Nasal Ketorolac Challenge Using Acoustic Rhinometry in Patients With Aspirin-Exacerbated Respiratory Disease.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Safer and less time-consuming alternatives to single-blind placebo-controlled oral challenge (SBPCOC) have been sought for the diagnosis of aspirin-exacerbated respiratory disease (AERD). Nasal challenges with various nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and assessment methods have been developed. Objective: Our objective was to evaluate the utility and safety of nasal ketorolac challenge (NKC) using acoustic rhinometry in patients with suspected AERD. METHODS: The study population comprised 36 patients with suspected AERD. NKC was performed with placebo (saline) and 13 mg of ketorolac sprayed as aerosol into both nostrils. A positive challenge result was defined as an increase of ≥30% in nasal symptoms (recorded using a visual analog scale) and a 30% drop in the sum of the volumes of both nasal cavities at 2-8 cm. Patients with a negative NKC result underwent SBPCOC with aspirin (cumulative dose of 750 mg). RESULTS: A naso-ocular reaction during NKC was detected in 21 patients. Four patients also developed mild asthma exacerbations (although only 1 experienced a decrease in FEV1 >15%). No other significant adverse events occurred. The remaining 15 patients with a negative NKC result had a negative response during aspirin SBPCOC. CONCLUSIONS: NKC assessed using acoustic rhinometry is a reliable method for the study of patients with AERD. We suggest that NKC assessed with acoustic rhinometry was useful and safe for selection of candidates for safe oral aspirin challenge.

Management of Pregnancy and Delivery in Patients With Hereditary Angioedema Due to C1 Inhibitor Deficiency.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: There is little information on pregnancy and delivery in patients with hereditary angioedema due to C1 inhibitor deficiency (C1INH-HAE). The aim of this study was to describe the effect of pregnancy and deliveries on symptoms of C1INH-HAE and review the need for and safety of treatments available during the study period. METHODS: Retrospective review using a purpose-designed questionnaire of 61 C1INH-HAE patients from 5 hospitals specialized in the management of HAE in Spain. The outcomes measured were number of pregnancies, changes in symptoms during pregnancy and delivery, mode of delivery, type of anesthesia during delivery, treatments received, and tolerance of treatments. RESULTS: We reviewed 125 full-term pregnancies (89 without a prior diagnosis of C1INH-HAE), 14 miscarriages, and 4 induced abortions. Patients reported an increased frequency of C1INH-HAE symptoms in 59.2% of pregnancies (74/125) and the presence of symptoms throughout pregnancy in 40% (50/125). Prophylactic C1INH-HAE therapy was used during 9 (7.2%) of the 125 pregnancies. Nine patients--in 11 pregnancies (8.8 %)--received treatment for acute attacks. Most deliveries (n=110, 88%) were vaginal. A cesarean section was necessary in 15 cases (12%). Short-term prophylaxis with pdhC1INH was administered before 14 deliveries (11.2 %); 111 deliveries (88.8 %) were performed without premedication and were well tolerated. Anesthesia was used in 51 deliveries (40.8%). CONCLUSIONS: Pregnancy has a variable influence on the clinical expression of C1INH-HAE. Attacks tend to occur more frequently but not to increase in severity. Vaginal delivery was mostly well tolerated. pdhC1INH prophylaxis should be administered prior to cesarean delivery and is also recommended before vaginal delivery if there are additional risk factors. pdhC1INH should always be available in the delivery room.

Knowledge, attitude and adherence of Spanish healthcare professionals to asthma management recommendations during pregnancy.

BACKGROUND: The aim of the present study was to evaluate the knowledge, attitude and adherence to asthma management recommendations during pregnancy of Spanish health care professionals. METHODS: A multiple choice survey with 14 questions was designed. Items assessed opinion about asthma guidelines and attitudes towards treatment, spirometry, specific immunotherapy and labour in pregnant asthmatic patients. Test completion was voluntary, individual, and anonymous. RESULTS: A total of 1000 questionnaires were fulfilled: respiratory medicine specialists (19.8%); allergy specialists (17.2%); primary care physicians (46.1%); and gynaecologists/obstetricians (16.9%). Guidelines were considered useful by 96.5% although 64% admitted that they followed them seldom or never. Most physicians (55.9%) answered that they would maintain asthma therapy in clinically stable patients. Almost 30% of physicians would not perform spirometry in pregnant asthma patients. 19% declared they would interrupt specific immunotherapy which had proven safe and effective. Univariate analysis revealed low adherence to be associated with the following variables: age, primary care or gynaecology/obstetrician specialisation, number of asthmatics attended per month, and declared use of guidelines for pregnant asthmatic patients. Multivariate analysis showed that being a primary care physician and a gynaecologist/obstetrician, attending a low number of asthma patients per month, and poor use of spirometry during pregnancy are associated to low adherence to asthma guidelines. CONCLUSION: Even though the majority of Spanish physicians surveyed seem to consider guidelines useful, their adherence to those is very low if translated to managing pregnant asthmatic patients. Educational strategies seem unavoidable and should be targetted mainly to primary care and gynaecology/obstetrician physicians.

