RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Despite the burden of pyelonephritis after kidney transplantation, there is no consensus on initial empirical antibiotic management. METHODS: We surveyed clinicians throughout the world on their practice and opinions about the initial empirical therapy of post-transplant pyelonephritis, using clinical vignettes. A panel of experts from 19 countries on six continents designed this survey, and invited 2145 clinicians to participate. RESULTS: A total of 721 clinicians completed the survey (response rate: 34%). In the hypothetical case of a kidney transplant recipient admitted with pyelonephritis but not requiring intensive care, most respondents reported initiating either a 3rd-generation cephalosporin (37%) or piperacillin-tazobactam (21%) monotherapy. Several patient-level factors dictated the selection of broader-spectrum antibiotics, including having a recent urine culture showing growth of a resistant organism (85% for extended-spectrum ß-lactamase-producing organisms, 90% for carbapenemase-producing organisms, and 94% for Pseudomonas aeruginosa). Respondents attributed high importance to the appropriateness of empirical therapy, which 87% judged important to prevent mortality. Significant practice and opinion variations were observed between and within countries. CONCLUSION: High-quality studies are needed to guide the empirical management of post-transplant pyelonephritis. In particular, whether prior urine culture results should systematically be reviewed and considered remains to be determined. Studies are also needed to clarify the relationship between the appropriateness of initial empirical therapy and outcomes of post-transplant pyelonephritis.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Patients without human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) are increasingly recognized as being at risk for cryptococcosis. Knowledge of characteristics of cryptococcosis in these patients remains incomplete. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study of cryptococcosis in 46 Australian and New Zealand hospitals to compare its frequency in patients with and without HIV and describe its characteristics in patients without HIV. Patients with cryptococcosis between January 2015 and December 2019 were included. RESULTS: Of 475 patients with cryptococcosis, 90% were without HIV (426 of 475) with marked predominance in both Cryptococcus neoformans (88.7%) and Cryptococcus gattii cases (94.3%). Most patients without HIV (60.8%) had a known immunocompromising condition: cancer (n = 91), organ transplantation (n = 81), or other immunocompromising condition (n = 97). Cryptococcosis presented as incidental imaging findings in 16.4% of patients (70 of 426). The serum cryptococcal antigen test was positive in 85.1% of tested patients (319 of 375); high titers independently predicted risk of central nervous system involvement. Lumbar puncture was performed in 167 patients to screen for asymptomatic meningitis, with a positivity rate of 13.2% where meningitis could have been predicted by a high serum cryptococcal antigen titer and/or fungemia in 95% of evaluable cases. One-year all-cause mortality was 20.9% in patients without HIV and 21.7% in patients with HIV (P = .89). CONCLUSIONS: Ninety percent of cryptococcosis cases occurred in patients without HIV (89% and 94% for C. neoformans and C. gattii, respectively). Emerging patient risk groups were evident. A high level of awareness is warranted to diagnose cryptococcosis in patients without HIV.
Assuntos
Criptococose , Cryptococcus gattii , Cryptococcus neoformans , Infecções por HIV , Meningite , Humanos , HIV , Estudos Retrospectivos , Nova Zelândia/epidemiologia , Austrália/epidemiologia , Criptococose/diagnóstico , Criptococose/epidemiologia , Hospitais , Antígenos de Fungos , Infecções por HIV/complicações , Infecções por HIV/epidemiologiaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Nocardiosis is rare after hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT). Little is known regarding its presentation, management, and outcome in this population. METHODS: This retrospective international study reviewed nocardiosis episodes in HCT recipients (1/1/2000-31/12/2018; 135 transplant centers; 33 countries) and described their clinical, microbiological, radiological, and outcome characteristics. RESULTS: We identified 81 nocardiosis episodes in 74 allo- and 7 auto-HCT recipients. Nocardiosis occurred a median of 8 (IQR: 4-18) months post-HCT. The most frequently involved organs were lungs (70/81; 86%) and brain (30/81; 37%); 29 (36%) patients were afebrile; 46/81 (57%) had disseminated infections. The most common lung imaging findings were consolidations (33/68; 49%) or nodules (32/68; 47%); brain imaging findings were multiple brain abscesses (19/30; 63%). Ten of 30 (33%) patients with brain involvement lacked neurological symptoms. Fourteen of 48 (29%) patients were bacteremic. Nocardia farcinica was the most common among molecularly identified species (27%; 12/44). Highest susceptibility rates were reported to linezolid (45/45; 100%), amikacin (56/57; 98%), trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (57/63; 90%), and imipenem (49/57; 86%). One-year and last follow-up (IQR: 4-42.5 months) all-cause mortality were 40% (32/81) and 52% (42/81), respectively. In the multivariable analysis, underlying disease not in complete remission (HR: 2.81; 95% CI: 1.32-5.95) and prior bacterial infection (HR: 3.42; 95% CI: 1.62-7.22) were associated with higher 1-year all-cause mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Nocardiosis is a late post-HCT infection usually manifesting as a pulmonary disease with frequent dissemination, brain infection, and bacteremia. Brain imaging should be performed in HCT recipients with nocardiosis regardless of neurological symptoms. Overall mortality is high.
