Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 186
Filtrar
Mais filtros

País/Região como assunto
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Adm Policy Ment Health ; 51(2): 147-161, 2024 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37971543

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To characterize the profile of patients who were readmitted for mental and behavioral disorders, in the Brazilian Unified Health System, from 2001 to 2014, and the factors associated with early and frequent readmission. METHOD: A retrospective, non-concurrent cohort study of patients admitted with a primary diagnosis of mental or behavioral disorders, from 2001 to 2014. This study selected demographic variables and clinical variables, as well as variables related to the characteristics of the hospitals. Poisson Regression methods with a robust variance estimator were used to estimate the incidence rate ratio (IRR) for each of the outcomes. RESULTS: Early readmission occurred for 6.8% of the patients and frequent readmission for 8.3%. Characteristics such as being male, younger, with a diagnosis of a bipolar disorder, and admitted to a specialized hospital show a higher IRR for early readmission. The occurrence of early readmission was the most heavily associated characteristic with an increased rate of early readmission, and the magnitude of this increase depends on the patient's age. CONCLUSION: Early and frequent readmissions are linked to patients' demographics, clinical information and health system's organization. Early readmission should be a priority in treatment planning to prevent frequent readmissions due to its strong association.


Assuntos
Readmissão do Paciente , Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Estudos de Coortes , Estudos Retrospectivos , Brasil , Fatores de Risco
2.
Qual Life Res ; 30(6): 1595-1604, 2021 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33454887

RESUMO

PURPOSE: Despite the advancements in renal replacement therapy, patients with end-stage renal disease face several limitations, with significant impacts on health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and mortality. This study aims to examine associations between quality of life and risk of death in Brazilian patients who underwent dialysis therapy between 2007 and 2015. METHODS: Observational, prospective, non-concurrent cohort study of patients who underwent dialysis therapy at the Brazilian Public Health System (SUS) and were followed up for 8 years. Semi-structured questionnaires interrogating socioeconomic and demographic characteristics, as well as HRQoL measures (36 Item Short-Form Health Survey, SF-36), were employed. The Cox proportional risk model was used to investigate associations between HRQoL and risk of death. RESULTS: Our sample comprised 1162 patients; of these, 884 were on hemodialysis (HD) and 278 on peritoneal dialysis (PD). Among the HD patients, death was associated with the physical (HR: 0.993; 95% CI: 0.989-0.997) and physical summary component (HR: 0.994; 95% CI: 0.989-0.999) domains of HRQoL. Regarding the PD patients, death was associated with the bodily pain (HR: 0.994; 95% CI: 0.990-0.998), mental health (HR: 0.094; 95% CI: 0.990-0.998), emotional problems (HR: 0.993; 95% CI: 0.987-0.998), social functioning (HR: 1.012; 95% CI: 1.002-1.023), physical problems (HR: 0.992; 95% CI: 0.986-0.998) and mental summary component (HR: 0.989; 95% CI: 0.981-0.997) domains of HRQoL. CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest that early and timely intervention measures aiming to enhance the HRQoL of dialysis patients are an essential component of professional practice and may contribute to improving the management of factors associated with dialysis patients' mortality.


Assuntos
Falência Renal Crônica/mortalidade , Falência Renal Crônica/psicologia , Diálise Peritoneal/psicologia , Qualidade de Vida/psicologia , Diálise Renal/psicologia , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Brasil , Estudos de Coortes , Feminino , Humanos , Falência Renal Crônica/terapia , Masculino , Transtornos Mentais/psicologia , Saúde Mental , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Dor/etiologia , Gravidez , Modelos de Riscos Proporcionais , Estudos Prospectivos , Inquéritos e Questionários , Adulto Jovem
3.
Int J Equity Health ; 18(1): 88, 2019 06 13.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31196095

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Breast cancer is the leading cause of death by cancer in women in Brazil. Timely access to treatment is a priority for health policy in the country. However, indicators of the disease are not equally distributed between women. Poverty and low levels of schooling associate with late diagnosis, worse prognosis and lower survival. OBJECTIVE: To investigate differences between women from different socio-demographic profiles in the breast cancer care trajectory in Belo Horizonte, Brazil. METHOD: This is a hermeneutic study through narrative analysis. The selection of the participants was based on data from hospital records of four public and private oncology services in Belo Horizonte, Brazil, according to the following variables: age, levels of schooling, and treatment cost source (Proxy of income): In-depth interviews were performed with 35 women characterized in three profiles: Profile 1 (n = 7), age range 51-69 years, schooling ≥15 years and private treatment cost; Profile 2 (n = 13), age range 35-58 years, schooling = 11 years and predominantly public treatment costing; Profile 3 (n = 15), age range 43-79 years, schooling ≤ 8 years and public treatment cost. RESULTS: The analysis of the narratives allowed the identification of three main themes (preventive care and first signs/symptoms; search for care and diagnosis of cancer; treatment and perceptions about care received) that highlighted differences between the trajectories, with prejudice to women with characteristics of greater vulnerability (Profile 3). CONCLUSION: Although in Brazil the attention to women with breast cancer is guided by principles of equality and equity of care, it is necessary to develop mechanisms to prevent discriminatory practices and that guarantee equality of access to diagnosis and treatment.


Assuntos
Neoplasias da Mama/terapia , Escolaridade , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde , Disparidades em Assistência à Saúde , Pobreza , Adulto , Idoso , Brasil , Cidades , Feminino , Serviços de Saúde , Hermenêutica , Hospitais , Humanos , Renda , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Narração , Fatores Socioeconômicos , Populações Vulneráveis
4.
Qual Life Res ; 28(6): 1485-1495, 2019 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30666548

RESUMO

PURPOSE: Despite advance in renal replacement therapy (RRT), patients with chronic end-stage renal disease (ESRD) face various limitations, and renal transplantation (Tx) is the treatment that impacts most on quality of life (QoL). This study aimed to assess changes in QoL in a cohort of ESRD dialysis patients. METHODS: Sociodemographic, clinical, nutritional, lifestyle, and QoL data were collected from 712 patients at baseline (time 1) and after 10 years of follow-up (time 2) for patients surviving. The QoL was assessed through the 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) and the multiple linear regression model was used to analyze the factors associated with change in QoL. RESULTS: A total of 205 survivors were assessed and distributed into three groups according to current RRT (Dialysis-Dialysis, Dialysis-Tx, and Dialysis-Tx-Dialysis). At time 1, only age was significantly different among groups; at time 2, transplant patients sustained greater social participation, job retention, and improvement in SF-36 scores. The factors associated with change in QoL were more time on dialysis interfering negatively on physical functioning (p = 0.002), role-physical limitations (p  = 0.002), general health (p  = 0.007), social functioning (p = 0.02), role-emotional (p = 0.003), and physical components ( p = 0.002); non-participation in social groups at times 1 and 2 reducing vitality (p = 0.02) scores; and having work at time 2, increasing vitality (p = 0.02) and mental health (p  = 0.02) scores. CONCLUSIONS: QoL was shown to be dynamic throughout the years of RRT, transplantation being the treatment with more benefits to the ESRD. More time on dialysis and limited social and occupational routine were associated with a reduction in QoL.