NSAID-sensitive antihistamine-induced urticaria/angioedema.

We present a case of urticaria caused by antihistamines in a patient with nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) sensitivity. A 35-year-old man experienced, on 2 separate occasions, immediate generalized urticaria during treatment with ibuprofen and naproxen, respectively. A single-blind, placebo-controlled oral challenge (SBPCOC) with piroxicam was carried out, and resulted in urticaria and angioedema 3 hours later. Two hours after initial clinical resolution, the patient developed multiple wheals on the trunk and upper limbs. He described similar delayed reactions after oral antihistamine administration on previous occasions. SBPCOCs with acetaminophen and etoricoxib were performed, with good tolerance. Skin prick and patch tests with loratadine and cetirizine were negative. After an SBPCOC with loratadine, the patient developed generalized urticaria 90 minutes after intake. Tolerance to fexofenadine 180 mg was confirmed. We describe the first case of a possible new subset of antihistamine urticaria, and suggest calling this NSAID-sensitive antihistamine-induced urticaria/angioedema.

Consensus statement on the diagnosis, management, and treatment of angioedema mediated by bradykinin. Part I. Classification, epidemiology, pathophysiology, genetics, clinical symptoms, and diagnosis.

BACKGROUND: There are no Spanish guidelines or consensus statement on bradykinin-induced angioedema. AIM: To review the pathophysiology, genetics, and clinical symptoms of the different types of bradykinin-induced angioedema and to draft a consensus statement in light of currently available scientific evidence and the experience of experts. This statement will serve as a guideline to health professionals. METHODS: The consensus was led by the Spanish Study Group on Bradykinin-Induced Angioedema (SGBA), a working group of the Spanish Society of Allergology and Clinical Immunology. A review was conducted of scientific papers on different types of bradykinin-induced angioedema (hereditary and acquired angioedema due to C1 inhibitor deficiency, hereditary angioedema related to estrogens, angioedema induced by angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors). Several discussion meetings of the SGBA were held in Madrid to reach the consensus. RESULTS: The pathophysiology, genetics, and clinical symptoms of the different types of angioedema are reviewed. Diagnostic approaches are discussed and the consensus reached is described. CONCLUSIONS: A review of bradykinin-induced angioedema and a consensus on diagnosis are presented.

Consensus statement on the diagnosis, management, and treatment of angioedema mediated by bradykinin. Part II. Treatment, follow-up, and special situations.

BACKGROUND: There are no previous Spanish guidelines or consensus statements on bradykinin-induced angioedema. AIM: To draft a consensus statement on the management and treatment of angioedema mediated by bradykinin in light of currently available scientific evidence and the experience of experts. This statement will serve as a guideline to health professionals. METHODS: The consensus was led by the Spanish Study Group on Bradykinin-Induced Angioedema, a working group of the Spanish Society of Allergology and Clinical Immunology. A review was conducted of scientific papers on different types of bradykinin-induced angioedema (hereditary and acquired angioedema due to C1 inhibitor deficiency, hereditary angioedema related to estrogens, angioedema induced by angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors). Several discussion meetings were held to reach the consensus. RESULTS: Treatment approaches are discussed, and the consensus reached is described. Specific situations are addressed, namely, pregnancy, contraception, travelling, blood donation, and organ transplantation. CONCLUSIONS: A review of and consensus on treatment of bradykinin-induced angioedema is presented.

A Review of the Latest Recommendations on the Management of Chronic Urticaria: A Multidisciplinary Consensus Statement from Andalusia, Spain. / Revisión de las últimas novedades en el manejo del paciente con urticaria crónica: Consenso multidisciplinar de la comunidad autónoma de Andalucía.

Chronic urticaria is a difficult-to-treat skin disorder that has a major impact on patient quality of life. The latest update of the European guideline on the management of urticaria was published in 2018. In this consensus statement, produced in the autonomous community of Andalusia, Spain, we describe a multidisciplinary approach for applying the new treatment algorithm proposed by the European guideline in our region.