Assuntos
Bacteriemia , Doenças Transmissíveis , Transplante de Células-Tronco Hematopoéticas , Pneumopatias , Nocardiose , Nocardia , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Bacteriemia/tratamento farmacológico , Medula Óssea , Doenças Transmissíveis/tratamento farmacológico , Transplante de Células-Tronco Hematopoéticas/efeitos adversos , Humanos , Pneumopatias/microbiologia , Nocardiose/diagnóstico , Nocardiose/tratamento farmacológico , Nocardiose/epidemiologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , TransplantadosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: High-intensity chemotherapy and advances in novel immunotherapies have seen the emergence of cytomegalovirus (CMV) infections in cancer patients other than allogeneic haemopoietic cell transplantation (HCT). Aim To evaluate the epidemiology, clinical characteristics and outcomes of CMV infection in this population. METHODS: A retrospective review of cancer patients other than allogeneic HCT who had CMV DNAemia and/or disease from July 2013 till May 2020 at a quaternary cancer centre was performed. RESULTS: Of 11 485 cancer patients who underwent treatment during this period, 953 patients had CMV DNA testing performed and 238 of them had CMV DNAemia. After excluding patients with allogeneic HCT, 62 patients with CMV DNAemia were identified, of whom 10 had concurrent CMV disease. The most frequent underlying malignancies were B-cell lymphoproliferative disease (LPD) (31%; 19/62), T-cell LPD (21%; 13/62), chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (11%; 7/62) and multiple myeloma (10%; 6/62). Most patients had lymphopenia (77%; 48/62), multiple cancer therapies (63%; 39/62 received ≥2 previous therapies), co-infection (56%; 35/62 had ≥1 co-infection) and corticosteroid therapy (48%; 30/62) within 1 month before CMV diagnosis. CMV DNAemia and disease were observed in patients receiving novel immunotherapies, including bispecific antibody therapy, chimeric-antigen receptor T-cell therapy and immune checkpoint inhibitors. CONCLUSION: Patients with haematological malignancy, particularly B-cell LPD, T-cell LPD, chronic lymphocytic leukaemia and multiple myeloma, were frequently identified to have CMV DNAemia and disease. Lymphopenia, multiple cancer therapies, co-infection and recent receipt of systemic corticosteroids were also commonly observed. Future studies are necessary to determine optimal identification and management of CMV in these patients.
Assuntos
Coinfecção , Infecções por Citomegalovirus , Transplante de Células-Tronco Hematopoéticas , Leucemia Linfocítica Crônica de Células B , Linfopenia , Mieloma Múltiplo , Humanos , Citomegalovirus/genética , Inibidores de Checkpoint Imunológico , DNA Viral , Infecções por Citomegalovirus/diagnóstico , Infecções por Citomegalovirus/epidemiologia , Transplante de Células-Tronco Hematopoéticas/efeitos adversos , Linfopenia/etiologia , Receptores de Antígenos , CorticosteroidesRESUMO
There are scarce data on the efficacy of ertapenem in the treatment of bacteremia due to extended-spectrum-beta-lactamase (ESBL)-producing Enterobacterales (ESBL-E) in kidney transplant (KT) recipients. We evaluated the association between treatment with ertapenem or meropenem and clinical cure in KT recipients with nonsevere bacteremic urinary tract infections (B-UTI) caused by ESBL-E. We performed a registered, retrospective, international (29 centers in 14 countries) cohort study (INCREMENT-SOT, NCT02852902). The association between targeted therapy with ertapenem versus meropenem and clinical cure at day 14 (the principal outcome) was studied by logistic regression. Propensity score matching and desirability of outcome ranking (DOOR) analyses were also performed. A total of 201 patients were included; only 1 patient (treated with meropenem) in the cohort died. Clinical cure at day 14 was reached in 45/100 (45%) and 51/101 (50.5%) of patients treated with ertapenem and meropenem, respectively (adjusted OR 1.29; 95% CI 0.51 to 3.22; P = 0.76); the propensity score-matched cohort included 55 pairs (adjusted OR for clinical cure at day 14, 1.18; 95% CI 0.43 to 3.29; P = 0.74). In this cohort, the proportion of cases treated with ertapenem with better DOOR than with meropenem was 49.7% (95% CI, 40.4 to 59.1%) when hospital stay was considered. It ranged from 59 to 67% in different scenarios of a modified (weights-based) DOOR sensitivity analysis when potential ecological advantage or cost was considered in addition to outcome. In conclusion, targeted therapy with ertapenem appears as effective as meropenem to treat nonsevere B-UTI due to ESBL-E in KT recipients and may have some advantages.
