Reliability Criteria of Two-Dimensional Shear Wave Elastography: Analysis of 4277 Measurements in 788 Patients.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Two-dimensional shear wave elastography (2D-SWE) is an accurate method for the non-invasive evaluation of liver fibrosis. We aimed to determine the reliability criteria and the number of necessary reliable measurements for 2D-SWE. METHODS: 788 patients with chronic liver disease underwent liver biopsy and 2D-SWE examination in three centers. The 4277 2D-SWE measurements performed were 2:1 randomly divided into derivation (n = 2851) and validation (n = 1426) sets. Reliability criteria for a 2D-SWE measurement were defined in the derivation set from the intrinsic characteristics given by the device (mean liver stiffness, standard deviation, diameter of the region of interest), with further evaluation in the validation set. RESULTS: In the whole population of 4277 measurements, AUROC for bridging fibrosis was 0.825 ± 0.006 and AUROC for cirrhosis was 0.880 ± 0.006. Mean stiffness and coefficient of variation (CV) were independent predictors of bridging fibrosis or cirrhosis. From these two parameters, new criteria were derived to define a reliable 2D-SWE measurement: stiffness <8.8 kPa, or stiffness between 8.8-11.9 kPa with CV <0.25, or stiffness ≥12.0 kPa with CV <0.10. In the validation set, AUROC for bridging fibrosis was 0.830 ± 0.013 in reliable measurements vs 0.667 ± 0.031 in unreliable measurements (P < .001). AUROC for cirrhosis was 0.918±0.014 vs 0.714 ± 0.027, respectively (P < .001). The best diagnostic accuracy for a 2D-SWE examination was achieved from three reliable measurements. CONCLUSIONS: Reliability of a 2D-SWE measurement relies on the coefficient of variation and the liver stiffness level. A 2D-SWE examination should include three reliable measurements according to our new criteria.

Evaluation of the Hepatorenal B-Mode Ratio and the "Controlled Attenuation Parameter" for the Detection and Grading of Steatosis.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the hepatorenal index ratio of Supersonic Imagine (B-mode ratio) and the controlled attenuation parameter (CAP) of FibroScan for the noninvasive diagnosis and grading of steatosis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Two centers prospectively included patients who underwent liver biopsy, B-mode ratio and CAP evaluation all on the same day between June 2017 and July 2019. MRI and histological morphometry were also performed in center 1. Histology (classic semiquantitative score and morphometry) was used as the reference. RESULTS: Concerning the B-mode ratio, the AUROCs for ≥ S1, ≥ S2 and ≥ S3 were respectively 0.896 ±â€Š0.20, 0.775 ±â€Š0.30 and 0.729 ±â€Š0.39 with the best cut-off values being 1.22 for ≥ S1 (Se = 76.4 %, Sp = 93.2 %), 1.42 for ≥ S2 (Se = 70.2 %, Sp = 71.2 %) and 1.54 for ≥ S3 (Se = 68.4 %, Sp = 69.8 %). The correlation between the B-mode ratio and morphometry was moderate (Rs = 0.575, p < 0.001) and the correlation between the B-mode ratio and MRI was good (Rs = 0.613, p < 0.001). Concerning the CAP, the AUROCs for ≥  S1, ≥ S2 and ≥ S3 were 0.926 ±â€Š0.18, 0.760 ±â€Š0.30 and 0.701 ±â€Š0.40, respectively, with the best cut-off values being 271 dB/m for ≥ S1 (Se = 84 %, Sp = 88.2 %), 331 dB/m for ≥ S2 (Se = 64.5 %, Sp = 74.7 %) and 355 dB/m for ≥ S3 (Se = 55.3 %, Sp = 75.1 %). The correlation between the CAP and morphometry and between the CAP and MRI was moderate in both cases (Rs = 0.526, p < 0.001 and Rs = 0.397, p < 0.001, respectively). The B-mode ratio was better at ruling in and the CAP was better at ruling out the disease. CONCLUSION: B-mode ratio and CAP show similar and good performance for the diagnosis of steatosis (≥ S1). However, both techniques are limited with respect to differentiating mild to moderate (≥ S2) or severe (≥ S3) steatosis.