MyomiRNAs and myostatin as physical rehabilitation biomarkers for myotonic dystrophy.

MiR-1 and myostatin are markers for muscle growth and regeneration. Myostatin has a key role in the regulation of muscle mass. Myotonic dystrophy type 1(DM1) patients have a disease-specific serum miRNA profile characterized by upregulation of miR-1, miR-206, miR-133a, and miR-133b (myomiRNAs).This study aims to evaluate the possible utility of myomiRs and myostatin as biomarkers of rehabilitation efficacy in DM1, supporting clinical outcomes that are often variable and related to the patient's clinical condition.In 9 genetically proven DM1 patients, we collected biological samples before (T0) and after (T1) exercise rehabilitation training as biological measurement. We measured serum myomiRNAs by qRT-PCR and myostatin by ELISA test. The clinical outcomes measures that we utilized during a 3-6 week rehabilitation controlled aerobic exercise period were the 6-min walking test (6MWT) that increased significantly of 53.5 m (p < 0.0004) and the 10-m walk test (10MWT) that decreased of 1.38 s.We observed, after physical rehabilitation, a significant downregulation of myomiRNAs and myostatin that occurred in parallel with the improvement of clinical functional outcome measures assessed as endurance and gait speed, respectively.The modulation of biomarkers may reflect muscle regeneration and increase muscle mass after aerobic exercise. miRNAs and myostatin might be considered as circulating biomarkers of DM1 rehabilitation. The efficacy of physical rehabilitation in counteracting molecular pathways responsible for muscle atrophy and disease progression and the role of these biomarkers in DM1 and other neuromuscular diseases warrant further investigation.

A large cohort of myotonia congenita probands: novel mutations and a high-frequency mutation region in exons 4 and 5 of the CLCN1 gene.

Myotonia congenita is a genetic disease characterized by impaired muscle relaxation after forceful contraction (myotonia) and caused by mutations in the chloride channel voltage-sensitive 1 (CLCN1) gene, encoding the voltage-gated chloride channel of skeletal muscle (ClC-1). In a large cohort of clinically diagnosed unrelated probands, we identified 75 different CLCN1 mutations in 106 individuals, among which 29 were novel mutations and 46 had already been reported. Despite the newly described mutations being scattered throughout the gene, in our patients, mutations were mostly found in exons 4 and 5. Most of the novel mutations located in the region comprising the intramembrane helices are involved in the ion-conducting pathway and predicted to affect channel function. We report for the first time that two mutations, inherited on the same allele as a heterozygous trait, abrogate disease expression, although when inherited singularly they were pathogenic. Such a mode of inheritance might explain the incomplete penetrance reported for autosomal dominant mutations in particular families.

Identification of novel mutations in five patients with mitochondrial encephalomyopathy.

MELAS, MERRF, LHON and NARP, are well-established mitochondrial syndromes associated with specific point mutations of mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA). However, these recurrent mtDNA mutations account for only a minority of mitochondrial disease cases. To evaluate the impact of novel mtDNA mutations, we performed mtDNA sequence analysis in muscle and other tissues of 240 patients with different mitochondrial neuromuscular syndromes. We identified a total of 33 subjects with novel, private or uncommon mutations. Among these, five novel mutations were found in both paediatric and adult cases. We here report on the clinical description of these patients, as well as the biochemical and molecular genetic characterization of the corresponding mutations. Patients 1 and 2 showed changes in ND genes, patient 3 carried a heteroplasmic deletion in the COI gene, patients 4 and 5 carried heteroplasmic mutations in tRNA(Trp) and tRNA(Phe), respectively. Altogether, these data indicate that mtDNA analysis must become part of the routine screening for mitochondrial disorders.

A standardized clinical evaluation of patients affected by facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy: The FSHD clinical score.

To define numerically the clinical severity of facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy (FSHD), we developed a protocol that quantifies muscle weakness by combining the functional evaluation of six muscle groups affected in this disease. To validate reproducibility of the protocol, 69 patients were recruited. Each patient was evaluated by at least five neurologists, and an FSHD severity score was given by each examiner. The degree of agreement among clinicians' evaluations was measured by kappa-statistics. Nineteen subjects received a score between 0 and 1, 9 had a score between 2 and 4, 20 received a score between 5 and 10, and 8 had a score between 11 and 15. Of the 13 subjects with D4Z4 alleles within the normal range (ranging from 10 to 150 repeats), 12 obtained a score of 0 and only 1 had a score of 1. Kappa-statistics showed a very high concordance for all muscle groups. We developed a simple, reliable, easily used tool to define the clinical expression of FSHD. Longitudinal studies will assess its sensitivity and utility in measuring changes for widespread use.

Neurophysiological Evidence of Motor Network Reorganization in Myotonic Dystrophy Type 1: A Pilot Magnetoencephalographic Study.

PURPOSE: Myotonic dystrophy type 1 is the most common muscular dystrophy in adults. Although brain involvement is well recognized, the relationship between cortical motor control and voluntary movement has not been sufficiently explored. This study aims at assessing magnetoencephalographic (MEG) rhythms at oscillatory and connectivity levels to map central motor control. METHODS: Magnetoencephalographic data were acquired from healthy subjects and five myotonic dystrophy type 1 subjects during resting state and foot movement. Resting state EEG band power, event-related desynchronization/synchronization, functional connectivity, and network features (node strength and betweenness centrality) were estimated. A statistical comparison of these indexes between the two groups was run; a linear correlation between event-related desynchronization and motor performance was obtained. RESULTS: Myotonic dystrophy type 1 subjects showed higher theta power over central motor regions and lower beta power over frontal areas, with a decrease of beta node strength over the dominant hemisphere and an increase of betweenness centrality over the vertex. Foot movement in the most impaired myotonic dystrophy type 1 subjects was inefficient in evoking event-related desynchronization. In less severely impaired participants, dominant foot movement was related to a bilateral sensorimotor event-related desynchronization. CONCLUSIONS: Results provide proof of a central dysfunction of movement. Identification of neurophysiological motor patterns in myotonic dystrophy type 1 could provide a guide for tailored therapy.

Effects of Functional Electrical Stimulation Lower Extremity Training in Myotonic Dystrophy Type I: A Pilot Controlled Study.

OBJECTIVE: Functional electrical stimulation (FES) is a new rehabilitative approach that combines electrical stimulation with a functional task. This pilot study evaluated the safety and effectiveness of FES lower extremity training in myotonic dystrophy type 1. DESIGN: This is a controlled pilot study that enrolled 20 patients with myotonic dystrophy type 1 over 2 years. Eight patients (age, 39-67 years) fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Four participants performed FES cycling training for 15 days (one daily session of 30 minutes for 5 days a week). A control group, matched for clinical and genetic variables, who had contraindications to electrical stimulation, performed 6 weeks of conventional resistance and aerobic training. The modified Medical Research Council Scale and functional assessments were performed before and after treatment. Cohen d effect size was used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: Functional electrical stimulation induced lower extremity training was well tolerated and resulted in a greater improvement of tibialis anterior muscle strength (d = 1,583), overall muscle strength (d = 1,723), and endurance (d = 0,626) than conventional training. CONCLUSIONS: Functional electrical stimulation might be considered a safe and valid tool to improve muscle function, also in muscles severely compromised in which no other restorative options are available. Confirmation of FES efficacy through further clinical trials is strongly advised.