Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic: a perspective from industry.

The global COVID-19 pandemic has led to unprecedented change throughout society.1 As the articles in this supplement outline, all segments of the broader cardiovascular community have been forced to adapt, to change models of care delivery, and to evolve and innovate in order to deliver optimal management for cardiovascular patients. The medtech/device industry has not been exempt from such change and has been forced to navigate direct and indirect COVID-associated disruption, with effects felt from supply chain logistics to the entire product lifecycle, from the running of clinical trials to new device approvals and managing training, proctoring and congresses in an increasingly-online world. This sea-change in circumstances itself has enforced the industry, in effect, to disrupt its own processes, models and activities. Whilst some of these changes may be temporary, many will endure for some time and some will doubtless become permanent; one thing is for sure: the healthcare ecosystem, including the medical device industry, will never look quite the same again. Although the pandemic has brought a short- to medium-term medical crisis to many countries, its role as a powerful disruptor cannot be underestimated, and may indeed prove to be a force for long-term good, given the accelerated innovation and rapid adaptation that it has cultivated.

1-year outcomes with the Absorb bioresorbable scaffold in patients with coronary artery disease: a patient-level, pooled meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Compared with metallic drug-eluting stents, bioresorbable vascular scaffolds (BVS) offer the potential to improve long-term outcomes of percutaneous coronary intervention. Whether or not these devices are as safe and effective as drug-eluting stents within the first year after implantation is unknown. METHODS: We did a patient-level, pooled meta-analysis of four randomised trials in which 3389 patients with stable coronary artery disease or a stabilised acute coronary syndrome were enrolled at 301 academic and medical centres in North America, Europe, and the Asia-Pacific region. These patients were randomly assigned to the everolimus-eluting Absorb BVS (n=2164) or the Xience cobalt-chromium everolimus-eluting stent (CoCr-EES; n=1225). The primary endpoints were the 1-year relative rates of the patient-oriented composite endpoint (all-cause mortality, all myocardial infarction, or all revascularisation) and the device-oriented composite endpoint of target lesion failure (cardiac mortality, target vessel-related myocardial infarction, or ischaemia-driven target lesion revascularisation). All analyses were by intention to treat. The four randomised trials included in our meta-analysis are all registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, numbers NCT01751906, NCT01844284, NCT01923740, and NCT01425281. FINDINGS: The summary treatment effect for the 1-year relative rates of the patient-oriented composite endpoint did not differ significantly different between BVS and CoCr-EES (relative risk [RR] 1·09 [0·89-1·34], p=0·38). Similarly, the 1-year relative rates of the device-oriented composite endpoint did not differ between the groups (RR 1·22 [95% CI 0·91-1·64], p=0·17). Target vessel-related myocardial infarction was increased with BVS compared with CoCr-EES (RR 1·45 [95% CI 1·02-2·07], p=0·04), due in part to non-significant increases in peri-procedural myocardial infarction and device thrombosis with BVS (RR 2·09 [0·92-4·75], p=0·08). The relative rates of all-cause and cardiac mortality, all myocardial infarction, ischaemia-driven target lesion revascularisation, and all revascularisation did not differ between BVS and CoCr-EES. Results were similar after multivariable adjustment for baseline imbalances, and were consistent across most subgroups and in sensitivity analysis when two additional randomised trials with less than 1 year of follow-up were included. INTERPRETATION: In this meta-analysis, BVS did not lead to different rates of composite patient-oriented and device-oriented adverse events at 1-year follow-up compared with CoCr-EES. FUNDING: Abbott Vascular.

A randomized trial evaluating everolimus-eluting Absorb bioresorbable scaffolds vs. everolimus-eluting metallic stents in patients with coronary artery disease: ABSORB Japan.