Assuntos
Falência Renal Crônica/psicologia , Falência Renal Crônica/terapia , Transplante de Rim/psicologia , Qualidade de Vida/psicologia , Diálise Renal/psicologia , Terapia de Substituição Renal/psicologia , Adulto , Estudos de Coortes , Emoções , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Masculino , Saúde Mental , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Participação Social , Sobreviventes
5.
Lancet Glob Health ; 12(2): e292-e305, 2024 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38245117

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Breast cancer is a public health priority in Brazil and ensuring equity in health care is one of the cancer control plan goals. Our aim was to present the first assessment on the influence of race or skin colour on breast cancer survival at the national level. METHODS: In this nationwide cohort study, data on women who initiated treatment for breast cancer in the public health-care system (Sistema Unico de Saúde), Brazil, were assembled through record linkage of administrative and mortality information systems. The administrative information systems were the Outpatient Information System (data from high complexity procedure authorisations) and the Hospital Information System (data from hospitalisation authorisations). We included women aged 19 years or older who started treatment between Jan 1, 2008, and Nov 30, 2010; self-identified as having White, Black, or Brown race or skin colour; had tumour stage I-IV; and were treated with chemotherapy or radiotherapy, or both. Patients were followed up until Dec 31, 2015. Patients with only hormone therapy records or who underwent only surgery were excluded. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate crude overall survival for race or skin colour by time since treatment initiation, and Cox regression to estimate all-cause mortality hazard ratios (HRs) before and after adjustment for other covariates. FINDINGS: We identified 59 811 women treated for stage I-IV breast cancer. 37 318 (62·4%) women identified themselves as White, 18 779 (31·4%) as Brown, and 3714 (6·2%) as Black. 5-year overall survival probability was higher for White women (74% [95% CI 73-74]) than Black women (64% [62-65]; p<0·0001). In adjusted regression models stratified by the absence of hormone therapy, Black women had a 24% (HR 1·24 [95% CI 1·16-1·34]; p<0·0001) higher risk of all-cause death than White women, and in the presence of hormone therapy Black women had a 25% (1·25 [1·14-1·38]; p<0·0001) higher risk of all-cause death than White women. INTERPRETATION: Black skin colour was identified as a statistically significant risk marker for lower 5-year survival probability and higher risk of all-cause death among women treated for breast cancer by the Sistema Unico de Saúde. Actions to understand and mitigate this unfair difference in health results are urgently needed. FUNDING: Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico and Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior and Pró-Reitoria de Pesquisa da Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais.


Assuntos
Neoplasias da Mama , Humanos , Feminino , Estudos de Coortes , Brasil/epidemiologia , Hospitalização , Hormônios
6.
Rheumatol Int ; 33(9): 2199-213, 2013 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23686218

RESUMO

Biological agents directed against tumor necrosis factor (TNF) represent therapeutic options for patients with ankylosing spondylitis with high disease activity despite use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. To evaluate the efficacy and safety of the anti-TNF agents infliximab, etanercept, adalimumab, golimumab, and certolizumab for the treatment of ankylosing spondylitis, we performed a systematic review of randomized clinical trials on adult patients with ankylosing spondylitis using articles culled from the EMBASE, MEDLINE, Cochrane Controlled Trials Register and LILACS databases (September/2012), manual literature search, and the gray literature. Study selections and data collection were performed by two independent reviewers, with disagreements solved by a third reviewer. The following outcomes were evaluated: ASAS 20 response, disease activity, physical function, vertebral mobility, adverse events, and withdraws. The meta-analysis was performed using the Review Manager(®) 5.1 software by applying the random effects model. Eighteen studies were included in this review. No study of certolizumab was included. Patients treated with anti-TNF agents were more likely to display an ASAS 20 response after 12/14 weeks (RR 2.21; 95 % CI 1.91; 2.56) and 24 weeks (RR 2.68; 95 % CI 2.06; 3.48) compared with controls, which was also true for several other efficacy outcomes. Meta-analysis of safety outcomes and withdraws did not indicate statistically significant differences between treatment and control groups after 12 or 30 weeks. Adalimumab, infliximab, etanercept, and golimumab can effectively reduce the signs and symptoms of the axial component of ankylosing spondylitis. Safety outcomes deserve further study, especially with respect to long-term follow-ups.


Assuntos
Espondilite Anquilosante/tratamento farmacológico , Fator de Necrose Tumoral alfa/antagonistas & inibidores , Adalimumab , Anticorpos Monoclonais/efeitos adversos , Anticorpos Monoclonais/uso terapêutico , Anticorpos Monoclonais Humanizados/efeitos adversos , Anticorpos Monoclonais Humanizados/uso terapêutico , Viés , Certolizumab Pegol , Etanercepte , Humanos , Fragmentos Fab das Imunoglobulinas/efeitos adversos , Fragmentos Fab das Imunoglobulinas/uso terapêutico , Imunoglobulina G/efeitos adversos , Imunoglobulina G/uso terapêutico , Polietilenoglicóis/efeitos adversos , Polietilenoglicóis/uso terapêutico , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto , Receptores do Fator de Necrose Tumoral/uso terapêutico
7.
Cad Saude Publica ; 39(8): e00188422, 2023.
Artigo em Português | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37820235

