RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy with S-1 for 1 year (corresponding to eight courses) is the standard treatment for pathological stage II gastric cancer. The phase III trial (JCOG1104) investigating the non-inferiority of four courses of S-1 to eight courses was terminated due to futility at the first interim analysis. To confirm the primary results, we reported the results after a 5-years follow-up in JCOG1104. METHODS: Patients histologically diagnosed with stage II gastric cancer after radical gastrectomy were randomly assigned to receive S-1 for eight or four courses. In detail, 80 mg/m2/day S-1 was administered for 4 weeks followed by a 2-week rest as a single course. RESULTS: Between February 16, 2012, and March 19, 2017, 590 patients were enrolled and randomly assigned to 8-course (295 patients) and 4-course (295 patients) regimens. After a 5-years follow-up, the relapse-free survival at 3 years was 92.2% for the 8-course arm and 90.1% for the 4-course arm, and that at 5 years was 87.7% for the 8-course arm and 85.6% for the 4-course arm (hazard ratio 1.265, 95% CI 0.846-1.892). The overall survival at 3 years was 94.9% for the 8-course arm, 93.2% for the 4-course arm, and that at 5 years was 89.7% for the 8-course arm, and 88.6% for the 4-course arm (HR 1.121, 95% CI 0.719-1.749). CONCLUSIONS: The survival of the four-course arm was slightly but consistently inferior to that of the eight-course arm. Eight-course S-1 should thus remain the standard adjuvant chemotherapy for pathological stage II gastric cancer.
Assuntos
Neoplasias Gástricas , Humanos , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapêutico , Quimioterapia Adjuvante , Seguimentos , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Neoplasias Gástricas/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias Gástricas/cirurgia , Neoplasias Gástricas/patologiaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Although proximal gastrectomy (PG) with the double-flap technique (DFT) is a function-preserving surgery that prevents esophagogastric reflux, there is a risk of developing metachronous remnant gastric cancer (MRGC). Moreover, details of MRGC and appropriate postoperative follow-up after PG with DFT are unclear. METHODS: We reviewed the medical records of 471 patients who underwent PG with DFT for cancer in a preceding, multicenter, retrospective study (rD-FLAP Study). We investigated the incidence of MRGC, frequency of follow-up endoscopy, and eradication of Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) infection. RESULTS: MRGC was diagnosed in 42 (8.9%) of the 471 patients, and 56 lesions of MRGC were observed. The cumulative 5- and 10-year incidence rates were 5.7 and 11.4%, respectively. There was no clinicopathological difference at the time of primary PG between patients with and without MRGC. Curative resection for MRGC was performed for 49 (88%) lesions. All patients with a 1-year, follow-up, endoscopy interval were diagnosed with early-stage MRGC, and none of them died due to MRGC. Overall and disease-specific survival rates did not significantly differ between patients with and without MRGC. The incidence rate of MRGC in the eradicated group after PG was 10.8% and that in the uneradicated group was 19.6%, which was significantly higher than that in patients without H. pylori infection at primary PG (7.6%) (p = 0.049). CONCLUSIONS: The incidence rate of MRGC after PG with DFT was 8.9%. Early detection of MRGC with annual endoscopy provides survival benefits. Eradicating H. pylori infection can reduce the incidence of MRGC.