AIMS: Theoretically, bioresorbable vascular scaffolds (BVSs) may provide superior long-term results compared with permanent metallic drug-eluting stents (DESs). However, whether BVSs are as safe and effective as metallic DESs prior to complete bioresorption is unknown. METHODS AND RESULTS: ABSORB Japan was a single-blind, multicentre, active-controlled, randomized trial designed to support regulatory approval of the Absorb BVS in Japan. Eligible patients with one or two de novo lesions in different epicardial vessels were randomized at 38 Japanese sites in a 2:1 ratio to Absorb BVS vs. cobalt-chromium everolimus-eluting stents (CoCr-EESs). The primary endpoint was target lesion failure [TLF: a composite of cardiac death, myocardial infarction attributable to target vessel, or ischaemia-driven target lesion revascularization (ID-TLR)] at 12 months, powered for non-inferiority. The major secondary endpoint was angiographic in-segment late lumen loss (LLL) at 13 months. A total of 400 patients were randomized to BVSs (266 patients and 275 lesions) or CoCr-EESs (134 patients and 137 lesions). TLF through 12 months was 4.2% with BVSs and 3.8% with CoCr-EESs [difference (upper one-sided 95% confidence limit) = 0.39% (3.95%); Pnon-inferiority < 0.0001]. Definite/probable stent/scaffold thrombosis at 12 months occurred in 1.5% of the patients with both devices (P = 1.0), and ID-TLR for restenosis was infrequent (1.1% with BVSs and 1.5% with CoCr-EESs, P = 1.0). With 96.0% angiographic follow-up, in-segment LLL at 13 months was 0.13 ± 0.30 mm with BVSs and 0.12 ± 0.32 mm with CoCr-EESs [difference (upper one-sided 95% confidence limit) = 0.01 (0.07); Pnon-inferiority < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: In the ABSORB Japan randomized trial, 12-month clinical and 13-month angiographic outcomes of BVSs were comparable to CoCr-EESs. CLINICAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01844284.

Evaluation of a fully bioresorbable vascular scaffold in patients with coronary artery disease: design of and rationale for the ABSORB III randomized trial.

BACKGROUND: Randomized trials have demonstrated progressive improvements in clinical and angiographic measures of restenosis with technologic iterations from balloon angioplasty to bare-metal stents and subsequently to drug-eluting stents (DES). However, the permanent presence of a metal stent prevents coronary vasomotion, autoregulation, and adaptive coronary remodeling. The limitations imposed by a permanent metal implant may be overcome with a bioresorbable scaffold. ABSORB III is a large-scale, multicenter, randomized trial designed to support US premarket approval of the ABSORB BVS platform and is the first study with sufficient size to allow valid examination of the relative clinical outcomes between metallic DES and bioresorbable scaffold. DESIGN: ABSORB III (ClincalTrials.gov NCT01751906) will register approximately 2,262 patients and includes a lead-in phase (n = 50), the primary randomized analysis group (n = 2,000), an imaging cohort (n = 200), and a pharmacokinetic substudy (n = 12). In the primary analysis group, approximately 2,000 patients with up to 2 de novo native coronary artery lesions in separate epicardial vessels will be prospectively assigned in a 2:1 ratio to ABSORB BVS versus XIENCE everolimus-eluting stents (EES). The primary end point is target lesion failure (the composite of cardiac death, target vessel-related myocardial infarction, or ischemia-driven target lesion revascularization) at 1 year, powered for noninferiority of ABSORB BVS compared to XIENCE EES. Clinical follow-up will continue for 5 years. Enrollment has been completed, and the principal results will be available in the fall of 2015. CONCLUSIONS: The large-scale ABSORB III randomized trial will evaluate the safety and effectiveness of ABSORB BVS compared to XIENCE EES in the treatment of patients with coronary artery disease.

Procedural effectiveness of a novel 1.20 mm diameter angioplasty catheter: clinical and angiographic outcomes.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate clinical and angiographic outcomes using a 1.20 mm diameter angioplasty catheter as part of a predilation strategy for coronary lesion treatment. BACKGROUND: Development of an angioplasty catheter with low crossing profile and small balloon diameter represents an opportunity to facilitate percutaneous revascularization of complex coronary disease. METHODS: Clinical and angiographic outcomes were evaluated following a predilation treatment strategy using a low profile, 1.20 mm angioplasty catheter. The primary end-point of procedural success was defined as successful device delivery, performance and lesion treatment without occurrence of perforation, flow-limiting dissection, reduction in baseline TIMI grade, or clinically significant arrhythmias, and with final achievement of TIMI 3 flow. In-hospital major adverse events were also determined. RESULTS: Among 71 patients (83 lesions), angiographic characteristics included: de novo lesion, 75.9%; saphenous vein graft 9.6%; lesion length (mean ± standard deviation), 12.27 ± 5.96 mm; reference vessel diameter, 2.61 ± 0.57 mm; lesion classification B2/C, 59.0%; baseline TIMI 0/1 flow, 4.8%. Procedural success was achieved for 98.5% (66/67) of patients. Catheter delivery to the target lesion was achieved in all patients, and the rate of device success with luminal improvement after predilation was 96.2% (75/78). No acute procedural complications were observed, and in-hospital target lesion failure occurred in 6 patients (8.5%) related to peri-procedural non-Q wave myocardial infarction. CONCLUSIONS: Coronary lesion predilation with a low profile, 1.20 mm angioplasty catheter is associated with favorable procedural safety and efficacy and may represent an effective treatment for complex coronary anatomy.