Assuntos
Bacteriemia , Transplante de Rim , Infecções Urinárias , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Bacteriemia/tratamento farmacológico , Estudos de Coortes , Ertapenem , Humanos , Pontuação de Propensão , Estudos Retrospectivos , Infecções Urinárias/tratamento farmacológico , beta-LactamasesRESUMO
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Brain nocardiosis is a rare but severe infection mostly occurring among immunocompromised patients. In this review, we present recent data on this infection and address some of the common clinical dilemmas encountered in patients with brain nocardiosis. RECENT FINDINGS: Strategies used to approach a patient with suspected brain nocardiosis include the 'conservative strategy' (without early neurosurgery) and the 'neurosurgical strategy' (with early aspiration or excision of brain abscess[es]). The advantages and disadvantages of both strategies are summarised. Our opinion is that the use of the 'conservative strategy' should be limited to well-selected patients presenting with an easily accessible extra-neurological lesion(s) and have brain abscesses at low risk of treatment failure. In terms of antimicrobial therapy, we summarise the data supporting the use of a multidrug regimen in patients with brain nocardiosis.Last, we list possible reasons for treatment failure in patients with brain nocardiosis and suggest interventions to overcome them. SUMMARY: Literature is scarce regarding brain nocardiosis, as a consequence of the rarity of this disease. A multidisciplinary and individualised management is required to optimise the outcome of patients with brain nocardiosis.
Assuntos
Abscesso Encefálico , Nocardiose , Nocardia , Encéfalo , Abscesso Encefálico/tratamento farmacológico , Humanos , Hospedeiro Imunocomprometido , Nocardiose/diagnóstico , Nocardiose/tratamento farmacológicoRESUMO
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: This review aims to summarize available guidelines as well as the emerging evidence for the prevention and treatment of invasive fungal diseases in high-risk haematology patients. RECENT FINDINGS: Primary mould-active prophylaxis is the strategy used in many centres to manage the risk of invasive fungal disease in high-risk haematology patients, and posaconazole remains the antifungal of choice for most of these patients. Data on the use of other antifungals for primary prophylaxis, including isavuconazole, are limited. There is considerable interest in identifying a strategy that would limit the use of mould-active agents to the patients who are the most likely to benefit from them. In this regard, a recent trial demonstrated that the preemptive strategy is noninferior to the empiric strategy. For primary treatment of invasive aspergillosis, two randomized trials found isavuconazole and posaconazole to be noninferior to voriconazole. Isavuconazole does not appear to require therapeutic drug monitoring. SUMMARY: Prophylaxis and treatment of invasive fungal diseases in high-risk haematology patients is a rapidly evolving field. Critical clinical questions remain unanswered, especially regarding the management of suspected invasive fungal diseases breaking through mould-active prophylaxis, and the duration of antifungal therapy for invasive mould infections.
