Monitoring of analgesia level during general anesthesia in children.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Monitoring of intraoperative nociception has made substantial progress in adult anesthesia during the last 10 years. Several monitors have been validated and their use has been associated with intraoperative or postoperative benefits in the adult population. In pediatric anesthesia, less data are available. However, several recent publications have assessed the performance of nociception monitors in children, and investigated their potential benefits in this context. This review will describe the main validated intraoperative nociception monitors, summarize adult findings and describe the available pediatric data. RECENT FINDINGS: Six intraoperative nociception indices were included in this review. Among them, four have shown promising results in children: Surgical Pleth Index (GE-Healthcare, Helsinki, Finland), Analgesia-Nociception Index (Mdoloris Medical Systems, Loos, France), Newborn-Infant Parasympathetic Evaluation (Mdoloris Medical Systems), and Pupillometry (IDMED, Marseille, France). The relevance of Skin Conductance (MedStorm innovations, AS, Oslo, Norway) under general anesthesia could not be established. Finally, the Nociception Level (Medasense, Ramat Gan, Israel) still requires to be investigated in children. SUMMARY: To date, four monitors may provide a relevant assessment of intraoperative nociception in children. However, the potential clinical benefits associated with their use to guide analgesia remain to be demonstrated.

Relationship between pre-incision Pupillary Pain Index and post-incision heart rate and pupillary diameter variation in children.

BACKGROUND: The Pupillary Pain Index is a recent pupillometric index designed to assess the level of analgesia under general anesthesia in children and adults. If analgesia is inadequate, acute nociceptive stimuli such as skin incision may induce significant hemodynamic disturbances. AIMS: Our aim was to investigate the potential relationship between pre-incision Pupillary Pain Index and heart rate increase following skin incision in children. METHODS: This was a prospective, non-randomized, registered pilot study. We included children undergoing surgery under general anesthesia. Pupillary Pain Index was assessed 2 min before skin incision. Then, heart rate maximal variation (ΔHR ) and pupillary diameter maximal variation (ΔPD ) in the minute following incision were recorded. Spearman coefficient was calculated to characterize the relationship between Pupillary Pain Index and ΔHR or ΔPD . Using receiver operating characteristic curve analysis, we also studied the predictive value of pre-incision Pupillary Pain Index for heart rate and pupillary diameter reactivity. RESULTS: 53 patients were included (10 ± 4 years, 40 ± 19 kg). There was a modest correlation between pre-incision Pupillary Pain Index and ΔHR (Spearman rs = 0.35 [0.05-0.57], p = .011), and between pre-incision Pupillary Pain Index and ΔPD (Spearman rs = 0.54 [0.33-0.71], p < .001). Regarding the predictive value of Pupillary Pain Index for heart rate or pupillary diameter reactivity, the corresponding areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves were 0.90 [0.82-0.99] and 0.78 [0.65-0.93], respectively. A threshold of Pupillary Pain Index <3 predicted the absence of heart rate reactivity at incision with a good performance (negative predictive value = 1). CONCLUSIONS: In children, pre-incision Pupillary Pain Index was moderately correlated with post-incision nociception. Pre-incision Pupillary Pain Index had good predictive performances for heart rate or pupillary diameter reactivity to skin incision. Pre-incision Pupillary Pain Index <3 might predict the absence of heart rate reaction to incision.

Effect of Different Concentrations of Propofol Used as a Sole Anesthetic on Pupillary Diameter: A Randomized Trial.

