The "velocity barrier" in giant slalom skiing: An experimental proof of concept.

BACKGROUND: Alpine skiing involves the conversion of potential energy into kinetic energy, with the "velocity barrier" (VB) at each moment corresponding to the maximal velocity at which the athlete can ski while staying within the boundaries of the gates and maintaining control. Nevertheless, this concept has never been proven by evidence. The aim of this study was to experimentally test the existence of the VB and clarify its relationship with skier's force production/application capacities. METHODS: Fourteen skiers were equipped with ski-mounted force plates and a positional device and ran a 2-turn Giant Slalom section starting from eight different heights on the slope. Three conditions were selected for further analysis: minimal entrance velocity (vmin ); entrance velocity allowing the better section time (VB); maximal entrance velocity (vmax ). Entrance velocity, section time, mean force output, ratio of force application effectiveness, velocity normalized energy dissipation, and path length were compared between the three conditions. Moreover, skier's mechanical energy and velocity curves were compared all along the section between the three conditions using SPM analysis. RESULTS: The section time was reduced in VB compared to vmin (p < 0.001) and vmax (p = 0.002). Skiers presented an incapacity to increase force output beyond the VB (p = 0.441) associated with a lower force application effectiveness (p = 0.005). Maximal entrance velocity was associated to higher energy dissipation (p < 0.001) and path length (p = 0.005). CONCLUSION: The present study experimentally supports the existence of the VB. The force production/application capacities seem to limit the skiing effectiveness beyond the VB, associated to increased energy dissipations and path length.

Fatigue-induced alterations in force production, trajectory and performance in alpine skiing.

In giant slalom, the ability to apply a high amount of force in the radial direction is essential for performance. A race is characterized by repeated turns performed at high velocity, potentially inducing fatigue. Therefore, this study aimed to assess the effect of fatigue on performance, trajectory characteristics, and force production capacities onto the snow. Twelve skiers ran a 4-turn section with (FATIGUE) and without pre-induced fatigue (CONTROL). Knee extensor maximal voluntary contraction (MVC) was performed before the experiment and after both conditions. Section time, energy dissipation, path length, total force output, force application effectiveness, and EMG activity of the main lower-limb muscles were compared between conditions. Multiple linear regressions were used to understand whether interindividual variability in the kinematic, kinetic and EMG between conditions explains variability in performance changes with fatigue. MVC was lower after FATIGUE (-19.1 ± 6.4%, p < 0.001) but did not change after CONTROL. FATIGUE was associated with longer section times (+0.21 ± 0.11 s, p < 0.001), energy dissipation (-0.78 ± 1.05 J.s.kg.m-1, p = 0.026), path length (+1.1 ± 1.6 m, p = 0.033) and lower force application effectiveness (-0.1 ± 0.1, p = 0.017). This study experimentally demonstrates that fatigue in giant slalom results in lower force application effectiveness, inducing over-dissipation of mechanical energy and longer path length, leading to lower performance.

Individual physiological responses to changes in shoe bending stiffness: a cluster analysis study on 96 runners.

BACKGROUND: Shoe longitudinal bending stiffness is known to influence running economy (RE). Recent studies showed divergent results ranging from 3% deterioration to 3% improvement in RE when bending stiffness increases. The variability of these results highlights inter-individual differences. Thus, our purpose was to study the runner-specific metabolic responses to changes in shoe bending stiffness. METHODS: After assessing their maximal oxygen consumption ([Formula: see text] max) and aerobic speed (MAS) during a first visit, 96 heterogeneous runners performed two treadmill 5 min runs at 75% [Formula: see text] max with two different prototypes of shoes on a second day. Prototypes differed only by their forefoot bending stiffness (17 N/mm vs. 10.4 N/mm). RE and stride kinematics were recorded during each trial. A clustering analysis was computed by comparing the measured RE and the technical measurement error of our gas exchange analyzer to identify functional groups of runners, i.e., responding similarly to footwear interventions. ANOVAs were then computed on biomechanical and morphological variables to compare the functional groups. RESULTS: Considering the whole sample (n = 96), there was no significant difference in RE between the two conditions. Cluster 1 (n = 29) improves RE in the stiffest condition (2.7 ± 2.1%). Cluster 2 (n = 26) impairs RE in the stiffest condition (2.7 ± 1.3%). Cluster 3 (n = 41) demonstrated no change in RE (0.28 ± 0.65%). Cluster 1 demonstrated 1.7 km·h-1 greater MAS compared to cluster 2 (p = 0.014). CONCLUSION: The present study highlights that the effect of shoe bending stiffness on RE is runner-specific. High-level runners took advantage of increased bending stiffness, whereas medium-level runners did not. Finally, this study emphasizes the importance of individual response examination to understand the effect of footwear on runner's performance.