Uninterrupted continuous glucose monitoring access is associated with a decrease in HbA1c in youth with type 1 diabetes and public insurance.

OBJECTIVE: Continuous glucose monitor (CGM) use is associated with improved glucose control. We describe the effect of continued and interrupted CGM use on hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) in youth with public insurance. METHODS: We reviewed 956 visits from 264 youth with type 1 diabetes (T1D) and public insurance. Demographic data, HbA1c and two-week CGM data were collected. Youth were classified as never user, consistent user, insurance discontinuer, and self-discontinuer. Visits were categorized as never-user visit, visit before CGM start, visit after CGM start, visit with continued CGM use, visit with initial loss of CGM, visit with continued loss of CGM, and visit where CGM is regained after loss. Multivariate regression adjusting for age, sex, race, diabetes duration, initial HbA1c, and body mass index were used to calculate adjusted mean and delta HbA1c. RESULTS: Adjusted mean HbA1c was lowest for the consistent user group (HbA1c 8.6%;[95%CI 7.9,9.3]). Delta HbA1c (calculated from visit before CGM start) was lower for visit after CGM start (-0.39%;[95%CI -0.78,-0.02]) and visit with continued CGM use (-0.29%;[95%CI -0.61,0.02]), whereas it was higher for visit with initial loss of CGM (0.40%;[95%CI -0.06,0.86]), visit with continued loss of CGM (0.46%;[95%CI 0.06,0.85]), and visit where CGM is regained after loss (0.57%;[95%CI 0.06,1.10]). CONCLUSIONS: Youth with public insurance using CGM have improved HbA1c, but only when CGM use is uninterrupted. Interruptions in use, primarily due to gaps in insurance coverage of CGM, were associated with increased HbA1c. These data support both initial and ongoing coverage of CGM for youth with T1D and public insurance.

Perceptions of Support Among Transgender and Gender-Expansive Adolescents and Their Parents.

PURPOSE: To capture and compare the perspectives of parents and their transgender and gender expansive (TGE) adolescents during pivotal moments of gender identity development and to report the level of adjustment during these parental experiences. METHODS: We utilized a mixed-methods approach and interviewed 36 parents and 23 TGE adolescents at our Gender Clinic. Parents retrospectively identified "pivotal moments" in their child's gender identity development and rated their levels of support and adjustment. Adolescents independently rated their parent's level of support during these moments to allow for comparative analyses. RESULTS: The supportive behavior most frequently identified by parents was connecting the adolescent to services, while adolescents considered their parents' use of the affirmed name or pronouns to be most supportive. We found a positive correlation between the parents' perceptions of support and those of TGE adolescents during pivotal moments (r = 0.4, p < 0.001). Adolescents rated the degree of parental support to be 3.73 points (95% confidence interval: [2.67,4.8], p < 0.001) higher on a Likert scale than corresponding ratings provided by parents in a generalized estimating equation model. Parents experienced moderate need for adjustment during these moments. CONCLUSIONS: Providers may use these findings to guide parents toward gender affirmative behaviors that may protect against negative mental health outcomes.