BACKGROUND: Pupillometry monitoring under general anesthesia is based on the assumption that pupillary diameter variations reflect the adequacy of the provided analgesia to the intensity of the nociceptive surgical stimulus. The accurate interpretation of pupillometric data requires establishing clearly what the expected baseline unstimulated pupillary diameter at each specific level of hypnosis is. Opioids decrease pupillary diameter in a dose-dependent fashion. In contrast, the effects of hypnotic drugs on pupillary diameter are not well known. Our aim was to describe the potential relationship between propofol predicted effect-site concentrations (Cets) ranging from 1 to 3 µg/mL and pupillary diameter. METHODS: Patients were randomized to receive propofol by target-controlled infusion at a predicted Cet of 1, 2, or 3 µg/mL (groups P1, P2, and P3, respectively). Pupillary diameter measurements were performed after 10 minutes of steady-state propofol infusion at the randomized Cet. No stimulation was performed during the study. Heart rate and bispectral index (BIS) were continuously recorded. RESULTS: Forty patients were included: (13, 14, and 13 in groups P1, P2, and P3, respectively). Mean pupillary diameter was 5.7 mm (1 mm) in group P1, 4.8 mm (1.3 mm) in group P2, and 3.3 mm (0.8 mm) in group P3. Propofol had a dose-dependent effect on pupillary diameter (linear regression R = 0.45, P < .001). Pupillary diameter was positively correlated with the BIS (Spearman r = 0.75 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.54 to -0.87] P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: From 1 to 3 µg/mL of predicted Cet, propofol has a dose-dependent effect on pupillary diameter. Within this concentrations range, there is a positive correlation between BIS and pupillary diameter. The subcortical effect of propofol on pupillary diameter is correlated to its effect on the cortex. Studies assessing pupillary diameter as a marker of the nociception-antinociception balance should be performed in patients with a standardized depth of hypnosis.

Assessment of Coagulation by Thromboelastography During Ongoing Postpartum Hemorrhage: A Retrospective Cohort Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Rapid assessment of hemostasis during postpartum hemorrhage (PPH) is essential to allow characterization of coagulopathy, to estimate bleeding severity, and to improve outcome. Point of care (POC) coagulation monitors could be of great interest for early diagnosis and treatment of coagulation disorders in PPH. METHODS: Women with ongoing PPH >500 mL who clinically required an assessment of coagulation with thromboelastography (TEG) were included. The primary aim of this retrospective observational cohort study was to assess the predictive accuracy of TEG parameters for the diagnosis of coagulation disorders (hypofibrinogenemia ≤2 g/L, thrombocytopenia ≤80,000/mm, prothrombin ratio ≤50%, or activated partial thromboplastin time ratio ≥1.5) during PPH. The analyzed TEG parameters were Kaolin-maximum amplitude (K-MA), Kaolin-maximum rate of thrombus generation using G (K-MRTGG), functional fibrinogen-maximum amplitude (FF-MA), and functional fibrinogen-maximum rate of thrombus generation using G (FF-MRTGG). Secondary aims of this study were (1) comparison of the time delay between classical parameters and velocity curve-derived parameters (K-MA versus K-MRTGG and FF-MA versus FF-MRTGG) and (2) evaluation of the accuracy of TEG parameters to predict severe hemorrhage estimated by calculated blood losses. RESULTS: Ninety-eight patients were included with 98 simultaneous TEG analyses and laboratory assays. All parameters had an excellent predictive performance. For the Kaolin assay, no significant difference was evidenced between K-MA and K-MRTGG for the predictive performance for hypofibrinogenemia ≤2 g/L and/or thrombocytopenia ≤80,000/mm (respective area under the curve [AUC], 0.970 vs 0.981). For the functional fibrinogen assay, no significant difference was evidenced between FF-MA and FF-MRTGG for the predictive performance for hypofibrinogenemia ≤2 g/L (respective AUC, 0.988 vs 0.974). For both assays, the time to obtain results was shorter for the velocity parameters (K-MRTGG: 7.7 minutes [2.4 minutes] versus K-MA: 24.7 minutes [4.2 minutes], P < .001; FF-MRTGG: 2.7 minutes [2.7 minutes] versus FF-MA: 14.0 minutes [4.3 minutes], P < .001). All TEG parameters derived from the Kaolin and functional fibrinogen assays and Clauss fibrinogen were significantly predictive of severe PPH >2500 mL. CONCLUSIONS: During PPH, when coagulation assessment is indicated, TEG provides a rapid and reliable detection of hypofibrinogenemia ≤2 g/L and/or thrombocytopenia ≤80,000/mm. No difference in performance was evidenced between the velocity-derived parameters (K-MRTGG and FF-MRTGG) and the classical parameters (K-MA and FF-MA). However, velocity-derived parameters offer the advantage of a shorter time to obtain results: FF-MRTGG parameter is available within ≤5 minutes. POC assessment of hemostasis during PPH management may help physicians to diagnose clotting disorders and to provide appropriate hemostatic support.

Sevoflurane Sedation with AnaConDa-S Device for a Child Undergoing Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation.