Assuntos
Aspergilose , Hematologia , Infecções Fúngicas Invasivas , Antifúngicos/uso terapêutico , Aspergilose/tratamento farmacológico , Humanos , Infecções Fúngicas Invasivas/tratamento farmacológico , Infecções Fúngicas Invasivas/prevenção & controle , VoriconazolRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Little is known regarding the optimal management of nocardiosis among solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients. It is often suggested to avoid trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SMX) monotherapy in heavily immunocompromised patients (such as SOT recipients) and/or in case of severe or disseminated nocardiosis. Our aim was to report our experience with TMP-SMX monotherapy in SOT recipients with nocardiosis. METHODS: Using data from a previously published European study, we assessed the incidence of adverse events in SOT recipients receiving TMP-SMX monotherapy and assessed its effectiveness. RESULTS: Thirty-one SOT recipients with nocardiosis were included, mostly kidney transplant recipients (20/31, 65%). Eleven (36%) had disseminated infection, and four (13%) had brain nocardiosis. Most patients had lung and/or pleural involvement (26/31, 84%). Daily dose of trimethoprim at initiation was 10 [6.4-14.8] mg/kg. The median estimated glomerular filtration rate at time of diagnosis of nocardiosis was 44 [30-62] ml/min/1.73 m². TMP-SMX was discontinued prematurely in one third of the patients (10/31, 32%, mostly for hematological toxicity [n = 3] or increased serum creatinine [n = 3]). Focusing on the 24 (77%) patients who completed at least 30 days of TMP-SMX monotherapy, 4 had late (>30 days) drug discontinuation, 1 experienced treatment failure, and 19 completed planned TMP-SMX monotherapy. Clinical outcome was favorable in these 19 patients, despite the fact that 8 (42%) had disseminated infection and 2 (11%) brain nocardiosis. Overall, all-cause 1-year mortality was 10% (3/31). CONCLUSIONS: TMP-SMX monotherapy appears to be effective for the treatment of most nocardiosis among SOT recipients. Interventional studies are needed to compare its safety and effectiveness with those of other regimens used to treat posttransplant nocardiosis.
Assuntos
Nocardiose , Transplante de Órgãos , Pneumonia por Pneumocystis , Humanos , Nocardiose/tratamento farmacológico , Nocardiose/epidemiologia , Transplante de Órgãos/efeitos adversos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Transplantados , Combinação Trimetoprima e Sulfametoxazol/efeitos adversosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Whether active therapy with ß-lactam/ß-lactamase inhibitors (BLBLI) is as affective as carbapenems for extended-spectrum ß-lactamase-producing Enterobacterales (ESBL-E) bloodstream infection (BSI) secondary to urinary tract infection (UTI) in kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) remains unclear. METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated 306 KTR admitted to 30 centers from January 2014 to October 2016. Therapeutic failure (lack of cure or clinical improvement and/or death from any cause) at days 7 and 30 from ESBL-E BSI onset was the primary and secondary study outcomes, respectively. RESULTS: Therapeutic failure at days 7 and 30 occurred in 8.2% (25/306) and 13.4% (41/306) of patients. Hospital-acquired BSI (adjusted OR [aOR]: 4.10; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.50-11.20) and Pitt score (aOR: 1.47; 95% CI: 1.21-1.77) were independently associated with therapeutic failure at day 7. Age-adjusted Charlson Index (aOR: 1.25; 95% CI: 1.05-1.48), Pitt score (aOR: 1.72; 95% CI: 1.35-2.17), and lymphocyte count ≤500 cells/µL at presentation (aOR: 3.16; 95% CI: 1.42-7.06) predicted therapeutic failure at day 30. Carbapenem monotherapy (68.6%, primarily meropenem) was the most frequent active therapy, followed by BLBLI monotherapy (10.8%, mostly piperacillin-tazobactam). Propensity score (PS)-adjusted models revealed no significant impact of the choice of active therapy (carbapenem-containing vs any other regimen, BLBLI- vs carbapenem-based monotherapy) within the first 72 hours on any of the study outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest that active therapy based on BLBLI may be as effective as carbapenem-containing regimens for ESBL-E BSI secondary to UTI in the specific population of KTR. Potential residual confounding and unpowered sample size cannot be excluded (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02852902).
