Long-term effects produced by early treatment of Class III malocclusion with rapid maxillary expansion and facemask followed by fixed appliances: A multicentre retro-prospective controlled study.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the short- and long-term dentoskeletal effects of early Class III treatment with rapid maxillary expansion and facemask (RME/FM) followed by fixed appliances. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 44 patients (27 females, 17 males) treated consecutively with RME/FM were included from the archives of 3 centres. Three lateral cephalograms were available: T0 (before the start of RME/FM therapy, mean age 8.1 ± 1.8 years), T1 (immediately after RME/FM, mean age 9.8 ± 1.6 years), and T2 (long-term observation, mean age 19.5 ± 1.6 years). A control group of 17 untreated Class III subjects (12 females and 5 males) also was selected. Between-group statistical comparisons were performed with ANCOVA. RESULTS: No statistically significant differences for any of the cephalometric variables were found at T0. In the short term, the treated group showed significant improvements in ANB (+2.9°), Wits appraisal (+2.7 mm), SNA (+1.8°) and SNB (-1.1°). A significant closure of CoGoMe angle (-1.3°) associated with smaller increments along Co-Gn (-2.4 mm) also was found together with a significant increase in intermaxillary divergence (+1.3°). In the long-term, significant improvements in ANB (+2.6°), Wits appraisal (+2.7 mm) and SNB (-1.7°) were recorded together with a significant closure of the CoGoMe angle (-2.9°). No significant long-term changes in vertical skeletal relationships were found. CONCLUSIONS: RME/FM therapy was effective in improving Class III dentoskeletal relationships in the short term. These changes remained stable in the long-term due mainly to favourable mandibular changes.

Predictability of expansion movements performed by clear aligners in mixed dentition in both arches: a retrospective study on digital casts.

BACKGROUND: to evaluate the predictability of expansion achieved in patients in early mixed dentition treated with Clear Aligners (CA), analyzing the efficiency of the expansion at the end of the first set of aligners and at the end of the therapy in the upper and lower arch. METHODS: 36 patients (20 F, 16 M; mean age 8.3 ± 1.5 years) were selected retrospectively from the Department of Orthodontics of the Hospital of Rome "Tor Vergata". All subjects were treated with CA with no other auxiliaries than attachments. For each patient a standardized sequential expansion protocol was planned for both arches. Digital dental casts were created at three observation periods from an intraoral scanner: prior to treatment (T0), at the end of the first set of aligners (T1), at the end of treatment (T2). The 3D models in planned position determined by the first Clincheck (CC) were obtained for comparison with T1 and T2. Six linear transversal measurements were used to evaluate the dimensional changes and the predictability of expansion movements, comparing T1-CC and T2-CC. RESULTS: a statistically significant increase within the pre-treatment and the final outcomes for all the variables examined was found. In the upper arch, the greatest level of predictability was detected at the level of the first (46.44%) and second deciduous molar width (44.95%) at T1. The analysis of T2-CC changes showed a significant increase in the percentage of predictability of expansion at the level of the first permanent molars, at mesial (54.86%) and distal (58.92%) width. In the lower arch, a higher percentage of predictability than the upper arch was reported at T1-CC and T2-CC, with the greatest values at the level of second (T1-CC: 48.70%; T2-CC: 75.32%) and first deciduous molar width (T1-CC: 45.71%; T2-CC: 72.75%). CONCLUSIONS: CA can induce significant transversal increments. The predictability of expansion is variable, but it did not exceed the 50% during the first set of aligners. It was necessary to apply refinement set to achieve a good predictability for expansion of about 70%. The expansion in the lower arch was observed to be more predictable than in the upper arch.

Dentoskeletal effects of rapid maxillary expander therapy in early mixed dentition patients with different vertical growing patterns without posterior crossbite: A retrospective study.

