Good acceptability of HIV, HBV, and HCV screening during immigration medical check-up amongst migrants in France in the STRADA study.

INTRODUCTION: The prevalence of HIV, hepatitis B, and hepatitis C amongst migrants in France is high. Thus, effective screening and follow-up is needed. The mandatory medical check-up for residency application is an opportunity to offer rapid HIV and hepatitis testing. The main objective of the STRADA study is to create a feasible and acceptable screening strategy for migrants. Within the STRADA study, this qualitative research examined the acceptability of conducting screening tests in the context of residency application. METHODS: We conducted a qualitative study amongst legal migrants over 18 years of age with sufficient knowledge of the French, English, or Arabic language. Interviews were performed following a semi-structured interview guide of open-ended questions. Interviews were transcribed verbatim and subsequently analyzed through thematic analysis. RESULTS: We interviewed 34 migrants. Mean age was 32.6 (min-max: 19, 59) years. The participants' region of origin was mostly Sub-Saharan Africa and the main reason for migrating to France was family reunification. Migrants' acceptability of HIV and hepatitis testing was high. Participants who accepted testing indicated a benefit for individual health and to avoid transmission. Most preferred rapid tests; reluctance was related to anxiety about the immediate results and the perceived reliability of rapid tests. Migrants' knowledge about HIV was satisfactory, but inadequate for hepatitis. Screening in the context of a compulsory medical visit did not present an obstacle for acceptability. Some expressed concern in the case of HIV but when explained, the independence between obtaining the residence permit along with screening and access to medical care was well understood. DISCUSSION: Medical check-ups at immigration centers is an opportunity to screen for HIV and hepatitis which is considered acceptable by migrants. Informing migrants that test results do not affect residency applications, and incorporating their preferences, are all important to optimize the acceptability of screening.

2020 recommendations from the French Society of Rheumatology for the management of gout: Urate-lowering therapy.

OBJECTIVE: To develop French Society of Rheumatology-endorsed recommendations for the management of urate-lowering therapy (ULT). METHODS: Evidence-based recommendations were developed by 9 rheumatologists (academic or community-based), 3 general practitioners, 1 cardiologist, 1 nephrologist and 1 patient, using a systematic literature search, one physical meeting to draft recommendations and two Delphi rounds to finalize them. RESULTS: A set of 3 overarching principles and 5 recommendations was elaborated. The overarching principles emphasize the importance of patient education, especially the need for explaining the objective of lowering serum urate (SU) level to obtain crystal dissolution, clinical symptoms disappearance and avoidance of complications. ULT is indicated as soon as the diagnosis of gout is established. SU level must be decreased below 300µmol/l (50mg/l) in all gout patients or at least below 360µmol/l (60ml/l) when the 300µmol/l target cannot be reached, and must be maintained at these targets and monitored life-long. The choice of the ULT primarily relies on renal function: in patients whose estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) is above 60ml/min/1.73m2, first-line ULT is allopurinol; in those with eGFR between 30 and 60ml/min/1.73m2, allopurinol use must be cautious and febuxostat can be considered as an alternative; and in those whose eGFR is below 30ml/min/1.73m2, allopurinol must be avoided and febuxostat should be preferred. Prophylaxis of ULT-induced gout flares involves progressive increase of ULT dosage and low-dose colchicine for at least 6 months. Cardiovascular risk factors and diseases, the metabolic syndrome and chronic kidney disease must be screened and managed. CONCLUSION: These recommendations aim to provide simple and clear guidance for the management of ULT in France.

2020 Recommendations from the French Society of Rheumatology for the management of gout: Management of acute flares.

OBJECTIVE: To develop French Society of Rheumatology-endorsed recommendations for the management of gout flares. METHODS: These evidence-based recommendations were developed by 9 rheumatologists (academic or community-based), 3 general practitioners, 1 cardiologist, 1 nephrologist and 1 patient, using a systematic literature search, one physical meeting to draft recommendations and 2 Delphi rounds to finalize them. RESULTS: A set of 4 overarching principles and 4 recommendations was elaborated. The overarching principles emphasize the importance of patient education, including the need to auto-medicate for gout flares as early as possible, if possible within the first 12h after the onset, according to a pre-defined treatment. Patients must know that gout is a chronic disease, often requiring urate-lowering therapy in addition to flare treatment. Comorbidities and the risk of drug interaction should be screened carefully in every patient as they may contraindicate some anti-inflammatory treatments. Colchicine must be early prescribed at the following dosage: 1mg then 0.5mg one hour later, followed by 0.5mg,2 to 3 times/day over the next days. In case of diarrhea, which is the first symptom of colchicine poisoning, dosage must be reduced. Colchicine dosage must also be reduced in patients with chronic kidney disease or taking drugs, which interfere with its metabolism. Other first-line treatment options are systemic/intra-articular corticosteroids, or non-steroidal anti-inflammatory agents (NSAIDs). IL-1 inhibitors can be considered as a second-line option in case of failure, intolerance or contraindication to colchicine, corticosteroids and NSAIDs. They are contraindicated in cases of infection and neutrophil blood count should be monitored. CONCLUSION: These recommendations aim to provide strategies for the safe use of anti-inflammatory agents, in order to improve the management of gout flares.

Partners and nurses' knowledge and representations of gout: A qualitative study.

Adherence to gout treatment is poor. Partners of patients and nurses are two major communicators with gouty patients, and their perceptions of illness may affect patient behavior. OBJECTIVE: To explore partners' and nurses' knowledge and representations of gout. METHODS: We used a qualitative grounded approach with semi-structured face-to-face individual interviews with a purposive sample of hospital nurses working in rheumatology and internal medicine departments and patient partners. Interviews were audio-recorded and transcribed. All authors met regularly to discuss coding and data interpretation. RESULTS: Overall, 20 nurses and 12 partners participated in the interviews. Four major themes were evidenced: knowledge gaps (gout cause was unknown, unawareness of urate-lowering therapy and the possibility to cure gout, focus in gout flare and diet); lack of information and education on gout (knowledge acquired by personal experiences, nurses complained to be insufficiently educated, partners highlighted the lack of information and that general practitioners did not have time to educate patients); gout consequences and social impacts (handicapping disease, avoid social activities like dinner with friends); attitudes towards gout flare and patient management (feeling powerless during flare, negative feelings such as being ashamed leading to postpone medical seek or unconcerned about their partner disease). Nurses regretted that they had not enough time to discuss issues with patients. CONCLUSION: Partners and nurses' knowledge of gout is based on daily experiences. Participants were eager to learn more about gout. Nurses' education and education programs including partners may improve gout management and patient adherence to treatment.