Assuntos
Bacteriemia , Transplante de Rim , Infecções Urinárias , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Bacteriemia/tratamento farmacológico , Carbapenêmicos , Infecções por Enterobacteriaceae/tratamento farmacológico , Humanos , Lactamas , Estudos Retrospectivos , Infecções Urinárias/tratamento farmacológico , Inibidores de beta-Lactamases/uso terapêutico , beta-LactamasesRESUMO
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Urinary tract infection (UTI) is the most common infection in kidney transplant recipients (KTRs). Several elements increase the risk of UTI and/or modify its clinical presentation among KTRs (e.g. immunosuppressive therapy, kidney allograft denervation, and use of urinary catheters). Also, KTRs may have UTIs because of difficult-to-identify and/or difficult-to-treat organisms. We provide an overview of the current knowledge regarding bacterial UTIs in KTRs, with a focus on recent findings. RECENT FINDINGS: There is accumulating evidence from clinical trials that screening for and treating asymptomatic bacteriuria is not beneficial in most KTRs (i.e. those who are ≥1-2 months posttransplant and do not have a urinary catheter). These patients have a point-prevalence of asymptomatic bacteriuria of only 3% and treating asymptomatic bacteriuria probably does not improve their outcomes. There is no clinical trial evidence to guide the management of symptomatic UTI in KTRs. Several important clinical questions remain unanswered, especially regarding the management of posttransplant pyelonephritis and the prevention of UTI in KTRs. SUMMARY: Despite its frequency and associated morbidity, UTI after kidney transplantation is an understudied infection. In an era of increasing antimicrobial resistance and limited resources, further research is needed to ensure optimal use of antimicrobials in KTRs with UTI.
Assuntos
Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Infecções Assintomáticas/terapia , Bacteriúria/tratamento farmacológico , Transplante de Rim/efeitos adversos , Infecções Urinárias/tratamento farmacológico , Antibioticoprofilaxia/métodos , Infecções Assintomáticas/epidemiologia , Bacteriúria/epidemiologia , Cistite/tratamento farmacológico , Cistite/epidemiologia , Humanos , Incidência , Pielonefrite/tratamento farmacológico , Pielonefrite/epidemiologia , Fatores de Risco , Transplantados , Cateterismo Urinário/efeitos adversos , Infecções Urinárias/epidemiologia , Infecções Urinárias/prevenção & controleRESUMO
BACKGROUND: The incidence of nosocomial infections due to carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae is increasing worldwide. Whole-genome sequencing (WGS) can help elucidate the transmission route of nosocomial pathogens. METHODS: We combined WGS and epidemiological data to analyze an outbreak of New Delhi metallo-ß-lactamase (NDM)-producing K. pneumoniae that occurred in 2 Belgian hospitals situated about 50 miles apart. We characterized 74 NDM-producing K. pneumoniae isolates (9 from hospital A, 24 from hospital B, and 41 contemporary isolates from 15 other Belgian hospitals) using pulsed-field gel electrophoresis and WGS. RESULTS: A K. pneumoniae sequence type 716 clone was identified as being responsible for the outbreak with all 9 strains from hospital A and 20 of 24 from hospital B sharing a unique pulsotype and being clustered together at WGS (compared with 1 of 41 isolates from other Belgian hospitals). We identified the outpatient clinic of hospital B as the probable bridging site between the hospitals after combining epidemiological, phylogenetic, and resistome data. We also identified the patient who probably caused the transmission. In fact, all but 1 strain from hospital A carried a Tn1331-like transposon, whereas none of the hospital B isolates did. The patient from hospital A who did not have the Tn1331-like transposon was treated at the outpatient clinic of hospital B on the same day as the first NDM-producing K. pneumoniae-positive patient from hospital B. CONCLUSIONS: The results from our WGS-guided investigation highlight the importance of implementing adequate infection control measures in outpatient settings, especially when healthcare delivery moves from acute care facilities to outpatient clinics.