Assuntos
Infecções por Helicobacter , Helicobacter pylori , Segunda Neoplasia Primária , Neoplasias Gástricas , Humanos , Incidência , Estudos Retrospectivos , Neoplasias Gástricas/epidemiologia , Neoplasias Gástricas/cirurgia , Neoplasias Gástricas/patologia , Segunda Neoplasia Primária/epidemiologia , Segunda Neoplasia Primária/cirurgia , Segunda Neoplasia Primária/patologia , Gastrectomia/efeitos adversos , Infecções por Helicobacter/complicações , Infecções por Helicobacter/epidemiologia , Infecções por Helicobacter/diagnóstico , Estudos Multicêntricos como AssuntoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Late complications following gastric cancer surgery, including postgastrectomy syndromes, are complex problems requiring a solution. Reported risk factors for developing late complications include surgery-related factors, such as the surgical approach and the extent of resection and reconstruction. However, this has not been assessed in a prospective study with a large sample size. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate associations between surgery-related factors and the development of late complications. Data from the JCOG0912 trial were used. It compared laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy (LADG) to open distal gastrectomy (ODG) in clinical stage I gastric cancer patients. METHODS: This study included 881/921 patients enrolled in the JCOG0912 trial. The incidence of late complications was compared between the ODG and the LADG arms. In addition, associations between surgery-related factors and the development of late complications were assessed by multivariable analyses using the proportional odds model to identify relevant risk factors. RESULTS: There was no difference in the type or number of patients with late complications between the LADG and the ODG arms. The multivariable analysis for each late complication revealed that the Billroth-I reconstruction (vs. R-en-Y or Billroth-II) had a lower risk of cholecystitis [odds ratio (OR) 0.187, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.039-0.905, P = 0.037] or ileus (OR 0.116, 95%CI 0.033-0.406, P < 0.001), and pylorus-preserving gastrectomy (vs. R-en-Y or Billroth-II) had a higher risk of reflux esophagitis (OR 3.348, 95% CI 1.371-8.176, P = 0.008). The surgical approach was not a risk factor for any late complications. CONCLUSION: Differences in surgical approaches did not constitute a risk for developing late complications after gastrectomy. Billroth-I reconstruction reduced the risk of ileus and cholecystitis, but pylorus-preserving gastrectomy carried a risk for reflux esophagitis.
Assuntos
Esofagite Péptica , Íleus , Obstrução Intestinal , Laparoscopia , Neoplasias Gástricas , Humanos , Esofagite Péptica/etiologia , Gastrectomia/efeitos adversos , Íleus/etiologia , Obstrução Intestinal/cirurgia , Laparoscopia/efeitos adversos , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/etiologia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/cirurgia , Estudos Prospectivos , Neoplasias Gástricas/cirurgia , Neoplasias Gástricas/complicações , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Splenectomy for proximal gastric cancer was found to offer no survival benefit in a randomized trial clarifying the role of splenectomy (JCOG0110 study). Although many studies have explored risk factors for morbidities following total gastrectomy, none have assessed the risk factors for postoperative complications in spleen-preserving total gastrectomy. METHODS: Using data from 505 patients enrolled in a previous randomized trial, risk factors for postoperative complications were identified by multivariable logistic regression analysis. Then, the risk factors were assessed separately between splenectomy and spleen-preserving total gastrectomy. RESULTS: Postoperative complications were identified in 119 patients (23.6%) and were more common following splenectomy than following spleen-preserving surgery (30.7% and 16.1%, respectively, p < 0.01). Multivariable analysis revealed that age ≥65 years (p = 0.032), body mass index ≥25 (p = 0.003), and blood loss ≥350 (p = 0.019) were independent risk factors for postoperative complications in the entire cohort. Among them, only body mass index was a significant independent risk factor for complications in both spleen preservation (p = 0.047) and splenectomy groups (p = 0.017). CONCLUSION: Risk factors for postoperative complications were essentially the same between splenectomy and spleen preservation. Being overweight increased the risk of postoperative complications.
