Parental and health visitor perceptions on growth screening in early childhood: a qualitative study.

BACKGROUND: Growth screening in early childhood can help identify children with a range of medical and psychosocial vulnerabilities. In the UK, childhood growth and development up to age 5 years are assessed through the Healthy Child Programme, delivered by health visitors. However, formal criteria to trigger referrals for onward investigation are unclear. There is a lack of qualitative data on the acceptability and feasibility of formal growth screening programmes. This study aimed to build understanding of the perceptions and motivations of caregivers and health visitors in relation to child growth and growth screening. METHODS: This longitudinal observational study was part of a larger study piloting an automated growth screening algorithm in Tower Hamlets, London. We conducted three separate qualitative focus group interviews with health visitors (n=10), English-speaking parents (n=6), and Sylheti-speaking parents (n=5). Participants were purposively sampled, and written informed consent was obtained. A bilingual researcher facilitated each group, using a semi-structured interview guide. Data were analysed by two researchers using thematic analysis and assessed for intercoder reliability. The interview guide was translated into Sylheti, and data from the Sylheti group were translated into English by the same bilingual researcher. FINDINGS: Findings suggest that parents desire holistic care in which health visitors are empowered to refer to other health professionals and council services. Parents also want easier access to health visitors, frequent visits with the same health-care provider, and advice on raising their children. Health visitors were seen as well positioned to play an essential role in educating parents on health and developmental milestones and in helping them identify when their child might need additional support. Both parents and health visitors stressed that resources need to be in place not only to assess children but also to provide access to services when problems are identified. INTERPRETATION: These findings suggest that implementing growth screening through health visitors is feasible and acceptable, provided health visitors are given the resources and capabilities to refer children to appropriate services. Interpretation is limited by the purposive nature of the sampling and possible response bias. FUNDING: Barts Charity.

Parental and healthcare provider attitudes towards the Healthy Child Programme in England: a qualitative analysis.

BACKGROUND: The Healthy Child Programme (HCP) in England, delivered by Health Visitors (HV) and Nursery Nurses (NN), aims to assess growth and development in pre-school age children. This qualitative analysis aimed to evaluate the perceptions and experiences of HCP providers and parents located in a London borough. METHODS: This qualitative analysis is part of a larger study piloting an automated growth screening algorithm in a London borough. We conducted three focus group discussions; two with parents of pre-school children participating in the pilot study, one in English (n = 6) and one in Sylheti (n = 5), and one with HVs and NNs (n = 11). Sampling was purposeful, and written informed consent was obtained. Groups were facilitated by the same bilingual researcher using semi-structured topic guides. Data were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis and assessed for intercoder reliability. RESULTS: Three broad themes were identified in the data: (1) lack of clarity around the role of the HV and NN; (2) a lack of resources; and (3) a desire for a preventative service. Underlying these themes was a sense of disempowerment shown by HVs/NNs and parents, as well as systemic issues in terms of the accessibility and practicality of the service. Nevertheless, parents and HVs/NNs all stressed the importance of the service in providing information, reassurance and advice. CONCLUSIONS: Various challenges prevent the HCP from providing equitable and effective care to every child. However, the service was recognised as very valuable by users and providers despite systemic difficulties.

Child play and caregiver support to promote convalescence following severe acute malnutrition in Zimbabwe: The Tamba-SAM pilot study.

Children hospitalised for severe acute malnutrition (SAM) have a high risk of mortality, relapse and rehospitalisation following hospital discharge. Current approaches fail to promote convalescence, or to address the underlying social determinants of SAM, meaning that restoration of long-term health, growth and neurodevelopment is not achieved. Although guidelines recommend play and stimulation to promote recovery, most caregivers are not supported to do this at home. We set out to evaluate the feasibility and acceptability of a codesigned intervention package aimed at providing child stimulation through play, and strengthening caregiver capabilities through problem-solving skills, peer support and income-generating activities. We evaluated the intervention in two phases, enroling 30 caregiver-child pairs from paediatric wards in Harare, Zimbabwe, once children who had been hospitalised with SAM were ready for discharge. Children were median 17.8 months old, and 28.6% had human immunodeficiency virus. Trained intervention facilitators (IFs)-lay workers whose own children had previously had SAM-delivered the intervention over 12 weeks with nurse supervision. Qualitative interviews with caregivers and IFs showed that the intervention was feasible and acceptable. Participants reported benefiting from the psychosocial support and counselling, and several started income-generating projects. Caregivers appreciated the concept of play and caregiver-child interaction, and all reported practising what they had learned. By Week 12, caregiver mental health and caregiver-child interaction improved significantly. Overall, the intervention was feasible, acceptable and showed promise in modifying caregiver knowledge, attitudes and practice. An efficacy trial is now needed to evaluate whether the intervention can improve child convalescence following complicated SAM.