An intravascular ultrasound appraisal of atherosclerotic plaque distribution in diseased coronary arteries.

BACKGROUND: The assumption that atherosclerosis accumulates in the proximal coronary arteries and that distal segments are spared has yet to be systematically shown in vivo. METHODS: We used intravascular ultrasound to analyze complete proximal, mid, and distal segments from 75 diseased left anterior descending arteries (LADs) and 61 diseased right coronary arteries (RCAs) (including either the posterolateral [PLA; n = 38] or posterior descending artery [PDA; n = 23]) to document that distal coronary arteries are more often free of disease vs proximal vessels. External elastic membrane, lumen, and plaque and media areas were measured every 0.4 mm (median), and plaque burden (plaque and media/external elastic membrane) and percentage of normal (plaque and media thickness <0.3 mm) cross sections/segment were determined. RESULTS: Left anterior descending artery plaque was heaviest in proximal and mid segments, diminishing significantly in distal segments; plaque burden was 46% ± 9% in proximal, 39% ± 8% in mid, and 31% ± 9% in distal LAD (P < .0001), with 93% (median) of distal LAD cross sections being normal compared with 21% of mid and 0% of proximal cross sections (P < .0001). Right coronary artery plaque gradient was less pronounced vs the LAD; plaque burden was 37% ± 13% in proximal, 40% ± 10% in mid, and 36% ± 10% in distal RCA, followed by 31% ± 11% in PDA and 33% ± 10% in PLA. This was supported by the median percentage of normal cross sections/segment: 0% proximal, 0% mid, and 23% distal RCA sections plus 100% PDA and 48% PLA sections. CONCLUSIONS: Intravascular ultrasound data indicated a proximal-to-distal LAD plaque gradient; significant disease was uncommon in the distal LAD. Conversely, the proximal-to-distal RCA plaque gradient was less distinct than the LAD, although disease in the PDA was still reduced compared with proximal segments.

Intravascular ultrasound predictors of long-term outcomes following ABSORB bioresorbable scaffold implantation: A pooled analysis of the ABSORB III and ABSORB Japan trials.

BACKGROUND: The long-term prognostic impact of IVUS findings following Absorb BVS implantation remains uncertain. This study aimed to identify the IVUS predictors of long-term clinical outcomes following ABSORB bioresorbable vascular scaffold (BVS) implantation from the pooled IVUS substudy cohorts of the ABSORB III and Japan trials. METHODS: A total of 298 lesions in 286 patients were enrolled with 2:1 randomization to ABSORB BVS vs. cobalt-chromium everolimus-eluting stents. This sub-analysis included 168 lesions of 160 patients in the Absorb arm whose post-procedural quantitative IVUS were available. The primary endpoint of this analysis was device-oriented composite endpoint (DOCE) of target lesion failure, including cardiac death, target vessel-related myocardial infarction, or ischemia-driven target lesion revascularization. The median follow-up duration was 4.9 [3.1-5.0] years. RESULTS: During follow-up, DOCE occurred in 10.1% of lesions treated with Absorb BVS. Among several post-procedural IVUS indices associated with DOCE, non-uniform device expansion (defined as uniformity index = minimum / maximum device area) (hazard ratio 0.47 per 0.1 increase [95%CI 0.28 to 0.77]; p = 0.003) and residual reference plaque burden (hazard ratio 4.01 per 10% increase [95%CI 1.50 to 10.77]; p = 0.006) were identified as independent predictors of DOCE by Cox multivariable analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Nonuniform device expansion and substantial untreated residual plaque in reference segments were associated with long-term adverse events following BVS implantation. Baseline imaging to identify the appropriate device landing zone and procedural imaging to achieve uniform device expansion if possible (e.g. through post-dilatation) may improve clinical outcomes of BVS implantation. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT01751906 (ABSORB III); NCT01844284 (ABSORB Japan).