RESUMO

Reimbursement to Brazilian Unified National Health System (SUS) is the most visible interface of the public-private relationship and its analysis can expand our understanding of the use of SUS by the supplementary sector. The study aims to characterize the beneficiaries of private health plans who underwent hemodialysis in the SUS, from 2012 to 2019, in relation to: gender, age group, region of residence, characteristics of the private health plans and the operators and of the care provided to them. The characteristics of the private health plans and the modality of the operators of the beneficiaries where then compared with data of the other beneficiaries in Brazil. An individual-centered database was constructed based on data from the Brazilian National Supplementary Health Agency (ANS); information on beneficiaries in Brazil was consulted in Brazilian Health Informatics Department (DATASUS). Frequency distributions were used to summarize the data, standardization by age and sex for characteristics of the private health plans and modality of the operators and ratio to compare frequencies. A total of 31,941 beneficiaries underwent hemodialysis in the SUS, 11,147 (34.9%) outside their municipality of residence, and 6,423 (20.11%) used the SUS for 25 months or more. When compared with other beneficiaries in Brazil, those who underwent hemodialysis in the SUS were more frequently linked to old private health plans (ratio, r = 2.41), collective by adherence (r = 1.76), individual/family (r = 1.36), outpatient (r = 4.66), municipal (r = 3.88), and/or philanthropic (r = 7.32). Private health plans with restrictive characteristics may have hindered the access of beneficiaries who performed hemodialysis in SUS to the networks of their operators and have represented one more among the factors that may have influenced the use of SUS by those beneficiaries, even with coverage provided for in their contracts.


O ressarcimento ao Sistema Único de Saúde (SUS) é a interface mais visível da relação entre saúde pública e privada, e sua análise pode ampliar o conhecimento sobre o uso do SUS pelo setor suplementar. O presente estudo objetivou caracterizar os beneficiários de planos privados de saúde que realizaram hemodiálise no SUS entre 2012 e 2019 em relação a: sexo, faixa etária, região de residência, características dos planos privados de saúde e das operadoras e a assistência prestada a eles. Visou também comparar características dos planos privados de saúde e modalidade das operadoras daqueles beneficiários com dados dos demais beneficiários do Brasil. Construiu-se uma base centrada no indivíduo a partir de dados da Agência Nacional de Saúde Suplementar (ANS); informações sobre beneficiários do Brasil foram consultadas no Departamento de Informática do SUS (DATASUS). Utilizou-se distribuições de frequências para resumir os dados, padronização por idade e sexo para características dos planos privados de saúde e modalidade das operadoras, e razão para comparar frequências. Um total de 31.941 beneficiários realizou hemodiálise no SUS, 11.147 (34,9%) destes fora de seu município de residência, e 6.423 (20,11%) utilizaram o SUS por 25 meses ou mais. Comparados aos demais beneficiários do Brasil, aqueles que realizaram hemodiálise no SUS estavam vinculados mais frequentemente a planos privados de saúde antigos (razão, r = 2,41), coletivos por adesão (r = 1,76), individuais/familiares (r = 1,36), ambulatoriais (r = 4,66), municipais (r = 3,88) e/ou a filantropias (r = 7,32). Planos privados de saúde com características restritivas podem ter dificultado o acesso dos beneficiários que realizaram hemodiálise no SUS às redes de suas operadoras, e representado mais um fator que pode ter influenciado o uso do SUS por aqueles beneficiários, mesmo com a cobertura prevista em seus contratos.


El resarcimiento al Sistema Único de Salud (SUS) es la interfaz más visible de la relación público-privada y su análisis puede ampliar el conocimiento sobre el uso del SUS por el sector suplementario. El estudio tuvo como objetivo caracterizar a los beneficiarios de planes privados de salud que realizaron hemodiálisis en el SUS, entre 2012 y 2019, con relación a: género, rango de edad, región de residencia, características de los planes privados de salud y de los operadores y a la asistencia prestada a ellos; y comparar características de los planes privados de salud y modalidad de los operadores de aquellos beneficiarios con datos de los demás beneficiarios de Brasil. Se construyó una base centrada en el individuo a partir de datos de la Agencia Nacional de Salud Suplementaria (ANS); las informaciones sobre los beneficiarios en Brasil fueron consultadas en el Departamento de Informática del SUS (DATASUS). Se utilizaron distribuciones de frecuencia para resumir los datos, la estandarización por edad y género para las características de los planes privados de salud y la modalidad de los operadores y la relación para comparar frecuencias. Un total de 31.941 beneficiarios se sometieron a hemodiálisis en el SUS, 11.147 (34,9 %) fuera de su municipio de residencia y 6.423 (20,11 %) utilizaron el SUS por 25 meses o más. Comparados a los demás beneficiarios de Brasil, los beneficiarios que se sometieron a hemodiálisis en el SUS estaban vinculados más frecuentemente a planes privados de salud antiguos (razón, r = 2,41), colectivos por adhesión (r = 1,76), individuales/familiares (r = 1,36), ambulatorios (r = 4,66), municipales (r = 3,88) y/o a filantropías (r = 7,32). Planes privados de salud con características restrictivas pueden haber dificultado el acceso de los beneficiarios que realizaron hemodiálisis en el SUS a las redes de sus operadores y pueden haber representado un factor más entre los que pueden haber influido en el uso del SUS por aquellos beneficiarios, incluso con cobertura prevista en sus contratos.


Assuntos
Planejamento em Saúde , Pacientes Ambulatoriais , Humanos , Brasil , Assistência Médica , Programas Governamentais
8.
Qual Life Res ; 21(6): 983-91, 2012 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21938644

RESUMO

PURPOSE: This study aimed to analyze and compare the quality of life of renal replacement therapy patients undergoing hemodialysis, peritoneal dialysis and those with renal transplantation in Brazil. In addition, we aimed to verify factors associated with patients' quality of life and the relationship between quality of life and treatment modality, socioeconomic and demographic conditions as well as aspects related to the disease and health services. METHODS: A representative sample of the dialysis units and transplant centers was obtained. Structured questionnaires were used to interview 3,036 patients in one of three treatment modalities: hemodialysis, peritoneal dialysis and renal transplant. Information was collected about socioeconomic and demographic characteristics and quality of life measures. RESULTS: There were significant differences between renal transplants and both forms of dialysis for all dimensions of the SF-36. Hemodialysis patients showed better results in the dimensions of functional capacity, physical aspects and social aspects, compared to peritoneal dialysis patients. Renal transplant patients had the best mean score in the physical component of quality of life. There were no significant differences among treatment groups regarding the mental component of quality of life. The physical and mental components were associated with comorbidities and age; however, older patients had better mental quality of life but worse physical quality of life. Patients in a higher socioeconomic class and patients that were not hospitalized also reported better quality of life. Unmarried and male patients presented better physical quality of life. The dialysis units and transplant centers influenced the patients' quality of life. CONCLUSIONS: Renal transplant patients have the best quality of life of the three treatment modalities. It is necessary to increase access to renal transplants.