Assuntos
Esplenectomia , Neoplasias Gástricas , Humanos , Idoso , Esplenectomia/efeitos adversos , Baço/cirurgia , Neoplasias Gástricas/cirurgia , Gastrectomia/efeitos adversos , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/etiologia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/cirurgia , Excisão de Linfonodo , Fatores de Risco , Estudos RetrospectivosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: The additive or synergistic sustained antitumour effect of immune checkpoint inhibitors in combination with oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy has previously been reported. We investigated the efficacy of nivolumab plus oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy versus placebo plus oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy as first-line therapy for patients with HER2-negative, unresectable advanced or recurrent gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction cancer. METHODS: We did a randomised, multicentre, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 2-3 trial (ATTRACTION-4) at 130 centres (hospitals, cancer centres, and medical centres) across Japan, South Korea, and Taiwan. We enrolled patients aged 20 years and older with previously untreated (except for neoadjuvant or adjuvant chemotherapy completed ≥180 days before recurrence), HER2-negative, unresectable, advanced or recurrent gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction cancer (regardless of PD-L1 expression), at least one measurable lesion per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours guidelines (version 1.1), and a baseline Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0 or 1. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to chemotherapy every 3 weeks (intravenous oxaliplatin 130 mg/m2 on day 1 plus either oral S-1 40 mg/m2 [SOX] or oral capecitabine 1000 mg/m2 [CAPOX], twice daily on days 1-14), in addition to either 360 mg nivolumab intravenously every 3 weeks (nivolumab plus chemotherapy group) or placebo (placebo plus chemotherapy group). Randomisation was done using an interactive web response system with block sizes of four and stratified by intensity of PD-L1 expression, ECOG performance status score, disease status, and geographical region. Patients, investigators, and the study sponsor were masked to treatment assignment. The primary endpoints were centrally assessed progression-free survival and overall survival in the intention-to-treat population, which included all randomly assigned patients. Safety was assessed in all patients who received at least one dose of the assigned treatment. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02746796. Trial recruitment is complete and follow-up is ongoing. FINDINGS: Between March 23, 2017, and May 10, 2018, 724 patients were randomly assigned to treatment: 362 patients to the nivolumab plus chemotherapy group and 362 to the placebo plus chemotherapy group. At the time of data cutoff on Oct 31, 2018, with a median follow-up of 11·6 months (IQR 8·7-14·1), median progression-free survival at a prespecified interim analysis was 10·45 months (95% CI 8·44-14·75) in the nivolumab plus chemotherapy group and 8·34 months (6·97-9·40) in the placebo plus chemotherapy group (hazard ratio [HR] 0·68; 98·51% CI 0·51-0·90; p=0·0007). At the time of data cutoff on Jan 31, 2020, with a median follow-up of 26·6 months (IQR 24·1-29·0), median overall survival at the final analysis was 17·45 months (95% CI 15·67-20·83) in the nivolumab plus chemotherapy group and 17·15 months (15·18-19·65) in the placebo plus chemotherapy group (HR 0·90; 95% CI 0·75-1·08; p=0·26). The most common treatment-related grade 3-4 adverse events were neutrophil count decreased (71 [20%] of 359 patients in the nivolumab plus chemotherapy group vs 57 [16%] of 358 patients in the placebo plus chemotherapy group) and platelet count decreased (34 [9%] vs 33 [9%]). Treatment-related serious adverse events of any grade were observed in 88 (25%) patients in the nivolumab plus chemotherapy group and in 51 (14%) in the placebo plus chemotherapy group, of which the most common was decreased appetite (18 [5%] vs ten [3%]). Six treatment-related deaths occurred: three in the nivolumab plus chemotherapy group (one each of febrile neutropenia, hepatic failure, and sudden death) and three in the placebo plus chemotherapy group (one each of sepsis, haemolytic anaemia, and interstitial lung disease). INTERPRETATION: Nivolumab combined with oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy significantly improved progression-free survival, but not overall survival, in Asian patients with untreated, HER2-negative, unresectable advanced or recurrent gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction cancer, and could potentially be a new first-line treatment option for these patients. FUNDING: Ono Pharmaceutical and Bristol-Myers Squibb.
Assuntos
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapêutico , Neoplasias Esofágicas/tratamento farmacológico , Junção Esofagogástrica , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/tratamento farmacológico , Nivolumabe/uso terapêutico , Neoplasias Gástricas/tratamento farmacológico , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Método Duplo-Cego , Neoplasias Esofágicas/mortalidade , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Receptor ErbB-2/análise , Neoplasias Gástricas/mortalidadeRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Recent retrospective studies have shown that increased intraoperative blood loss (IBL) during curative gastrectomy for patients with advanced gastric cancer is a negative prognostic indicator for recurrence. However, there are no reliable reports assessing this with a large-scale prospective cohort. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of IBL on long-term outcomes using data from the JCOG1001 phase III trial, which was designed to determine if bursectomy led to improved survival vs. nonbursectomy in patients with cT3/4a gastric cancer. METHODS: This study included 1203 of the 1204 patients enrolled in the JCOG1001. From the tertiles of IBL (196 ml, 400 ml), we divided the patients into three groups: IBL < 200 ml representing small blood loss (SBL, n = 404), 200 ml ≤ IBL < 400 ml representing medium blood loss (MBL, n = 393), and IBL ≥ 400 ml representing large blood loss (LBL, n = 406). The impact of IBL on relapse-free survival (RFS) was evaluated with univariable comparisons and multivariable Cox regression analyses. RESULTS: Three-year RFS after SBL, MBL, and LBL was 81.7%, 74.8%, and 70.6%, respectively. Multivariable analysis identified IBL, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status, pT, pN, and postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy as independent predictors of RFS. Compared with SBL as a reference, the hazard ratios of MBL and LBL were 1.461 (P = 0.012) and 1.520 (P = 0.009), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Based on the analysis of data from a large-scale prospective study, an IBL of ≥ 200 ml after curative surgery for patients with cT3/4a gastric cancer was an independent predictor of reduced RFS.
Assuntos
Neoplasias Gástricas , Perda Sanguínea Cirúrgica , Gastrectomia , Humanos , Prognóstico , Estudos Prospectivos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Neoplasias Gástricas/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias Gástricas/cirurgiaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Our previous report showed that surgical palliation maintained quality of life (QOL), improved solid food intake, and had an acceptable surgical safety among patients with malignant bowel obstruction (MBO) caused by advanced gastric cancer. This study performed a survival analysis stratified by the patients' QOL to elucidate its impact on survival. METHODS: Patients who underwent resection or bypass of the small intestine/colon or ileostomy/colostomy for bowel obstruction caused by peritoneal dissemination of gastric cancer were included. Validated instruments (EuroQoL-5 Dimensions) were used to assess QOL at baseline and 2 weeks, 1 month, and 3 months following surgical palliation. Postoperative improvement in oral intake was also evaluated using the Gastric Outlet Obstruction Scoring System (GOOSS). Univariate and multivariate survival analyses were performed using baseline characteristics and changes in QOL and GOOSS scores 2 weeks after surgery to determine prognostic factors. RESULTS: We enrolled 60 patients with a median survival time of 6.64 (95% CI 4.76-10.28) months. Patients who received postoperative chemotherapy and had lower baseline C-reactive protein (CRP) levels, higher baseline albumin levels, better baseline EuroQoL-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) scores, and improved oral intake after palliative surgery exhibited significantly better survival. Multivariate analysis identified postoperative chemotherapy, lower baseline CRP levels, and improved oral intake as independent prognostic factors. CONCLUSIONS: The current study revealed that baseline QOL and postoperative QOL changes did not affect survival. Moreover, improved oral intake, lower baseline CRP levels, and postoperative chemotherapy were significant prognostic factors in patients who underwent palliative surgery for advanced gastric cancer with MBO.
Assuntos
Obstrução da Saída Gástrica , Neoplasias Gástricas , Obstrução da Saída Gástrica/etiologia , Humanos , Cuidados Paliativos/métodos , Estudos Prospectivos , Qualidade de Vida , Estudos Retrospectivos , Neoplasias Gástricas/complicações , Neoplasias Gástricas/cirurgia , Análise de SobrevidaRESUMO
PURPOSE: To establish whether gastrectomy for early gastric cancer (EGC) in elderly patients is related to poor survival. METHODS: The subjects of this retrospective study were patients aged ≥ 75 years with primary stage IA EGC, who underwent curative resection with endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) or surgery. RESULTS: We analyzed data on 365 patients who underwent ESD and 170 patients who underwent surgery. Overall survival (OS) was not significantly different for the ESD group vs. the surgery group (5-year cumulative rates, 81.5% vs. 79.7%; log-rank test, P = 0.506). Multivariate analysis revealed that treatments; namely, ESD or surgery, were not associated with OS (hazard ratio 1.09, 95% confidence interval 0.77-1.51). Similar results were observed even in the subgroups with worse conditions, such as age > 80 years, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 2-3, Charlson comorbidity index ≥ 2, and prognostic nutritional index ≤ 46.7. Using propensity score matching, we selected 88 pairs of patients who underwent ESD or surgery with baseline characteristics matched and found that OS was not different between the two groups (log-rank test, P = 0.829). CONCLUSION: OS was comparable for elderly patients who underwent ESD and those who underwent surgery for EGC. Surgical invasiveness did not worsen the prognosis, even for elderly patients.
