have sex with men with or without human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection, transgender and gender-diverse populations, and sex workers. Scaling up testing and treatment uptake to achieve HCV microelimination may facilitate global HCV elimination by 2030.

A Randomized Clinical Trial of 1-Dose vs Accelerated 2-Dose Schedule for Hepatitis A Virus (HAV) Revaccination Among People With Human Immunodeficiency Virus Who Were Nonresponders or Had Seroreversion After Primary HAV Vaccination.

BACKGROUND: For people with human immunodeficiency virus (PWH) who have no serological responses to their primary hepatitis A virus (HAV) vaccination or have seroreversion after successful primary vaccination, the optimal revaccination strategy remains unclear. METHODS: In this open-label, randomized clinical trial, PWH who tested negative for anti-HAV antibodies after receiving a standard 2-dose series of primary HAV vaccination were enrolled and assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive either 1 dose (the 1-dose group) or 2 doses of HAV vaccine administered 4 weeks apart (the 2-dose group). Serological response rates and anti-HAV antibody titers were compared at weeks 24 and 48. RESULTS: Of the 153 participants (77 in the 1-dose group and 76 in the 2-dose group), the overall serological response rates at week 48 after revaccination were similar between the 2 groups (2- vs 1-dose, 80.2% vs 71.4%, P = .20). However, anti-HAV antibody titers were consistently higher in the 2-dose group than in the 1-dose group. In subgroup analysis, PWH who were nonresponders to primary HAV vaccination were significantly more likely to mount a serological response after 2-dose HAV revaccination (68.4% vs 44.1%, P = .038). No severe adverse events were reported throughout the study. CONCLUSIONS: Two-dose HAV revaccination administered 4 weeks apart yielded similar serological responses as 1-dose revaccination among PWH who were nonresponders or had seroreversion after primary HAV vaccination. The 2-dose revaccination schedule generated significantly higher anti-HAV antibody titers and was more likely to elicit serological responses at week 48 among PWH who were nonresponders to primary HAV vaccination. Clinical Trials Registration. NCT03855176.

Evolution of Hepatitis B Virus (HBV) Serologic Markers Among Antiretroviral-Naive Young People Living With Human Immunodeficiency Virus Who Had Undergone Neonatal HBV Vaccination and Initiated Antiretroviral Therapy.

BACKGROUND: With initiation of antiretroviral therapy (ART) containing nucleos(t)ide reverse-transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs) with anti-hepatitis B virus (HBV) activity, the evolution of HBV serologic markers among people living with human immunodeficiency virus (PLWH) who were born in the era of nationwide neonatal HBV vaccination is rarely investigated. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study evaluated the changes of HBV serologic markers (hepatitis B surface antigen [HBsAg], antibody to hepatitis B surface antigen [anti-HBs], and antibody to hepatitis B core antigen [anti-HBc]) of PLWH who had undergone neonatal HBV vaccination. Clinical characteristics were analyzed and the incidences of evolution of HBV serologic markers were estimated. RESULTS: Between 2004 and 2020, 608 PLWH (mean age, 24 years) were included and 62.0% initiated tenofovir-containing ART: 13 (2.1%) were HBsAg-positive, 312 (51.3%) tested triple-negative, 209 (34.4%) had vaccine-induced seroprotection against HBV, and 74 (12.2%) tested positive for anti-HBc with or without anti-HBs. Among 492 PLWH who received a median follow-up of 2.8 years, 4 cases of incident HBV infection occurred (0.59 per 100 person-years of follow-up [PYFU]) in PLWH testing triple-negative at baseline despite ART containing NRTIs with anti-HBV activity. Of PLWH with seroprotection against HBV at baseline, 38 subsequently lost anti-HBs (4.46 per 100 PYFU) and 4 cases of incident HBV infection occurred (0.47 per 100 PYFU). PLWH with an anti-HBs antibody titer ≥100 mIU/mL at baseline (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 0.10 [95% confidence interval {CI}: .02-.42]) and CD4 ≥500 cells/µL during follow-up (aHR, 0.51 [95% CI: .30-1.00]) were less likely to lose HBV seroprotection. CONCLUSIONS: Among young PLWH who had undergone neonatal HBV vaccination, evolution of HBV serologic markers and incident infections occurred despite ART containing NRTIs with anti-HBV activity.