Assuntos
Falência Renal Crônica/terapia , Transplante de Rim , Qualidade de Vida , Terapia de Substituição Renal , Adulto , Brasil , Comorbidade , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Humanos , Transplante de Rim/psicologia , Masculino , Terapia de Substituição Renal/métodos , Terapia de Substituição Renal/psicologia , Fatores Socioeconômicos , Inquéritos e Questionários
9.
Gen Hosp Psychiatry ; 77: 69-76, 2022.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35567812

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To investigate overall and sex-related characteristics associated with the risk of death by suicide within 365 days of discharge in patients admitted to psychiatric hospitals in the Brazilian Unified Health System (SUS). METHOD: A non-concurrent prospective cohort of adult patients admitted to psychiatric hospitals in the SUS, from 2002 to 2015. Patients were stratified according to sociodemographic and clinical variables. Adjusted hazard ratios (aHRs) of suicide within 365 days of discharge were estimated using Cox proportional hazard regression models. RESULTS: This sample comprised 1,228,784 adult patients admitted to psychiatric hospitals. Of these, 3201 died by suicide within 365 days of discharge. The risk of suicide was positively associated with male sex, age between 18 and 29 years, living in the South region, and living in rural or intermediate municipalities. The highest risk of suicide was among patients with depressive disorders (aHR, 3.87; 95%CI, 3.41-4.38) follow by opioid-related disorders (aHR, 2.71; 95%CI, 2.00-3.67), particularly among female patients. CONCLUSION: Patients with a psychiatric hospital admission should have access to mental health care services immediately after discharge and in the long term. Findings of this study may support suicide prevention policies and have implications for clinical decisions related to patient discharge and follow-up.


Assuntos
Transtornos Mentais , Prevenção do Suicídio , Adolescente , Adulto , Brasil/epidemiologia , Feminino , Hospitalização , Hospitais Psiquiátricos , Humanos , Masculino , Transtornos Mentais/epidemiologia , Transtornos Mentais/psicologia , Transtornos Mentais/terapia , Alta do Paciente , Estudos Prospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Adulto Jovem
10.
Cien Saude Colet ; 27(3): 1133-1146, 2022 Mar.
Artigo em Português, Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35293450

RESUMO

The aim was to verify the association of individual factors and healthcare system characteristics with time to initiate treatment of lung cancer by the Brazilian National Health System, in Minas Gerais state. A retrospective cohort study, with patients who initiated treatment for lung cancer by the SUS, from 2008 to 2015. Sociodemographic and clinical characteristics of patients, besides organizational variables of the healthcare system were selected. The logistic regression model evaluated the association of selected explanatory variables with the outcome of initiating treatment within 60 days after diagnosis. Odds ratio (OR) and respective 95% confidence interval were used to measure the power of association. Most treatments for lung cancer in the state of Minas Gerais initiated within 60 days after diagnosis. However, being male and diagnosed as stage IV increased the likelihood of starting treatment within 60 days. On the other hand, the patient's age, radiation therapy as first treatment, and the place of residence decreased such chance. Time to initiate treatment is associated with individual characteristics and provision of services in macroregions, and the observed inequalities possibly raised from the better or worse access of the population to the services provided by SUS.


O objetivo foi verificar a associação entre fatores individuais e organizativos do sistema de saúde com o tempo para o início do tratamento do câncer de pulmão pelo Sistema Único de Saúde (SUS) em Minas Gerais. Estudo de coorte retrospectiva com pacientes que iniciaram o tratamento para o câncer de pulmão pelo SUS de 2008 a 2015. Foram selecionadas variáveis sociodemográficas, clínicas e organizativas do sistema de saúde. O modelo de regressão logística avaliou a associação do desfecho do início do tratamento em até 60 dias após o diagnóstico com as variáveis explicativas selecionadas. Utilizou-se a odds ratio (OR) e o respectivo intervalo de confiança (95%) para mensurar a força de associação. A maioria dos tratamentos para o câncer de pulmão em Minas Gerais foram iniciados em até 60 dias após o diagnóstico, entretanto, ser do sexo masculino e diagnosticado em estadiamento IV aumentaram a chance de iniciar o tratamento em até 60 dias; todavia o aumento da idade, iniciar o tratamento por radioterapia, e o local de residência, diminuíram. O tempo para início do tratamento está associado a características individuais e à provisão de serviços nas macrorregiões, e as desigualdades observadas possivelmente se originam a partir do melhor ou pior acesso da população aos serviços prestados.


Assuntos
Atenção à Saúde , Neoplasias Pulmonares , Brasil/epidemiologia , Humanos , Neoplasias Pulmonares/terapia , Masculino , Estudos Retrospectivos
11.
Cad Saude Publica ; 38(10): e00277521, 2022.
Artigo em Português | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36287526

RESUMO

This study aimed to investigate whether there is an association between the Extended Health Regions (EHR) of residence in the state of Minas Gerais, Brazil, and the interval between diagnosis and start of treatment for women who underwent outpatient treatment (chemotherapy or radiotherapy) for cervical cancer by the Brazilian Unified National Health System (SUS), between 2001 and 2015. This is a cross-sectional study, part of a cohort with 8,857 women. Negative binomial regression models were used to evaluate the association of EHR of residence and the interval between diagnosis and start of treatment (in days), considering a significance level of 5%. The models were constructed using blocks of sociodemographic, clinical, and treatment-related covariates. It was found that the EHR of residence of women is associated with the interval between diagnosis and start of treatment. The northern EHR was the region of the state where the average time to start treatment was lower, and not residing in this EHR increases the average time to start treatment between 24% and 93% compared to other EHRs in the state. The disparity in the interval between diagnosis and start of treatment between the regions of Minas Gerais is evident. The availability of services enabled for the treatment of cancer in the EHRs does not necessarily results in a greater agility for the start of treatment. Understanding the flows of Oncology Care Networks and their regional differences is essential to improve public policies that ensure compliance with current laws, such as Law n. 12,732/2012, which recommends the start of treatment for cancer patients within 60 days after diagnosis.


O objetivo deste estudo é investigar se há associação entre as Regiões Ampliadas de Saúde (RAS) de residência de Minas Gerais, Brasil, e o intervalo entre diagnóstico e início de tratamento de mulheres que realizaram tratamento ambulatorial (quimioterapia ou radioterapia) para câncer do colo do útero pelo Sistema Único de Saúde (SUS), entre 2001 e 2015. Trata-se de um estudo transversal, recorte de uma coorte, com 8.857 mulheres. Para avaliar a associação da RAS de residência e o intervalo entre diagnóstico e início de tratamento (em dias), foram utilizados modelos de regressão binomial negativa, considerando nível de significância de 5%. Os modelos foram construídos usando blocos de covariáveis sociodemográficas, clínicas e relacionadas ao tratamento. Foi determinado que a RAS de residência das mulheres está associada ao intervalo entre o diagnóstico e o início de tratamento. A RAS Norte foi a região do estado onde a média de tempo para iniciar o tratamento foi menor, e não residir nessa RAS aumenta a média de tempo para iniciar o tratamento entre 24% e 93% em comparação com outras RAS do estado. Fica evidente a disparidade no intervalo entre diagnóstico e início de tratamento entre as regiões do Estado de Minas Gerais. A disponibilidade de serviços habilitados para o tratamento do câncer nas RAS não reflete necessariamente em maior agilidade para início de tratamento. Compreender os fluxos das Redes de Atenção Oncológica e suas diferenças regionais é fundamental para aprimorar políticas públicas que garantam o cumprimento de leis vigentes, como a Lei nº 12.732/2012, que preconiza o início do tratamento de pacientes com câncer em até 60 dias após o diagnóstico.


El objetivo de este estudio es investigar si existe una asociación entre las Regiones Ampliadas de Salud (RAS) de residencia en Minas Gerais, Brasil, y el intervalo entre el diagnóstico y el inicio del tratamiento para mujeres que realizaron tratamiento ambulatorio (quimioterapia o radioterapia) para cáncer de cuello uterino por el Sistema Único de Salud (SUS) entre 2001 y 2015. Se trata de un estudio transversal, recortado de una cohorte, con 8.857 mujeres. Para evaluar la asociación entre la RAS de residencia y el intervalo entre el diagnóstico y el inicio del tratamiento (en días), se utilizaron modelos de regresión binomial negativa, considerando el nivel de significancia del 5%. Los modelos se construyeron utilizando bloques de covariables sociodemográficas, clínicas y relacionadas con el tratamiento. Se encontró una asociación entre la RAS de residencia de las mujeres y el intervalo entre el diagnóstico y el inicio del tratamiento. La región de la RAS Norte tuvo tiempo promedio más corto para el inicio del tratamiento, pero si las mujeres no residen en esta RAS el tiempo promedio para el inicio del tratamiento puede aumentar entre el 24% y el 93% en comparación con otras RAS del estado. Queda evidente la disparidad del intervalo entre el diagnóstico y el inicio del tratamiento entre las regiones de Minas Gerais. La disponibilidad de servicios habilitados para el tratamiento del cáncer en la RAS no necesariamente refleja la mayor rapidez para el inicio del tratamiento. Es fundamental comprender los flujos de las Redes de Atención Oncológica y sus diferencias regionales para buscar mejorar las políticas públicas que garantizan el cumplimiento de la legislación vigente, como la Ley nº 12.732/2012, que recomienda que el tratamiento de los pacientes con cáncer debe empezar dentro de los 60 días posteriores al diagnóstico.


Assuntos
Neoplasias do Colo do Útero , Humanos , Feminino , Brasil/epidemiologia , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero/diagnóstico , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero/terapia , Estudos Transversais , Pacientes Ambulatoriais , Assistência Ambulatorial
12.
Lancet Psychiatry ; 9(10): 771-781, 2022 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35964638

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: People with severe mental illness have a mortality rate higher than the general population, living an average of 10-20 years less. Most studies of mortality among people with severe mental illness have occurred in high-income countries (HICs). We aimed to estimate all-cause and cause-specific relative risk (RR) and excess mortality rate (EMR) in a nationwide cohort of inpatients with severe mental illness compared with inpatients without severe mental illness in a middle income country, Brazil. METHODS: This national retrospective cohort study included all patients hospitalised through the Brazilian Public Health System (Sistema Único de Saúde [SUS]-Brazil) between Jan 1, 2000, and April 21, 2015. Probabilistic and deterministic record linkages integrated data from the Hospital Information System (Sistema de informações Hospitalares) and the National Mortality System (Sistema de Informação sobre Mortalidade). Follow-up duration was measured from the date of the patients' first hospitalisation until their death, or until April 21, 2015. Severe mental illness was defined as schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, or depressive disorder by ICD-10 codes used for the admission. RR and EMR were calculated with 95% CIs, comparing mortality among patients with severe mental illness with those with other diagnoses for patients aged 15 years and older. We redistributed deaths using the Global Burden of Diseases, Injuries, and Risk Factors Study methodology if ill-defined causes of death were stated as an underlying cause. FINDINGS: From Jan 1, 2000, to April 21, 2015, 72 021 918 patients (31 510 035 [43·8%] recorded as male and 40 974 426 [56·9%] recorded as female; mean age 41·1 (SD 23·8) years) were admitted to hospital, with 749 720 patients (372 458 [49·7%] recorded as male and 378 670 [50·5%] as female) with severe mental illness. 5 102 055 patient deaths (2 862 383 [56·1%] recorded as male and 2 314 781 [45·4%] as female) and 67 485 deaths in patients with severe mental illness (39 099 [57·9%] recorded as male and 28 534 [42·3%] as female) were registered. The RR for all-cause mortality in patients with severe mental illness was 1·27 (95% CI 1·27-1·28) and the EMR was 2·52 (2·44-2·61) compared with non-psychiatric inpatients during the follow-up period. The all-cause RR was higher for females and for younger age groups; however, EMR was higher in those aged 30-59 years. The RR and EMR varied across the leading causes of death, sex, and age groups. We identified injuries (suicide, interpersonal violence, and road injuries) and cardiovascular disease (ischaemic heart disease) as having the highest EMR among those with severe mental illness. Data on ethnicity were not available. INTERPRETATION: In contrast to studies from HICs, inpatients with severe mental illness in Brazil had high RR for idiopathic epilepsy, tuberculosis, HIV, and acute hepatitis, and no significant difference in mortality from cancer compared with inpatients without severe mental illness. These identified causes should be addressed as a priority to maximise mortality prevention among people with severe mental illness, especially in a middle-income country like Brazil that has low investment in mental health. FUNDING: Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, Fundação de Amparo a Pesquisa do Estado de Minas Gerais, FAPEMIG, and the Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior-Brasil.


