Scanner and kVp dependence of measured CT numbers in the ACR CT phantom.

Quality control testing of CT scanners in our region includes a measurement of CT numbers in the American College of Radiology (ACR) CT phantom using a standardized protocol. CT number values are clinically relevant in determining the composition of various tissues in the body. Accuracy is important in the characterization of tumors, assessment of coronary calcium, and identification of urinary stone composition. Effective quality control requires that tolerance ranges of CT number values be defined: a measured value outside the range indicates the need for further investigation and possible recalibration of the scanner. This paper presents the results of CT number measurements on 36 scanners (25 GE, 10 Siemens and 1 Toshiba) at each available kVp. Among the five materials (solid water, air, polyethylene, acrylic, bone-equivalent) the measured CT numbers exhibit manufacturer and kVp dependence, which should be taken into account when defining tolerances. With this scan protocol, air and solid water values are significantly higher on GE scanners than on Siemens scanners (p-value < 0.01 at each kVp). The CT numbers of polyethylene and acrylic increase with kVp, while the bone-equivalent CT number decreases. These results are used to define manufacturer- and kVp-specific tolerance ranges for the CT numbers of each material in this phantom, which will be used in our quality control program.

A Radiographic Diagnostic Reference Level Survey Using Patient and Phantom Data.

A diagnostic reference level (DRL) survey was conducted for seven common radiographic projections across an integrated health region, covering 27 hospitals and clinics. The projections surveyed were Chest Posterior-Anterior (PA) and Lateral, Abdomen Supine and Upright, L-spine Anterior-Posterior (AP) and Lateral, and Pelvis. Dose area product (DAP) values were collected from patient examinations in 43 digital radiography (DR) rooms and in 18 conventional rooms which use computed radiography (CR). In each room, data were collected for between 10 and 20 patient exposures for each surveyed projection. In addition, for each projection and room, a DAP value was measured for the exposure of a uniform acrylic phantom of standardized thickness. DAP values in DR rooms were found to be significantly lower than in CR rooms (p < 0.05). Therefore, DR and CR rooms were analyzed separately. Based on the survey results, separate DRLs are presented for DR and CR rooms, for both patient and phantom DAP values. DRLs have been set at the 75th percentile values; 25th percentile and median values are also presented to characterize the range of observed values. When identifying which rooms were above the DRLs, the patient and phantom data identified a partially different set of rooms. Possible reasons for these differences, including uncertainties in the patient data, are discussed.