Impact of archived M184V/I mutation on the effectiveness of switch to co-formulated elvitegravir, cobicistat, emtricitabine and tenofovir alafenamide among virally suppressed people living with HIV.

OBJECTIVES: Real-world experience regarding the effectiveness of co-formulated elvitegravir, cobicistat, emtricitabine and tenofovir alafenamide (EVG/C/FTC/TAF) as a switch regimen is sparse among people living with HIV (PLWH) harbouring the M184V/I mutation with or without thymidine analogue-associated mutations (TAMs). METHODS: In this retrospective multicentre study, PLWH who were switched to EVG/C/FTC/TAF after having achieved viral suppression (plasma HIV RNA <200 copies/mL) for 6 months or longer were included. Patients with archived M184V/I mutation (case patients) were matched to controls without M184V/I mutation at a 1:4 ratio. Patients with a history of virological failure or resistance to elvitegravir were excluded. The primary endpoint was virological non-success (plasma HIV RNA ≥50 copies/mL) at Week 48 of switch using a modified FDA snapshot analysis. RESULTS: Overall, 100 case patients with the M184V/I mutation were identified, including 6 (6.0%) with K65R and 13 (13.0%) with at least one TAM, and were matched to 400 controls in terms of gender, age (mean = 40.3 versus 39.7 years) and cumulative exposure duration to tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (median = 146 versus 143 weeks). At Week 48, the rate of virological non-success for the case patients and controls was 5.0% (5/100) and 3.3% (13/400), respectively (difference = 1.7%; 95% CI = -2.9%-6.3%), while the rate of virological success was 88.0% and 89.5% for the case patients and controls, respectively. The presence of the K65R mutation or TAMs was not associated with virological non-response. CONCLUSIONS: Among virally suppressed PLWH, EVG/C/FTC/TAF is effective in maintaining viral suppression at Week 48 despite archived M184V/I mutation with or without TAMs.

Early Seroreversion After 2 Doses of Hepatitis A Vaccination in Human Immunodeficiency Virus-Positive Patients: Incidence and Associated Factors.

Serological responses (Seroresponse) and durability of hepatitis A virus (HAV) vaccination are reduced among human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-positive patients. Incidence of and associated factors with early seroreversion (loss of seroresponse) among HIV-positive patients who have achieved seroresponses after two doses of HAV vaccination remain unclear. In this multicenter study, we followed HIV-positive adults who had mounted seroresponses after completing two doses of HAV vaccination during a recent outbreak of acute hepatitis A between 2015 and 2017, a 1:4 case-control study was conducted to identify factors associated with seroreversion. Case patients were those with seroreversion, and controls were those with similar follow-up durations who were able to maintain seroresponses. During the study period, 49 of the 1,256 patients (3.9%) seroreverted after a median follow-up of 611 days. In a case-control study, seroreversion was more likely to occur in patients with a higher weight (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.703; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.292-2.323, per 10-kg increment) and HIV viremia at the time of vaccination (aOR, 2.922; 95% CI, 1.067-7.924), whereas positive seroresponse at 6 months of HAV vaccination and higher CD4 lymphocyte counts at vaccination were inversely associated with early seroreversion with an aOR of 0.059 (95% CI, 0.020-0.154) and 0.837 (95% CI, 0.704-0.979, per 100-cell/mm3 increment), respectively, in multivariable analyses. Conclusion: During an outbreak setting, early seroreversion following two-dose HAV vaccination occurred in 3.9% of HIV-positive patients. Lower and delayed seroresponses to HAV vaccination, a higher weight, and HIV viremia and lower CD4 lymphocyte counts at the time of HAV vaccination were associated with early seroreversion. Regular monitoring of seroresponse and booster vaccination might be warranted, especially in HIV-positive adults with predictors of early seroreversion.

Therapeutic drug monitoring of the teicoplanin trough level after the loading doses in patients receiving venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation.

