RESUMO
Measles outbreaks were recently reported in Europe due to low immunization rates. In this scenario, identifying the reasons of no vaccination is crucial to set up strategies to improve immunization rate. A cross-sectional study was conducted to investigate the determinants of missed vaccination in children living in Southern Italy, during the 2016 outbreak. A standardized face-to-face questionnaire was used to record demographic data, immunization status, and reasons for missed vaccination. A total of 1141 children (median age 86 months, male 47.2%) was enrolled, 77.8% of the children were adequately vaccinated for age, 6.3% were incompletely vaccinated for age, and 15.9% did not receive any vaccine dose. Vaccination rate and reasons for not vaccinating significantly varied according to age, with children ≤ 24 months showing the lowest rate (67.8%). Reasons for not vaccinating included fear for side effects (51%), presence of underlying chronic conditions (12.2%), skip scheduled appointment (12.2%), refusal of vaccination (10.3%), acute illnesses (7.2%), and allergy to eggs (4.6%). The presence of underlying condition was a risk factor for inadequate immunization (p < 0.0001). Only 4.7% of conditions were true contraindications to vaccine administration.Conclusion: We reported inadequate measles immunization rate in Southern Italy, with lowest rates in children ≤ 2 years or with underlying conditions. Only a minority had true contraindications to vaccine uptake. Implementation strategies addressed to health-care professionals and families should focus on the reported determinants to increase measles vaccination coverage. What is Known: ⢠Measles is a viral, highly communicable disease, preventable by vaccine. ⢠Measles elimination in Europe failed as demonstrated by outbreaks in several countries, due to low immunization rates. What is New: ⢠Inadequate measles immunization rate due to false contraindications in Southern Italy, with lowest rates in children ≤ 2 years. ⢠The presence of underlying disease is a risk factor for inadequate immunization.
Assuntos
Vacina contra Sarampo/administração & dosagem , Sarampo/prevenção & controle , Cooperação e Adesão ao Tratamento/estatística & dados numéricos , Cobertura Vacinal/estatística & dados numéricos , Adolescente , Atitude Frente a Saúde , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Estudos Transversais , Surtos de Doenças/prevenção & controle , Feminino , Humanos , Lactente , Itália/epidemiologia , Masculino , Sarampo/epidemiologia , Vacina contra Sarampo/efeitos adversos , Fatores de Risco , Inquéritos e Questionários , Adulto JovemRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Despite consistent recommendations by all Public Health Authorities in support of annual influenza vaccination for at-risk categories, there is still a low uptake of influenza vaccine in these groups including health care workers (HCWs). Aim of this observational two-phase study was to estimate the immunization rates for influenza in four subsequent seasons and for pandemic H1N1 influenza in HCWs of a University Hospital, and to investigate its distribution pattern and the main determinants of immunization. Phase 1 data collection was performed in 2009-2010, during the peak of H1N1 pandemic. Phase 2 data collection, aimed to investigate seasonal influenza vaccination coverage in the three seasons after pandemic, was performed in 2012-2013. METHODS: The overall H1N1 vaccination rate was derived by the Hospital immunization registry. In 2010, the personnel of three Departments (Infectious Diseases, Pediatrics and Gynecology/Obstetrics) completed a survey on influenza. A second-phase analysis was performed in 2012 to investigate influenza vaccination coverage in three consecutive seasons. RESULTS: The first-phase survey showed a low coverage for influenza in all categories (17 %), with the lowest rate in nurses (8.1 %). A total of 37 % of health care workers received H1N1 vaccine, with the highest rate among physicians and the lowest in nurses. H1N1 vaccination was closely related to the Department, being higher in the Department of Infectious Diseases (53.7 %) and Pediatrics (42.4 %) than in Gynecology/Obstetrics (8.3 %). The second-phase survey showed the lowest rate of influenza vaccination in 2012/13 season. The main reasons for not being vaccinated were "Unsure of the efficacy of vaccine" and "Feel not at-risk of getting influenza or its complications". Despite recommendations, influenza vaccine uptake remains poor. CONCLUSION: Immunization is largely perceived as a personal protection rather than a measure needed to prevent disease spreading to at-risk patients. Compulsory vaccination against influenza should be considered as a possible strategy, at least in health institutions where at-risk patients are admitted.