INTRODUCTION: This study aimed to analyze the variation of dentoskeletal effects after rapid maxillary expander therapy in subjects with different vertical growth patterns. METHODS: The study sample consisted of 94 patients (32 males, 62 females; mean age 8.9 ± 1.5 years) treated with rapid maxillary expander (RME) anchored on first permanent molars. For each subject, lateral cephalograms and maxillary digital dental casts were available before RME, immediately after appliance removal, and 1 year after appliance removal. All the subjects were divided into 3 groups according to their vertical facial patterns (low-angle, normal-angle, and high-angle). Cephalometric analysis was conducted on lateral cephalograms. The virtual 3-dimensional models were used to analyze the torque of the first permanent molars and intercanine and intermolar width. The differences between the vertical facial subgroups were contrasted by analysis of variance multicomparison test (P <0.05). RESULTS: In the short-term (from before to immediately after RME removal), high-angle subjects showed a mandibular clockwise rotation compared with other groups. No significant long-term vertical and sagittal skeletal changes (from before to 1 year after RME removal) were found between the groups. A greater increase in maxillary molar torque was observed in high-angle subjects than in the other groups. The low-angle patients showed a greater increase in the intercanine diameter. CONCLUSIONS: Hyperdivergent subjects showed increased buccal tipping of the anchor molars after the expansion. Hypodivergent and normodivergent subjects showed lower buccal tipping after the expansion and an increased expansion effect in the anterior region.

Leveling the curve of Spee: Comparison between continuous archwire treatment and Invisalign system: A retrospective study.

INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this study was to evaluate and compare leveling of the curve of Spee (COS) achieved by traditional fixed appliances and Invisalign clear aligners (Align Technology, Santa Clara, Calif). METHODS: This retrospective study involved 2 groups of subjects with an increased COS depth. Patients treated with the Invisalign system (I group) and patients treated with the standard edgewise full-fixed appliance (F group). The I group included 30 subjects (13 males, 17 females; mean age, 24 years 5 months ± 19 months). The F group included 32 subjects (12 males, 20 females; mean age, 22 years 4 months ± 21 months). The 2 groups were matched for sex, age, vertical pattern, and observation period. Pretreatment (T0) and posttreatment (T1) lateral cephalograms were analyzed. COS depth was measured on digital dental casts. The intragroup variation between T0 and T1 was analyzed with a paired t test. The intergroup variation was evaluated using an unpaired t test. RESULTS: The leveling of COS was statistically significant, comparing T0 and T1 within the groups. The F group presented a statistically significant extrusion of posterior teeth, with a flaring of the mandibular incisors. The I group showed a statistically significant intrusion of the mandibular incisors, with excellent control in the proclination of incisors during the intrusion movement. CONCLUSIONS: Traditional continuous archwire treatment and the Invisalign system effectively level the COS.

Dento-skeletal response to three different protocols of rapid maxillary expansion in hyperdivergent growing subjects: a longitudinal retrospective study.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to evaluate the dento-skeletal response in hyperdivergent growing patients comparing Rapid Maxillary Expansion (RME) using three different protocols. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Three groups of hyperdivergent subjects treated with RME were analyzed. In 41 patients (23F, 18M) the RME was bonded on the maxillary deciduous second molars (E-RME group); in 40 patients (24F, 16M) the RME was bonded on the first permanent maxillary molars (6-RME group); in 45 patients (26F,19M) the RME was bonded on the first permanent maxillary molars with a removable mandibular Bite-Block (6-RME/BB group). Lateral cephalograms and dental casts were scanned and digitally measured before treatment (T1), at the appliance removal (T2) and at least 1 year after the appliance removal (T3). The comparison was made within the same group and between the groups. Statistical comparisons were assessed with analysis of variance multi-comparison test (*P = 0.05). RESULTS: A significant increase of upper molars buccal tipping was observed in 6-RME group when compared with E-RME and 6-RME/BB groups in the short-term (T2-T1) and long-term (T3-T1); a significant intercanine width increase was observed in E-RME group at the same times. No significant differences in dentoalveolar variables were observed comparing E-RME group versus 6-RME/BB group. CONCLUSIONS: The E-RME protocol allows for a greater skeletal expansion and produces a lower buccal tipping of the first permanent upper molars. The use of the BB in 6-RME/BB group shows a similar attitude to the E-RME protocol then can be considered an effective therapeutic alternative.

Soft tissue evaluation of functional therapy in growing patients with Class II malocclusion: a long-term study.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to analyse the soft tissue changes produced by the functional treatment of mandibular advancement in growing Class II patients. MATERIALS: The treated group consisted of 25 Caucasian patients (12 females and 13 males) with dento-skeletal Class II malocclusion treated with functional therapy (Activator). All patients were evaluated before treatment (T1; mean age, 9.9 years), at the end of functional treatment phase (T2; mean age, 11.9 years), and at a post-pubertal follow-up observation (T3; mean age, 18.5 years). The treated group was compared with a matched control group of 25 untreated subjects (13 females, 12 males) with untreated Class II division 1 malocclusion. Statistical comparisons between the two groups were performed with independent samples t-tests (P < 0.05). RESULTS: Significant improvements were found during the long-term interval for mandibular sulcus (9.9°) and the profile facial angle (9.8°) in the treated group. No significant effects were found in terms of lower face percentage between the two groups. CONCLUSION: Removable functional appliances induced positive effects on the soft tissue profile in Class II growing subjects with good stability in the long-term.