BACKGROUND: The optimal loading dose of teicoplanin in patients receiving venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) has never been determined by therapeutic drug monitoring. This study investigated the appropriateness of proposed loading dose regimens of teicoplanin when administered to patients receiving VA-ECMO by using a previously proposed loading dosage and measuring the teicoplanin trough concentration (Ctrough). METHODS: Patients who initiated teicoplanin therapy while receiving VA-ECMO were enrolled. Every included patient received four loading doses of teicoplanin at a dose of 12 mg/kg. The first three doses were administered 12 h apart, and the fourth dose was administered 24 h after the third dose. Blood samples were collected before administering the maintenance dose (i.e., the fifth dose), and the teicoplanin Ctrough was measured. Serum teicoplanin levels were determined using an Agilent 1290 ultra-high performance liquid chromatography system. RESULTS: The teicoplanin Ctrough was successfully tested in 11 patients. Their median age was 68.2 years, and 81.8% of them were men. The median of each loading dose was 11.6 (range, 10.7-12.8) mg/kg. The median teicoplanin Ctrough was 22.01 (range, 14.85-44.84) mg/L. All patients had a Ctrough of more than 10 mg/L, whereas 90.9% (10/11) of the patients achieved a Ctrough of more than 15 mg/L. CONCLUSION: The loading dosage consisting of four doses of teicoplanin administered within the first 72 h at a dose of 12 mg/kg/dose could achieve an adequate therapeutic Ctrough of teicoplanin in patients receiving VA-ECMO.

Serologic responses and effectiveness of hepatitis A vaccination among human immunodeficiency virus-positive individuals during the outbreak of acute hepatitis A.

Outbreaks of hepatitis A virus (HAV) infection have been occurring among men who have sex with men in the Asia-Pacific region, the United States, and several European countries since June 2015 and recently among persons who are homeless and use illicit drugs in the United States. We evaluated the serologic responses and effectiveness of HAV vaccination in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-positive individuals during the outbreak in Taiwan. From June 1, 2015, to September 30, 2016, anti-HAV immunoglobulin G was prospectively determined among all HIV-positive individuals. We prospectively observed 1,533 HAV-seronegative, HIV-positive individuals (94.1% being men who have sex with men with a median cluster of differentiation 4 (CD4) count of 550 cells/µL) who were advised to receive two doses of HAV vaccine administered 6 months apart. Of them, 1,001 individuals (65.3%) received at least one dose of HAV vaccine during the study period and 532 (34.7%) declined to receive vaccine. The primary endpoints were serologic response at weeks 28-36 and acquisition of HAV infection during follow-up. The incidence rate of acute HAV infection was 3.7 and 99.3 per 1,000 person-years of follow-up in the vaccinated and unvaccinated groups, respectively, resulting in a vaccine effectiveness of 96.3%. At weeks 28-36, the seroconversion rates were 63.8% and 93.7% in the intention-to-treat and per-protocol analyses, respectively. The factors associated with seroconversion at weeks 28-36 were younger age (per 1-year decrease, adjusted odds ratio, 1.08; 95% confidence interval, 1.02-1.12) and undetectable plasma HIV RNA load (adjusted odds ratio, 3.19; 95% confidence interval, 1.32-7.68). CONCLUSION: During the outbreak of acute hepatitis A, two-dose HAV vaccination is effective at preventing HAV infection among HIV-positive individuals receiving combination antiretroviral therapy; our data highlight the importance of HAV serologic screening and vaccination to prevent outbreaks of acute hepatitis A in at-risk populations. (Hepatology 2018;68:22-31).

Impact of antiretroviral therapy containing tenofovir disoproxil fumarate on the survival of patients with HBV and HIV coinfection.