Assuntos
Transtornos Mentais , Adulto , Brasil/epidemiologia , Causas de Morte , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Transtornos Mentais/epidemiologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco
13.
Value Health ; 14(5 Suppl 1): S24-8, 2011.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21839893

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To perform a cost-effectiveness evaluation from the perspective of the Brazilian National Health System of alternatives strategies (i.e., conventional interferon, pegylated interferon, and lamivudine) for the treatment of patients with chronic hepatitis B who present elevated aminotransferase levels and no evidence of cirrhosis at the beginning of treatment. METHODS: A Markov model was developed for chronic hepatitis B (hepatitis B antigen e [HBeAg] positive and negative) with 40 years' time horizon. Costs and benefits were discounted at 5%. Annual rates of disease progression, costs due to complications, and the efficacy of medicines were obtained from the literature. One-way and probabilistic sensitivity analysis evaluated uncertainties. RESULTS: For HBeAg positive patients, peginterferon (48 weeks) resulted in an increase of 0.21 discounted life-years gained compared to interferon (24 weeks). The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) converted to US dollars using the 2009 purchasing power parity conversion factor was US$100,752.24 per life-year gained. For HBeAg negative patients, it was observed that interferon (48 weeks) compared with long-term lamivudine presented an increase of 0.45 discounted life-years gained and ICER of US$15,766.90 per life-year gained. In the sensitivity analysis, the ICER was more sensitive to variation in the probability of transition from chronic hepatitis B to compensated cirrhosis, discount rate, and medicine prices. Cost-effectiveness acceptability curve for HBeAg positive (pegylated interferon vs. conventional interferon) and negative (conventional interferon vs. lamivudine) showed that conventional interferon was cost-effective until three times the gross domestic product per capita. CONCLUSIONS: For patients with chronic hepatitis B with elevated aminotransferase levels in the pretreatment and no cirrhosis who were HBeAg positive, pegylated interferon (48 weeks) provided more life-years gained when compared to conventional interferon (24 weeks), and the ICER surpasses the country's buying power, which makes conventional interferon the chosen alternative. For HBeAg negative patients, conventional interferon (48 weeks) compared to lamivudine provided more life-years gained at a favorable ICER.


Assuntos
Antivirais/economia , Custos de Medicamentos , Hepatite B Crônica/economia , Interferons/economia , Lamivudina/economia , Avaliação de Processos e Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde/economia , Adulto , Alanina Transaminase/sangue , Antivirais/uso terapêutico , Biomarcadores/sangue , Brasil , Análise Custo-Benefício , Progressão da Doença , Produto Interno Bruto , Anticorpos Anti-Hepatite B/sangue , Antígenos E da Hepatite B/imunologia , Hepatite B Crônica/complicações , Hepatite B Crônica/diagnóstico , Hepatite B Crônica/tratamento farmacológico , Humanos , Interferons/uso terapêutico , Lamivudina/uso terapêutico , Cadeias de Markov , Modelos Econômicos , Programas Nacionais de Saúde/economia , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento
14.
Value Health ; 14(5 Suppl 1): S71-7, 2011.
Artigo em Português | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21839903

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To describe the expenses of the Ministry of Health of Brazil with users of High-Cost Drug Program that began treatment between 2000-2004, according to their demographic and clinical characteristics. METHODS: We made a probabilistic-deterministic linkage of national databases of drugs and mortality, resulting in a historical cohort of patients using high-cost medications in 2000-2004. The per capita spending on medicines were stratified by a follow-up period and described according to demographic, clinical and type of drug used. RESULTS: The total population atended by the program was 611,419, being 63.5% female, average age 46 years. 41.9% of patients living in the Southeast and 29.7% in the Northeast of Brazil. 24.5% of patients began treatment in 2000, 12.4% in 2001, with increasing trend until 2004. The most prevalent diagnosis referred to the genitourinary system diseases and the most common use of chemical groups were antianemic preparations. 40,941 deaths were detected (6.7% of total). The total expenditure per capita was R$4.794,34. Higher spending per capita was observed in males, aged 47, who lived in the Southeast of Brazil and began treatment in 2000, had diagnoses of infectious and parasitic diseases and used blood substitutes and perfusions solutions. CONCLUSION: The understanding of the expenses involved subsidizes restructuring actions and scheduling drug programs, also provides information for therapeutic groups which are priorities for analysis.


Assuntos
Custos de Medicamentos , Gastos em Saúde , Programas Nacionais de Saúde/economia , Brasil , Custos de Medicamentos/legislação & jurisprudência , Uso de Medicamentos/economia , Feminino , Financiamento Governamental , Regulamentação Governamental , Alocação de Recursos para a Atenção à Saúde/economia , Gastos em Saúde/legislação & jurisprudência , Política de Saúde , Pesquisa sobre Serviços de Saúde , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Modelos Econômicos , Programas Nacionais de Saúde/legislação & jurisprudência , Desenvolvimento de Programas , Fatores de Tempo
15.
Cancer Epidemiol ; 71(Pt A): 101899, 2021 04.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33548845

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Cervical cancer survival is marked by socioeconomic and demographic inequalities. We investigated differences in survival across health regions in Minas Gerais, Brazil, in cervical cancer patients who underwent treatment in the Brazilian Public Health System. METHODS: From a database developed through probabilistic and deterministic linkage of data from information systems of the Brazilian Public Health System, we identified cervical cancer cases, diagnosed between 2002 and 2010, who underwent radiation and/or chemotherapy and lived in Minas Gerais, Brazil. Five-year overall and cause-specific survivals were estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method and compared using the log-rank test. We used extended Cox models to assess the relationship between the health region of residence and the overall and cause-specific death risk, adjusting for relevant variables. RESULTS: We included 5613 patients with a median age of 55.0 years. Median follow-up time was 70.0 months. Five-year overall and cause-specific survivals were 56.3 % and 63.6 %, respectively. Across the 13 health regions, 5-year survival ranged from 46.6%-64.2% (p < 0.001) in the overall analysis and from 52.0% to 72.0% (p < 0.001) in the cause-specific analysis. Multivariate models revealed a significantly higher death risk for most health regions in comparison to the reference health region (Norte). Adjustment by age, tumor stage, comorbidity, treatment, travel time, and year of diagnosis had little effect on the association. CONCLUSION: We found regional disparities in cervical cancer survival that persisted after relevant adjustments. Uneven regional provision of health services might be implicated in these disparities, affecting timely access to treatment for cervical cancer patients.