Assuntos
Ressecção Endoscópica de Mucosa , Neoplasias Gástricas , Idoso , Ressecção Endoscópica de Mucosa/métodos , Gastrectomia , Mucosa Gástrica/cirurgia , Humanos , Prognóstico , Estudos Retrospectivos , Neoplasias Gástricas/cirurgia , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
We evaluated the clinical outcome and assessed the safety of robot-assisted distal pancreatectomy(RADP)of early 5 cases in our institutional introduction. We followed the guidelines for introduction of robot-assisted pancreatectomy proposed by Japanese Society of Endoscopic Surgery. Patients' characteristics were 2 men and 3 women, 45-79(median 52) years old, and 3 patients with neuroendocrine neoplasm, 1 with intraductal papillary neoplasm and 1 with mucinous cystic neoplasm. Spleen-preserving RADP was performed in 2 cases. Clinical outcomes of 5 cases underwent RADP were, operation time was 308-437(median 330)minutes, blood loss was 5-270(median 100)mL and none received transfusion. Postoperative pancreatic fistula and postoperative complication more than Grade â ¢a(Clavien-Dindo classification)were none. Postoperative hospital stay was 7-11(median 8)days. RADP in our institution was safely introduced by following the proposal of guidelines.
Assuntos
Laparoscopia , Neoplasias Pancreáticas , Robótica , Masculino , Humanos , Feminino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Pancreatectomia , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/cirurgia , Resultado do Tratamento , Pâncreas/cirurgia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias , Estudos RetrospectivosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Patients with peritoneal dissemination of gastric cancer have poor oral intake caused by malignant bowel obstruction (MBO). Palliative surgery has often been undertaken to improve quality of life (QOL), but few prospective studies on palliative surgery in this patient population have been published. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We prospectively investigated the significance of palliative surgery using patient-reported QOL measures. Patients underwent palliative surgery by small intestine/colon resection or small intestine/colon bypass or ileostomy/colostomy for MBO. The primary endpoint was change in QOL assessed at baseline, 14 days, 1 month, and 3 months following palliative surgery using the Euro QoL Five Dimensions (EQ-5D™) questionnaire and the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire gastric cancer module (QLQ-STO22). Secondary endpoints were postoperative improvement in oral intake and surgical complications. RESULTS: Between April 2013 and March 2018, 63 patients were enrolled from 14 institutions. The mean EQ-5D™ utility index baseline score of 0.6 remained consistent. Gastric-specific symptoms mostly showed statistically significant improvement from baseline. Forty-two patients (67%) were able to eat solid food 2 weeks after palliative surgery and 36 patients (57%) tolerated it for 3 months. The rate of overall morbidity of ≥ grade III according to the Clavien-Dindo classification was 16% (10 patients) and the 30-day postoperative mortality rate was 3.2% (2 patients). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with MBO caused by peritoneal dissemination of gastric cancer, palliative surgery did not improve QOL while improving solid food intake, with an acceptable postoperative morbidity and mortality rate.
