Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 13 de 13
Filtrar
1.
Diabetes Technol Ther ; 10(4): 232-44; quiz 245-6, 2008 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18699743

RESUMO

Continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) is an evolving technology poised to redefine current concepts of glycemic control and optimal diabetes management. To date, there are few randomized studies examining how to most effectively use this new tool. Therefore, a group of eight diabetes specialists heard presentations on continuous glucose sensor technology and then discussed their experience with CGM in order to identify fundamental considerations, objectives, and methods for applying this technology in clinical practice. The group concluded that routine use of CGM, with real-time data showing the rate and direction of glucose change, could revolutionize current approaches to evaluating and managing glycemia. The need for such progress is indicated by the growing prevalence of inadequately treated hyperglycemia. Coordinating financial and educational resources and developing clear protocols for using glucose sensor technology are urgent priorities in promoting wide adoption of CGM by patients and health care providers. Finally, researchers, manufacturers, payers, and advocacy groups must join forces on the policy level to create an environment conducive to managing continuous data, measuring outcomes, and formalizing best practices.


Assuntos
Técnicas Biossensoriais/tendências , Automonitorização da Glicemia/instrumentação , Automonitorização da Glicemia/tendências , Diabetes Mellitus/terapia , Falha de Equipamento , Guias como Assunto , Humanos , Tecnologia/tendências
2.
Diabetes Technol Ther ; 10(6): 419-39, 2008 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18937550

RESUMO

Current clinical guidelines for diabetes care encourage self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG) to improve glycemic control. Specific protocols remain variable, however, particularly among non-insulin-using patients. This is due in part to efficacy studies that neglect to consider (1) the performance of monitoring equipment under real-world conditions, (2) whether or how patients have been taught to take action on test results, and (3) the physiological, behavioral, and social circumstances in which SMBG is carried out. As such, a multidisciplinary group of specialists, including several endocrinologists, a health psychologist, a diabetes nurse practitioner, and a patient advocate (the Panel), discuss within this review article how the potential of SMBG might be fully realized in today's healthcare environment. The resulting recommendations cover technological, clinical, behavioral, and research considerations with the aim of achieving short- and long-term benefits, ranging from fewer hypoglycemic episodes to lower complication-related costs. The panel also made suggestions for designing future studies that increase the ability to discern optimal models of SMBG utilization for individuals with diabetes who may, or may not, use insulin.


Assuntos
Automonitorização da Glicemia/métodos , Automonitorização da Glicemia/normas , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1/sangue , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/sangue , Adulto , Automonitorização da Glicemia/instrumentação , Calibragem , Europa (Continente) , Humanos , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Sociedades Médicas , Tecnologia/normas , Estados Unidos
3.
Curr Med Res Opin ; 34(6): 1153-1162, 2018 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29429377

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2D) is a growing global epidemic. Due to the progressive nature of the disease, many people with T2D require insulin at some point, most commonly a long-acting (basal) insulin to assist with 24-h control of glucose levels. OBJECTIVE: This opinion paper provides an overview of considerations for primary care providers (PCPs) in intensifying the treatment regimen when basal insulin therapy is inadequate. RESULTS: Control of mealtime hyperglycemia, in addition to fasting hyperglycemia, has been shown to be crucial in reaching A1c goals of <7.0%. However, initiating and optimizing mealtime insulin therapy can be challenging for both people with T2D and PCPs, due to a perceived lack of efficacy and burden of insulin treatment, causing "psychological insulin resistance" in people with T2D and clinical inertia among PCPs. Successful implementation of mealtime insulin therapy requires not only choosing appropriate treatment strategies, but also addressing patient-related behavioral and emotional barriers. Simplified treatment algorithms, combined with the use of advanced technology (devices such as insulin pens, pumps, and patches), and collaborative decision-making can help decrease barriers to effective mealtime insulin therapy. CONCLUSIONS: It is possible to implement an effective basal-bolus insulin regimen in people with T2D in a way that improves glucose control while minimizing negative effects on quality-of-life, treatment satisfaction, and psychological well-being.


Assuntos
Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2 , Jejum , Hemoglobinas Glicadas/análise , Insulina de Ação Prolongada/administração & dosagem , Período Pós-Prandial , Qualidade de Vida , Algoritmos , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/sangue , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/tratamento farmacológico , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/fisiopatologia , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/psicologia , Jejum/sangue , Jejum/psicologia , Humanos , Hiperglicemia/tratamento farmacológico , Hiperglicemia/etiologia , Hipoglicemiantes/uso terapêutico , Sistemas de Infusão de Insulina , Satisfação do Paciente , Atenção Primária à Saúde/métodos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA