Revascularization of Isolated Superior Mesenteric Artery Dissection for Post-Mesenteric Infarction Exudative Enteropathy: The Contribution of a Multidisciplinary Care Teamwork.

BACKGROUND: Isolated dissection of the superior mesenteric artery (SMA) is increasingly diagnosed; the conservative treatment appears to be the best option when blood supply is maintained. However, some patients require a more invasive attitude, due to acute or chronic ischemic complication. Multidisciplinary care within a health-care network improves medical and surgical support. We present a case of chronic complication of isolated SMA dissection requiring a revascularization, followed by bowel resection. CASE PRESENTATION: A 49-year-old man presented abdominal pain secondary to necrotizing enterocolitis of unknown cause. An isolated small bowel resection with immediate restoration of continuity was first performed to remove the necrotic tissue. The patient developed post-ischemic exudative enteropathy and small intestinal bacterial overgrowth (SIBO). Re-examination of the first computed tomography (CT) scan revealed an isolated dissection of the SMA that had not been diagnosed. The patient was then successfully treated by superior mesenteric revascularization, and after recovering, he underwent small bowel resection for chronic ischemia. CONCLUSIONS: SMA revascularization has to be performed in case of SMA dissection complicated of bowel ischemia. Enteropathy is a rare complication of chronic mesenteric ischemia requiring digestive and vascular management in a dedicated health-care team.

Conversion of Sleeve Gastrectomy to Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass: Is Intrathoracic Migration of the Sleeve of High Incidence?

BACKGROUND: Conversion of SG to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) is increasing. Intrathoracic migration of the sleeve (ITM) often seems associated and is increasingly reported. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Patients who underwent a conversion of SG to RYGB from August 2013 to December 2022 were included. Two groups were compared: patients operated on for weight loss failure (WLF gp) and those operated on for gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD gp). Demographic data, the incidence of ITM, weight loss outcomes, resolution of symptoms, and morbidity were analyzed. RESULTS: Fifty-nine patients were included with an average follow-up of 32 months: 46 patients in the GERD gp (78%) were compared to 13 patients (22%) in the WLF gp. Groups were comparable regarding age and gender, but BMI and commodities were significantly higher in the WLF gp. In the GERD gp, on preoperative gastroscopy, 30% had a esophagitis, 48% had an ITM which required a posterior crural closure versus no esophagitis (p=0.02) and 23% of ITM in the WLF gp (p=0.11). Conversion led to 93% of GERD symptom improvement. In the WLF gp, mean TWL% was 15.3%, significantly greater than in the GERD gp (TWL% = 4.6%, p = 0.01). The complication rate was 10% at 30 days and 3.4% after 30 days, not significantly different between groups. CONCLUSION: The main indication of conversion of SG to RYGB was because of GERD: in these indications, the incidence of ITM was high requiring a surgical treatment with a very good efficacy on symptoms. Weight loss results were disappointing.