BACKGROUND: Deep sedation in critically ill children undergoing extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) can be challenging. Volatile anesthetics like sevoflurane can be a good alternative for patients hospitalized in pediatric intensive care units, in whom adequate sedation is difficult to obtain. CASE DESCRIPTION: We report here the first pediatric case of a patient under extracorporeal membrane oxygenation receiving sedation by sevoflurane using the AnaConDa-S device. This 2-year-old girl, suffering from congenital diaphragmatic hernia, was put on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation due to a persistent pulmonary hypertension following metapneumovirus infection. Despite high doses of drugs, neither satisfactory sedation nor analgesia could be reached. Sevoflurane allowed her to be released and we were able to wean her from certain drugs. Her physiological parameters and the indicators of pain and sedation improved. CONCLUSION: Anesthesia using sevoflurane with the AnaConDa-S device is efficient for children under ECMO. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: This is the first pediatric report on anesthesia with sevoflurane under ECMO. HOW TO CITE THIS ARTICLE: Soreze Y, Piloquet J-E, Amblard A, Constan I, Rambaud J, Leger P-L. Sevoflurane Sedation with AnaConDa-S Device for a Child Undergoing Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation. Indian J Crit Care Med 2020;24(7):596-598.

Pupillary Pain Index Changes After a Standardized Bolus of Alfentanil Under Sevoflurane Anesthesia: First Evaluation of a New Pupillometric Index to Assess the Level of Analgesia During General Anesthesia.

BACKGROUND: The pupillary pain index (PPI) is a novel pupillometric index, designed to assess intraoperative analgesia. It is based on the evaluation of the pupillary response to electrical stimuli of increasing intensity. It ranges from 1 (low level of pupillary reactivity, high level of analgesia) to 10 (high level of pupillary reactivity, low level of analgesia). In this first evaluation of the PPI, our objective was to investigate the PPI changes after a bolus of 10 µg·kg(-1) of alfentanil in children under sevoflurane general anesthesia. METHODS: After ethics committee approval and informed consent, 20 healthy children (9 ± 5 years) undergoing elective surgery under general anesthesia were included in this prospective, open, registered pilot study (NCT02646592). Anesthetic induction was standardized with sevoflurane 6% and propofol 1 mg·kg(-1). After tracheal intubation, sevoflurane concentration was maintained at 2% for 10 minutes. A first PPI measurement was performed (PPI-1), and a bolus of 10 µg·kg(-1) was administered. Two minutes after this bolus, a second PPI measurement was performed (PPI-2). Heart rate, blood pressure, and bispectral index were recorded before and after each PPI measurement. Resting pupillary diameter was recorded before each PPI measurement. PPI scores before and after the bolus of alfentanil were compared using a Wilcoxon signed rank test. RESULTS: PPI scores decreased after administration of a bolus of alfentanil (median difference: -3 [95% confidence interval, -4 to -2]). The median (quartiles) of PPI-1 (baseline, before alfentanil) was 6 (4, 7), and the median (quartiles) of PPI-2 (after alfentanil) was 2 (2, 3) (P < .001). No difference was found in resting pupillary diameter before PPI-1 and PPI-2 (2.2 ± 0.2 and 2.2 ± 0.3 mm, respectively; P = .86). There were no significant changes in heart rate or blood pressure after PPI measurements (P = .46 and .49, respectively). Bispectral index was slightly increased after PPI measurements (P = .01; mean bispectral index increase <5%). No withdrawal movements occurred during PPI measurements. CONCLUSIONS: There was a significant decrease in PPI after alfentanil administration. The results of this pilot study suggest that PPI score decreases when the level of analgesia increases. PPI measurement was not associated with a clinical or hemodynamic nociceptive response. This new index might provide useful information to individually adapt opioid administration before nociceptive stimuli under general anesthesia.

EEG profiles during general anesthesia in children: A comparative study between sevoflurane and propofol.