BACKGROUND: Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) is active against both HBV and HIV. Whether the introduction of TDF-containing combination antiretroviral therapy (cART) has improved the outcome of HIV/HBV-coinfected patients remains unclear in areas of higher HBV endemicity. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed medical records of newly diagnosed antiretroviral-naïve HIV-infected patients between 2007 and 2015. Four groups of patients were defined, according to the HBV status and availability of TDF for HIV treatment in Taiwan in 2011. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality. RESULTS: During the 9-year study period, 1,723 HIV-infected patients were included, with a median age of 31 years and baseline CD4 count of 273 cells per µL. The HBV seroprevalence had declined from 18.1% (125/692) in the pre-TDF era to 10.1% (104/1031) in the post-TDF era. The respective mortality rate for HIV/HBV-coinfected and HIV-monoinfected patients in the pre-TDF era was 23.2 (95% CI, 12.5-43.1) and 9.6 (95% CI, 6.1-15.0) deaths per 1000 person-years of follow-up [PYFU], and the respective mortality rate in the post-TDF era was 15.7 (95% CI, 7.0-34.8) and 8.0 (95% CI, 5.5-11.6) deaths per 1000 PYFU. The adjusted hazard ratio for mortality in multivariate Cox proportional-hazards regression analysis among HIV/HBV-coinfected patients compared to HIV-monoinfected patients was 2.79 (95% CI, 1.25-6.22) in pre-TDF era and 1.11 (95% CI, 0.45-2.72) in post-TDF era. CONCLUSIONS: In this country of high HBV endemicity, the adverse impact of chronic HBV infection on the survival observed in the pre-TDF era has significantly diminished among HIV/HBV-coinfected patients compared to HIV-monoinfected patients in the era of TDF-containing cART.

Comparable Serologic Responses to 2 Different Combinations of Inactivated Hepatitis A Virus Vaccines in HIV-Positive Patients During an Acute Hepatitis A Outbreak in Taiwan.

We evaluated the serologic responses to different 2-dose combinations of the inactivated hepatitis A virus (HAV) vaccines Havrix and Vaqta among human immunodeficiency virus-positive individuals during an acute hepatitis A outbreak in Taiwan. In this 16-month retrospective study, one group received 1 dose of Havrix followed by 1 dose of Vaqta, and another group received 2 doses of Vaqta. The Havrix-Vaqta and Vaqta-Vaqta groups achieved similar seroconversion rates at weeks 28-36 (82.3% and 80.9%, respectively; absolute difference, 1.3% [95% confidence interval {CI}, -6.3%-3.7%]) and week 48 (94.7% and 94.4%, respectively; absolute difference, 0.3% [95% CI, -2.6%-3.2%]), suggesting the interchangeability of different combinations of HAV vaccines. The significantly higher seroconversion rate after the first dose of Vaqta, compared with the dose of Havrix (53.0% vs 32.4%) may provide potential benefits in preventing HAV infection during the outbreak.

Less Severe but Prolonged Course of Acute Hepatitis A in Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV)-Infected Patients Compared With HIV-Uninfected Patients During an Outbreak: A Multicenter Observational Study.

Background: This multicenter retrospective cohort study aimed to compare the clinical presentations and evolution of acute hepatitis A (AHA) between human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected patients and HIV-uninfected counterparts during the AHA outbreak. Methods: Clinical and laboratory data were collected from the medical records of the patients with AHA at the 14 hospitals around Taiwan between May 2015 and May 2017. Results: A total of 297 adult patients with AHA were included during the study period. Their mean age was 31.4 years (range, 19.0-76.1 years); 93.4% were men and 58.6% were men who have sex with men. Of 265 patients with known HIV serostatus, 166 (62.6%) were HIV infected. Compared with HIV-uninfected patients, HIV-infected patients had a lower peak alanine aminotransferase (ALT) level (median, 1312 vs 2014 IU/L, P = .003), less coagulopathy (6.0% vs 16.2%, P = .007), and less hepatomegaly or splenomegaly on imaging studies, but a higher rate of delayed resolution of hepatitis (38.8% vs 21.3%, P = .009). HIV-infected patients with plasma RNA load <1000 copies/mL while receiving combination antiretroviral therapy (cART) had a higher peak ALT level (median, 1420 vs 978 IU/L, P = .006) and less delay in resolution of hepatitis (30.6% vs 48.8%, P = .047) than patients without cART or with plasma RNA load ≥1000 copies/mL. Conclusions: During an AHA outbreak, HIV-infected patients had a lower severity, but delayed resolution, of AHA than HIV-uninfected patients. Better viral suppression by cART alleviated the impact of HIV infection on the disease course of AHA in HIV-infected patients.

Incidence of acute hepatitis A among HIV-positive patients during an outbreak among MSM in Taiwan: Impact of HAV vaccination.

