A natural experiment to assess how urban interventions in lower socioeconomic areas influence health behaviors: the UrbASanté study.

BACKGROUND: Mechanisms underlying the associations between changes in the urban environment and changes in health-related outcomes are complex and their study requires specific approaches. We describe the protocol of the interdisciplinary UrbASanté study, which aims to explore how urban interventions can modify environmental exposures (built, social, and food environments; air quality; noise), health-related behaviors, and self-reported health using a natural experiment approach. METHODS: The study is based on a natural experiment design using a before/after protocol with a control group to assess changes in environmental exposures, health-risk behaviors, and self-reported health outcomes of a resident adult population before and after the implementation of a time series of urban interventions in four contiguous neighborhoods in Paris (France). The changes in environmental exposures, health-related behaviors, and self-reported health outcomes of a resident adult population will be concurrently monitored in both intervention and control areas. We will develop a mixed-method framework combining substantial fieldwork with quantitative and qualitative analytical approaches. This study will make use of (i) data relating to exposures and health-related outcomes among all participants and in subsamples and (ii) interviews with residents regarding their perceptions of their neighborhoods and with key stakeholders regarding the urban change processing, and (iii) existing geodatabases and field observations to characterize the built, social, and food environments. The data collected will be analyzed with a focus on interrelationships between environmental exposures and health-related outcomes using appropriate approaches (e.g., interrupted time series, difference-in-differences method). DISCUSSION: Relying on a natural experiment approach, the research will provide new insights regarding issues such as close collaboration with urban/local stakeholders, recruitment and follow-up of participants, identification of control and intervention areas, timing of the planned urban interventions, and comparison of subjective and objective measurements. Through the collaborative work of a consortium ensuring complementarity between researchers from different disciplines and stakeholders, the UrbASanté study will provide evidence-based guidance for designing future urban planning and public health policies. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This research was registered at the ClinicalTrial.gov (NCT05743257).

[Time and space in the care pathways of women suffering from breast cancer]. / Temps et espaces dans les parcours de soins de femmes souffrant d'un cancer du sein.

Facing breast cancer, women in precarious situations are more likely to be diagnosed at an advanced stage, and when detected at the same stage, they are more to die as well as faster. In this paper, we analyze a corpus of 40 semi-structured interviews conducted in six cancer services in hospitals of the Paris area on the care pathways of women with breast cancer. The analysis focuses on the beginning of the pathways (until the first treatments) and concentrates on their spatial and temporal dimension in the light of precariousness. Depending on the women's situations with regard to precariousness, the spatial and temporal organization of the pathways differs. There are socially differentiated latency periods that delay diagnosis (prior to meeting a medical professional) or the beginning of treatment (in relation to rights, the responsiveness of the health care system, and the interactions between women and the system). Spatially, the geometry of the pathways is variable and reflects different expectations of health institutions and medical staff according to the social profiles of the women. However, a detailed analysis of the pathways allows us to nuance these differences in terms of precariousness. The women's capacity to be autonomous, their network of contacts, the accessibility and responsiveness of the health care system, as well as the sensitive and emotional dimension of this stressful event affect the pathways both in terms of time and space.

[Impact of precariousness on breast cancer care in the Île-de-France region: Results of the DESSEIN study]. / Impact de la précarité sur la prise en charge du cancer du sein en Île-de-France : résultats de l'étude DESSEIN.

INTRODUCTION: Precariousness has been associated with an increase in breast cancer mortality, but the links between precariousness, stage at diagnosis and care pathways are little explored. The objective of the DESSEIN study was to assess the impact of precariousness on disease and care pathways. METHODS: Prospective observational study in Île-de-France comparing precarious and non-precarious patients consulting for breast cancer and followed for 1 year. RESULTS: In total, 875 patients were included between 2016 and 2019 in 19 institutions: 543 non-precarious patients and 332 precarious patients. Precarious patients had a more advanced stage at diagnosis (55% T1 vs. 63%, 30% N+ vs 19%, P=0.0006), had a higher risk of not receiving initially planned treatment (4 vs. 1%, P=0.004), and participated less in clinical trials (5 vs. 9%, P=0.03). Non-use of supportive oncology care was 2 times more frequent among patients in precarious situations (P<0.001). During treatment, 33% of deprived patients reported a loss of income, compared with 24% of non-deprived patients (P<0.001). At 12 months from diagnosis, lay-offs were 2 times more frequent in precarious patients (P=0.0001). DISCUSSION: Precariousness affects all stages of the cancer history and care pathway. Particular attention needs to be paid to vulnerable populations, considering issues of accessibility and affordability of care, health literacy and possible implicit bias from the care providers.

Influence of geographic access and socioeconomic characteristics on breast cancer outcomes: A systematic review.

Socio-economic and geographical inequalities in breast cancer mortality have been widely described in European countries and the United States. To investigate the combined effects of geographic access and socio-economic characteristics on breast cancer outcomes, a systematic review was conducted exploring the relationships between: (i) geographic access to healthcare facilities (oncology services, mammography screening), defined as travel time and/or travel distance; (ii) breast cancer-related outcomes (mammography screening, stage of cancer at diagnosis, type of treatment and rate of mortality); (iii) socioeconomic status (SES) at individuals and residential context levels. In total, n = 25 studies (29 relationships tested) were included in our systematic review. The four main results are: The statistical significance of the relationship between geographic access and breast cancer-related outcomes is heterogeneous: 15 were identified as significant and 14 as non-significant. Women with better geographic access to healthcare facilities had a statistically significant fewer mastectomy (n = 4/6) than women with poorer geographic access. The relationship with the stage of the cancer is more balanced (n = 8/17) and the relationship with cancer screening rate is not observed (n = 1/4). The type of measures of geographic access (distance, time or geographical capacity) does not seem to have any influence on the results. For example, studies which compared two different measures (travel distance and travel time) of geographic access obtained similar results. The relationship between SES characteristics and breast cancer-related outcomes is significant for several variables: at individual level, age and health insurance status; at contextual level, poverty rate and deprivation index. Of the 25 papers included in the review, the large majority (n = 24) tested the independent effect of geographic access. Only one study explored the combined effect of geographic access to breast cancer facilities and SES characteristics by developing stratified models.