BACKGROUND: In this prospective study, we describe the electroencephalographic (EEG) profiles in children anesthetized with sevoflurane or propofol. METHODS: Seventy-three subjects (11 years, range 5-18) were included and randomly assigned to two groups according to the anesthetic agent. Anesthesia was performed by target-controlled infusion of propofol (group P) or by sevoflurane inhalation (group S). Steady-state periods were performed at a fixed randomized concentration between 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6 µg.ml-1 of propofol in group P and between 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5% of sevoflurane in group S. Remifentanil was continuously administered throughout the study. Clinical data, Bispectral Index (BIS), and raw EEG were continuously recorded. The relationship between BIS and anesthetic concentrations was studied using nonlinear regression. For all steady-state periods, EEG traces were reviewed to assess the presence of epileptoid signs, and spectral analysis of raw EEG was performed. RESULTS: Under propofol, BIS decreased monotonically and EEG slowed down as concentrations increased from 2 to 6 µg.ml-1 . Under sevoflurane, BIS decreased from 0% to 4% and paradoxically rose from 4% to 5% of expired concentration: this increase in BIS was associated with the occurrence of fast oscillations and epileptoid signs on the EEG trace. Propofol was associated with more delta waves and burst suppression periods compared to sevoflurane. CONCLUSION: Under deep anesthesia, the BIS and electroencephalographic profiles differ between propofol and sevoflurane. For high concentrations of sevoflurane, an elevated BIS value may be interpreted as a sign of epileptoid patterns or EEG fast oscillations rather than an insufficient depth of hypnosis.

Influence of Depth of Hypnosis on Pupillary Reactivity to a Standardized Tetanic Stimulus in Patients Under Propofol-Remifentanil Target-Controlled Infusion: A Crossover Randomized Pilot Study.

BACKGROUND: Pupillometry allows the measurement of pupillary diameter variations in response to nociceptive stimuli. This technique has been used to monitor the balance between analgesia and nociception. Under general anesthesia, the amplitude of pupillary dilation is related to the amount of administered opioids. The objective of this study was to determine whether at a constant infusion rate of opioids, the pupillary response was influenced by depth of hypnosis assessed by the bispectral index (BIS). METHODS: Twelve patients (14-20 years) anesthetized for orthopedic surgery were included. Under propofol-remifentanil target-controlled infusion, remifentanil effect site target concentration was fixed at 1 ng/mL. Two measures of pupillary reflex dilation were performed on each patient in a randomized order: one at BIS 55 and one at BIS 25. These levels of BIS were obtained by adjusting propofol target concentration and maintained for 10 minutes before each measure. For each measure, we applied a standardized tetanic stimulation on the patient's forearm (60 mA, 100 Hz, 5 seconds). All measures were performed before the beginning of surgery. RESULTS: Pupillary dilation was significantly greater at BIS 55 than at BIS 25: 32.1% ± 5.3% vs 10.4% ± 2.5% (mean difference estimate [95% confidence interval]: 21.8% [12.9-30.6], P < .001), without carryover effect (P = .30) nor period effect (P = .52). Hemodynamic parameters and BIS were not modified by the stimulation. CONCLUSIONS: In patients receiving a constant infusion of remifentanil at a target concentration of 1 ng/mL, pupillary dilation after a standardized tetanic stimulation was influenced by depth of hypnosis assessed by the BIS.

Evaluating Patient-Centered Outcomes in Clinical Trials of Procedural Sedation, Part 2 Safety: Sedation Consortium on Endpoints and Procedures for Treatment, Education, and Research Recommendations.

The Sedation Consortium on Endpoints and Procedures for Treatment, Education, and Research, established by the Analgesic, Anesthetic, and Addiction Clinical Trial Translations, Innovations, Opportunities, and Networks, a public-private partnership with the US Food and Drug Administration, convened a second meeting of sedation experts from a variety of clinical specialties and research backgrounds to develop recommendations for procedural sedation research. The previous meeting addressed efficacy and patient- and/or family-centered outcomes. This meeting addressed issues of safety, which was defined as "the avoidance of physical or psychological harm." A literature review identified 133 articles addressing safety measures in procedural sedation clinical trials. After basic reporting of vital signs, the most commonly measured safety parameter was oxygen saturation. Adverse events were inconsistently defined throughout the studies. Only 6 of the 133 studies used a previously validated measure of safety. The meeting identified methodological problems associated with measuring infrequent adverse events. With a consensus discussion, a set of core and supplemental measures were recommended to code for safety in future procedural clinical trials. When adopted, these measures should improve the integration of safety data across studies and facilitate comparisons in systematic reviews and meta-analyses.

Pupillary reflex dilation in response to incremental nociceptive stimuli in patients receiving intravenous ketamine.