Assuntos
Disparidades nos Níveis de Saúde , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero/epidemiologia , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Brasil/epidemiologia , Feminino , Geografia , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Modelos de Riscos Proporcionais , Estudos Prospectivos , Análise de Sobrevida , Adulto Jovem
16.
Rev Bras Epidemiol ; 24: e210006, 2021.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33439942

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To analyze cancer-specific mortality (CSM) and other-cause mortality (OCM) among patients with prostate cancer that initiated treatment in the Brazilian Unified Health System (SUS), between 2002 and 2010, in Brazil. METHODS: Retrospective observational study that used the National Oncological Database, which was developed by record-linkage techniques used to integrate data from SUS Information Systems, namely: Outpatient (SIA-SUS), Hospital (SIH-SUS), and Mortality (SIM-SUS). Cancer-specific and other-cause survival probabilities were estimated by the time elapsed between the date of the first treatment until the patients' deaths or the end of the study, from 2002 until 2015. The Fine-Gray model for competing risk was used to estimate factors associated with patients' risk of death. RESULTS: Of the 112,856 studied patients, the average age was 70.5 years, 21% died due to prostate cancer, and 25% due to other causes. Specific survival in 160 months was 75%, and other-cause survival was 67%. For CSM, the main factors associated with patients' risk of death were: stage IV (AHR = 2.91; 95%CI 2.73 - 3.11), systemic treatment (AHR = 2.10; 95%CI 2.00 - 2.22), and combined surgery (AHR = 2.30, 95%CI 2.18 - 2.42). As for OCM, the main factors associated with patients' risk of death were age and comorbidities. CONCLUSION: The analyzed patients with prostate cancer were older and died mainly from other causes, probably due to the presence of comorbidities associated with the tumor.


Assuntos
Neoplasias da Próstata , Idoso , Brasil/epidemiologia , Causas de Morte , Humanos , Masculino , Neoplasias da Próstata/mortalidade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Medição de Risco , Análise de Sobrevida
17.
Cad Saude Publica ; 37(9): e00211520, 2021.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34586168

RESUMO

This study aimed to identify differences in the scope of practice of primary care physicians and find the main factors associated with expanded practice in rural and urban areas of Brazil. Data from an online survey with 2,277 primary care physicians, conducted between January and March 2016, were used. Differences regarding activities and procedures performed by physicians per area were verified using Kruskal-Wallis/Dunn's post hoc and chi-square tests. Multivariate linear regression analyses were done using a bootstrap technique to identify the main factors associated with an expanded scope of practice. Regardless of the location, the results showed that the practices of the primary care physicians are below their competences. Rural physicians performed a higher number of procedures and activities compared with their peers from intermediate and urban municipalities. Within the overall sample, the variables related to a broader scope of practice included: male gender, work in rural municipalities, participation in training and continuing education programs and consultation of clinical protocols, articles and books. This study contributes with evidence that the medical scope of practice varies according to location. Recognizing and understanding the differences and associated factors for an expanded scope of practice is necessary to determine the skills and resources required for practice in rural and urban areas, collaborating in proposals of strategies to improve quality and access of health care services.


Assuntos
Médicos de Atenção Primária , Serviços de Saúde Rural , Brasil , Humanos , Masculino , Atenção Primária à Saúde , População Rural , Âmbito da Prática
18.
Cad Saude Publica ; 37(8): e00002220, 2021.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34550177

RESUMO

This study aims to evaluate changes in quality of life of cancer patients at the beginning of the first and the second cycle of chemotherapy (CT) in hospitals in Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais State, Brazil. Longitudinal, prospective, descriptive study with a quantitative approach. We enrolled 230 patients, from a broader cohort, diagnosed with the five most frequent types of cancer (breast, colorectal, cervical, lung, and head and neck), aged 18 years or older, who were initiating CT for the first time. quality of life was assessed with the EORTC QLQ-C30 version 3, applied at the beginning of the first and second chemotherapy cycle. The paired Wilcoxon test was used to identify differences in quality of life between the two time points. A multivariate linear regression analysis was performed using the bootstrap method to investigate potential predictors of global health Status/quality of life. There was a significant increase in patients' emotional function scores (p < 0.001) as well as symptom scores for pain (p = 0.026), diarrhea (p = 0.018), and nausea/vomiting (p < 0.001) after initiation of CT. Widowhood was associated with improvements in the global health Status/quality of life (p = 0.028), whereas the presence of cervical cancer (p = 0.034) and being underweight (p = 0.033) were related to poorer global health status/quality of life scores. CT has detrimental effects on patients' physical health but, on the other hand, it leads to improvements in the emotional domain. Patients' individual characteristics at the beginning of CT are associated with changes in their quality of life. Our study could help identify these characteristics.


Assuntos
Neoplasias , Qualidade de Vida , Brasil , Hospitais , Humanos , Neoplasias/tratamento farmacológico , Estudos Prospectivos , Inquéritos e Questionários
19.
Cad Saude Publica ; 37(4): e00031920, 2021.
Artigo em Português | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33886704

RESUMO

The expansion in the variety of clinical guidelines in oncology is perceptible worldwide, highlighting the need to guarantee the quality of these documents. The study thus aimed to assess the quality of Brazilian national guidelines for treatments of breast, prostate, and colon and rectal cancers. We selected 12 Brazilian guidelines published by four different drafting groups (Ministry of Health, Supplementary Health System, and medical societies and associations), and the AGREE II instrument was applied. In all these guidelines, we identified important weaknesses in more than one Domain, especially low values for "applicability" and "editorial independence". The patterns observed per Domains are more related to the drafting group than the respective clinical conditions. Lower scores in "drafting rigor" and "editorial independence" were obtained by nongovernmental drafting groups, including absence of information or lack of its transparency. Although the "clarity of presentation" in the Ministry of Health guidelines was relatively lower, all the guidelines presented major limitations in "applicability". Consequently, in the overall assessment, none of the guidelines was recommended without modifications, and four were not recommended at all. Finally, it is necessary to upgrade the guidelines according to the underlying evidence ("methodological rigor") and to present the recommended practices in a comprehensible and applicable way ("applicability"), and to mitigate conflicting interests in order to offer cancer patients the best available care in Brazil.