Comparison of the dento-skeletal effects produced by Leaf expander versus rapid maxillary expander in prepubertal patients: a two-center randomized controlled trial.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to compare the skeletal and dentoalveolar effects produced by slow maxillary expansion (SME) with the Leaf expander versus the conventional rapid maxillary expansion (RME) on digital dental casts, lateral and postero-anterior cephalometric radiographs. TRIAL DESIGN: This is a superiority, two-center, two arms parallel balanced randomization trial. METHODS: Patients in the mixed dentition were included with a transverse interarch discrepancy of at least 3 mm. An expansion screw using moderate continuous forces (Leaf group) was compared to a conventional RME screw (RME group). The primary response variable was the difference in maxillary intermolar width (U6-U6) measured at baseline (T0) and one-year follow-up (T1) on the digital dental casts. Other dento-skeletal variables were also measured on digital dental casts and cephalograms. Computer-generated block randomization was used with allocation concealed in sequentially numbered opaque sealed envelopes. The examiner was blinded on the type of expander used. Linear models were used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: Twenty-eight patients in the Leaf group and 28 patients in the RME group were randomized and included in the study. There were no dropouts. U6-U6 did not show a statistically significant difference between the two groups (-0.4 mm in favor of the RME group, 95% CI from -1.2 to 0.5, P = 0.365). As for the other secondary variables no statistically significant differences were found between the two groups except maxillary intercanine width (U3-U3, -0.9 mm in favor of the RME group, 95%CI from -1.5 to -0.3, P = 0.005) and maxillary skeletal width (Mx-Mx, -1.4 mm in favor of the RME group, 95%CI from -2.4 to -0.3, P = 0.013). CONCLUSIONS: No significant differences between the RME and Leaf groups were detected for any of the analyzed dento-skeletal variables except the T1-T0 differences in U3-U3 and Mx-Mx that were significantly greater in the RME group. REGISTRATION: The study was registered in the ISRCTN register on 08/11/2016 with the number ISRCTN18263886. FUNDING: No funding or conflict of interest to be declared.

Mandibular morphometric analysis in open bite early treatment relapse subjects: a retrospective observational pilot study.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this retrospective study was to evaluate the mandibular shape differences between a group of success and a group of failure Anterior Open Bite (AOB) malocclusion early orthodontic treatment in growing subjects, in order to identify mandibular features of relapse. METHODS: Twenty three patients (7 males, 16 females, 9.3 years ±1,5 years) were enrolled from the Department of Orthodontics at the University of Rome Tor Vergata. Inclusion criteria were: white ancestry, overbite < 0 mm, mixed dentition phase, end-to-end or Class I molar relationship, first skeletal class assessed on lateral cephalograms (0° < ANB < 4°), cervical skeletal maturation CS1-CS2, no previous orthodontic treatment, no congenital diseases. Pre-treatment (T1) lateral cephalograms were acquired. Each patient underwent early orthodontic treatment with Rapid Maxillary Expander (RME) and Bite Block (BB) or Quad-Helix Crib (QHC) until open bite correction. Radiographic records were recollected at T2 (permanent dentition, skeletal cervical maturation CS3-CS4). Mean interval time T2-T1 was 4.2 years ±6 months. According to treatment stability, a Relapse Group (RG 11 patients, 3 M, 8F; 13.7 years ±8 months, 7 subjects treated with RME/BB, 4 with QH/C) and a Success Group (SG, 12 patients, 4 M, 8F; 13.4 ± 10 months, 7 subjects treated with QH/C, 5 with RME/BB) were identified. On the lateral radiographs the mandibular length (Co-Gn), the inferior gonial angle (NGo^GoMe) and the antegonial notch depth (AND) were analyzed. Then the mandibular Geometric Morphometric analysis (GMM) was applied. Intergroup statistically significant differences were found using student's t-tests. Procrustes analysis and principal component analysis (PCA) were performed for the GMM. RESULTS: At T1 no statistically significant differences were found between RG and SG, however higher values of antegonial notch depth were found in RG. T2-T1 comparison showed in RG statistically significant increases in Co-Gn (p = 0.04), NGo^GoMe angle (p = 0.01) and antegonial notch depth (p = 0,04). PC1 confirmed the increase in the antegonial notch depth in RG when compared to SG at T2. CONCLUSIONS: The increased antegonial notch depth associated with the increased mandibular length and the increased gonial angle could be responsible of relapse of early orthodontic treatment in open bite growing subjects.