Pupillometry is a non-invasive monitoring technique, which allows dynamic pupillary diameter measurement by an infrared camera. Pupillary diameter increases in response to nociceptive stimuli. In patients anesthetized with propofol or volatile agents, the magnitude of this pupillary dilation is related to the intensity of the stimulus. Pupillary response to nociceptive stimuli has never been studied under ketamine anesthesia. Our objective was to describe pupillary reflex dilation after calibrated tetanic stimulations in patients receiving intravenous ketamine. After written consent, 24 patients of our pediatric burn care unit were included. They received an oral morphine premedication (0.3 mg kg-1) 1 h before their scheduled daily dressing change. Just before the procedure, they received 1 mg kg-1 of intravenous ketamine. Two minutes after this bolus, tetanic stimulations of incremental intensities were performed on the arm of each patient (5-10-20-30-40-60 mA, 60 s interval between stimulations). Pupillary diameter, heart rate and movements were recorded before and after each stimulation. Tetanic stimulations were associated with changes in pupillary diameter and heart rate. The magnitude of these changes was significantly influenced by the intensity of stimulation (ANOVA for repeated measures, p < 0.001). Movement was associated with a 32% increase in diameter (ROC curves, AUC 0.758) with 65% sensitivity and 77% specificity. In children, pupillary reflex dilation to nociceptive stimuli persists under deep sedation obtained with 1 mg kg-1 of intravenous ketamine combined with a 0.3 mg kg-1 oral morphine premedication, and its magnitude depends on the intensity of the stimulation. Our results confirm that pupillometry could be a relevant way to monitor nociception in anaesthetised subjects, including those receiving ketamine. Trial registration clinicaltrials.gov, NCT 02648412.

Pupillometry-guided Intraoperative Remifentanil Administration versus Standard Practice Influences Opioid Use: A Randomized Study.

BACKGROUND: Pupillometry has shown promising results for assessing nociception in anesthetized patients. However, its benefits in clinical practice are not demonstrated. The aim of this prospective randomized study was to evaluate the impact of intraoperative pupillometry monitoring on perioperative opioid consumption in major gynecologic surgery. METHODS: After receiving ethics committee approval and written consent of patients, American Society of Anesthesiologists status I to II women undergoing gynecologic surgery were included in this single-blinded, prospective, parallel-arm randomized study. General anesthesia was standardized with propofol-remifentanil target-controlled infusion. Patients were randomly assigned into two groups. In the pupillometry group, remifentanil administration was guided by pupillary diameter changes. In the standard group, remifentanil administration was left to the discretion of the anesthesiologist. The primary outcome was intraoperative remifentanil consumption. RESULTS: Fifty-five patients were analyzed. Remifentanil consumption was markedly decreased in the pupillometry group (3.8 [3.4 to 4.8 µg · kg · h] vs. 7.9 µg · kg · h [6.5 to 9.0 µg · kg · h] in the standard group; difference = 4.2 µg · kg · h [95% CI, 3.0 to 5.3 µg · kg · h]; P < 0.001). Cumulative 0- to 12-h morphine consumption was reduced in the pupillometry group (two-way repeated measures ANOVA 0.3 ± 0.1 vs. 0.4 ± 0.2 mg/kg; P = 0.048). A telephone survey 3 months after surgery revealed that 15 of 29 patients in the standard group still experienced procedure-related pain versus 3 of 23 in the pupillometry group (chi-square P = 0.037). No adverse events associated with pupillometry were observed during the study. CONCLUSIONS: The use of pupillometry to guide intraoperative analgesia reduced intraoperative remifentanil consumption and postoperative morphine requirements. The possible consequences of decreasing intraoperative remifentanil in terms of chronic pain require further investigation.

Evaluating Patient-Centered Outcomes in Clinical Trials of Procedural Sedation, Part 1 Efficacy: Sedation Consortium on Endpoints and Procedures for Treatment, Education, and Research Recommendations.

