Left bundle branch area pacing in a young athlete with progressive cardiac conduction (Lev-Lenegre) disease.

We present the case of a professional soccer player affected by right bundle branch block and symptomatic 2:1 atrio-ventricular block during effort, due to progressive cardiac conduction disease (Lev-Lenegre disease), who received successful left bundle branch area pacing after a failed attempt at His bundle pacing. The electrocardiographic outcome of paced QRS was consistent with a rapid electrical activation of the left ventricle through the Purkinje system. The pursue of physiological pacing was preferred over conventional, given the young age of our patient and the expectedly high burden of stimulation, to reduce the long-term risk of pacing-induced cardiomyopathy.

The relationship between anatomy and electrical parameters in His bundle pacing: A transthoracic echocardiography evaluation.

PURPOSE: The implantation site of the His bundle (HB) lead may influence pacing parameters. Our aim was to characterize the anatomical location of the HB lead tip and its relationship with acute electrical parameters. METHODS: Consecutive patients who underwent HB lead implantation, guided by standard fluoroscopy and electrophysiology, were prospectively enrolled. The relationship between HB lead tip and tricuspid valve plane (TVP) was assessed with post-procedure transthoracic echocardiography. RESULTS: Twenty-five patients were studied. In 11 patients (44%), the HB lead tip did not cross the TVP (A group): in 7 cases it was screwed in the right atrium at a mean distance of -6.1 mm from the TVP and, in 4 cases, at the level of the tricuspid annulus. In the remaining 14 patients (56%), the lead tip crossed the TVP (V group): it was screwed in the right ventricle at a mean distance of 9.3 mm from the TVP. A and V groups had comparable HB capture thresholds (1.6 ± 1 V vs 1.7 ± 0.7 V, 1 ms pulse-width; p = 0.66); selective HB capture was significantly more represented in the A group (91% vs 21%; p = 0.001). Significantly higher R-wave amplitudes were seen in the V group (6.7 ± 3 vs 2.5 ± 1.7 mV; p = 0.0004), and they positively correlated with the distance from the TVP (p = 0.0038). Atrial oversensing was never observed. CONCLUSION: In a consecutive cohort of HB pacing recipients, the rate of patients who had an effective HB capture in the atrium was substantial and was characterized by different electrophysiological properties than in the ventricle.

Additional benefits of nonconventional modalities of cardiac resynchronization therapy using His bundle pacing.

INTRODUCTION: Dyssynchrony persists in many patients despite cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). Aim of this proof-of-concept study was to achieve better CRT, with a QRS approximating the normal width and axis, by using His bundle pacing (HBP) and nonconventional pacing configurations. METHODS AND RESULTS: In 20 patients with CRT indications, we performed an acute intrapatient comparison between conventional biventricular (CONV) and three nonconventional pacing modalities: HBP alone, His bundle, and coronary sinus pacing (HBP + CS), and HBP + CS plus right ventricular pacing (TRIPLE). Electrical dyssynchrony was assessed by means of QRS width and axis; "quasi-normal" axis meant an R/S ratio ≥ 1 in leads I and V6 and ≤1 in V1. Mechanical dyssynchrony was assessed by speckle tracking echocardiography. QRS width was 153 ± 18 ms on CONV, shortened to 137 ± 16 ms on HBP + CS (P = .001) and to 130 ± 14 ms on TRIPLE (P = .001), while it remained unchanged on HBP (159 ± 32 ms; P = .17). The rate of patients with "quasi-normal" axis was 5% on CONV, and increased to 90% on HBP (P = .0001), to 63% on HBP + CS (P = .001), and to 44% on TRIPLE (P = .02). On radial strain analysis, the time-to-peak difference between anteroseptal and posterolateral segments was 143 ± 116 ms on CONV, shortened to 121 ± 127 ms on HBP (P = .79), to 67 ± 70 ms on HBP + CS (P = .02), and to 76 ± 55 ms on TRIPLE (P = .05). On discharge, HBP was chosen in 15% of patients, HBP + CS in 55%, and TRIPLE in 30%; CONV was never chosen. CONCLUSION: Nonconventional modalities of CRT provide acute additional electrical and mechanical resynchronization. An interpatient variability exists.

Resynchronization of the left ventricular contraction by tailored programming of right and left ventricular pacing.

AIMS: The prerequisite and the rationale for the benefit of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is that it is able to resynchronize left ventricular (LV) walls that have a delayed activation. METHODS AND RESULTS: In 69 consecutive patients who underwent biventricular (BIV) pacemaker implantation, we assessed the magnitude of intraventricular resynchronization achieved by means of simultaneous (BIV 0) and sequential BIV pacing (with an individually optimized VV interval value among +80 ms and -80 ms) using pulsed-wave tissue Doppler imaging techniques and in particular the measurement of the intra-LV electromechanical delay. The intra-LV delay was defined as the difference between the longest and the shortest activation time in the six basal segments of the LV. An abnormal intra-LV delay was defined as a value >41 ms. The intra-LV delay was 63 +/- 28 ms baseline, decreased to 44 +/- 26 ms with BIV 0 and to 26 +/- 15 ms with optimized BIV (P = 0.001). BIV 0 determined the shortest delay in 28 (41%) patients (23 +/- 12 ms). In 41 (59%) patients, a better resynchronization was achieved with optimized VV intervals (LV first in 32 and RV first in 5) or single-chamber pacing (LV in 3 and RV in 1). With BIV 0, the intra-LV delay remained abnormal in 41% and was longer than baseline in 30% of patients compared with 9 and 12% with optimized BIV, respectively (P = 0.001). CONCLUSION: A sub-optimal resynchronization is achieved with simultaneous BIV pacing in most patients. A tailored programming of the relative contribution of RV and LV pacing forms the prerequisite for improving CRT results.

[Recent advances in the treatment of syncopal syndromes]. / Prospettive di trattamento delle sindromi sincopali.

Syncope is a transient, self-limited loss of consciousness, usually leading to falling. The underlying mechanism is a transient global cerebral hypoperfusion. Since there are many causes of syncope, a specific treatment cannot be administered without knowing the exact mechanism responsible for the loss of consciousness. The main therapeutic innovations of the most recent years are isometric counter-pressure maneuvres, lower limb compression bandage and therapy guided by implantable loop recorder in patients with recurrent suspected neurally-mediated syncope.