BACKGROUND: An unprecedented outbreak of acute hepatitis A has occurred among MSM in Taiwan since June 2015. We aimed to describe the seroepidemiology of HAV infection and to investigate the relationship between HAV vaccination and the incidence of acute hepatitis A among HIV-positive patients at the largest designated hospital for HIV care during the outbreak. METHODS: Between 2012 and 2016, the HAV serostatus, vaccination history and clinical characteristics of HIV-positive patients were retrospectively reviewed. A case-control study was performed to identify the factors associated with acute hepatitis A. The trends of HAV vaccination rate and incidence of acute hepatitis A among HAV-seronegative patients were examined during the outbreak. RESULTS: During the 4.5-year period, 2088 HIV-positive patients with a mean age of 37.7 years and 90.2% being MSM were included. The overall HAV seroprevalence was 34.3%, which was significantly higher in older and non-MSM patients. The estimated incidence rate of acute hepatitis A was 52.6 cases per 1000 person-years of follow-up during the outbreak. The associated factors with acquiring acute hepatitis A were recent syphilis and having not received HAV vaccines. The HAV vaccination rate during the outbreak increased from 4.7% to 70.6% and the incidence rate of acute hepatitis A declined when up to 65% of the patients were immunized or tested positive for HAV. CONCLUSIONS: The seroprevalence of HAV infection was low in the younger HIV-positive individuals. Prevention of acute hepatitis A was achieved among HIV-positive, HAV-seronegative patients through HAV vaccination and increased herd immunity during the ongoing outbreak.

Serological responses to revaccination with hepatitis A virus (HAV) vaccines among HIV-positive individuals whose anti-HAV antibody waned after primary vaccination.

BACKGROUND: Among HIV-positive individuals, seroprotection for hepatitis A virus (HAV) following primary vaccination may wane with time. However, seroresponses to HAV revaccination are rarely investigated among HIV-positive patients who have lost protective antibodies after primary vaccination. METHODS: During the outbreak of acute hepatitis A in Taiwan after June 2015, HAV-seronegative, HIV-positive individuals were advised to receive two doses of HAV vaccines at 24 weeks apart. A retrospective 1:2 matched case-control study was conducted to compare the seroresponses at weeks 4, 24, 28 and 48 of HAV vaccination between those who underwent revaccination after having lost protective antibodies (case patients) and those who underwent primary vaccination (controls). RESULTS: Seventy-five case patients and 150 matched controls were included. The serological response rates were consistently higher among the case patients than controls: 88.1% vs 10.5% at week 4 following the first dose of HAV vaccination (P < .001); 93.3% vs 46.0% at week 24 (immediately before the second dose; P < .001); 98.7% vs 62.7% at week 28 (4 weeks after the second dose; P < .001) and 98.7% vs 92.7% at week 48 (P = .06). The anti-HAV antibody titres as reflected by the semi-quantitative assay for the case patients were also significantly higher than the controls at weeks 24, 28 and 48 following HAV vaccination. CONCLUSIONS: We demonstrated faster and better serological responses to HAV revaccination among the HIV-positive individuals who had lost their anti-HAV antibodies after primary vaccination. Single dose of HAV revaccination may provide rapid and sufficient seroresponses for HAV during the outbreak of acute hepatitis A.

Serological responses to revaccination against HBV in HIV-positive patients born in the era of nationwide neonatal HBV vaccination.