Assuntos
Instituições de Assistência Ambulatorial , Infecção Hospitalar , Surtos de Doenças , Infecções por Klebsiella/epidemiologia , Infecções por Klebsiella/microbiologia , Klebsiella pneumoniae/classificação , Klebsiella pneumoniae/genética , Análise por Conglomerados , Biologia Computacional/métodos , Farmacorresistência Bacteriana , Genoma Bacteriano , Humanos , Infecções por Klebsiella/transmissão , Klebsiella pneumoniae/efeitos dos fármacos , Klebsiella pneumoniae/isolamento & purificação , Testes de Sensibilidade Microbiana , Anotação de Sequência Molecular , Sequenciamento Completo do Genoma , beta-Lactamases/genéticaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Urinary tract infection is the most common infection among kidney transplant recipients (KTRs). Many transplant physicians fear that host compromise will allow low-virulence strains to cause pyelonephritis in KTRs, so they often treat asymptomatic bacteriuria with antibiotics. Identification of the host/microbe factors that determine the clinical presentation (i.e. pyelonephritis versus asymptomatic bacteriuria) once an Escherichia coli strain enters a KTRs bladder could inform management decisions. METHODS: We prospectively collected all E. coli isolates causing either pyelonephritis or asymptomatic bacteriuria in KTRs at our institution (December 2012-June 2015). Whole-genome sequencing was used to assess bacterial characteristics (carriage of 48 virulence genes and phylogenetic and clonal background). Host parameters were also collected. RESULTS: We analysed 72 bacteriuria episodes in 54 KTRs (53 pyelonephritis, 19 asymptomatic bacteriuria). The pyelonephritis and asymptomatic bacteriuria isolates exhibited a similar total virulence gene count per isolate [median 18 (range 5-33) and 18 (5-30), respectively; P = 0.57] and for individual virulence genes differed significantly only for the prevalence of the pap operon (pyelonephritis 39%,versus asymptomatic bacteriuria 0%; P = 0.002). No other significant between-group differences were apparent for 86 other bacterial and host variables. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that bacterial adherence plays a role in the pathogenesis of pyelonephritis in KTRs despite significantly altered host urinary tract anatomy and weakened immunity. Whether KTRs might benefit from targeted therapies (e.g. vaccination or inhibitors of fimbrial adhesion) has yet to be studied.
Assuntos
Bacteriúria/microbiologia , Infecções por Escherichia coli/microbiologia , Proteínas de Escherichia coli/genética , Escherichia coli/genética , Estudo de Associação Genômica Ampla/métodos , Transplante de Rim/efeitos adversos , Pielonefrite/microbiologia , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Doenças Assintomáticas , DNA Bacteriano/genética , Escherichia coli/isolamento & purificação , Proteínas de Escherichia coli/metabolismo , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Filogenia , Estudos Prospectivos , Transplantados , VirulênciaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: There is no consensus on the optimal management of immunosuppression during bacterial infections among solid organ transplant recipients. METHODS: A multicenter, cross-sectional survey, of high-volume kidney and liver transplant centers across US and Europe. Structured questionnaires including six multiple-choice questions concerning the management of immunosuppression during infection were distributed among 381 centers. RESULTS: A total of 124 (33%) centers fully completed the questionnaire: 67 liver, 57 kidney centers. Participating centers reported heterogenous approaches to immunosuppression management for all types of immunosuppressive drugs. Notably, kidney centers reported similar frequencies of either discontinuation (19%), continuation (19%), or dose reduction (17.5%) of antimetabolites; discontinuation only for life-threatening infection (17.5%) or case by case decisions (27%). Calcineurin inhibitors (CNI) management was heterogenous mostly among liver centers, with 8% discontinuing the CNI, 18% continuing, and 22% reducing dose. Heterogenous approaches to management of steroids and inhibitors of the mammalian target of rapamycin were also demonstrated. CONCLUSIONS: Immunosuppression management during bacterial infection is heterogenous in US and European centers. Immunosupression reduction (ISR) during infection is a common practice, though supported by limited evidence. Demonstrating high heterogeneity in the approach to ISR, together with the equivocal results of clinical studies, support consideration of an interventional clinical trial.
Assuntos
Infecções Bacterianas/etiologia , Gerenciamento Clínico , Terapia de Imunossupressão/métodos , Transplante de Rim , Transplante de Fígado , Transplantados/estatística & dados numéricos , Estudos Transversais , Europa (Continente) , Humanos , Imunossupressores/administração & dosagem , Inquéritos e Questionários , Estados UnidosRESUMO
Background: Asymptomatic bacteriuria is frequent in kidney transplant recipients (KTRs). However, there is no consensus on diagnosis or management. We conducted a European survey to explore current practice related to the diagnosis and management of asymptomatic bacteriuria in adult KTRs. Methods: A panel of experts from the European Renal Association-European Dialysis Transplant Association/Developing Education Science and Care for Renal Transplantation in European States working group and the European Study Group for Infections in Compromised Hosts of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases designed this cross-sectional, questionnaire-based, self-administered survey. Invitations to participate were e-mailed to European physicians involved in the care of KTRs. Results: Two hundred and forty-four participants from 138 institutions in 25 countries answered the survey (response rate 30%). Most participants [72% (176/244)] said they always screen for asymptomatic bacteriuria in KTRs. Six per cent (15/240) reported never treating asymptomatic bacteriuria with antibiotics. When antimicrobial treatment was used, 24% of the participants (53/224) said they would start with empirical antibiotics. For an episode of asymptomatic bacteriuria caused by a fully susceptible microorganism and despite no contraindications, a majority of participants (121/223) said they would use a fluoroquinolone (n = 56), amoxicillin/clavulanic acid (n = 38) or oral cephalosporins (n = 27). Conclusions: Screening for and treating asymptomatic bacteriuria are common in KTRs despite uncertainties around the benefits and harms. In an era of antimicrobial resistance, further studies are needed to address the diagnosis and management of asymptomatic bacteriuria in these patients.