Assuntos
Qualidade de Vida , Neoplasias Gástricas , Humanos , Cuidados Paliativos , Estudos Prospectivos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Neoplasias Gástricas/complicações , Neoplasias Gástricas/cirurgiaRESUMO
There is a wide variety of vessel types in the transverse colon region. Among them, it is very rare that the accessory middle colonic artery(A-MCA)is branched from the splenic artery. We found a transverse colon cancer. The dominant vessel of the cancer was the A-MCA branched from the splenic artery. This vessel type was confirmed by preoperative 3D-CT. We performed a laparoscopic left hemicolectomy for the cancer. In this study, we report a case of safe laparoscopic surgery in which we separate the A-MCA branched from the splenic artery using the preoperative 3D-CT image.
Assuntos
Colo Transverso , Neoplasias do Colo , Laparoscopia , Artérias , Colectomia , Colo Transverso/cirurgia , Neoplasias do Colo/diagnóstico por imagem , Neoplasias do Colo/cirurgia , Humanos , Artéria Esplênica , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios XRESUMO
Case 1: A 51-year-old man with advanced gastric cancer and peritoneal metastasis was referred to our hospital. He received fourth-line chemotherapy with nivolumab, but it became PD. Next, he received S-1 plus docetaxel therapy as fifth- line therapy. After 2 courses of S-1 plus docetaxel, erythema and blisters appeared on his limbs, with erosions of the oral mucosa and penis. We diagnosed Stevens-Johnson syndrome(SJS)based on the clinical and pathological findings. He received steroid treatment, but the cutaneous symptoms persisted; therefore, it was impossible to continue the chemotherapy because of the SJS. Case 2: A 75-year-old woman with recurrence of peritoneally disseminated gastric cancer received third-line chemotherapy with nivolumab. After 1 course of nivolumab, erythema appeared on her body and limbs, with erosion of the lips and oral mucosa. We diagnosed SJS based on the clinical findings. She received steroid treatment, but the cutaneous symptoms persisted; therefore, it was impossible to continue chemotherapy because of the SJS. It should be noted that the onset of serious irAEs, such as SJS, might make continuous chemotherapy difficult.
Assuntos
Síndrome de Stevens-Johnson , Neoplasias Gástricas , Idoso , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia , Nivolumabe/efeitos adversos , Síndrome de Stevens-Johnson/etiologia , Neoplasias Gástricas/tratamento farmacológicoRESUMO
The splenic artery and vein are important to the remnant stomach after distal gastrectomy(DG). Hence, total gastrectomy is recommended when performing gastrectomy and distal pancreatectomy(DP)with splenectomy(S). In the present case, a man in his 70s was diagnosed with early gastric cancer. Abdominal CT detected a dilated main pancreatic duct. Chronic pancreatitis was suspected, but malignancy could not be completely ruled out. Thus, DG with Roux-en-Y reconstruction and DP with S were performed simultaneously. The remnant gastric blood flow was evaluated with intraoperative indocyanine green(ICG)fluorography and the blood flow was confirmed. Finally, the remnant stomach was preserved. The postoperative course was uneventful, except for the occurrence of anastomosis edema. This result suggests that ICG fluorescence is useful to evaluate remnant gastric blood flow and that it may be possible to perform DG and DP with S simultaneously depending on the case.
Assuntos
Gastrectomia , Pancreatectomia , Esplenectomia , Idoso , Fluorescência , Humanos , Verde de Indocianina , MasculinoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: The clinical efficacy of nivolumab has been shown as a third-line treatment for advanced gastric cancer; however, nivolumab sometimes causes immune-related adverse events(irAEs). We retrospectively examined the clinical features and influence on treatment in cases of irAEs after nivolumab treatment. METHOD: We retrospectively examined 43 patients who received nivolumab treatment at our institution between October 2017 and December 2019. RESULT: The incidence of irAEs was 23.2%(10/43), and Grade 3 or higher irAEs included interstitial pneumonia, hypoadrenalism, Stevens- Johnson syndrome(SJS), and type 1 diabetes. Three patients showed long-term disease control after irAE onset. Meanwhile, SJS prevented patients from continuing treatment for gastric cancer. DISCUSSION: Nivolumab is effective in some patients with gastric cancer, while irAEs made subsequent treatment difficult. Trifluridine/tipiracil or irinotecan are also known to be effective as therapeutic drugs after third-line treatment for gastric cancer in addition to nivolumab; therefore, the choice of the third-line drug and management of irAEs owing to individual cases are considered desirable. CONCLUSION: Long-term efficacy is expected with nivolumab, but it may be necessary to recognize that the onset of serious irAEs might make subsequent treatment difficult.