BACKGROUND: Serological responses to revaccination against hepatitis B virus (HBV) are unclear in HIV-positive adults who had undergone neonatal HBV vaccination and whose antibodies against HBV had waned in the era of combination antiretroviral therapy (cART). METHODS: Between 2000 and 2017, 666 HIV-positive men who have sex with men (MSM) who were born after 1986, when nationwide neonatal HBV vaccination programme was implemented in Taiwan, were included for analyses. A serological response was defined when a hepatitis B surface antibody (anti-HBs) titre ≥10 mIU/mL was measured 4-24 weeks after the third dose of HBV vaccination. RESULTS: During the study period, 295 (48.7%) HIV-positive MSM (mean age, 23.2 years) who had lost HBV seroprotection were eligible for revaccination; 171 (58.0%) received at least 1 dose (20-µg) of HBV vaccine and 116 (39.3%) completed the 3-dose schedule. The serological response rate to 3 doses of HBV revaccination was 74.0% and the rate of high-titre response (anti-HBs titre ≥100 mIU/mL) was 46.0%. The CD4 count before the first dose (per 50-cell/µL increment, adjusted odds ratio, 1.14; 95% confidence interval, 1.01-1.29) was positively associated with the serological response. The incident rate of HBV infection was 9.2 per 1000 person-years of follow-up among the patients who were non-responders after revaccination. CONCLUSIONS: Despite HBV vaccination in the neonatal period, the serological response rate to HBV revaccination in HIV-positive MSM was modest and could wane rapidly. Regular testing of anti-HBs should be integrated into the HIV care despite cART containing HBV-active agents.

Mycoplasma genitalium infection and resistance-associated mutations to macrolides and fluoroquinolones among high-risk patients in Taiwan.

BACKGROUND: Mycoplasma genitalium is an emerging etiology of sexually transmitted infections (STIs) with increasing resistance to antimicrobials. Surveillance on the epidemiology of M. genitalium infection and antimicrobial resistance is warranted. METHODS: Between September 2021 and August 2023, people with HIV (PWH) and people without HIV (PWoH) at risk of STIs were screened for M. genitalium infection using a multiplex polymerase-chain-reaction assay of specimens collected from the rectum, urethra, oral cavity, and vagina. The prevalences of resistance-associated mutations (RAMs) of M. genitalium to fluoroquinolones, macrolides, and tetracycline were investigated. RESULTS: During the 2-year study period, 1021 participants were enrolled, including 531 PWH and 490 PWoH. Overall, 83 (8.1%) and 34 (7.6%) participants had M. genitalium infection at baseline and during follow-up, respectively, with the rectum being the most common site of detection (61.5%). With the first course of antimicrobial treatment, 27 of 63 (42.9%) participants with M. genitalium infection were cured during follow-up, including 24 of 58 (41.4%) who received doxycycline monotherapy. The prevalence of RAMs to macrolides, fluoroquinolones, and tetracyclines at baseline were 24.3%, 22.4%, and 7.9%, respectively. Though PWH had more M. genitalium infection (10.2% vs 5.9%, p = 0.01), a higher rate of RAMs to macrolides (41.0% vs 14.7%, p < 0.01) was found in PWoH. CONCLUSIONS: Among high-risk populations, the prevalence of M. genitalium infection was 8.1%. The overall genotypic resistance of M. genitalium to macrolides and fluoroquinolones was moderately high in Taiwan. Detection of M. genitalium infection and antimicrobial resistance is warranted to ensure resistance-guided antimicrobial treatments to be administered.

Underweight predicts extubation failure after planned extubation in intensive care units.

BACKGROUND: Body weight is associated with different physiological changes and the association between weight and mortality in critical care setting had been discussed before. In this study, we investigated the linkage between underweight and post-extubation failure in mechanical ventilated patients in critical setting. METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study including patients who were admitted to medical or surgical intensive care units (ICU) between June 2016 and July 2018 and had received endotracheal intubation for more than 72 hours. Those who passed spontaneous breathing trial and underwent a planned extubation were enrolled. Extubation failure was defined as those who required reintubation within the first 72 hours for any reasons. The probability of extubation failure was calculated. Demographic and clinical characteristics were recorded. Multivariate logistic regression models were then used to determine the potential risk factors associated with extubation failure. RESULTS: Overall, 268 patients met the inclusion criteria and were enrolled in our study for analysis. The median age of included patients was 67 years (interquartile range, 55-80 years) with 65.3% being male; 63.1% of the patients were included from medical ICU. The proportion of extubation failure in our cohort was 7.1% (19/268; 95% confidence interval [CI], 4.3-10.9%). Overall, underweight patients had the highest risk of extubation failure (8/50), as compared with normoweight (9/135) and overweight patients (2/83). In the multivariate analysis, being underweight (adjust OR [aOR], 3.80, compared to normoweight; 95% CI, 1.23-11.7) and lower maximal inspiratory airway pressure (aOR per one cmH2O decrease, 1.05; 95% CI 1.00-1.09) remained significantly associated with extubation failure. CONCLUSION: In our study, being underweight and lower maximal inspiratory airway pressure was associated with post-extubation respiratory failure after a planned extubation.

