Combined miRNA and SERS urine liquid biopsy for the point-of-care diagnosis and molecular stratification of bladder cancer.

BACKGROUND: Bladder cancer (BC) has the highest per-patient cost of all cancer types. Hence, we aim to develop a non-invasive, point-of-care tool for the diagnostic and molecular stratification of patients with BC based on combined microRNAs (miRNAs) and surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy (SERS) profiling of urine. METHODS: Next-generation sequencing of the whole miRNome and SERS profiling were performed on urine samples collected from 15 patients with BC and 16 control subjects (CTRLs). A retrospective cohort (BC = 66 and CTRL = 50) and RT-qPCR were used to confirm the selected differently expressed miRNAs. Diagnostic accuracy was assessed using machine learning algorithms (logistic regression, naïve Bayes, and random forest), which were trained to discriminate between BC and CTRL, using as input either miRNAs, SERS, or both. The molecular stratification of BC based on miRNA and SERS profiling was performed to discriminate between high-grade and low-grade tumors and between luminal and basal types. RESULTS: Combining SERS data with three differentially expressed miRNAs (miR-34a-5p, miR-205-3p, miR-210-3p) yielded an Area Under the Curve (AUC) of 0.92 ± 0.06 in discriminating between BC and CTRL, an accuracy which was superior either to miRNAs (AUC = 0.84 ± 0.03) or SERS data (AUC = 0.84 ± 0.05) individually. When evaluating the classification accuracy for luminal and basal BC, the combination of miRNAs and SERS profiling averaged an AUC of 0.95 ± 0.03 across the three machine learning algorithms, again better than miRNA (AUC = 0.89 ± 0.04) or SERS (AUC = 0.92 ± 0.05) individually, although SERS alone performed better in terms of classification accuracy. CONCLUSION: miRNA profiling synergizes with SERS profiling for point-of-care diagnostic and molecular stratification of BC. By combining the two liquid biopsy methods, a clinically relevant tool that can aid BC patients is envisaged.

SERS Liquid Biopsy Profiling of Serum for the Diagnosis of Kidney Cancer.

Renal cancer (RC) represents 3% of all cancers, with a 2% annual increase in incidence worldwide, opening the discussion about the need for screening. However, no established screening tool currently exists for RC. To tackle this issue, we assessed surface-enhanced Raman scattering (SERS) profiling of serum as a liquid biopsy strategy to detect renal cell carcinoma (RCC), the most prevalent histologic subtype of RC. Thus, serum samples were collected from 23 patients with RCC and 27 controls (CTRL) presenting with a benign urological pathology such as lithiasis or benign prostatic hypertrophy. SERS profiling of deproteinized serum yielded SERS band spectra attributed mainly to purine metabolites, which exhibited higher intensities in the RCC group, and Raman bands of carotenoids, which exhibited lower intensities in the RCC group. Principal component analysis (PCA) of the SERS spectra showed a tendency for the unsupervised clustering of the two groups. Next, three machine learning algorithms (random forest, kNN, naïve Bayes) were implemented as supervised classification algorithms for achieving discrimination between the RCC and CTRL groups, yielding an AUC of 0.78 for random forest, 0.78 for kNN, and 0.76 for naïve Bayes (average AUC 0.77 ± 0.01). The present study highlights the potential of SERS liquid biopsy as a diagnostic and screening strategy for RCC. Further studies involving large cohorts and other urologic malignancies as controls are needed to validate the proposed SERS approach.

SERS-based DNA methylation profiling allows the differential diagnosis of malignant lymphadenopathy.

This study highlights the potential of surface-enhanced Raman scattering (SERS) to differentiate between B-cell lymphoma (BCL), T-cell lymphoma (TCL), lymph node metastasis of melanoma (Met) and control (Ctr) samples based on the specific SERS signal of DNA extracted from lymph node tissue biopsy. Differences in the methylation profiles as well as the specific interaction of malignant and non-malignant DNA with the metal nanostructure are captured in specific variations of the band at 1005 cm-1, attributed to 5-methylcytosine and the band at 730 cm-1, attributed to adenine. Thus, using the area ratio of these two SERS marker bands as input for univariate classification, an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.70 was achieved in differentiating between malignant and non-malignant DNA. In addition, DNA from the BCL and TCL groups exhibited differences in the area of the SERS band at 730 cm-1, yielding an AUC of 0.84 in differentiating between these two lymphadenopathies. Lastly, using multivariate data analysis techniques, an overall accuracy of 94.7% was achieved in the differential diagnosis between the BCL, TCL, Met and Ctr groups. These results pave the way towards the implementation of SERS as a novel tool in the clinical setting for improving the diagnosis of malignant lymphadenopathy.

SERS liquid biopsy in breast cancer. What can we learn from SERS on serum and urine?

SERS analysis of biofluids, coupled with classification algorithms, has recently emerged as a candidate for point-of-care medical diagnosis. Nonetheless, despite the impressive results reported in the literature, there are still gaps in our knowledge of the biochemical information provided by the SERS analysis of biofluids. Therefore, by a critical assignment of the SERS bands, our work aims to provide a systematic analysis of the molecular information that can be achieved from the SERS analysis of serum and urine obtained from breast cancer patients and controls. Further, we compared the relative performance of five different machine learning algorithms for breast cancer and control samples classification based on the serum and urine SERS datasets, and found comparable classification accuracies in the range of 61-89%. This result is not surprising since both biofluids show striking similarities in their SERS spectra providing similar metabolic information, related to purine metabolites. Lastly, by carefully comparing the two datasets (i.e., serum and urine) we show that it is possible to link the misclassified samples to specific metabolic imbalances, such as carotenoid levels, or variations in the creatinine concentration.