The Sedation Consortium on Endpoints and Procedures for Treatment, Education, and Research, established by the Analgesic, Anesthetic, and Addiction Clinical Trial Translations, Innovations, Opportunities, and Networks public-private partnership with the US Food and Drug Administration, convened a meeting of sedation experts from a variety of clinical specialties and research backgrounds with the objective of developing recommendations for procedural sedation research. Four core outcome domains were recommended for consideration in sedation clinical trials: (1) safety, (2) efficacy, (3) patient-centered and/or family-centered outcomes, and (4) efficiency. This meeting identified core outcome measures within the efficacy and patient-centered and/or family-centered domains. Safety will be addressed in a subsequent meeting, and efficiency will not be addressed at this time. These measures encompass depth and levels of sedation, proceduralist and patient satisfaction, patient recall, and degree of pain experienced. Consistent use of the recommended outcome measures will facilitate the comprehensive reporting across sedation trials, along with meaningful comparisons among studies and interventions in systematic reviews and meta-analyses.

Bispectral index under propofol anesthesia in children: a comparative randomized study between TIVA and TCI.

BACKGROUND: In children, only a few studies have compared different modes of propofol infusion during a total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) with propofol and remifentanil. The aim of this study was to compare Bispectral Index (BIS) profiles (percentage of time spent at adequate BIS values) between four modes of propofol infusion: titration of the infusion rate on clinical signs (TIVA0 ), titration of the infusion rate on the BIS (TIVABIS ), target controlled infusion (TCI) guided by the BIS either with the Kataria model (TCI KBIS ) or the Schnider model (TCI SBIS ). METHODS: Sixty-six children (aged from 4 to 14 years) were prospectively randomized into one of the four groups. In the TIVA0 group, the anesthesiologist was blinded to the BIS. In each group, the percentage of time with adequate BIS values (45-55), the bias, and imprecision were calculated. RESULTS: The propofol consumption was similar in the four groups. During the maintenance phase, the percentage of time spent in the targeted BIS range was significantly lower in the TIVA0 group compared to the three other groups (TIVA0 : 31% ± 22, TIVABIS : 59% ± 17, TCI KBIS : 53% ± 12, TCI SBIS : 56% ± 17). The bias was not statistically different between the four groups, but the imprecision was larger for the TIVA0 group. Compared to the Kataria model, the Schnider model was associated with shorter time delay to reach the desired BIS, to eyes opening, and to tracheal extubation. CONCLUSIONS: Propofol administration using manual infusion guided by clinical signs was associated with higher risks of over- or underdosage when compared to BIS-guided administrations. When propofol infusion was guided by the BIS, no major difference was found between TIVA and TCI (either with the Kataria or the Schnider model). This study highlights the need of a pharmacodynamic feedback during propofol anesthesia in children.

Monitoring depth of anesthesia: from consciousness to nociception. A window on subcortical brain activity.

Anesthesia results from several inhibitor processes, which interact to lead to loss of consciousness, amnesia, immobility, and analgesia. The anesthetic agents act on the whole brain, the cortical and subcortical areas according to their receptor targets. The conscious processes are rather integrated at the level of the cortical neuronal network, while the nonconscious processes such as the nociception or implicit memory require subcortical processing. A reliable and meaningful monitoring of depth of anesthesia should provide assessment of these different processes. Besides the EEG monitoring which gives mainly information on cortical anesthetic effects, it would be relevant to have also a subcortical feedback allowing an assessment of nociception. Several devices have been proposed in this last decade, to give us an idea of the analgesia/nociception balance. Up to now, most of them are based on the assessment of the autonomic response to noxious stimulation. Among the emerging clinical devices, we can mention those which assess vascular sympathetic response (skin conductance), cardiac and vascular sympathetic response (surgical pleth index), parasympathetic cardiac response (analgesia nociception index), and finally the pupillometry which is based on the assessment of the pupillary reflex dilatation induced by nociceptive stimulations. Basically, the skin conductance might be the most adapted to assess the stress in the awake or sedated neonate, while the performances of this method appear disappointing under anesthesia. The surgical pleth index is still poorly investigated in children. The analgesia nociception index showed promising results in adults, which have to be confirmed, especially in children and in infants, and lastly pupillometry, which can be considered as reliable and reactive in children as in adults, but which is still sometimes complicated in its use.

Pain monitoring in anesthetized children: first assessment of skin conductance and analgesia-nociception index at different infusion rates of remifentanil.