Scaffold underexpansion and late lumen loss after bioresorbable scaffold implantation: Insights from ABSORB JAPAN trial.

BACKGROUND: Device underexpansion is associated with late adverse outcomes after bioresorbable vascular scaffold (BVS) implantation. This study, representing official IVUS results of the ABSORB Japan trial, aimed to characterize IVUS findings, focusing specifically on acute device expansion, and to investigate its impact on late lumen loss (LLL) with Absorb-BVS compared with cobalt-chromium everolimus-eluting stents (CoCr-EES). METHODS: ABSORB Japan enrolled 148 patients (2:1 randomization) in the IVUS cohort. Serial IVUS was prescheduled at post-procedure and 3 years. Acute device expansion was evaluated with respect to the degree and uniformity of the implanted device. RESULTS: Overall, Absorb-BVS showed smaller and more nonuniform device expansion at post-procedure, compared with CoCr-EES, which was particularly prominent in small-vessel lesions. In serial analysis, Absorb-BVS showed unique associations of smaller device expansion (r = 0.40, p = 0.001) and more nonuniformity (r = 0.29, p = 0.007) at post-procedure with greater LLL at 3 years, primarily attributable to greater negative remodeling (r = 0.39, p = 0.006). In contrast, acute device expansion showed no relation with subsequent lumen change in CoCr-EES. In Absorb-BVS, ischemic-driven target lesion or vessel revascularization (ID-TLR or ID-TVR) at 3 years occurred more frequently in small- versus large-vessel lesions (12.5% vs. 0%, p = 0.04 for ID-TLR and 15.6% vs. 2.3%, p = 0.08 for ID-TVR). Conversely, Absorb BVS had no target lesion nor vessel failure, even in small-vessel lesions, when adequate device expansion was achieved at post-procedure. CONCLUSIONS: Unlike CoCr-EES, underexpansion was associated with greater negative remodeling and LLL in Absorb-BVS. This may in part account for the poorer outcomes of Absorb-BVS than CoCr-EES when under-expanded.

Comparison of everolimus-eluting bioresorbable vascular scaffolds and metallic stents: three-year clinical outcomes from the ABSORB China randomised trial.

AIMS: Absorb bioresorbable vascular scaffolds (BVS) and XIENCE cobalt-chromium everolimus-eluting stents (CoCr-EES) had comparable angiographic and clinical outcomes up to one year in patients enrolled in the ABSORB China randomised trial. Whether these favourable results with BVS continue beyond one year up to three years is unknown. In this study we sought to analyse the outcomes from the trial up to three-year follow-up. METHODS AND RESULTS: ABSORB China was a prospective, open-label, multicentre trial in which 480 patients with one or two native coronary artery lesions were randomised 1:1 to BVS (N=241) vs. CoCr-EES (N=239). Clinical endpoints included target lesion failure (TLF; cardiac death, target vessel-related myocardial infarction or ischaemia-driven target lesion revascularisation), its components, and definite/probable stent/scaffold thrombosis (ST). There were no significant differences in clinical outcomes in patients treated with BVS and CoCr-EES up to three years, including TLF (5.5% vs. 4.7%, p=0.68) and definite/probable ST (0.9% vs. 0.0%, p=0.50). STs in the BVS arm consisted of one probable subacute event at 15 days and one definite very late event at 622 days. Among 32 BVS patients with a reference vessel diameter between 2.25 and 3.75 mm by quantitative coronary angiography and in whom post-dilatation was performed at >16 atm with a balloon:scaffold diameter >1:1 and balloon ≤scaffold diameter 0.5 mm, no TLF or ST events occurred within three years. CONCLUSIONS: In the ABSORB China trial, BVS and CoCr-EES had similar results up to three-year follow-up, the time at which the scaffold has completely resorbed. BVS outcomes may be further optimised by appropriate lesion selection and implantation technique.