Durability of serologic responses to inactivated hepatitis A virus vaccination among people living with HIV following acute hepatitis A outbreak: a 5-year follow-up study.

Serologic responses to hepatitis A virus (HAV) vaccination may wane among immunocompromised populations. To evaluate the long-term seroresponses to 2-dose HAV vaccination, we retrospectively included people living with HIV (PLWH) who had achieved seroconversion within 12 months after vaccination at a university hospital during an outbreak of acute hepatitis A between 2015 and 2017. PLWH included in the study received either Havrix or Vaqta. The seroresponses were evaluated 60 months after the second dose of vaccination and estimated by the intention-to-treat (ITT) with last-observation-carried-forward (LOCF) and per-protocol (PP) analyses. Overall, 986 PLWH (median age, 34 years and CD4 count, 587 cells/µL) were included. The rates of PLWH with persistent seroprotection at month 60 of vaccination were 90.7% (894/986) and 97.4% (748/768) in the ITT with LOCF and PP analyses, respectively. PLWH with persistent seroprotection had achieved higher peak anti-HAV IgG titers after vaccination and had a slower decline in antibody levels compared with those with seroreversion. In the multivariable analysis, seroreversion at month 60 was associated with a higher body-mass index (per 1-kg/m2 increase, AOR, 1.10; 95% CI, 1.04-1.17), lowest-ever CD4 count (per 10-cell/µL increase, AOR 0.98; 95% CI, 0.97-1.00), plasma HIV RNA <200 copies/ml at vaccination (AOR, 0.28; 95% CI, 0.14-0.59), and having received Vaqta as the first dose of HAV vaccination (AOR, 0.44; 95% CI, 0.27-0.70). The seroprotection against HAV remained high in the long-term follow-up among PLWH on antiretroviral therapy after 2-dose HAV vaccination. Regular monitoring of seroresponses and timely administration of HAV vaccines are warranted to maintain seroprotection.

Effectiveness of second-generation integrase strand-transfer inhibitor-based regimens for antiretroviral-experienced people with HIV who had viral rebound.

BACKGROUND: Antiretroviral regimens containing a second-generation integrase strand-transfer inhibitor (INSTI) plus 2 nucleos(t)ide reverse-transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs) are the recommended therapy for people with HIV (PWH) who are antiretroviral-naïve or on stable antiretroviral therapy (ART) with viral suppression. Real-world data on the virologic effectiveness of co-formulated bictegravir/emtricitabine/tenofovir alafenamide (BIC/FTC/TAF) among PWH with virologic failure while receiving other ART remain sparse. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of PWH who had viral rebound with plasma HIV RNA >1000 copies/mL and were switched to either dolutegravir combined with 2 NRTIs or BIC/FTC/TAF. The primary end point was re-achieving viral suppression within the first 48 weeks of switch. The association between NRTI-related resistance-associated mutations (RAMs) and virologic effectiveness was examined. RESULTS: Seventy-nine PWH with viral rebound while receiving other antiretroviral regimens were included. Within the first 48 weeks of switch, the overall probability of re-achieving viral suppression was 79.7% (82.5% [33/40] and 76.9% [30/39] for BIC/FTC/TAF and dolutegravir-based regimens, respectively, p = 0.78). PWH with a higher CD4 lymphocyte count (adjusted odds ratio, per 100-cell/mm3 increase, 1.41; 95% confidence interval, 1.02-1.95) were more likely to re-achieve viral suppression. Among PWH switching to BIC/FTC/TAF who had pre-existing RAMs to NRTIs before switch, 14 of 15 (93.3%) successfully achieved viral suppression. CONCLUSIONS: Switching to BIC/FTC/TAF and dolutegravir-based regimens could re-achieve viral suppression in four-fifth of the PWH who experienced viral rebound during treatment with other antiretroviral regimens. Pre-existing NRTI-related RAMs did not have adverse impact on the effectiveness of dolutegravir combined with 2 NRTIs or BIC/FTC/TAF.