Assuntos
Neoplasias Gástricas , Humanos , Imunoterapia , Nivolumabe/efeitos adversos , Prognóstico , Estudos Retrospectivos , Neoplasias Gástricas/tratamento farmacológicoRESUMO
The case involved a female in her 70s. Six years prior, she had undergone an abdominoperineal rectal resection for rectal cancer. Local recurrence was observed during follow-up so preoperative chemoradiotherapy was performed to shrink the tumor, followed by a total pelvic exenteration, bilateral ureterocutaneous fistula, and perineal reconstruction with a gracilis myocutaneous flap. She was discharged from hospital 39 days following surgery with no major complications. We herein report on a case of a good postoperative course due to surgery including a total pelvic exenteration and perineal reconstruction with a gracilis myocutaneous flap for postoperative local recurrence.
Assuntos
Retalho Miocutâneo , Exenteração Pélvica , Neoplasias Retais , Feminino , Humanos , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/cirurgia , Períneo/cirurgia , Neoplasias Retais/cirurgiaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Cancer cachexia is characterized by weight loss and is associated with increased morbidity and mortality in patients with cancer. Anamorelin (ONO-7643; ANAM) is a novel and selective ghrelin receptor agonist that improves appetite, lean body mass (LBM), body weight, and anorexia. METHODS: This multicenter, open-label, single-arm study investigated the efficacy and safety of 100 mg anamorelin in 50 Japanese patients with advanced and unresectable gastrointestinal (colorectal, gastric, or pancreatic) cancer. ANAM was administered once daily over 12 weeks. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients that maintained or gained LBM over the course of the study. Secondary endpoints included changes in LBM, body weight, quality of life (QoL), and nutritional status biomarkers. RESULTS: The proportion of patients who responded to treatment was 63.3% (95% CI, 48.3%-76.6%), with a least square mean ± SE change in LBM and body weight from baseline of 1.89 ± 0.36 kg and 1.41 ± 0.61 kg, respectively. Appetite-related questions on the QoL questionnaire showed that ANAM improved appetite. Adverse events occurred in 79.6% of patients, and the most common treatment-related adverse events were increased γ-glutamyl transpeptidase (8.2%), diabetes mellitus (6.1%), hyperglycemia (6.1%), and prolonged QRS complex (6.1%). CONCLUSIONS: ANAM improved anorexia and patients' nutritional status, resulting in rapid increases in LBM and body weight in patients with advanced gastrointestinal cancer who had cancer cachexia. ANAM treatment was well tolerated over 12 weeks. ANAM is a potential clinically beneficial pharmacotherapeutic option for patients with advanced gastrointestinal cancer who have cancer cachexia.