Bioresorbable Scaffold for Treatment of Coronary Artery Lesions: Intravascular Ultrasound Results From the ABSORB Japan Trial.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to characterize post-procedural intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) findings in the ABSORB Japan trial, specifically stratified by the size of target coronary arteries. BACKGROUND: Despite overall noninferiority confirmed in recent randomized trials comparing bioresorbable vascular scaffolds (BVS) (Absorb BVS) and cobalt-chromium everolimus-eluting metallic stents (CoCr-EES), higher event rates of Absorb BVS have been reported with suboptimal deployment, especially in small coronary arteries. METHODS: In the ABSORB Japan trial, 150 patients (2:1 randomization) were scheduled in the IVUS cohort. Small vessel was defined as mean reference lumen diameter <2.75 mm. Tapered-vessel lesions were defined as tapering index (proximal/distal reference lumen diameter) ≥1.2. RESULTS: Overall, IVUS revealed that the Absorb BVS arm had smaller device expansion than the CoCr-EES arm did, which was particularly prominent in small- and tapered-vessel lesions. Higher tapering index was also associated with higher rates of incomplete strut apposition in Absorb BVS, but not in CoCr-EES. With respect to procedural techniques, small-vessel lesions were treated more frequently with noncompliant balloons at post-dilatation but using significantly lower pressure in the Absorb BVS arm. In contrast, tapered-vessel lesions were post-dilated at equivalent pressure but with significantly smaller balloon catheters in the Absorb BVS arm, compared with the CoCr-EES arm. CONCLUSIONS: The significantly smaller device expansion especially in small vessels may account for the poorer outcomes of Absorb BVS in this lesion type. Appropriate optimization strategy, possibly different between polymeric and metallic devices, needs to be established for bioresorbable scaffold technology. (AVJ-301 Clinical Trial: A Clinical Evaluation of AVJ-301 Absorb™ BVS) in Japanese Population [ABSORB JAPAN]; NCT01844284).

The incidence and relevance of site-reported vs. patient-reported angina: insights from the ABSORB II randomized trial comparing Absorb everolimus-eluting bioresorbable scaffold with XIENCE everolimus-eluting metallic stent.

AIMS: In the ABSORB II trial, comparing Absorb™ bioresorbable vascular scaffold with metallic XIENCE™ everolimus-eluting stent (EES), a difference was found in site-reported new or worsening angina using adverse event (AE) reporting. However, the clinical relevance of this site-reported angina is unclear. The aim of the present study was therefore to investigate the clinical relevance of site-reported angina by evaluating its relation with cardiac endpoints, cardiovascular resource utilization (including diagnostics and treatment), positive exercise stress tolerance tests (ETTs), and Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ). METHODS AND RESULTS: Site-reported new or worsening angina was captured on cardiac AE forms. There was a wide variation in the total number of days with site-reported angina (overall interquartile range 35-279 days). Patients with site-reported angina showed higher rates of cardiovascular events [including the patient-oriented composite endpoint of all deaths, all myocardial infarctions (MI), or all revascularizations (21.1 vs. 4.2%, P < 0.0001), all MIs (2.3 vs. 0%, P = 0.03), and all revascularizations (21.1 vs. 0.7%, P < 0.0001)], cardiovascular resource utilization (including stress tests, anti-anginal medication, diagnostic angiographies, and hospitalization), and positive ETTs (51.9 vs. 14.9%, P < 0.001), compared with those without site-reported angina. Furthermore, an event-based analysis of the SAQ showed that patients with ongoing angina within the recall period of 4 weeks prior to the SAQ assessment have clinically and statistically significant decrements of >14 points in SAQ scores compared with those with no reported angina. CONCLUSIONS: We showed that the site-reported angina through AE reporting may be clinically relevant because of their relation with cardiovascular events (mostly repeat revascularizations), cardiovascular resource utilization, ETT, and SAQ. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01425281; Unique identifier: NCT01425281.

Design of a visible-light spectroscopy clinical tissue oximeter.

