Diverting Loop Ileostomy in the Management of Medically Refractory Constipation Cases Not Falling Into Classical Categories.

BACKGROUND: The approach to constipation refractory to medical management does not necessarily follow classical teaching and is challenging. Although the role of surgery is unclear, diverting loop ileostomy may be offered to gauge symptom response followed by colectomy for appropriate patients. OBJECTIVE: Our goal was to examine outcomes in patients with constipation not falling into classical subtypes who underwent diverting loop ileostomy creation as the initial surgical intervention. Our secondary aim was to offer patients colectomy and anastomosis and examine their outcome if they improved after ileostomy. DESIGN: The study design was a retrospective review. SETTINGS: This study was conducted in the pelvic floor center of our colorectal surgery department from January 2006 to December 2018. PATIENTS: Patients with medically refractory constipation referred for surgical consideration and not falling into classical constipation categories (slow transit, normal transit, or pelvic floor dysfunction) underwent evaluation with transit marker study, cinedefecography, and anal physiology and were offered ileostomy as initial surgical management. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary measures were symptom improvement and self-reported quality of life improvement with increased patient satisfaction. RESULTS: Eighty-seven patients underwent diverting loop ileostomy as initial surgical therapy. Group 1 had 54 (62%) patients who self-reported symptom improvement, discontinued anticonstipation medication, and had ileostomy output >200 mL/day. Of these 54 patients, 25 had colectomy with anastomosis, 16 (64%) of whom had symptom improvement, stayed off bowel medication, and had >1 bowel movement daily. Group 2 had 33 patients who did not meet the above criteria after initial ileostomy. Nine patients in group 2 elected colectomy with anastomosis after intensive counseling; 6 (66%) reported the same positive results above. LIMITATIONS: The study limitations included: 1) no objective outcome measures of patient's perceived symptom improvement and satisfaction and 2) retrospective review. CONCLUSION: Initial creation of diverting loop ileostomy may be offered to a subset of refractory constipation patients not falling into classical categories after thorough workup. Patients who self-report symptom improvement, have ileostomy output >200 mL/day, and do not require bowel medication may have acceptable results with subsequent colectomy and ileorectal anastomosis. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/B854. ILEOSTOMA EN ASA DERIVATIVA EN CASOS DE ESTREIMIENTO REFRACTARIOS AL TRATAMIENTO MDICO, QUE NO PERTENECEN A LAS CATEGORAS CLSICAS: ANTECEDENTES:El enfoque del estreñimiento refractario al tratamiento médico, que no siempre se presenta como las formas descritas clasicamente, es un desafío. Si bien el papel de la cirugía no está claro, se puede ofrecer una ileostomía en asa para medir la respuesta de los síntomas, seguida de colectomía en pacientes seleccionados.OBJETIVO:Evaluar los resultados de pacientes con estreñimiento, que no pertenecen a las formas clásicas de presentación, que se les realizó una ileostomía en asa de derivación, como intervención quirúrgica inicial. El objetivo secundario fue ofrecer a los pacientes una colectomía con anastomosis primaria y evaluar si mejoraban sus resultados después de la ileostomía.DISEÑO:El diseño del estudio fue una revisión retrospectiva.MARCO:Este estudio se realizó en el centro del piso pélvico de nuestro departamento de cirugía colorrectal, e incluyo los pacientes atendidos entre enero de 2006 y diciembre de 2018.PACIENTES:Se incluyeron los pacientes con estreñimiento refractario al tratamiento médico, derivados para evaluación quirúrgica, que no presentaban las formas clásicas de presentación (tránsito lento, tránsito normal, disfunción del suelo pélvico). Estos se sometieron a evaluación con estudio de tránsito colónico, cinedefecografía y fisiología anal, y se les ofreció una ileostomía en asa como tratamiento quirúrgico inicial.PRINCIPALES MEDIDAS DE RESULTADO:Las primeras medidas fueron la mejora de los síntomas y la calidad de vida informado por el paciente.RESULTADOS:Ochenta y siete pacientes fueron sometidos a ileostomía en asa como tratamiento quirúrgico inicial. El grupo 1 tenía 54 (62%) pacientes que informaron mejoría de los síntomas, interrumpieron la medicación proquinética y tuvieron un débito por la ileostomía >200 cc/día. De estos 54 pacientes, 25 se sometieron a colectomía más anastomosis primaria y 16 (64%) tuvieron una mejoría de los síntomas, dejaron de tomar medicamentos proquinéticos y tuvieron más de una evacuación al día. El grupo 2 tenía 33 pacientes que no cumplían con los criterios de mejoría de los síntomas después de la ileostomía inicial. Nueve pacientes del grupo 2 eligieron colectomía con anastomosis después de un asesoramiento intensivo, 6 (66%) informaron resultados positivos de mejoría de los síntomas.LIMITACIONES:Las limitaciones del estudio incluyeron 1) ninguna medida de resultado objetiva de la mejora y satisfacción de los síntomas percibidos por el paciente 2) revisión retrospectiva.CONCLUSIÓNES:La creación inicial de una ileostomía en asa de derivación se puede ofrecer a un subgrupo de pacientes con estreñimiento refractario que no entran en las categorías clásicas después de un estudio exhaustivo. La mejoría de los síntomas, informado por los pacientes, producción de ileostomía >200 cc/día y que no requieren medicación proquinética, pueden tener resultados aceptables con colectomía y anastomosis ileorrectal. Consulte Video Resumen en http://links.lww.com/DCR/Bxxx. (Traducción-Dr. Rodrigo Azolas).