Effects of pendulum appliance versus clear aligners in the vertical dimension during Class II malocclusion treatment: a randomized prospective clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: The aim of the present study was to compare the effects on vertical dentoskeletal dimension produced by Pendulum appliance and Clear Aligners in patients with Class II malocclusion. TRIAL DESIGN: This is a prospective two-arm parallel group randomized clinical trial with 1:1 allocation ratio. METHODS: The Pendulum Group (PG) consisted of 20 patients (15F, 5 M) with a mean age of 17.2 ± 4.3 years. The Clear Aligners Group (CAG) comprised 20 patients (13F, 7 M) with a mean age of 17.2 ± 3.2 years. Distalization's protocol in PG involved the activation of TMA wires till the achievement of Class I molar relationship. A protocol of sequential distalization was applied in the CAG. For each subject lateral cephalograms have been analyzed before treatment (T1) and at the end of the therapy (T2). Descriptive statistics and statistical between-group comparisons (PG vs CAG) were calculated for the craniofacial starting forms at T1 and for the T2-T1 changes. Statistical between-group comparisons for the T2-T1 changes were performed with independent samples t-tests (P < 0.05). RESULTS: The PG showed significantly greater increases in SN^GoGn° when compared with CAG (+ 2.1 and - 0.3 degrees, respectively). Clockwise rotation of the occlusal plane with significantly greater increase of SN^POccl angle was observed in PG (+ 2.8 degrees) when compared with CAG (- 4.2 degrees). The PG revealed a significant increase in the N-Me variable with a mean change of + 4.4 mm compared to the CAG with mean values of - 1.2 mm. The PG showed an increase in the ArGo^GoMe angle (+ 0.7° degrees) compared to the CAG (- 3.4° degrees). The PG showed significantly greater increases in both maxillary and mandibular first molar to palatal plane (+ 1.3 and + 2.1 mm, respectively) when compared with CAG (- 0.9 and - 0.2 mm, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Upper molar distalization with clear aligners represents a valid alternative to non-extraction treatment of Class II malocclusion, reducing the extrusion of maxillary first molars and improving the management of the occlusal plane and vertical dimension. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT05298280. Registered 28 March 2022-Retrospectively registered, https://clinicaltrials.gov .

Light-curing process for clear aligners' attachment reproduction: comparison between two nanocomposites cured by the auxiliary of a new tool.

BACKGROUND: Attachments' configuration play an important role during Clear Aligner Treatment (CAT) for aligner retention and control of movements planned. The aims were to compare the macroscopic morphology of attachments reproduced with flowable (FNC) and conventional (CNC) composites and the effects on them of two light-guide tips with different dimensions. METHODS: 4 resin casts derived from the initial scan of the same patient were obtained. 10 vestibular attachments were replaced on both upper and lower arches of each model with CNC (Models A, B) and FNC (Models C, D). Each composite was cured by means of the same LED lamp with both regular light-guide (Models A, B) and push and light tool® (Models C, D). The 80 attachments were qualitative analyzed by means of a digital stereo microscope. Surface roughness and waviness measurements were assessed by contact probe surface profiler (TalySurf CLI 2000; Taylor Hobson, Leicester, United Kingdom). Statistical analysis was performed with independent samples t-tests. Significance was established at the P < 0.05 level. RESULTS: Model A showed lower values of surface roughness (Ra - 1.41 µm, Rt - 3.46 µm) and waviness (Wa - 2.36 µm, Wt - 10.95 µm) when compared with Model C. Significant reduction of waviness (Wa - 3.85 µm, Wt - 4.90 µm) was observed on Model B when compared with Model D. Significant increase of roughness and waviness parameters (Ra 3.88 µm, Rt 21.07, Wa 2.89 µm, Wt 14.74 µm) was found when CNC sample (Model A) was cured with regular light-guide tip. Higher values (Ra 2.33 µm, Rt 24.07 µm, Wa 1.67 µm, Wt 20.79 µm) were observed after regular light-guide tips curing on FNC sample (Model C). CONCLUSIONS: CNC resins determine more regular surfaces of attachments profiles. The additional use of a smaller light- guide of the LED push and light tool® allows to improve the macroscopic morphology of the attachments and to maximize light irradiance delivering by enhancing the polymerization process and the integrity of the features during the treatment.