We develop a clinical visible-light spectroscopy (VLS) tissue oximeter. Unlike currently approved near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) or pulse oximetry (SpO2%), VLS relies on locally absorbed, shallow-penetrating visible light (475 to 625 nm) for the monitoring of microvascular hemoglobin oxygen saturation (StO2%), allowing incorporation into therapeutic catheters and probes. A range of probes is developed, including noncontact wands, invasive catheters, and penetrating needles with injection ports. Data are collected from: 1. probes, standards, and reference solutions to optimize each component; 2. ex vivo hemoglobin solutions analyzed for StO2% and pO2 during deoxygenation; and 3. human subject skin and mucosal tissue surfaces. Results show that differential VLS allows extraction of features and minimization of scattering effects, in vitro VLS oximetry reproduces the expected sigmoid hemoglobin binding curve, and in vivo VLS spectroscopy of human tissue allows for real-time monitoring (e.g., gastrointestinal mucosal saturation 69+/-4%, n=804; gastrointestinal tumor saturation 45+/-23%, n=14; and p<0.0001), with reproducible values and small standard deviations (SDs) in normal tissues. FDA approved VLS systems began shipping earlier this year. We conclude that VLS is suitable for the real-time collection of spectroscopic and oximetric data from human tissues, and that a VLS oximeter has application to the monitoring of localized subsurface hemoglobin oxygen saturation in the microvascular tissue spaces of human subjects.

The ABSORB EXTEND study: preliminary report of the twelve-month clinical outcomes in the first 512 patients enrolled.

AIMS: The safety and performance of the Absorb Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffold (Absorb BVS) system (Abbott Vascular, Santa Clara, CA, USA) has been previously established in 131 patients from cohort A and cohort B of the first-in-man ABSORB trial. Following this trial, ABSORB EXTEND was initiated as a global continued access study (outside of the USA) to expand experience with the Absorb BVS system to different geographies with broader inclusion criteria to include the treatment of longer lesions and multiple vessels. We report in this manuscript the twelve-month clinical outcomes of the first 512 patients in this population. METHODS AND RESULTS: ABSORB EXTEND is a prospective, single-arm, open-label clinical study which will enrol up to 800 patients at up to 100 sites. Included are patients with lesions ≤28 mm in length and reference vessel diameter of 2.0-3.8 mm (as assessed by on-line QCA or IVUS). Treatment of a maximum of two de novo native coronary artery lesions is permitted when each lesion is located in a different epicardial vessel. An independent clinical events committee adjudicates all endpoint-related events. At one year, for the first 512 patients enrolled in the study, the composite endpoints of ischaemia-driven MACE and ischaemia-driven target vessel failure were 4.3% and 4.9%, respectively. The cumulative rate of ARC defined definite and probable scaffold thrombosis for this population was 0.8% at one year. CONCLUSIONS: This interim analysis of the ABSORB EXTEND study shows low rates of MACE and scaffold thrombosis. The study is registered on clinicaltrials.gov (unique identifier NCT01023789).

Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffolds Versus Metallic Stents in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease: ABSORB China Trial.

BACKGROUND: The everolimus-eluting bioresorbable vascular scaffold (BVS) is designed to achieve results comparable to metallic drug-eluting stents at 1 year, with improved long-term outcomes. Whether the 1-year clinical and angiographic results of BVS are noninferior to current-generation drug-eluting stents has not been established. OBJECTIVES: This study sought to evaluate the angiographic efficacy and clinical safety and effectiveness of BVS in a randomized trial designed to enable approval of the BVS in China. METHODS: Eligible patients with 1 or 2 de novo native coronary artery lesions were randomized to BVS or cobalt-chromium everolimus-eluting stents (CoCr-EES) in a 1:1 ratio stratified by diabetes and the number of lesions treated. Angiographic and clinical follow-up were planned at 1 year in all patients. The primary endpoint was angiographic in-segment late loss (LL), powered for noninferiority with a margin of 0.15 mm. RESULTS: A total of 480 patients were randomized (241 BVS vs. 239 CoCr-EES) at 24 sites. Acute clinical device success (98.0% vs. 99.6%; p = 0.22) and procedural success (97.0% and 98.3%; p = 0.37) were comparable in BVS- and CoCr-EES-treated patients, respectively. The primary endpoint of in-segment LL at 1 year was 0.19 ± 0.38 mm for BVS versus 0.13 ± 0.38 mm for CoCr-EES; the 1-sided 97.5% upper confidence limit of the difference was 0.14 mm, achieving noninferiority of BVS compared with CoCr-EES (pnoninferiority = 0.01). BVS and CoCr-EES also had similar 1-year rates of target lesion failure (cardiac death, target vessel myocardial infarction, or ischemia-driven target lesion revascularization; 3.4% vs. 4.2%, respectively; p = 0.62) and definite/probable scaffold/stent thrombosis (0.4% vs. 0.0%, respectively; p = 1.00). CONCLUSIONS: In the present multicenter randomized trial, BVS was noninferior to CoCr-EES for the primary endpoint of in-segment LL at 1 year. (A Clinical Evaluation of Absorb Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffold [Absorb BVS] System in Chinese Population-ABSORB CHINA Randomized Controlled Trial [RCT]; NCT01923740).

