Screening for dilated cardiomyopathy in immediate family members: to whom, how, when (and where).

Dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) is defined by the presence of left ventricular dilation and systolic dysfunction in the absence of coronary artery disease, valvular disease, congenital heart disease, or altered haemodynamic conditions. Dilated cardiomyopathy can recognize multiple aetiologies, including infectious processes, effect of toxic substances, immunological mechanisms, and genetic causes. In recent years, many genes coding for proteins involved in the structure and function of the cardiomyocytes have been associated with the development of DCM, making the identification of familial forms increasingly frequent. At the same time, an ever-increasing use of cardiac magnetic resonance imaging has made it possible to identify early morpho-functional alterations in subjects with initial forms of the disease, or carriers of pathogenic genetic variants. The increasingly in-depth understanding of the genetic and molecular mechanisms operating in DCM has also favoured the development of new therapeutic strategies including drugs with molecular targets and gene therapies. In this panorama, screening of family members of patients affected by DCM represents an important tool for early diagnosis, treatment, and prognostic stratification. In relation to its clinical relevance and its complexity, it is important that family screening and follow-up of identified patients are carried out in units dedicated to the treatment and study of cardiomyopathies.

Echocardiography in Anderson-Fabry Disease.

Echocardiography is the most common diagnostic tool to screen for Fabry cardiomyopathy as it is fast, non-invasive, low-cost, widely available, easily applicable and reproducible. Echocardiography is the first-line investigation, being useful in all the stages of the disease: (1) in gene-positive patients, to unveil signs of early cardiac involvement and allowing timely treatment; (2) in patients with overt cardiomyopathy to estimate the severity of cardiac involvement, the possible related complications, and the effect of treatment. Recently, advanced echocardiographic techniques, such as speckle tracking analysis, are offering new insights in the assessment of Fabry disease patients and in the differential diagnosis of cardiomyopathies with hypertrophic phenotype. The aim of this review is to provide a comprehensive overview on the cardiac structural and functional abnormalities described in Fabry disease by means of echocardiography.

The Heart in Fabry Disease: Mechanisms Beyond Storage and Forthcoming Therapies.

In patients with Fabry disease (FD), cardiovascular involvement is the main cause of death and reduction of quality of life. Left ventricular hypertrophy mimicking hypertrophic cardiomyopathy is the main feature of FD cardiac involvement although glycolipid storage occurs in all cardiac cellular types. Accumulation of lysosomal globotriasylceramide represents the main mechanism of cardiac damage in early stages, but secondary pathways of cellular and tissue damage, triggered by lysosomal storage, and including altered energy production, inflammation and cell death, contribute to cardiac damage and disease progression. These mechanisms appear prominent in more advanced stages, hampering and reducing the efficacy of FD-specific treatments. Therefore, additional cardiovascular therapies are important to manage cardiovascular symptoms and reduce cardiovascular events. Although new therapies targeting lysosomal storage are in development, a better definition and comprehension of the complex pathophysiology of cardiac damage in FD, may lead to identify new therapeutic targets beyond storage and new therapeutic strategies.

Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Features of Fabry Disease: From Early Diagnosis to Prognostic Stratification.

In the past few years, the wide application of cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) significantly changed the approach to the study of cardiac involvement in Fabry Disease (FD). The possibility to perform non-invasive tissue characterization, including new sequences such as T1/T2 mapping, offered a powerful tool for differential diagnosis with other forms of left ventricular hypertrophy. In patients with confirmed diagnosis of FD, CMR is the most sensitive non-invasive technique for early detection of cardiac involvement and it provides new insight into the evolution of cardiac damage, including gender-specific features. Finally, CMR multiparametric detection of subtle changes in cardiac morphology, function and tissue composition is potentially useful for monitoring the efficacy of specific treatment over time. This paper aims to provide a comprehensive review of current knowledge regarding the application of CMR in FD cardiac involvement and its clinical implication.

From Atrial Fibrillation Management to Atrial Myopathy Assessment: The Evolving Concept of Left Atrium Disease in Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy.

Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) is the most prevalent genetically inherited cardiovascular disorder in adults and a significant cause of heart failure and sudden cardiac death. Historically, atrial fibrillation (AF) has been considered as a critical aspect in HCM patients as it is considered to be a marker of disease progression, escalates the frequency of heart failure hospitalisations, increases the risk of thromboembolic events, and worsens quality of life and outcome. Increasing evidence suggests that AF is the result of a subtle long-standing process that starts early in the history of HCM. The process of left atrial dilation accompanied by morphologic and functional remodelling is the quintessential prerequisite for the onset of AF. This review aims to describe the current understanding of AF pathophysiology in HCM, emphasising the role of left atrial myopathy in its development. In addition, we discuss risk factors and management strategies specific to AF in the context of HCM, providing insights into the complexities and challenges of treating this specific patient population.

Myocardial Work by Speckle-Tracking Echocardiography in Heart Transplant Recipients: Association Between Global Work Efficiency and Coronary Allograft Vasculopathy.