A ampliação da variedade de diretrizes clínicas em oncologia é perceptível em todo o mundo, o que salienta a necessidade de garantir a qualidade destes documentos. Assim, o objetivo do estudo foi avaliar a qualidade de diretrizes nacionais de tratamentos dos cânceres de mama, próstata e de cólon e reto. Foram selecionadas 12 diretrizes brasileiras publicadas por quatro grupos elaboradores distintos (Ministério da Saúde, sistema suplementar de saúde e de sociedades e associações médicas), e aplicado o instrumento AGREE II. Em todas as diretrizes avaliadas foram identificadas fragilidades importantes em mais de um Domínio, com destaque para os baixos valores para "aplicabilidade" e "independência editorial". Os padrões observados por Domínios apresentam-se mais relacionados com o grupo elaborador do que com as condições clínicas tratadas. Menores escores no "rigor do desenvolvimento" e "independência editorial" foram obtidos por grupos elaboradores não governamentais, inclusive com ausência ou falta de transparência nas informações. Mesmo que a "clareza da apresentação" das diretrizes do Ministério da Saúde tenha sido relativamente inferior, na "aplicabilidade" todas apresentaram limitações expressivas. Consequentemente, na avaliação global nenhuma das diretrizes foi recomendada sem modificações, sendo quatro delas não recomendadas. Por fim, é necessário qualificar as recomendações no que tange as evidências que as fundamentam ("rigor metodológico"), assim como dispor de forma compreensível e exequível as condutas a serem adotadas ("aplicabilidade") e mitigar interesses conflitantes, para que seja ofertado o melhor cuidado aos pacientes oncológicos no país.


La ampliación de la variedad de directrices clínicas en oncología es perceptible en todo el mundo, lo que resalta la necesidad de garantizar la calidad de estos documentos. Por este motivo, el objetivo de este estudio fue evaluar la calidad de directrices nacionales de tratamientos de los cánceres de mama, próstata, así como de colon y recto. Se seleccionaron doce directrices brasileñas, publicadas por cuatro grupos elaboradores distintos (Ministerio de Salud, sistema suplementario de salud, así como sociedades y asociaciones médicas), y se aplicó el instrumento AGREE II. En todas las directrices evaluadas se identificaron debilidades importantes en más de un Dominio, destacando los bajos valores para la "aplicabilidad" e "independencia editorial". Los patrones observados por Dominios se presentan más relacionados con el grupo elaborador, que con las condiciones clínicas tratadas. Menores puntuaciones en el "rigor del desarrollo" e "independencia editorial" se obtuvieron por parte de grupos elaboradores no gubernamentales, inclusive con ausencia o falta de transparencia en la información. A pesar de que la "claridad de la presentación" de las directrices del Ministerio de la Salud haya sido relativamente inferior en la "aplicabilidad", todas presentaron limitaciones expresivas. Consecuentemente, en la evaluación global, ninguna de las directrices fue recomendada sin modificaciones, siendo cuatro de ellas no recomendadas. Por fin, se hace necesario cualificar las recomendaciones, en lo que se refiere a las evidencias que las fundamentan ("rigor metodológico"), así como disponer de forma comprensible y factible las conductas que deben ser adoptadas ("aplicabilidad"), al igual que mitigar intereses conflictivos, para que sea ofertado el mejor cuidado a los pacientes oncológicos en el país.


Assuntos
Neoplasias , Brasil , Humanos , Masculino , Neoplasias/terapia
20.
Arq Bras Cardiol ; 116(4): 744-753, 2021 04.
Artigo em Inglês, Português | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33886722

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Heart transplant is the main therapeutic alternative for advanced heart failure patients. Several risk factors affect these patients' survival; however, few studies about the topic are available in Brazil. OBJECTIVES: To review the survival rates of heart transplant patients in the Brazilian Public Health System (Sistema Único de Saúde - SUS) between 2000 and 2015. METHODS: This is a non-concurrent, open cohort study, involving cardiac transplant patients in Brazil. The cumulative survival probability was estimated by the Kaplan-Meier curve, and the curve comparison was done using the Log-Rank test. The Cox model was used to calculate the Hazard-Ratio (HR). Analyses were conducted at the 95% confidence level. RESULTS: The heart transplant survival rate median in Brazil, during the period, was 8.3 years. Each additional year in the recipient's age, the occurrence of infections, and the performance of the surgical procedure in the South Region were associated with a higher risk of graft loss. A higher use ratio of immunosuppressants mycophenolate and azathioprine acted as a protection factor. CONCLUSIONS: The analyses conducted provide the first information about the median survival time in heart transplant patients in Brazil. The difference noticed among the geographical regions may be related to the different treatment protocols adopted in the country, especially in the early 2000s. The rate of mycophenolate and azathioprine use as a protection factor suggests that, despite the absence of differences among therapeutic strategies, use of these drugs may favor survival of certain patients. The study provides robust epidemiological data, which are relevant for public health.


FUNDAMENTO: O transplante cardíaco é a principal alternativa terapêutica para pacientes com insuficiência cardíaca avançada. Diversos fatores de risco influenciam a sobrevivência desses pacientes, entretanto, poucos estudos acerca do tema estão disponíveis no Brasil. OBJETIVOS: Analisar a sobrevivência de pacientes transplantados cardíacos pelo Sistema Único de Saúde no Brasil entre 2000-2015. MÉTODOS: Trata-se de uma coorte não concorrente, aberta, de pacientes transplantados cardíacos no Brasil. A probabilidade acumulada de sobrevivência foi estimada por Kaplan-Meier e a comparação entre as curvas realizada pelo Teste de Log-Rank. O modelo de Cox foi utilizado para calcular o Hazard-Ratio (HR). As análises foram realizadas ao nível de 95% de confiança. RESULTADOS: A mediana de sobrevivência do transplante cardíaco no Brasil no período foi 8,3 anos. Cada ano adicional na idade do receptor, a ocorrência de infecções e a realização do procedimento cirúrgico na região Sul relacionaram-se ao maior risco de perda do enxerto. Maior proporção de uso dos imunossupressores micofenolato e azatioprina atuou como fator protetor. CONCLUSÕES: As análises realizadas fornecem a primeira informação quanto ao tempo de sobrevivência mediana do transplante cardíaco no Brasil. A diferença observada entre as regiões pode estar relacionada aos diferentes protocolos de tratamento adotados no país, principalmente no início dos anos 2000. A proporção de uso de micofenolato e azatioprina como fator protetor sugere que, apesar de não haver diferença entre as estratégias terapêuticas, o uso desses medicamentos pode favorecer a sobrevida de determinados pacientes. O estudo apresenta dados epidemiológicos robustos e importantes para a saúde pública.


Assuntos
Transplante de Coração , Imunossupressores , Brasil/epidemiologia , Estudos de Coortes , Sobrevivência de Enxerto , Humanos , Estudos Retrospectivos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA