A Cost-Effective Analysis of Systematically Using Mapping Systems During Catheter Ablation Procedures in Children and Teenagers.

The aim of this study is to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of an extended use of 3D non-fluoroscopic mapping systems (NMSs) during paediatric catheter ablation (CA) in an adult EP Lab. This study includes 58 consecutive patients (aged between 8 and 18) who underwent CA from March 2005 to February 2015. We compare the fluoroscopy data of two groups: group I, patients who underwent CA from 2005 to 2008 using only fluoroscopy, and group II, patients who underwent CA from 2008 to 2015 performed also using NMSs. Two cost-effectiveness analyses were carried out: the first method was based on the alpha value (AV), and the second one was based on the value of a statistical life (VSL). For both methods, a children's correction factor was also considered. The reduction cost estimated from all these methods was compared to the real additional cost of using NMSs. The use of an NMS during a CA procedure has led to an effective dose reduction (ΔE) of 2.8 milli-Sievert. All presented methods are based on parameters with a wide range of values. The use of an NMS, applying directly AV values or VSL values, is not cost-effective for most countries. Only considering the children's correction factor, the CA procedure using an NMS seems to be cost-effective. The cost-effectiveness of a systematic use of NMSs during CA procedures in children and teenagers remains a challenging task. A positive result depends on which value of AV or VSL is considered and if the children's correction factor is applied or not.

The Benefit of a General, Systematic Use of Mapping Systems During Electrophysiological Procedures in Children and Teenagers: The Experience of an Adult EP Laboratory.

Standard imaging during electrophysiological procedures (EPs) uses fluoroscopy. The aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility, efficacy, safety and effect of an extended use of non-fluoroscopic mapping systems (NMSs) for imaging during paediatric EPs in an adult EP laboratory focusing on the amount of X-ray exposure. This study is a retrospective analysis that includes consecutive young patients (83 pts, aged between 8 and 18) who underwent EPs from March 2005 to February 2015. We compare the fluoroscopy data of two groups of pts: Group I, pts who underwent EPs from 2005 to 2008 using only fluoroscopy and Group II, pts who underwent EPs from 2008 to 2015 performed also using NMSs. The use of an NMS resulted in reduced fluoroscopy time in Group II {median value 0.1 min (95 % CI [0.00-1.07])} compared to Group I {median value 3.55 min (95 % CI [1.93-7.83]) (MW test, P < 0.05)}. There was a complementary reduction in the total X-ray exposure from 2.53 Gy cm(2) (95 % CI [1.51-4.66]) in Group I to 0.05 Gy cm(2) in Group II (95 % CI [0.00-1.22]) (MW test, P < 0.05). Regarding ablation procedures, the median effective dose decreased from 3.04 mSv (95 % CI [1.22-6.89]) to 0.25 mSv (95 % CI [0.00-0.60]) (MW test, P < 0.05). The use of an NMS dramatically reduces fluoroscopy time and total X-ray exposure during EPs in children and teenagers in an adult EP laboratory. In our experience, this reduction is mainly related to the systematic day-to-day use of NMSs.

Coronary sinus activation patterns in patients with and without left bundle branch block undergoing electroanatomic mapping system-guided cardiac resynchronization therapy device implantation.

BACKGROUND: Implantation of the left ventricular (LV) lead in segments with delayed electrical activation may improve response to cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the amount and regional distribution of LV electrical delay (LVED) in patients with or without left bundle branch block (LBBB). METHODS: We enrolled 60 patients who underwent electroanatomic mapping system-guided CRT device implantation. Activation mapping of the coronary sinus (CS) branches was performed using an insulated guidewire. LVED was defined as the interval between the beginning of the QRS complex on the surface electrocardiogram (ECG) and the local electrogram and expressed in milliseconds or as percentage of the total QRS duration (LVED%). RESULTS: Forty-three patients showed a LBBB and 17 a non-LBBB electrocardiographic pattern. A total of 148 CS branches (mean 2.5 per patient; range 2-4 per patient) were mapped. Patients with LBBB showed higher maximum LVED (135 ms [108-150 ms] vs 100 ms [103-110 ms]; P < .001) and LVED% (86% [79%-89%] vs 72% [54%-80%]; P < .001) than did patients without LBBB. The maximum LVED was recorded in mid-basal anterolateral or inferolateral LV segments (traditional CRT targets), significantly more often in patients with LBBB than in patients without LBBB (85% vs 59%; P = .02). The number of CS branches showing LVED >50% of the total QRS duration, >75% of the total QRS duration, and >85 ms was significantly higher in patients with LBBB than in patients without LBBB. CONCLUSION: Patients without LBBB showed lower LVED and more heterogeneous electrical activation of the CS than did patients with LBBB. This finding may contribute to a lower rate of response to CRT of patients without LBBB and suggests the use of activation mapping to guide LV lead placement.