Per-oral Pyloromyotomy (POP) for Medically Refractory Gastroparesis: Short Term Results From the First 100 Patients at a High Volume Center.

OBJECTIVE: For patients with gastroparesis, temporary pyloric disruption has been shown to improve symptoms and gastric emptying. Per-oral pyloromyotomy (POP) is an innovative endoscopic procedure to divide the pylorus from within a submucosal tunnel, as a corollary to surgical pyloromyotomy. Here we evaluate subjective and objective outcomes 12-weeks after POP at a high volume center. METHODS: The first 100 consecutive patients undergoing POP were included, with procedure dates between January 2016 and October 2017. Patients were evaluated using the Gastroparesis Cardinal Symptom Index (GCSI), and 4-hour solid-phase scintigraphic gastric emptying studies (GES) prior to procedure and at 90 days post-POP RESULTS:: The study cohort was 85% female with a mean age of 45.0 ±â€Š14.6 years. Gastroparesis etiologies were divided among idiopathic (56%), diabetic (21%), postsurgical (19%), and other in 4%. There were 67% of the patients who had previous endoscopic or surgical interventions for gastroparesis. Most POP procedures were performed in the operating room (97%) and were completed in an average of 33 minutes. Ten patients incurred complications (10%), which included 1 diagnostic laparoscopy and 2 cases of gastrointestinal bleeding. Overall GCSI improved from a preoperative mean of 3.82 ±â€Š0.86 to 2.54 ±â€Š1.2 (P < 0.001). The improvement in each GCSI subscore was also highly statistically significant. Among the patients with postoperative GES available, 78% had objectively better 4-hour emptying with a mean improvement in retention by 23.6% (P < 0.001). This included 57% of patients with normal gastric emptying post-POP. CONCLUSION: For patients with medically refractory gastroparesis, POP results in both subjective and objective improvement in the majority of patients. Prior intervention does not obviate POP as a therapeutic option. POP should be included along the treatment algorithm for patients with gastroparesis as an organ-sparing procedure.

Per oral endoscopic pyloromyotomy for refractory gastroparesis: initial results from a single institution.

INTRODUCTION: Gastroparesis is a debilitating disease characterized by delayed gastric emptying in the absence of mechanical obstruction. A new intramural technique, per oral endoscopic pyloromyotomy (POP), has been proposed as an alternative to surgical pyloroplasty for the management of medical refractory gastroparesis. Herein, we detail the short-term results of POP at our institution. METHODS: POP was first performed at our institution in January 2016. All patients undergoing POP for management of gastroparesis from January 2016 through January 2017 were prospectively followed. All patients underwent a 4-h, non-extrapolated gastric emptying scintigraphy study and were asked to rate their symptoms using the Gastroparesis Cardinal Symptom Index (GCSI) at their pre-procedure visit and at 3 months post-procedure. RESULTS: A total of 47 patients underwent POP during the defined study period. Twenty-seven (57.4%) patients had idiopathic gastroparesis, 12 (25.6%) had diabetic gastroparesis, and eight (17.0%) had post-surgical gastroparesis. Forty-one (87.2%) patients had at least one previous intervention (i.e., enteral feeding tube, gastric pacer, botox injection) for their gastroparesis symptoms. All patients had evidence of gastroparesis on pre-procedure gastric emptying studies. The average length of hospital stay was 1 day. One patient died within 30-days of their index procedure which was unrelated to the procedure itself. The average pre-procedure percentage of retained food at 4 h was 37% compared to an average post-procedure percentage of 20% (p < 0.03). The average pre-procedure GCSI score was 4.6 compared to an average post-procedure GCSI of 3.3 (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: POP is a safe and feasible endoscopic intervention for medical refractory gastroparesis. Additional follow-up is required to determine the long-term success of this approach in alleviating gastroparesis symptoms.