Assuntos
Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Infecções Assintomáticas/terapia , Bacteriúria/diagnóstico , Bacteriúria/tratamento farmacológico , Transplante de Rim/efeitos adversos , Padrões de Prática Médica/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto , Infecções Assintomáticas/epidemiologia , Bacteriúria/microbiologia , Estudos Transversais , Europa (Continente)/epidemiologia , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Inquéritos e Questionários , TransplantadosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Asymptomatic bacteriuria, defined as bacteriuria without signs or symptoms of urinary tract infection (UTI), occurs in 17% to 51% of kidney transplant recipients and is thought to increase the risk for a subsequent UTI. No consensus exists on the role of antibiotics for asymptomatic bacteriuria in kidney transplantation. OBJECTIVES: To assess the benefits and harms of treating asymptomatic bacteriuria in kidney transplant recipients with antimicrobial agents to prevent symptomatic UTI, all-cause mortality and the indirect effects of UTI (acute rejection, graft loss, worsening of graft function). SEARCH METHODS: We searched the Cochrane Kidney and Transplant Register of Studies up to 1 September 2017 through contact with the Information Specialist using search terms relevant to this review. Studies in the Register are identified through searches of CENTRAL, MEDLINE, and EMBASE, conference proceedings, the International Clinical Trials Register (ICTRP) Search Portal, and ClinicalTrials.gov. SELECTION CRITERIA: All randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi-RCTs in any language assessing treatment of asymptomatic bacteriuria in kidney transplant recipients at any time-point after transplantation. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two authors independently determined study eligibility, assessed quality and extracted data. Primary outcomes were incidence of symptomatic UTI and incidence of antimicrobial resistance. Other outcomes included incidences of all-cause mortality, graft loss, graft rejection, graft function, hospitalisation for UTI, adverse reactions to antimicrobial agents and relapse or persistence of asymptomatic bacteriuria. We expressed dichotomous outcomes as absolute risk difference (RD) or risk ratio (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) and continuous data as mean differences (MD) with 95% CI. Data were pooled using the random effects model. MAIN RESULTS: We included two studies (212 participants) comparing antibiotics versus no treatment, and identified three on-going studies. Overall, incidence of symptomatic UTI varied between 19% and 31% in the groups not treated for asymptomatic bacteriuria. Antibiotic treatment had uncertain effects on preventing symptomatic UTI (2 studies, 200 participants: RR 0.86, 95% CI 0.51 to 1.45). Risk for selecting multidrug-resistant organisms was uncertain with antibiotic treatment (1 study, 112 participants: RR 1.21, 95% CI 0.60 to 2.41). Persistence of asymptomatic bacteriuria was high regardless of treatment. Antibiotics also have uncertain effects on other important patient and graft outcomes, for instance on all-cause mortality (1 study, 112 participants: RR 2.23, 95% CI 0.21 to 23.86), graft loss (1 study, 112 participants: RR 1.11, 95% CI 0.07 to 17.36), acute rejection (1 study, 112 participants: RR 0.93, 95% CI 0.44 to 1.97), hospitalisation for UTI (1 study, 112 participants: RR 0.74, 95% CI 0.13 to 4.27), graft function (2 studies, 200 participants, MD in serum creatinine concentration -0.06 mg/dL, 95% CI -0.19 to 0.08) and adverse reactions (1 study, 112 participants: no severe adverse event attributable to the antibiotic treatment). Evidence quality was low for all outcomes. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Currently, there is insufficient evidence to support routinely treating kidney transplant recipients with antibiotics in case of asymptomatic bacteriuria after transplantation, but data are scarce. Further studies assessing routine antibiotic treatment would inform practice and we await the results of three ongoing randomised studies, which may help resolve existing uncertainties.