Caesarean delivery vasopressor management.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: This review assesses the maternal and fetal effects of vasopressor administration during spinal anaesthesia for caesarean delivery, with emphasis on recent findings. RECENT FINDINGS: Maternal heart rate is a good surrogate for cardiac output. The initial hypotensive effect of spinal anaesthesia is caused by a rapid decrease in systemic vascular resistance, which makes α-agonists the logical first-line therapy. Effective prophylactic phenylephrine administration can be associated with reduced maternal cardiac output, but this has not been associated with adverse maternal or fetal effects. Prophylactic phenylephrine infusion can cause hypertension if increasing arterial pressure does not trigger a timely reduction in the rate of administration. Phenylephrine has been used safely in mothers with cardiac disease and in pregnancies with suspected fetal compromise. Fetal genotype may increase resistance to ephedrine-induced acidosis. The combination of vagolytics and vasopressors has caused maternal hypertensive crises with serious adverse outcome. SUMMARY: Phenylephrine is the current vasopressor of choice for the prevention of maternal hypotension and nausea. Phenylephrine regimens need to be developed that can reliably and safely be used with noninvasive blood pressure cycle times less frequent than every minute. Further vasopressor should be used with caution when vagolytic therapy is, quite rightly, used to treat bradycardia associated with hypotension.

Fetal and maternal effects of phenylephrine and ephedrine during spinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery.

BACKGROUND: In our routine practice, we observed a reduced incidence of fetal acidosis (umbilical artery pH < 7.20) at cesarean delivery during spinal anesthesia when a combination of phenylephrine and ephedrine was used as first line vasopressor therapy, compared with using ephedrine alone. METHODS: The study was randomized and double blind. It compared phenylephrine 100 microg/ml (phenylephrine group), ephedrine 3 mg/ml (ephedrine group), and phenylephrine 50 microg/ml combined with ephedrine 1.5 mg/ml (combination group), given by infusion, to maintain maternal systolic arterial pressure at baseline during spinal anesthesia for elective cesarean delivery. RESULTS: Fetal acidosis was less frequent in the phenylephrine group (1 of 48) (P = 0.004) and less frequent in the combination group (1 of 47) (P = 0.005) than in the ephedrine group (10 of 48). The mean systolic arterial pressure was similar for the three groups: Phenylephrine group median 98% (IQR 94-103) of baseline, ephedrine group 100% (96-106) and combination group 101% (97-108) (P = 0.11). The mean heart rate was higher in the ephedrine group (median 107% [IQR 99-118] of baseline) than in the phenylephrine group (88% [82-98]) (P < 0.0001), or the combination group (96% [86-102]) (P < 0.0001). Nausea and vomiting were less frequent in the phenylephrine group (nausea 17%, vomiting 0%) than in the ephedrine group (nausea 66%, vomiting 36%) (P < 0.0001), or the combination group (nausea 55%, vomiting 18%) (P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Giving phenylephrine alone by infusion at cesarean delivery was associated with a lower incidence of fetal acidosis and maternal nausea and vomiting than giving ephedrine alone. There was no advantage to combining phenylephrine and ephedrine because it increased nausea and vomiting, and it did not further improve fetal blood gas values, compared with giving phenylephrine alone.

Evidence that intravenous vasopressors can affect rostral spread of spinal anesthesia in pregnancy.

BACKGROUND: The authors have previously observed an apparent association between rostral spread of spinal anesthesia and choice of intravenous vasopressor given to maintain maternal systolic arterial pressure during cesarean delivery. This study tested the hypothesis that an intravenous infusion of phenylephrine can reduce rostral spread of spinal anesthesia in pregnancy, compared with ephedrine. METHODS: The study was randomized and double blind. It compared phenylephrine 100 microg/ml (phenylephrine group, n = 30), and ephedrine 3 mg/ml (ephedrine group, n = 30), given by infusion, to prevent maternal hypotension during combined spinal-epidural anesthesia for cesarean delivery. Two ml intrathecal plain levobupivacaine, 0.5%, combined with 0.4 ml intrathecal fentanyl, 50 microg/ml, and 10 ml epidural saline was given with the patient in the sitting position. The upper level of neural blockade to cold and light touch sensation was recorded at 10 and 20 min postspinal. Epidural space pressure was recorded at 5, 10, 15, and 20 min. RESULTS: At 20 min, the upper dermatome blocked to cold sensation was median T3 (interquartile range, T2-T4) for the phenylephrine group, compared with T1 (T1-T2) for the ephedrine group (P = 0.001). At 20 min, the upper dermatome blocked to light touch sensation was median T5 (T4-T8) for the phenylephrine group, compared with T3 (T2-T6) for the ephedrine group (P = 0.009). The mean epidural space pressure in the phenylephrine group was 16 (13-19) mmHg, compared with 16 (13-18) mmHg in the ephedrine group (P = 0.63). CONCLUSIONS: This study provides evidence that intravenous phenylephrine can decrease rostral spread of spinal anesthesia in pregnancy, compared with intravenous ephedrine. Further work is required to investigate possible mechanisms and to assess its clinical significance.