Survey of patient-specific quality assurance practice for IMRT and VMAT.

A first-time survey across 15 cancer centers in Ontario, Canada, on the current practice of patient-specific quality assurance (PSQA) for intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) and volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) delivery was conducted. The objectives were to assess the current state of PSQA practice, identify areas for potential improvement, and facilitate the continued improvement in standardization, consistency, efficacy, and efficiency of PSQA regionally. The survey asked 40 questions related to PSQA practice for IMRT/VMAT delivery. The questions addressed PSQA policy and procedure, delivery log evaluation, instrumentation, measurement setup and methodology, data analysis and interpretation, documentation, process, failure modes, and feedback. The focus of this survey was on PSQA activities related to routine IMRT/VMAT treatments on conventional linacs, including stereotactic body radiation therapy but excluding stereotactic radiosurgery. The participating centers were instructed to submit answers that reflected the collective view or opinion of their department and represented the most typical process practiced. The results of the survey provided a snapshot of the current state of PSQA practice in Ontario and demonstrated considerable variations in the practice. A large majority (80%) of centers performed PSQA measurements on all VMAT plans. Most employed pseudo-3D array detectors with a true composite (TC) geometry. No standard approach was found for stopping or reducing frequency of measurements. The sole use of delivery log evaluation was not widely implemented, though most centers expressed interest in adopting this technology. All used the Gamma evaluation method for analyzing PSQA measurements; however, no universal approach was reported on how Gamma evaluation and pass determination criteria were determined. All or some PSQA results were reviewed regularly in two-thirds of the centers. Planning related issues were considered the most frequent source for PSQA failures (40%), whereas the most frequent course of action for a failed PSQA was to review the result and decide whether to proceed to treatment.

Effect of Supine vs Prone Breast Radiotherapy on Acute Toxic Effects of the Skin Among Women With Large Breast Size: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Importance: Women with large breast size treated with adjuvant breast radiotherapy (RT) have a high rate of acute toxic effects of the skin. Breast RT in the prone position is one strategy that may decrease these toxic effects. Objective: To determine if breast RT in the prone position reduces acute toxic effects of the skin when compared with treatment in the supine position. Design, Setting, and Participants: This phase 3, multicenter, single-blind randomized clinical trial accrued patients from 5 centers across Canada from April 2013 to March 2018 to compare acute toxic effects of breast RT for women with large breast size (bra band ≥40 in and/or ≥D cup) in the prone vs supine positions. A total of 378 patients were referred for adjuvant RT and underwent randomization. Seven patients randomized to supine position were excluded (5 declined treatment and 2 withdrew consent), and 14 patients randomized to prone position were excluded (4 declined treatment, 3 had unacceptable cardiac dose, and 7 were unable to tolerate being prone). Data were analyzed from April 2019 through September 2020. Interventions: Patients were randomized to RT in the supine or prone position. From April 2013 until June 2016, all patients (n = 167) received 50 Gy in 25 fractions (extended fractionation) with or without boost (range, 10-16 Gy). After trial amendment in June 2016, the majority of patients (177 of 190 [93.2%]) received the hypofractionation regimen of 42.5 Gy in 16 fractions. Main Outcomes and Measures: Main outcome was moist desquamation (desquamation). Results: Of the 357 women (mean [SD] age, 61 [9.9] years) included in the analysis, 182 (51.0%) were treated in the supine position and 175 (49.0%) in prone. There was statistically significantly more desquamation in patients treated in the supine position compared with prone (72 of 182 [39.6%] patients vs 47 of 175 [26.9%] patients; OR, 1.78; 95% CI, 1.24-2.56; P = .002), which was confirmed on multivariable analysis (OR, 1.99; 95% CI, 1.48-2.66; P < .001), along with other independent factors: use of boost (OR, 2.71; 95% CI, 1.95-3.77; P < .001), extended fractionation (OR, 2.85; 95% CI, 1.41-5.79; P = .004), and bra size (OR, 2.56; 95% CI, 1.50-4.37; P < .001). Conclusions and Relevance: This randomized clinical trial confirms that treatment in the prone position decreases desquamation in women with large breast size receiving adjuvant RT. It also shows increased toxic effects using an RT boost and conventional fractionation. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01815476.

Quantitative fluorescence imaging of point-like sources in small animals.

A planar imaging approach is described for the in vivo quantitative reconstruction of fluorescent point sources in small animals. The method uses the diffusion approximation as a forward model of light propagation from a point source in a homogeneous tissue to find source depth and strength. The tissue optical properties obtained from video reflectometry measurements were used to compensate for the effects of tissue heterogeneity. The method was evaluated on images of fluorescent sources implanted 2-8.5 mm deep in the thigh and abdomen of rats post mortem. In more than 70% of the total number of implants the source depth was retrieved with an error of less than 1 mm. The largest absolute error was 1.9 mm. In retrieving source strength, the errors ranged from 0.4% to 89% generally increasing with increased source depth.

Introduction of moderate deep inspiration breath hold for radiation therapy of left breast: Initial experience of a regional cancer center.

PURPOSE: Practical aspects of introducing moderate deep inspiration breath hold (mDIBH) for treatment of left breast cancer in a regional cancer program in terms of workflow and treatment delivery requirements are described. Differences in heart and lung doses between free breathing (FB) and mDIBH plans are presented as well as heart position reproducibility and resulting dosimetric impact using cone beam computed tomography (CBCT). METHODS AND MATERIALS: A mDIBH process was established. Therapists observed duration and quantity of breath holds required for setup, imaging, and beam delivery during treatment. Treatment plans were generated on the FB and mDIBH CT datasets allowing comparison of heart and lung dose-volume data for 50 patients. Five consecutive CBCT images were used to measure the distance between the heart and chest wall for 5 patients. Estimates of dose to the translated heart were then made with the treatment planning system. RESULTS: When compared with FB delivery, mDIBH treatment time for tangents and boosts increased by 5 minutes, while 3- or 4-field techniques increased by 10 minutes. Differences in heart dose D10 cc, mean, V30 and V10 were statistically significant between the FB and mDIBH tangents and 3- or 4-field treatment plans. Statistically significant differences in V20, V10, V5, and mean lung doses were observed for 3- and 4-field FB and mDIBH plans. Differences between lung V5 dose metrics for FB and mDIBH 2-field plans were statistically significant. Interfraction mean translations in heart position coronally ranged from -6.2 to 2.6 mm and resulted in non-negligible increases in the heart dose. CONCLUSIONS: Moderate deep inspiration breath hold has been successfully implemented in our regional cancer center for treatment of left breast cancer and is now a standard practice. This change in practice from FB to mDIBH treatment has not impacted our ability to meet provincial guidelines for patient throughput.