BACKGROUND: Analgesia and nociception can not be specifically monitored during general anesthesia. Movement of the patient or hemodynamic variations are usually considered as symptoms of insufficient analgesia. The measure of skin conductance (SC) allows an assessment of peripheral sympathetic activity. The analgesia-nociception index (ANI) provides an evaluation of the parasympathetic activity based on heart rate variability. These two non-invasive monitors might allow a better assessment of perioperative nociception. OBJECTIVES: Describe the profiles of SC and ANI after a standardized nociceptive stimulation, in anesthetized children, at different infusion rates of remifentanil. MATERIALS/METHODS: For this pilot study, 12 children (8.4 ± 5 years) scheduled for middle-ear surgery were anesthetized with desflurane to maintain a bispectral index at 50. Remifentanil was used for analgesia, at an initial infusion rate of 0.2 µg·kg(-1) ·min(-1) . Remifentanil infusion rate was then decreased: Five steady-state periods of 10 min were obtained at 0.2, 0.16, 0.12, 0.08, and 0.04 µg·kg(-1) ·min(-1) . At the end of each period, a standardized tetanic stimulation was applied to the patient. Variations in heart rate, blood pressure, SC, and ANI were recorded before and after each stimulation. RESULTS: After the stimulation, ANI was significantly decreased compared with prestimulation values for all remifentanil infusion rates. This decrease was greater at 0.04 µg·kg(-1) ·min(-1) than at the other infusion rates. SC, heart rate, and blood pressure were not modified by the stimulations, whatever the dose of remifentanil. CONCLUSION: ANI might provide a more sensitive assessment of nociception in anesthetized children than hemodynamic parameters or skin conductance.

Nociception level response to calibrated stimulations in children: First assessment of the nociception level index in pediatric anesthesia.

INTRODUCTION: Intraoperative monitoring of nociception has made great progress in adult anesthesia. However, pediatric data are scarce. The Nociception Level (NOL) is one of the most recent indexes of nociception. Its originality is that it provides a multiparametric assessment of nociception. In adults, NOL monitoring allowed lower perioperative opioid requirements, hemodynamic stability, and qualitative postoperative analgesia. So far, the NOL has never been used in children. Our objective was to validate the ability of NOL to provide a quantitative assessment of nociception in anesthetized children. METHODS: In 5-12 years old children anesthetized with sevoflurane and alfentanil (10 µg kg-1), before surgical incision, we performed three standardized tetanic stimulations (5 s, 100 Hz) of different intensities (10-30-60 mA) in a randomized order. NOL, heart rate, blood pressure and Analgesia-Nociception Index variations were assessed after each stimulation. RESULTS: Thirty children were included. Data were analyzed with a covariance pattern linear mixed regression model. NOL increased after the stimulations (p < 0.05 at each intensity). NOL response was influenced by stimulation intensity (p < 0.001). Heart rate and blood pressure were barely modified by the stimulations. Analgesia-Nociception Index decreased after the stimulations (p < 0.001 at each intensity). Analgesia-Nociception index response was not influenced by stimulation intensity (p = 0.064). NOL and Analgesia-Nociception Index responses were significantly correlated (Pearson r = 0.47; p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: NOL allows a quantitative assessment of nociception under anesthesia in 5-12 years-old children. This study provides a solid basis for all future investigations on NOL monitoring in pediatric anesthesia. REGISTRATION: NCT05233449.

Epileptogenic effect of sevoflurane: determination of the minimal alveolar concentration of sevoflurane associated with major epileptoid signs in children.

BACKGROUND: Sevoflurane has become the gold standard for inhalation induction in children. However in children as in adults, epileptiform electroencephalographic signs have been described under high concentrations of sevoflurane. The aim of this study was to determine the minimal alveolar concentration (MAC) of sevoflurane associated with the occurrence of major epileptiform signs (MES) in 50% children under steady-state conditions. The MAC of MES (MAC MES) was determined in 100% oxygen and with the addition of 50% nitrous oxide or after the injection of alfentanil (ALFENTA). METHODS: Seventy-nine children (3-11 yr), undergoing elective surgery and premedicated with hydroxyzine were included. After induction by inhalation and tracheal intubation, a 10-min period with a stable expired fraction of sevoflurane was obtained. The MES were defined as rhythmic polyspikes or epileptiform discharges. Electroencephalographic recordings were blindly analyzed by two independent experts. The MAC MES were determined by the Dixon method: the concentration of sevoflurane was determined by the result from the previous patient: increase of 0.2% if MES were absent or decrease of 0.2% if MES were present. Three consecutive series were performed: (1) in 100% oxygen (MAC MESO2); (2) in 50% oxygen and 50% nitrous oxide (MAC MESN2O); and (3) in 100% oxygen with a bolus of alfentanil (MAC MESALFENTA). RESULTS: The MAC MESO2 was 4.3±0.1% (mean±SD), the MAC MESN2O and the MAC MESALFENTA were higher, respectively: 4.6±0.2% (P=0.01) and 4.6±0.2% (P=0.02). CONCLUSIONS: In children premedicated with hydroxyzine, the MAC MES of sevoflurane calculated in 100% O2 corresponded to 1.75 surgical MAC. In addition, our results have demonstrated a moderate effect of nitrous oxide and alfentanil in raising the threshold of MES.