1-year clinical outcomes of diabetic patients treated with everolimus-eluting bioresorbable vascular scaffolds: a pooled analysis of the ABSORB and the SPIRIT trials.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to evaluate 1-year clinical outcomes of diabetic patients treated with the Absorb bioresorbable vascular scaffold (BVS). BACKGROUND: Clinical outcomes of diabetic patients after BVS implantation have been unreported. METHODS: This study included 101 patients in the ABSORB Cohort B trial and the first consecutive 450 patients with 1 year of follow-up in the ABSORB EXTEND trial. A total of 136 diabetic patients were compared with 415 nondiabetic patients. In addition, 882 diabetic patients treated with everolimus-eluting metal stents (EES) in pooled data from the SPIRIT trials (SPIRIT FIRST [Clinical Trial of the Abbott Vascular XIENCE V Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent System], SPIRIT II [A Clinical Evaluation of the XIENCE V Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent System], SPIRIT III [Clinical Trial of the XIENCE V Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent System (EECSS)], SPIRIT IV Clinical Trial [Clinical Evaluation of the XIENCE V Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent System]) were used for the comparison by applying propensity score matching. The primary endpoint was a device-oriented composite endpoint (DoCE), including cardiac death, target vessel myocardial infarction, and target lesion revascularization at 1-year follow-up. RESULTS: The cumulative incidence of DoCE did not differ between diabetic and nondiabetic patients treated with the BVS (3.7% vs. 5.1%, p = 0.64). Diabetic patients treated with the BVS had a similar incidence of the DoCE compared with diabetic patients treated with EES in the matched study group (3.9% for the BVS vs. 6.4% for EES, p = 0.38). There were no differences in the incidence of definite or probable scaffold/stent thrombosis (0.7% for both diabetic and nondiabetic patients with the BVS; 1.0% for diabetic patients with the BVS vs. 1.7% for diabetic patients with EES in the matched study group). CONCLUSIONS: In the present analyses, diabetic patients treated with the BVS showed similar rates of DoCEs compared with nondiabetic patients treated with the BVS and diabetic patients treated with EES at 1-year follow-up. (ABSORB Clinical Investigation, Cohort B; NCT00856856; ABSORB EXTEND Clinical Investigation; NCT01023789; Clinical Trial of the Abbott Vascular XIENCE V Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent System [SPIRIT FIRST]; NCT00180453; A Clinical Evaluation of the XIENCE V Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent System [SPIRIT II]; NCT00180310; Clinical Trial of the XIENCE V Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent System [EECSS] [SPIRIT III]; NCT00180479; Clinical Evaluation of the XIENCE V Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent System [SPIRIT IV Clinical Trial]; NCT00307047).