Comparison between two screws for maxillary expansion: a multicenter randomized controlled trial on patient's reported outcome measures.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to compare an expansion screw of the maxilla that generates moderate and continuous forces versus a conventional screw for rapid maxillary expansion (RME) on patient-reported outcome measure during the first 12 weeks of treatment. TRIAL DESIGN: This is a superiority, multicenter, two-arm parallel balanced randomization trial. METHODS: Patients in the mixed dentition were included with a transverse discrepancy between the two arches of at least 3 mm. An expansion screw using moderate continuous forces (Leaf group, treated with an expansion screw with Ni-Ti springs) was compared to a conventional RME screw that generates intermittent heavy forces (RME group). The primary response variable was the visual analogue scale (VAS) on pain calculated in the first 12 weeks of therapy. The VAS on difficulty on speaking and oral hygiene, patient satisfaction, and complications were also evaluated. A computer-generated block randomization was used with allocation concealed in sequentially numbered opaque-sealed envelopes. Blinding was not applicable. Linear models were used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: Twenty-eight patients in the Leaf group and 28 patients in the RME group were randomized and included in the study. There were no dropouts. The mean of the VAS for pain was 0.3 ± 0.4 in the Leaf group and 0.6 ± 0.5 in the RME group. The difference was -0.3 (95 per cent CI from -0.5 to -0.0; P = 0.017) in favour of the Leaf group. The difference in pain was marked in the first week (Leaf group 2.2 ± 2.3; RME group 3.7 ± 2.6; difference -1.5; 95 per cent CI from -2.7 to -0.3; P = 0.019). CONCLUSIONS: Patients in the Leaf group experienced a lower degree of pain, especially during the first week following the application of the expander. For the other variables, no significant differences were reported between the two treatments. REGISTRATION: The study was registered in the ISRCTN register on 8 November 2016 with the number ISRCTN18263886.

Enamel interproximal reduction during treatment with clear aligners: digital planning versus OrthoCAD analysis.

BACKGROUND: The aim of the study was to compare the amount of interproximal enamel reduction (IPR) provided on ClinCheck software with the amount of IPR carried out by the orthodontist during treatment with clear aligners. METHODS: 30 subjects (14 males, 16 females; mean age of 24.53 ± 13.41 years) randomly recruited from the Invisalign account of the Department of Orthodontics at the University of Rome "Tor Vergata" from November 2018 to October 2019, were collected according to the following inclusion criteria: mild to moderate dento-alveolar discrepancy (1.5-6.5 mm); Class I canine and molar relationship; full permanent dentition (excluding third molars); both arches treated only using Comprehensive Package by Invisalign system; treatment plan including IPR. Pre- (T0) and post-treatment (T1) digital models (.stl files), created from an iTero scan, were collected from all selected patients. The OrthoCAD digital software was used to measure tooth mesiodistal width in upper and lower arches before (T0) and at the end of treatment (T1) before any refinement. The widest mesio-distal diameter was measured for each tooth excluding molars by "Diagnostic" OrthoCAD tool. The total amount of IPR performed during treatment was obtained comparing the sum of mesio-distal widths of all measured teeth at T0 and T1. Significant T1-T0 differences were tested with dependent sample t-test (P < 0.05). RESULTS: In the upper arch, IPR was digitally planned on average for 0.62 mm while in the lower arch was on average for 1.92 mm. As for the amount of enamel actually removed after IPR performing, it was on average 0.62 mm in the maxillary arch. In the mandibular arch, the mean of IPR carried out was 1.93 mm. The difference between planned IPR and performed IPR is described: this difference was on average 0.00 mm in the upper arch and 0.01 in the lower arch. CONCLUSIONS: The amount of enamel removed in vivo corresponded with the amount of IPR planned by the Orthodontist using ClinCheck software.