Nocturnal hypoxemia, but not hypercapnia, correlates with sleep quality in children.

BACKGROUND: A correlation has been observed between obstructive sleep events and sleep quality. The aim of the study was to assess if there is also a correlation between nocturnal hypoxemia and hypercapnia and sleep efficiency and sleep fragmentation in children. METHODS: Nocturnal pulse oximetry (S(pO(2))) and transcutaneous carbon dioxide (P(tcCO(2))) recordings with simultaneous actigraphy were performed in 38 children with nocturnal hypoxemia and hypercapnia during spontaneous breathing (nocturnal hypoventilation [NH] group), 25 children with partially corrected nocturnal hypoventilation (PC-NH group), and 11 subjects with normal nocturnal gas exchange (no-NH group). RESULTS: Sleep efficiency and sleep fragmentation on actigraphy correlated with minimal S(pO(2)) (r(2) = 0.21, P = .004, and r(2) = -0.10, P = .050, respectively) and the percentage of night time with S(pO(2)) < 90% (r(2) = -0.33, P < .001, and r(2) = 0.13, P = .028, respectively) in the NH group. Sleep efficiency and sleep fragmentation also correlated with pulse rate standard deviation (r(2) = -0.42, P < .001, and r(2) = 0.37, P < .001, respectively). No correlation was observed between sleep efficiency and sleep fragmentation and P(tcCO(2)). No correlation was observed between sleep efficiency and sleep fragmentation and S(pO(2)), P(tcCO(2)), and pulse rate in the PC-NH group. Sleep efficiency, sleep fragmentation, and nocturnal S(pO(2)), and P(tcCO(2)) were all normal and not correlated in the no-NH group. CONCLUSIONS: In children with nocturnal hypoventilation, nocturnal hypoxemia but not hypercapnia correlates with sleep efficiency and sleep fragmentation on actigraphy.

The EEG signal: a window on the cortical brain activity.

The accurate assessment of the depth of anesthesia, allowing a more accurate adaptation of the doses of hypnotics, is an important end point for the anesthesiologist. It is a particularly crucial issue in pediatric anesthesia, in the context of the recent controversies about the potential neurological consequences of the main anesthetic drugs on the developing brain. The electroencephalogram signal reflects the electrical activity of the neurons in the cerebral cortex. It is thus the key to assessment of the level of hypnosis. Beyond visual analysis, several monitoring devices allow an automated treatment of the electroencephalographic (EEG) signal, combining time and frequency domain analysis. Each of these monitors focuses on a specific combination of characteristics of the signal and provides the clinician with useful information that remains, however, partial. For a comprehensive approach of the EEG-derived indices, the main features of the normal EEG, in adults and children, will be presented in the awake state and during sleep. Age-related modifications accompanying cerebral maturation during infancy and childhood will be detailed. Then, this review will provide an update on how anesthetic drugs, particularly hypnotics, influence the EEG signal, and how the main available monitors analyze these drug-induced modifications. The relationships between pain, memory, and the EEG will be discussed. Finally, this review will focus on some specific EEG features such as the electrical epileptoid activity observed under sevoflurane anesthesia. The EEG signal is the best window we have on cortical brain activity and provides a fair pharmacodynamic feedback of the effects of hypnotics. However, the cortex is only one of several targets of anesthesia. Hypnotics and opiates, have also subcortical primary targets, and the EEG performances in the evaluation or prediction of nociception are poor. Monitoring subcortical structures in combination with the EEG might in the future allow a better evaluation and a more precise adaptation of balanced anesthesia.