Sports Medicine Research Practices for Categorizing Transgender and/or Intersex Participants.

CONTEXT: Approximately 1 to 1.4 million individuals (0.58% of the population) in the United States identify as transgender, yet no literature could be found regarding how researchers should adapt clinical research studies when intersex or transgender individuals volunteer as participants. Therefore, the objective was to determine if there is a consensus among recently published researchers in 3 athletic training and sports medicine journals regarding procedures used to categorize participants and data of transgender or intersex individuals in a research study. METHODS: The authors developed a 14-item survey using Qualtrics XM to assess how researchers categorize individuals and their data when intersex or transgender individuals volunteer to participate in clinical research studies that are not intended to focus on intersex or transgender individuals. The survey was sent to 378 individuals in athletic training and related fields who recently published research manuscripts from 2018 to 2020 in one or more of 3 leading journals in the field including the Journal of Athletic Training, the Journal of Sport Rehabilitation, and the Athletic Training and Sports Health Care Journal. RESULTS: A total of 82 respondents completed the survey, yielding a response rate of 21.69%. When categorizing research participants who were not using hormones or surgery to transition, several respondents were unsure how to categorize transgender individuals (n = 14, 17.1%) or intersex individuals (n = 35, 42.7%). If the research participant was using hormones and/or surgery to transition, many respondents were unsure how to categorize the sex of the individual (n = 27, 32.9%). Only 5 (6.1%) respondents indicated that their organization has policies that guide their inclusion of transgender and/or intersex individuals in research studies. CONCLUSIONS: There does not appear to be consensus among researchers who recently published in athletic training and sports medicine journals regarding how to categorize transgender and intersex individuals who volunteer to participate in research studies.

Assessing physical activity during youth sport: the Observational System for Recording Activity in Children: Youth Sports.

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the validity and interrater reliability of the Observational System for Recording Activity in Children: Youth Sports (OSRAC:YS). Children (N = 29) participating in a parks and recreation soccer program were observed during regularly scheduled practices. Physical activity (PA) intensity and contextual factors were recorded by momentary time-sampling procedures (10-second observe, 20-second record). Two observers simultaneously observed and recorded children's PA intensity, practice context, social context, coach behavior, and coach proximity. Interrater reliability was based on agreement (Kappa) between the observer's coding for each category, and the Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC) for percent of time spent in MVPA. Validity was assessed by calculating the correlation between OSRAC:YS estimated and objectively measured MVPA. Kappa statistics for each category demonstrated substantial to almost perfect interobserver agreement (Kappa = 0.67-0.93). The ICC for percent time in MVPA was 0.76 (95% C.I. = 0.49-0.90). A significant correlation (r = .73) was observed for MVPA recorded by observation and MVPA measured via accelerometry. The results indicate the OSRAC:YS is a reliable and valid tool for measuring children's PA and contextual factors during a youth soccer practice.

Measurement of general and specific approaches to physical activity parenting: a systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Parents play a significant role in shaping youth physical activity (PA). However, interventions targeting PA parenting have been ineffective. Methodological inconsistencies related to the measurement of parental influences may be a contributing factor. The purpose of this article is to review the extant peer-reviewed literature related to the measurement of general and specific parental influences on youth PA. METHODS: A systematic review of studies measuring constructs of PA parenting was conducted. Computerized searches were completed using PubMed, MEDLINE, Academic Search Premier, SPORTDiscus, and PsycINFO. Reference lists of the identified articles were manually reviewed as well as the authors' personal collections. Articles were selected on the basis of strict inclusion criteria and details regarding the measurement protocols were extracted. A total of 117 articles met the inclusionary criteria. Methodological articles that evaluated the validity and reliability of PA parenting measures (n=10) were reviewed separately from parental influence articles (n=107). RESULTS: A significant percentage of studies used measures with indeterminate validity and reliability. A significant percentage of articles did not provide sample items, describe the response format, or report the possible range of scores. No studies were located that evaluated sensitivity to change. CONCLUSION: The reporting of measurement properties and the use of valid and reliable measurement scales need to be improved considerably.