Evaluating TNM stage prognostic ability in a population-based cohort of gastric adenocarcinoma patients in a low-incidence country.

OBJECTIVES: TNM stage is the preeminent cancer staging system and a fundamental determinant of disease prognosis. Our goal was to evaluate the predictive power of TNM stage for gastric adenocarcinoma (GAC), in a low-incidence country. METHODS: A province-wide chart review of GAC patients diagnosed from April 1, 2005 to March 31, 2008 was conducted in Ontario and linked to routinely collected vital status data with a follow-up on March 31, 2012. TNM staging was classified using the sixth and seventh Union International for Cancer Control/American Joint Committee on Cancer editions. Kaplan-Meier and log-rank tests compared stage-stratified survival estimates. Discrimination was evaluated using Harrell's C statistic. RESULTS: The cohort included 2366 patients. One- and 5-year survival was 43% and 17%. Using the sixth edition, 9% of patients had stage I disease, 5.4% stage II, 7.3% stage III, and 64% stage IV; 15% were not staged. Using the seventh edition, 9% were stage I, 7.7% stage II, 16% stage III, and 54% stage IV; 14% were not staged. Stage-stratified 5-year survival ranged from 68% to 7% with the sixth edition and from 70% to 4% with the seventh edition. Harrell's C statistic was 0.64 (0.63-0.65) for the broad sixth edition staging categories and 0.68 (0.67-0.69) for the broad seventh edition. Discriminative power was similar for the refined stage categories and across multiple subgroup analyses; it was best in non-metastatic patients. CONCLUSION: Existing staging systems for GAC used in North America predict individualized prognosis poorly. The creation of a more complex prediction tool is necessary to provide accurate and precise prognostication information to oncologists, patients, and their families.

Juvenile-onset ankylosing spondylitis is associated with worse functional outcomes than adult-onset ankylosing spondylitis.

OBJECTIVE: To compare functional outcome of patients with juvenile-onset ankylosing spondylitis (JoAS; defined as AS with symptom onset before 16 years of age) with that of patients with adult-onset AS (AoAS) and to identify variables associated with a poor functional outcome of JoAS. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was performed of 326 JoAS patients who participated in a postal survey conducted by the Spondylitis Association of America. This cohort was compared with 2,021 AoAS patients who participated in the same survey. Simple and multiple logistic regression analyses were performed to identify differences with respect to clinical features, demographic features, and functional outcome (defined by the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index [BASFI]) between the 2 groups. A validation cohort of 255 AS patients was also surveyed. RESULTS: The mean +/- SD BASFI score (controlled for disease duration) for JoAS was 51.3 +/- 1.5 compared with 46.4 +/- 0.6 for AoAS (P < 0.0001). Multiple logistic regression identified only age (P < 0.0001) and income status (P < 0.0001) as factors associated with functional impairment. CONCLUSION: It appears that JoAS is a progressive disease and is associated with significant delay in diagnosis and worse functional outcome compared with AoAS. Furthermore, women do worse than men with JoAS. This would argue for the importance of early diagnosis and treatment of AS, particularly in the subgroup of patients with JoAS.

Recent advances in the treatment of the spondyloarthropathies.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Recently, there has been renewed interest in the spondyloarthropathy family of chronic inflammatory rheumatic conditions, which has been fueled to a large extent by the biologic era. Over the period of the past 2 years in particular, there have been several notable advances. First, there have been a number of large, high-quality randomized controlled trials evaluating the tumor necrosis factor (TNF) blockers and conservative treatments such as physiotherapy and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs for use in spondyloarthropathy. This has paved the way for the development of better tools to assess outcome in these patients both in daily practice and in the context of clinical trials. This review uses a systematic approach to outline the most recent (within the last 2 years) and the most pertinent advances in the treatments of the spondyloarthropathies, with particular emphasis on ankylosing spondylitis and psoriatic arthritis. RECENT FINDINGS: Supervised group exercise programs maintain flexibility and posture in patients with ankylosing spondylitis, and spa therapy is a cost-effective treatment option in ankylosing spondylitis. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs have a role in symptom modification and, more importantly, may prevent structural disease progression in patients with ankylosing spondylitis when administered continuously at a fixed dose. TNF blockers have been evaluated in a number of randomized controlled trials in ankylosing spondylitis and psoriatic arthritis and have been demonstrated to be safe and effective in the short-term management of these diseases. Longer-term trials are awaited with radiographic outcomes to comment on their disease-modifying properties and their long-term safety and efficacy profiles. SUMMARY: There has been renewed interest in the spondyloarthropathy family of disorders, with an explosion in the number of trials evaluating outcome with the TNF blockers. To date, no cure has been found for the disease, but these agents are emerging as the best therapeutic option available for patients with ankylosing spondylitis and psoriatic arthritis to date.