Assuntos
Caquexia/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias Gastrointestinais/tratamento farmacológico , Hidrazinas/uso terapêutico , Oligopeptídeos/uso terapêutico , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Feminino , Humanos , Hidrazinas/farmacologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Oligopeptídeos/farmacologiaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: In the ABSOLUTE trial, weekly nanoparticle albumin-bound paclitaxel (w-nab-PTX) showed non-inferiority to weekly solvent-based paclitaxel (w-sb-PTX) for overall survival (OS). Thus, w-nab-PTX might be an option for second-line chemotherapy in advanced gastric cancer (AGC). However, predictive factors for efficacies of these agents have not been evaluated. METHODS: Patients previously enrolled in the ABSOLUTE trial were divided into apparent peritoneal metastasis group (PM group) and no apparent peritoneal metastasis group (no PM group) based on baseline imaging evaluated by RECIST ver. 1.1 criteria and amount of ascites. OS, progression-free survival, and overall response rate were compared between two arms in each group. RESULTS: This study included 240 and 243 patients in the w-nab-PTX and w-sb-PTX arms, respectively. In the PM group, the w-nab-PTX arm (n = 88) had longer OS than the w-sb-PTX arm (n = 103), and median survival time (MST) of 9.9 and 8.7 months [hazard ratio (HR) 0.63; 95% CI 0.45-0.88; P = 0.0060], respectively. In the no PM group, the w-nab-PTX arm (n = 140) had shorter OS than the w-sb-PTX arm (n = 152), and MST of 11.6 and 15.7 months (HR 1.40; 95% CI 1.06-1.86; P = 0.0180), respectively. After adjusting for prognostic factors, the HR for OS in the w-nab-PTX arm versus the w-sb-PTX arm was 0.59 (95% CI 0.42-0.83; P = 0.0023; PM group) and 1.34 (95% CI 1.01-1.78; P = 0.0414; no PM group), with significant interaction between treatment efficacy and presence of peritoneal metastasis (P = 0.0003). CONCLUSIONS: The presence of apparent peritoneal metastasis might be a predictive factor for selecting w-nab-PTX for pretreated AGC patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: JapicCTI-132059.
Assuntos
Albuminas/uso terapêutico , Antineoplásicos/uso terapêutico , Paclitaxel/uso terapêutico , Neoplasias Peritoneais/secundário , Neoplasias Gástricas/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias Gástricas/patologia , Adulto , Idoso , Portadores de Fármacos , Sistemas de Liberação de Medicamentos/métodos , Feminino , Humanos , Estimativa de Kaplan-Meier , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Nanopartículas , Paclitaxel/administração & dosagem , Neoplasias Peritoneais/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias Peritoneais/mortalidade , Intervalo Livre de Progressão , Modelos de Riscos Proporcionais , Terapia de Salvação/métodos , Terapia de Salvação/mortalidade , Neoplasias Gástricas/mortalidade , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
This is a first report of gastrectomy after nivolumab immunotherapy. We describe a case in an elderly woman with gastric cancer diagnosed with cT4bN3M1(LYM), cStage â £B disease. Although she was administered 2 courses of SOX chemotherapy as the primary treatment, she could not continue the treatment to due to bone marrowsuppression. The second-line treatment was weekly PTX therapy, but she experienced Grade 3 neutropenia and thrombocytopenia in the first course and could not continue treatment. Nivolumab as the next treatment was effective but was discontinued for suspected druginduced pneumonia. During that time, tumor hemorrhage occurred and we performed total gastrectomy. Postoperatively, nivolumab chemotherapy was resumed. There were no adverse events and the patient has had a continued partial response for 30 courses. Gastrectomy was necessary in this case, allowing observation of the pathological findings of this highly effective case.
Assuntos
Antineoplásicos Imunológicos/uso terapêutico , Nivolumabe/uso terapêutico , Neoplasias Gástricas , Idoso , Feminino , Gastrectomia , Humanos , Intervalo Livre de Progressão , Neoplasias Gástricas/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias Gástricas/cirurgiaRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Pembrolizumab and nivolumab are anti-programmed death receptor-1(PD-1)antibodies. The use of pembrolizumab for unresectable or metastatic cancer with microsatellite instability-high(MSI-High)has been recently approved. However, there were few clinical reports on MSI in gastric cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We examined the clinicopathological features and MSI for 37 patients who underwent chemotherapy for unresectable gastric cancer in January 2019. RESULTS: MSI-High was observed in 3 patients(8.1%). Among the MSI-High patients, there was a tendency towards older age, female sex, undifferentiated type, distal-located lesions and lymphatic vessel invasions, but the differences were not significant. Eleven patients underwent chemotherapy with nivolumab, 4 of them had partial response(PR). Three out of the 4 patients (75%)were MSI-High. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggested that anti-PD-1 antibody could be effective as a secondary treatment for unresectable or metastatic gastric cancer among MSI-High patients.