Identification of connective tissue disease autoantibodies and a novel autoantibody anti-annexin A11 in patients with "idiopathic" interstitial lung disease.

BACKGROUND: Autoantibodies are a hallmark feature of Connective Tissue Diseases (CTD). Their presence in patients with idiopathic interstitial lung disease (ILD) may suggest covert CTD. We aimed to determine the prevalence of CTD autoantibodies in patients diagnosed with idiopathic ILD. METHODS: 499 patient sera were analysed: 251 idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF), 206 idiopathic non-specific interstitial pneumonia (iNSIP) and 42 cryptogenic organising pneumonia (COP). Autoantibody status was determined by immunoprecipitation. RESULTS: 2.4% of IPF sera had a CTD-autoantibody compared to 10.2% of iNSIP and 7.3% of COP. 45% of autoantibodies were anti-synthetases. A novel autoantibody targeting an unknown 56 kDa protein was found in seven IPF patients (2.8%) and two NSIP (1%) patients. This was characterised as anti-annexin A11. CONCLUSION: Specific guidance on autoantibody testing and interpretation in patients with ILD could improve diagnostic accuracy. Further work is required to determine the clinical significance of anti-annexin A11.

Management and outcomes of interstitial lung disease associated with anti-synthetase syndrome: A systematic literature review.

BACKGROUND: Anti-synthetase syndrome (ASS) is a chronic autoimmune condition, with interstitial lung disease (ILD) being a key feature. This systematic literature review (SLR; CRD42023416414) aimed to summarise treatments and outcomes of ILD associated with ASS (ASS-ILD). METHODS: Databases were searched for articles discussing ASS-ILD management and outcomes, published 1946-September 2023.Screening and data-extraction were performed by two reviewers. Meta-analysis, using a random effects model, and paired t-tests, were undertaken where appropriate to evaluate post-treatment-change in Pulmonary Function Tests (PFT). RESULTS: Ten articles were included, comprising 514 patients: 67.8% female, mean age 52.4years (SD4.6). Baseline high-resolution computed tomography was documented in 447 patients (86.9%); the most common pattern was non-specific interstitial pneumonia (n = 220; 49.2%). The most common myositis-associated autoantibody was anti-Jo1 (48%) with 27.8% having associated anti-Ro52 antibodies.Pooled estimates, after meta-analysis, for baseline Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) was 60.8% predicted (SE 2.1), and Diffusion Capacity of Lungs for Carbon Monoxide (DLco) was 49.8% (SE 3.5). After one-year, pooled improvement in FVC was 14.1% from baseline (SE 3.1) and in DLco was 15.1% (SE 2.8). Paired t-test demonstrated significant overall improvement in FVC (p = 0.007) and DLco (p = 0.002).Patients receiving RTX had 12.2% improvement in FVC and 2.9% increase in DLco at one-year; for patients receiving CYC, there was 17% improvement and 6.3% increase, respectively. 28 deaths were reported. CONCLUSION: Our SLR, the first to summarise management and outcomes of ASS-ILD, found no conclusive difference between effectiveness of treatments. More robust trials are required to reduce morbidity and mortality resulting from ASS-ILD.

The utility of comprehensive autoantibody testing to differentiate connective tissue disease associated and idiopathic interstitial lung disease subgroup cases.

Interstitial lung disease (ILD) comprises many heterogeneous disease groups, the largest being CTD-associated and those labelled as idiopathic out of necessity. The mechanisms causing ILD are poorly understood, but most CTD- and idiopathic-ILD cases can respond to immunosuppression, clearly suggesting a pathological role for inflammation. By contrast, corticosteroid immunosuppression causes harm without benefit in the feared idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis, suggesting that inflammation plays little pathological role, and where ILD progresses rapidly to lethal outcome even with anti-fibrotic drug use. Given the treatment response differences apparent between ILD subgroups, and the dangers and costs of corticosteroid and anti-fibrotic drug use, respectively, it has become vital in every ILD patient to make an accurate subgroup diagnosis, to optimize treatment selections. This review discusses why differentiating CTD- and idiopathic-ILD subgroup cases remains so problematic, and why existing comprehensive CTD-specific serology would, if generally available, represent an ideal biomarker tool to enhance ILD subgroup diagnostic accuracy.

The diagnosis and management of systemic autoimmune rheumatic disease-related interstitial lung disease: British Society for Rheumatology guideline scope.

Interstitial lung disease (ILD) is a significant complication of many systemic autoimmune rheumatic diseases (SARDs), although the clinical presentation, severity and outlook may vary widely between individuals. Despite the prevalence, there are no specific guidelines addressing the issue of screening, diagnosis and management of ILD across this diverse group. Guidelines from the ACR and EULAR are expected, but there is a need for UK-specific guidelines that consider the framework of the UK National Health Service, local licensing and funding strategies. This article outlines the intended scope for the British Society for Rheumatology guideline on the diagnosis and management of SARD-ILD developed by the guideline working group. It specifically identifies the SARDs for consideration, alongside the overarching principles for which systematic review will be conducted. Expert consensus will be produced based on the most up-to-date available evidence for inclusion within the final guideline. Key issues to be addressed include recommendations for screening of ILD, identifying the methodology and frequency of monitoring and pharmacological and non-pharmacological management. The guideline will be developed according to methods and processes outlined in Creating Clinical Guidelines: British Society for Rheumatology Protocol version 5.1.