Palatal vault morphometric analysis of the effects of two early orthodontic treatments in anterior open bite growing subjects: a controlled clinical study.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the palatal morphological changes in Anterior Open Bite (AOB) pre-pubertal subjects treated with Rapid Maxillary Expansion and Bite-Block (RME/BB) or Quad Helix with crib (QH/C) when compared with a Control Group (CG) by using Geometric Morphometric Analysis (GMM). METHODS: AOB group (AOBG) included 30 subjects (20 females, 10 males, mean age 8.1 ± 0.8ys) with dentoskeletal AOB. AOBG was divided in two subgroups according to the treatment strategy: RME/BB group (RME/BBg) included 15 subjects (10 females, 5 males, QH/C group (QH/Cg) comprised 15 subjects (10 females, 5 males). The two subgroups were compared with a CG of 15 subjects (10 females, 5 males) matched for sex, age, vertical pattern, and observation period. Digital upper dental casts were collected before treatment (T1) and at the end of the active treatment (T2). Landmarks and semilandmarks were digitized on dental casts and GMM was applied. Procrustes analysis and principal component analysis (PCA) were performed. RESULTS: At T2, RME/BBg when compared with QH/Cg evidenced no statistically significant differences. Instead, RME/BBg showed an increased maxillary transverse dimension and a decreased palatal depth when compared with CG. The comparison QH/Cg vs. CG demonstrated a slight transversal maxillary expansion. CONCLUSIONS: RME/BBg showed significant changes in the transversal and vertical dimensions with a clear maxillary expansion and a decrease of the palatal depth when compared with QH/Cg and CG. QH/Cg showed a significant slight maxillary expansion and no variation in vertical and sagittal planes when compared with CG.

Conventional versus laser gingivectomy in the management of gingival enlargement during orthodontic treatment: a randomized controlled trial.

OBJECTIVES: To compare the use of diode laser with conventional surgery evaluating the effectiveness of gingivectomy as an adjunct to non-surgical periodontal treatment in the management of gingival enlargement (GE) during orthodontic treatment. TRIAL DESIGN: Prospective three-arm parallel group randomized clinical trial with 1:1:1 allocation ratio. METHODS: Sixty subjects (33 males and 27 females), with a mean age of 14.4 ± 1.9 years, were selected according to inclusion criteria: overgrown gingivae on the labial side of the anterior teeth secondary to fixed appliance therapy, six maxillary anterior teeth present, and healthy non-smokers patients. Patients were enrolled in the study and randomly assigned to three groups by a computer-generated randomization list and by a block size of 4. The allocation information was concealed in opaque and sealed envelopes by the statistician. In the first group, all subjects underwent a conventional scalpel gingivectomy of the maxillary anterior sextant. In the second group, all subjects were treated using laser-assisted gingivectomy; while subjects assigned to the third group underwent only non-surgical periodontal treatment and served as control group (CG). The observer who performed all the measurements was blinded to the group assignment. Blinding was obtained by eliminating from the elaboration file every reference to patient group assignment. Intergroup comparisons of changes in the periodontal parameters were conducted at 1, 3, and 6 months using ANOVA with repeated measures and Tukey's post hoc tests. The significance level was set at P <0.05. RESULTS: After 1 month, the TGs showed a significant improvement of all periodontal parameters when compared with the CG. No statistically significant differences were observed between the two TGs. At the 3-month observation, a relapse occurred in the TGs, while the CG showed the greater improvement of soft tissue health. In the 6-month versus 3-month evaluation, no significant differences between the three groups were found for any periodontal measurements. In the long-term evaluation (6 months versus baseline), a significant greater reduction of pockets were found in the TGs when compared with the CG. CONCLUSIONS: The adjunct use of both scalpel gingivectomy and laser gingivectomy was more effective in controlling gingival inflammation than non-surgical periodontal treatment alone at 1, 3 and 6 months. In the control group, greater improvement in the periodontal parameters were observed within 3 months, depending on a self-care approach for the management of GE. LIMITATIONS: This study was a short-term study (6-month follow-up). TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov (registration number: NCT03514316).

Changes in mandibular shape after early treatment in subjects with open bite: a geometric morphometric analysis.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the mandibular modifications in anterior open bite (OB) growing subjects treated with Rapid Maxillary Expansion and bite block (RME/BB) or Quad Helix with crib (QH/C) when compared with a Control Group (CG) by using Geometric Morphometric Method (GMM) and conventional cephalometric. MATERIALS: The OB group comprised 34 subjects (26 girls, 8 boys) with dentoskeletal OB and a mean age of 8.0 ± 1.0 years. OB group was divided in two subgroups: RME/BB group comprised 17 subjects (13 girls, 4 boys), while QH/C group included 17 subjects (13 girls, 4 boys). The two subgroups were compared with a CG of 17 subjects (13 girls, 4 boys) matched for sex, age, vertical pattern, and observation periods. Two consecutives lateral cephalograms were available: the first one was taken before treatment (T1), and the second one was acquired at a follow-up observation at least 4 years after the completion of treatment (T2). Landmarks and semilandmarks were digitized on lateral cephalograms and GMM was applied. Procrustes analysis and principal component analysis were performed. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) with Tukey post hoc tests was used to compare the T2-T1 cephalometric changes between the RME/BB, QH/C, and CG. RESULTS: In the long term, RME/BB showed a significantly greater decrease of the Condylar axis to mandibular plane angle when compared to CG and QH/C. GMM showed an increased in height of the mandibular ramus in RME/BB group with tendency to counterclockwise rotation of the mandible when compared with QH/C and CG groups. CONCLUSIONS: RME/BB subjects showed significant changes in the shape of the mandibular ramus with a counterclockwise rotation tendency when compared with QH/C and CG subjects.