Coronary allograft vasculopathy (CAV) is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality after heart transplantation. CAV is often diagnosed in later stages or during routine screening in asymptomatic subjects. Myocardial work (MW), calculated using left ventricular global longitudinal strain (LV-GLS) and systemic blood pressure, may be associated with the presence of CAV and outperform conventional echocardiographic parameters. In this retrospective observational study, heart transplant recipients who underwent regular follow-up at our institution between May 2022 and September 2023 were enrolled. All included patients underwent speckle-tracking echocardiography, including MW indexes. CAV was classified according to invasive coronary angiography or computed tomography performed within 12 months of index echocardiography. We collected all available clinical and echocardiographic parameters and evaluated the potential association with CAV. CAV was detected in 29 of 93 patients (31%) (CAV+). Of the MW indexes, the mean global work efficiency (GWE) was 90 ± 6% and was significantly lower in CAV+ than CAV- subjects (86 ± 7% vs 91 ± 4%, p <0.001). GWE (OR 0.86, CI 0.77 to 0.94, p = 0.002), E/e' ratio (OR 1.27, CI 1.08 to 1.52, p = 0.006), and left ventricular ejection fraction (OR 0.90; CI 0.81 to 0.98, p = 0.017) were independently associated with the presence of CAV. GWE (GWE vs LV-GLS, delta area under the curve 0.154, p = 0.047) and the proposed model (GWE+E/e' vs LV-GLS, delta area under the curve 0.198, p = 0.004) were significantly superior in stratifying the incremental risk for CAV compared with LV-GLS. In conclusion, GWE was observed to be independently associated with the presence of CAV. MW could represent a novel noninvasive screening method for CAV in heart transplant recipients. Larger and prospective studies are needed to confirm this hypothesis.

Real-world candidacy to mavacamten in a contemporary hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy population.

AIMS: In the EXPLORER-HCM trial, mavacamten reduced left ventricular outflow tract obstruction (LVOTO) and improved functional capacity of symptomatic hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy (HOCM) patients. We sought to define the potential use of mavacamten by comparing real-world HOCM patients with those enrolled in EXPLORER-HCM and assessing their eligibility to treatment. METHODS AND RESULTS: We collected information on HOCM patients followed up at 25 Italian HCM outpatient clinics and with significant LVOTO (i.e. gradient ≥30 mmHg at rest or ≥50 mmHg after Valsalva manoeuvre or exercise) despite pharmacological or non-pharmacological therapy. Pharmacological or non-pharmacological therapy resolved LVOTO in 1044 (61.2%) of the 1706 HOCM patients under active follow-up, whereas 662 patients (38.8%) had persistent LVOTO. Compared to the EXPLORER-HCM trial population, these real-world HOCM patients were older (62.1 ± 14.3 vs. 58.5 ± 12.2 years, p = 0.02), had a lower body mass index (26.8 ± 5.3 vs. 29.7 ± 4.9 kg/m2 , p < 0.0001) and a more frequent history of atrial fibrillation (21.5% vs. 9.8%, p = 0.027). At echocardiography, they had lower left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF, 66 ± 7% vs. 74 ± 6%, p < 0.0001), higher left ventricular outflow tract gradients at rest (60 ± 27 vs. 52 ± 29 mmHg, p = 0.003), and larger left atrial volume index (49 ± 16 vs. 40 ± 12 ml/m2 , p < 0.0001). Overall, 324 (48.9%) would have been eligible for enrolment in the EXPLORER-HCM trial and 339 (51.2%) for treatment with mavacamten according to European guidelines. CONCLUSIONS: Real-world HOCM patients differ from the EXPLORER-HCM population for their older age, lower LVEF and larger atrial volume, potentially reflecting a more advanced stage of the disease. About half of real-world HOCM patients were found eligible to mavacamten.

Myocarditis and COVID-19 related issues.

The recent COVID-19 (Coronavirus Disease 2019) pandemic by SARS-CoV2 infection has caused millions of deaths and hospitalizations across the globe. In the early pandemic phases, the infection had been initially considered a primary pulmonary disease. However, increasing evidence has demonstrated a wide range of possible cardiac involvement. Most of systemic and cardiac damage is likely sustained by a complex interplay between inflammatory, immune-related and thrombotic mechanisms. Biventricular failure and myocardial damage with elevation of cardiac biomarkers have been reported in COVID-19 patients, although histological demonstration of acute myocarditis has been rarely documented. Indeed while cardiac magnetic resonance findings include different patterns of myocardial involvement in terms of late gadolinium enhancement, histological data from necropsy and endomyocardial biopsy showed peculiar inflammatory patterns, mostly composed by macrophages. On the other hand COVID-19 vaccines based on mRN technology have been also associated with increased risk of myocarditis. COVID-19 and mRNA vaccine-related myocarditis present different clinical and imaging presentations and recent data suggest the presence of distinctive immunological mechanisms involved.