Marijuana and Breastfeeding: A Pilot Survey of Mothers.

OBJECTIVE: To describe maternal knowledge, attitudes, and practices related to marijuana use and breastfeeding, and determine their association with knowledge about potential harmful effects of marijauna use while breastfeeding. METHODS: Cross-sectional study design, using a 48-item survey, including previously validated questions, of postpartum mothers at a single urban, academic hospital from 2018 to 2019. Mothers ≥ 18 years with a newborn ≥ 35 weeks' gestation were eligible. Descriptive statistics were tabulated, and associations were tested by using χ2 analysis. RESULTS: Of 46 participants, 57% reported marijuana use, and 13% use within the past 12 months. The large majority (87%) knew that use while breastfeeding may be harmful to the infant, whereas just 46% knew that marijuana or THC is found in breast milk. Only 35% received prenatal and 30% postnatal counseling on the risks of marijuana use while breastfeeding. Those aware compared to those unaware that marijuana use during pregnancy may cause learning and behavior problems were more likely to know that use while breastfeeding may be harmful to the infant (75% vs. 25%, P = .03). Those reporting prenatal HCP discussion about the risks of marijuana use while breastfeeding compared to those without such counseling were more likely to know that marijuana/ or HC is found in breast milk (69% vs. 33%, P = .02). CONCLUSIONS: The majority of mothers were aware that marijuana use while breastfeeding may be harmful to the infant, but a minority received counseling about the risks of marijuana use while breastfeeding.

Influence of methodological and patient factors on serum NMDAR IgG antibody detection in psychotic disorders: a meta-analysis of cross-sectional and case-control studies.

BACKGROUND: Antibodies targeting the N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor (NMDAR) have been detected in patients with psychosis. However, studies measuring the IgG subclass in serum have provided variable estimates of prevalence, and it is unclear whether these antibodies are more common in patients than controls. Because these inconsistencies could be due to methodological approaches and patient characteristics, we aimed to investigate the effect of these factors on heterogeneity. METHODS: We searched Web of Science and Ovid (MEDLINE and PsycINFO) for cross-sectional and case-control studies published between Jan 1, 2000, and May 5, 2019, that reported NMDAR IgG antibody seropositivity in patients with psychosis. Pooled proportions and odds ratios (ORs) were derived using random-effects models. We estimated between-study variance (τ2) and the proportion of observed variance due to heterogeneity (I2). We then used univariable random-effects meta-regression analysis to investigate the effect of study factors on heterogeneity of proportions and ORs. Our protocol was registered on PROSPERO (CRD42018099874). FINDINGS: Of 1276 articles in the initial search, 28 studies were eligible for inclusion, including 14 cross-sectional studies and 14 case-control studies. In cross-sectional studies, NMDAR IgG antibodies were detected in 0·73% (95% CI 0·09-1·38; I2 56%; p=0·026) of patients with psychosis, and in case-control studies, patients with psychosis were not significantly more likely to be seropositive than healthy individuals (OR 1·57, 95% CI 0·78-3·16; I2 15%; p=0·20). Meta-regression analyses indicated that heterogeneity was significantly associated with assay type across both study designs, illness stage in cross-sectional studies, and study quality in case-control studies. Compared with studies using a fixed cell-based assay, cross-sectional and case-control studies using the live method yielded higher pooled prevalence estimates (0·36% [95% CI -0·23 to 0·95] vs 2·97% [0·70 to 5·25]) and higher ORs (0·65 [0·33 to 1·29] vs 4·43 [1·73 to 11·36]). In cross-sectional studies, the prevalence was higher in exclusively first-episode samples than in multi-episode or mixed samples (2·18% [0·25 to 4·12] vs 0·16% [-0·31 to 0·63]), and in case-control studies, higher ORs were reported in low-quality studies than in high-quality studies (3·80 [1·47 to 9·83] vs 0·72 [0·36 to 1·42]). INTERPRETATION: Higher estimates of NMDAR IgG antibody prevalence have been obtained with the live cell-based assay, and studies using this method find that seropositivity is more common in patients with psychosis than in controls. The effects of illness stage and study quality on heterogeneity were not consistent across study designs, and we provide clear recommendations for clinicians and researchers regarding interpreting these findings. FUNDING: None.

Prevalence and clinical characteristics of serum neuronal cell surface antibodies in first-episode psychosis: a case-control study.

BACKGROUND: Psychosis is a common presenting feature in antibody-mediated encephalitis, for which prompt recognition and treatment usually leads to remission. We aimed to investigate whether people with circumscribed schizophrenia-like illnesses have such antibodies-especially antibodies against the N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor (NMDAR)-more commonly than do healthy controls. METHODS: We recruited patients aged 14-35 years presenting to any of 35 mental health services sites across England with first-episode psychosis, less than 6 weeks of treatment with antipsychotic medication, and a score of 4 or more on at least one selected Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) item. Patients and controls provided venous blood samples. We completed standardised symptom rating scales (PANSS, ACE-III, GAF) at baseline, and tested serum samples for antibodies against NMDAR, LGI1, CASPR2, the GABAA receptor, and the AMPA receptor using live cell-based assays. Treating clinicians assessed outcomes of ICD diagnosis and functioning (GAF) at 6 months. We included healthy controls from the general population, recruited as part of another study in Cambridge, UK. FINDINGS: Between Feb 1, 2013, and Aug 31, 2014, we enrolled 228 patients with first-episode psychosis and 105 healthy controls. 20 (9%) of 228 patients had serum antibodies against one or more of the neuronal cell surface antibodies compared with four (4%) of 105 controls (unadjusted odds ratio 2·4, 95% CI 0·8-7·3). These associations remained non-significant when adjusted for current cigarette smoking, alcohol consumption, and illicit drug use. Seven (3%) patients had NMDAR antibodies compared with no controls (p=0·0204). The other antibodies did not differ between groups. Antibody-positive patients had lower PANSS positive, PANSS total, and catatonia scores than did antibody-negative patients. Patients had comparable scores on other PANSS items, ACE-III, and GAF at baseline, with no difference in outcomes at 6 months. INTERPRETATION: Some patients with first-episode psychosis had antibodies against NMDAR that might be relevant to their illness, but did not differ from patients without NMDAR antibodies in clinical characteristics. Our study suggests that the only way to detect patients with these potentially pathogenic antibodies is to screen all patients with first-episode psychosis at first presentation. FUNDING: Medical Research Council.