Assuntos
Atitude do Pessoal de Saúde , Pessoal de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Vírus da Influenza A Subtipo H1N1/imunologia , Vacinas contra Influenza/administração & dosagem , Influenza Humana/prevenção & controle , Adulto , Idoso , Estudos Transversais , Surtos de Doenças , Feminino , Hospitais Universitários , Humanos , Influenza Humana/epidemiologia , Itália/epidemiologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Sistema de Registros , Vacinação/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto JovemRESUMO
The COVID-19 pneumonia was firstly reported in Wuhan, China, in December 2019. The disease had a rapid spread all over the word becoming an international public health emergency. Limited data were available on COVID-19 positive neonates. We reviewed relevant literature to understand the clinical course of disease and transmission routes in affected neonates. The aim of the study was evaluating the clinical course and prognosis of SARS-CoV-2 positive neonates. Based on current literature, the hypothesis of vertical transmission of SARS-CoV-2, though conceivable, remains unproven. A research conducted on PubMed database from December 2019 to April 27, 2020 revealed that were reported 25 neonates affected by SARS-CoV-2. Main symptoms were fever, cough, or shortness of breath but often these neonates did not show other symptoms during length stay in hospital. No deaths occurred.
Assuntos
Betacoronavirus/isolamento & purificação , Infecções por Coronavirus , Doenças do Recém-Nascido , Transmissão Vertical de Doenças Infecciosas/prevenção & controle , Pandemias , Pneumonia Viral , COVID-19 , Infecções por Coronavirus/diagnóstico , Infecções por Coronavirus/fisiopatologia , Infecções por Coronavirus/transmissão , Humanos , Recém-Nascido , Doenças do Recém-Nascido/diagnóstico , Doenças do Recém-Nascido/fisiopatologia , Controle de Infecções , Pneumonia Viral/diagnóstico , Pneumonia Viral/fisiopatologia , Pneumonia Viral/transmissão , SARS-CoV-2RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Food aversion (FA) is an eating behavior where children refuse solid or fluid intake. FA can compromise the weaning off parenteral nutrition (PN) in children with intestinal failure (IF), reducing their quality of life (QoL). Around 25% of children with IF experience FA, but few data are available on interventions to get over FA. Messy play therapy (MPT) uses sensory activities to provide another meaningful avenue for learning in children by creating a fun way to experience new textures. This study aims to assess the efficacy of MPT in FA. METHODS: Demographic data and MPT intervention were retrospectively recorded between 2004 and 2017. Food was categorized by tastes and textures. Data are expressed as median and interquartile range (25%-75%). RESULTS: Twelve children were identified. MPT was started at 9 (6-16) months with an enrolling time within the program of 10.11 (7.75-12.5) months. MPT was ended after 19.5 (16.75-28.5) months, and all patients achieved tolerance to oral diet. Significant improvement in savory (P = .001), sweet (P = .002), and mixed texture (P = .001) of food intake was reported. Better QoL and mealtimes with family were reported at median follow-up of 39 (24-56) months. CONCLUSIONS: MPT seems to be a positive intervention to overcome FA. In our experience, the children have gone from not tolerating any intake to tolerating an oral diet, which means enjoying their mealtimes. Further studies are needed to evaluate the effectiveness of MPT in a larger scale of patients.
Assuntos
Transtornos da Alimentação e da Ingestão de Alimentos/complicações , Transtornos da Alimentação e da Ingestão de Alimentos/terapia , Enteropatias/complicações , Enteropatias/psicologia , Nutrição Parenteral/psicologia , Ludoterapia/métodos , Transtornos da Alimentação e da Ingestão de Alimentos/psicologia , Feminino , Humanos , Lactente , Comportamento do Lactente/psicologia , Enteropatias/terapia , Masculino , Qualidade de Vida/psicologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: An increased but unpredictable risk of malnutrition is associated with hospitalization, especially in children with chronic diseases. We investigated the applicability of Screening Tool for Risk of Impaired Nutritional Status and Growth (STRONGkids), an instrument proposed to estimate the risk of malnutrition in hospitalized children. We also evaluated the role of age and co-morbidities as risk for malnutrition. METHODS: The STRONGkids consists of 4 items providing a score that classifies a patient in low, moderate, high risk for malnutrition. A prospective observational multi-centre study was performed in 12 Italian hospitals. Children 1-18 years consecutively admitted and otherwise unselected were enrolled. Their STRONGkids score was obtained and compared with the actual nutritional status expressed as BMI and Height for Age SD-score. RESULTS: Of 144 children (75 males, mean age 6.5 ± 4.5 years), 52 (36%) had an underlying chronic disease. According to STRONGkids, 46 (32%) children were at low risk, 76 (53%) at moderate risk and 22 (15%) at high risk for malnutrition. The latter had significantly lower Height for Age values (mean SD value -1.07 ± 2.08; p = 0.008) and BMI values (mean SD-values -0.79 ± 2.09; p = 0.0021) in comparison to other groups. However, only 29 children were actually malnourished. CONCLUSIONS: The STRONGkids is easy to administer. It is highly sensitive but not specific. It may be used as a very preliminary screening tool to be integrated with other clinical data in order to reliably predict the risk of malnutrition.