Monitoring in vivo absorption of a drug-eluting bioabsorbable stent with intravascular ultrasound-derived parameters a feasibility study.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to investigate the feasibility of using quantitative differential echogenicity to monitor the in vivo absorption process of a drug-eluting poly-l-lactic-acid (PLLA) bioabsorbable stent (BVS, Abbott Vascular, Santa Clara, California). BACKGROUND: A new bioabsorbable, balloon-expanded coronary stent was recently evaluated in a first-in-man study. Little is known about the absorption process in vivo in diseased human coronary arteries. METHODS: In the ABSORB (Clinical Evaluation of the BVS everolimus eluting stent system) study, 30 patients underwent treatment with the BVS coronary stent system and were examined with intracoronary ultrasound (ICUS) after implantation, at 6 months and at 2-year follow-up. Quantitative ICUS was used to measure dimensional changes, and automated ICUS-based tissue composition software (differential echogenicity) was used to quantify plaque compositional changes over time in the treated regions. RESULTS: The BVS struts appeared as bright hyperechogenic structures and showed a continuous decrease of their echogenicity over time, most likely due to the polymer degradation process. In 12 patients in whom pre-implantation ICUS was available, at 2 years the percentage-hyperechogenic tissue was close to pre-implantation values, indicating that the absorption process was either completed or the remaining material was no longer differentially echogenic from surrounding tissues. CONCLUSIONS: Quantitative differential echogenicity is a useful plaque compositional measurement tool. Furthermore, it seems to be valuable for monitoring the absorption process of bioabsorbable coronary stents made of semi-crystalline polymers.

Photodynamic therapy: applications in atherosclerotic vascular disease with motexafin lutetium.

Photodynamic therapy (PDT) has been approved as a tissue-specific light-activated cytotoxic therapy for many diseases. The ability of PDT to destroy target tissues selectively is especially appealing for atherosclerotic plaque. Biotechnology has developed a new generation of selective photosensitizers and catheter-based technological advances in light delivery have allowed the introduction of PDT into the vasculature. The largest experience to date is with motexafin lutetium (MLu, Antrin), an expanded porphyrin (texaphyrin) that accumulates in plaque. The combination of the motexafin lutetium and endovascular illumination, or Antrin phototherapy, has been shown to reduce plaque in animal models. Antrin phototherapy generates cytotoxic singlet oxygen that has been shown to induce apoptosis in macrophages and smooth muscle cells. The safety, tolerability, and preliminary efficacy of Antrin phototherapy has been assessed in a phase 1 dose-ranging clinical trial in subjects with peripheral artery disease and is currently being examined in a phase 1 study in subjects with lesions of the native coronary arteries undergoing stent implantation. The preliminary results suggest that Antrin phototherapy is safe, well tolerated, and nontraumatic.

Continuous, noninvasive, and localized microvascular tissue oximetry using visible light spectroscopy.

BACKGROUND: The authors evaluated the ability of visible light spectroscopy (VLS) oximetry to detect hypoxemia and ischemia in human and animal subjects. Unlike near-infrared spectroscopy or pulse oximetry (SpO2), VLS tissue oximetry uses shallow-penetrating visible light to measure microvascular hemoglobin oxygen saturation (StO2) in small, thin tissue volumes. METHODS: In pigs, StO2 was measured in muscle and enteric mucosa during normoxia, hypoxemia (SpO2 = 40-96%), and ischemia (occlusion, arrest). In patients, StO2 was measured in skin, muscle, and oral/enteric mucosa during normoxia, hypoxemia (SpO2 = 60-99%), and ischemia (occlusion, compression, ventricular fibrillation). RESULTS: In pigs, normoxic StO2 was 71 +/- 4% (mean +/- SD), without differences between sites, and decreased during hypoxemia (muscle, 11 +/- 6%; P < 0.001) and ischemia (colon, 31 +/- 11%; P < 0.001). In patients, mean normoxic StO2 ranged from 68 to 77% at different sites (733 measures, 111 subjects); for each noninvasive site except skin, variance between subjects was low (e.g., colon, 69% +/- 4%, 40 subjects; buccal, 77% +/- 3%, 21 subjects). During hypoxemia, StO2 correlated with SpO2 (animals, r2 = 0.98; humans, r2 = 0.87). During ischemia, StO2 initially decreased at -1.3 +/- 0.2%/s and decreased to zero in 3-9 min (r2 = 0.94). Ischemia was distinguished from normoxia and hypoxemia by a widened pulse/VLS saturation difference (Delta < 30% during normoxia or hypoxemia vs. Delta > 35% during ischemia). CONCLUSIONS: VLS oximetry provides a continuous, noninvasive, and localized measurement of the StO2, sensitive to hypoxemia, regional, and global ischemia. The reproducible and narrow StO2 normal range for oral/enteric mucosa supports use of this site as an accessible and reliable reference point for the VLS monitoring of systemic flow.