Morphometric analysis of the palatal shape and arch dimension in subjects with buccally displaced canine.

OBJECTIVES: To analyse morphological variations of the palate shape and maxillary arch dimension between a group of subjects with unilaterally or bilaterally buccally impacted maxillary canines and a control group (CG) by means of 3D geometric morphometric (GMM). MATERIALS: Pre-treatment records of 50 subjects (16 males and 34 females; mean age 13.9 years ± 1.8) with one or both canines buccally displaced were collected retrospectively. A CG of 50 subjects was selected from a list of orthodontic patients at the same dental hospital. The experimental group, buccally displaced canine (BDC) was divided in two groups: unilateral buccally displaced canine (UBDC) and bilateral buccally displaced canine (BBDC). To analyse the palate's shape and maxillary arch dimension, study casts were scanned. To study the entirety of the palatal shape, 3D GMM analysis was used. To analyse the maxillary arch dimension, the virtual three-dimensional models were measured with a specific software (VAM, Vectra, Canfield Scientific, Fairfield, New Jersey, USA). RESULTS: When comparing the groups with the GMM analysis, patients with BDC showed a statistically significant narrower and higher palatal vault. About the analysis of linear measurements, the intercanine width, the anterior and posterior segment length were significantly smaller in BDC, UBDC, and BBDC subjects when compared with the controls and there were no differences between UBDC versus BBDC groups. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with buccally displaced permanent canine tended to have maxillary transverse constriction and variation in palatal vault morphology. The morphometric variation of the palatine vault and arch dimensions can be considered a clinical factor associated with the presence of BDC.

Development and validation of a prediction model for long-term unsuccess of early treatment of Class III malocclusion.

AIM: To develop and validate a prediction model to forecast long-term stability of early treatment with rapid maxillary expansion (RME) and facemask (FM) in a large sample of Class III growing patients. METHODS: The Brazilian Group (BG) consisted of 73 consecutively treated Caucasian Class III patients (41 females and 32 males). Mean age at T0 (before treatment) was 7.1 ± 1.6 years, while mean age at T1 (long-term follow-up) was 21.8 ± 3.2 years. The Italian Group (IG, validation cohort) comprised 28 consecutively treated Caucasian Class III patients (14 females and 14 males, mean age at T0 9.0 ± 1.3 years and mean age at T1 18.2 ± 1.4 years). Cephalometric analysis was performed on lateral cephalograms at T0. Gender and cephalometric variables, chronologic age, and dentition phase at T0 were used as predictors for long-term unsuccessful treatment at T1. All predictors for unsuccessful treatment in the BG were subjected to bivariate logistic regression. Only those statistically significant predictors in the bivariate logistic regression entered mixed stepwise logistic regression with P = 0.05 to enter and to leave. The validity of the prediction model derived from the BG was then tested on the IG. RESULTS: The prediction model consisted of only one cephalometric variable: the angle between the Condylar Axis and the Mandibular Plane (CondAx-MP) (odds ratio: 1.52, 95% confidence interval: 1.25-1.85, P < 0.0001). Unsuccessful treatment at T1 was predicted for values of CondAx-MP at T0 greater than the cut-off value of 147.8 degrees. BG patients predicted incorrectly were 3 out of 22 for the unsuccessful cases and 1 out of 51 for the successful cases. Therefore, accuracy was 0.95, sensitivity 0.86, specificity 0.98, and positive and negative predictive values were 0.95 and 0.94. When the predictive model was applied on IG, all five unsuccessful cases were predicted correctly, while only 1 out of 23 successful patients was predicted incorrectly. CONCLUSION: CondAx-ML was identified as a reliable predictor for long-term stability of early Class III treatment with RME and FM.

The insulin-degrading enzyme is an allosteric modulator of the 20S proteasome and a potential competitor of the 19S.

The interaction of insulin-degrading enzyme (IDE) with the main intracellular proteasome assemblies (i.e, 30S, 26S and 20S) was analyzed by enzymatic activity, mass spectrometry and native gel electrophoresis. IDE was mainly detected in association with assemblies with at least one free 20S end and biochemical investigations suggest that IDE competes with the 19S in vitro. IDE directly binds the 20S and affects its proteolytic activities in a bimodal fashion, very similar in human and yeast 20S, inhibiting at (IDE) ≤ 30 nM and activating at (IDE) ≥ 30 nM. Only an activating effect is observed in a yeast mutant locked in the "open" conformation (i.e., the α-3ΔN 20S), envisaging a possible role of IDE as modulator of the 20S "open"-"closed" allosteric equilibrium. Protein-protein docking in silico proposes that the interaction between IDE and the 20S could involve the C-term helix of the 20S α-3 subunit which regulates the gate opening of the 20S.

Efficacy of ketoprofen lysine salt and paracetamol/acetaminophen to reduce pain during rapid maxillary expansion: A randomized controlled clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: Rapid maxillary expansion (RME) is an orthopaedic procedure indicated for a wide variety of clinical conditions. AIM: The aim of the study was to compare the effects of ketoprofen lysine salt (KLS) vs paracetamol/acetaminophen (P) on pain perception during RME. DESIGN: One hundred and fifty-one subjects (mean age 8.6 year) were enrolled in this prospective controlled clinical trial according to inclusion criteria: prepuberal stage of development, negative posterior transverse interarch discrepancy, non-concurrent use of other drugs. First phase: n.40 allocated to Group 1 used 40 mg of KLS, n.40 to Group 2 used 250 mg of P, n.36 to Group 3 as control group. Second phase: n.35 allocated to Group 4 used 40 mg ketoprofen lysine salt once a day for the first 3 days of activation. Pain experience was reported on a numeric rating scale (0-4) and a 100-mm visual analogue scale. Pain perception was tested with the Mann-Whitney test (P < 0.05). RESULTS: Pain perception was higher during the first 3 days of activation and it was described as mild to moderate. Group 1 experienced significantly less pain during the fourth, fifth, and sixth day (P < 0.05) compared with Group 2. Patients of the Group 4 reported significantly lower pain during the whole period of RME activation (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The perceived higher pain was reported during the second and third day of expansion. The analgesic effect of KLS is more effective than P during the fourth, fifth, and sixth day. The use of KLS during the first 3 days of activation seems to be able reducing pain during the whole active phase.

Three-dimensional airway changes after adenotonsillectomy in children with obstructive apnea: Do expectations meet reality?

INTRODUCTION: The assessment of the volumetric changes of the airways after adenotonsillectomy has gained popularity among orthodontists, but the validity of such evaluation is not clear. METHODS: Thirty patients with obstructive sleep apnea diagnosed with the use of polysomnography (PSG) were evaluated according to the Apnea and Hypopnea Index (AHI), the obstructive apnea index (OAI), the oxygen desaturation index (ODI), the lowest oxygen saturation (LSpO2), and the average oxygen saturation (ASpO2). The volume and the minimal cross-section of lower (oropharynx and velopharynx) and upper (nasopharynx) spaces of the airways were calculated. Patients were adenotonsillectomized; posttreatment data were collected after 12 months. Thirty comparison patients also had the volume of airways evaluated. RESULTS: A statistically significant improvement (P < 0.05) of most PSG parameters was observed after adenotonsillectomy: AHI from 14.5 to 5.2, OAI from 9.4 to 5.5, ODI from 14.6 to 6.5, and LSpO2 from 77% to 94%). A significant increase in airway volume of the lower space (from 2571.5 mm3 to 5276.3 mm3) and the upper space (from 726 mm3 to 1056.9 mm3), as well as in the minimal cross-section of the airways (from 98.5 mm2 to 335.8 mm2) was found in adenotonsillectomy patients. No significant volumetric changes of the airways were observed in the comparison patients. No significant correlation was found between PSG parameters and the dimensions of the airways before adenotonsillectomy. No significant correlation was found between changes of the PSG parameters and changes of the dimensions of the airways 12 months after the adenotonsillectomy. CONCLUSIONS: Adenotonsillectomy contributed to the increase of the airway volume and minimal cross-section, and to the improvement of the PSG parameters, but there was no correlation between the magnitude of the anatomic changes and the improvement of the breathing mode.