Chronic Myeloid Leukemia, Version 2.2024, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology.

Chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) is defined by the presence of Philadelphia chromosome resulting from a reciprocal translocation between chromosomes 9 and 22 [t9;22] that gives rise to a BCR::ABL1 fusion gene. CML occurs in 3 different phases (chronic, accelerated, and blast phase) and is usually diagnosed in the chronic phase in developed countries. Tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) therapy is a highly effective treatment option for patients with chronic phase-CML. The primary goal of TKI therapy in patients with chronic phase-CML is to prevent disease progression to accelerated phase-CML or blast phase-CML. Discontinuation of TKI therapy with careful monitoring is feasible in selected patients. This manuscript discusses the recommendations outlined in the NCCN Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of patients with chronic phase-CML.

High response rates and transition to transplant after novel targeted and cellular therapies in adults with relapsed/refractory acute lymphoblastic leukemia with Philadelphia-like fusions.

Philadelphia (Ph)-like acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) is associated with a poor response to standard chemotherapy. However, outcomes with novel antibody and cellular therapies in relapsed/refractory (r/r) Ph-like ALL are largely unknown. We conducted a single-center retrospective analysis of adult patients (n = 96) with r/r B-ALL and fusions associated with Ph-like who received novel salvage therapies. Patients were treated with 149 individual novel regimens (blinatumomab = 83, inotuzumab ozogamicin [InO] = 36, and CD19CAR T cells = 30). The median age at first novel salvage therapy was 36 years (range; 18-71). Ph-like fusions were IGH::CRLF2 (n = 48), P2RY8::CRLF2 (n = 26), JAK2 (n = 9), ABL-class (n = 8), EPOR::IGH (n = 4) and ETV6::NTRK2 (n = 1). CD19CAR T cells were administered later in the course of therapy compared to blinatumomab and InO (p < .001) and more frequently in recipients who relapsed after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (alloHCT) (p = .002). Blinatumomab was administered at an older age compared to InO and CAR T-cells (p = .004). The complete remission (CR)/CR with incomplete hematologic recovery (CRi) rates were 63%, 72%, and 90% following blinatumomab, InO and CD19CAR, respectively, among which 50%, 50%, and 44% of responders underwent consolidation with alloHCT, respectively. In multivariable analysis, the type of novel therapy (p = .044) and pretreatment marrow blasts (p = .006) predicted the CR/CRi rate, while the Ph-like fusion subtype (p = .016), pretreatment marrow blasts (p = .022) and post-response consolidation with alloHCT (p < .001) influenced event-free survival. In conclusion, novel therapies are effective in inducing high remission rates in patients with r/r Ph-like ALL and successfully transitioning the responders to alloHCT.

Extramedullary disease relapse and progression after blinatumomab therapy for treatment of acute lymphoblastic leukemia.

BACKGROUND: Blinatumomab has demonstrated encouraging activity in relapsed/refractory (r/r) and minimal residual disease-positive (MRD+) acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). Extramedullary disease (EMD) relapse or relapse with CD19- disease has been observed after blinatumomab therapy in patients with r/r or MRD+ ALL. However, the pathophysiology and risk factors of treatment failure are not fully understood. METHODS: This study retrospectively reviewed the outcomes of adult patients with B-cell ALL treated with blinatumomab (n = 132) for either r/r (n = 103) or MRD+ disease (n = 29) at the authors' center (2013-2021) and analyzed factors associated with treatment response and EMD failure. RESULTS: The overall response rate was 64%. A lower marrow blast burden before blinatumomab (P = .049) and no history of previous EMD (P = .019) were significantly associated with a higher response. Among the patients who responded to blinatumomab, 56% underwent consolidation with allogeneic transplantation. Blinatumomab failure was observed in 89 patients; 43% of these patients (n = 38) either progressed or relapsed at extramedullary sites. A history of extramedullary involvement (53% vs 24%; P = .005) and retention of CD19 expression at the time of relapse/progression (97% vs 74%; P = .012) were associated with a higher risk for extramedullary failure. Central nervous system (CNS) failure after blinatumomab was encountered in 39% of the patients with EMD. CONCLUSIONS: A history of EMD predicted an inferior response to blinatumomab therapy with a higher risk for relapse/progression at extramedullary sites (particularly CNS). Consolidation with allogenic transplantation in patients who primarily responded to blinatumomab did not abrogate the risk of extramedullary relapse. The incorporation of extramedullary assessment and the intensification of CNS prophylaxis may help in addressing extramedullary failure. LAY SUMMARY: Extramedullary failure is common during blinatumomab therapy for relapsed/refractory acute lymphoblastic leukemia. A history of extramedullary disease predicts an inferior response to blinatumomab therapy and a higher risk for relapse/progression at extramedullary sites. Most extramedullary failure cases retain CD19 expression.

NCCN Guidelines® Insights: Myelodysplastic Syndromes, Version 3.2022.

The NCCN Guidelines for Myelodysplastic Syndromes (MDS) provide recommendations for the evaluation, diagnosis, and management of patients with MDS based on a review of clinical evidence that has led to important advances in treatment or has yielded new information on biologic factors that may have prognostic significance in MDS. The multidisciplinary panel of MDS experts meets on an annual basis to update the recommendations. These NCCN Guidelines Insights focus on some of the updates for the 2022 version of the NCCN Guidelines, which include treatment recommendations both for lower-risk and higher-risk MDS, emerging therapies, supportive care recommendations, and genetic familial high-risk assessment for hereditary myeloid malignancy predisposition syndromes.

Considerations for Use of Hematopoietic Growth Factors in Patients With Cancer Related to the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Hematopoietic growth factors, including erythrocyte stimulating agents (ESAs), granulocyte colony-stimulating factors, and thrombopoietin mimetics, can mitigate anemia, neutropenia, and thrombocytopenia resulting from chemotherapy for the treatment of cancer. In the context of pandemic SARS-CoV-2 infection, patients with cancer have been identified as a group at high risk of morbidity and mortality from this infection. Our subcommittee of the NCCN Hematopoietic Growth Factors Panel convened a voluntary group to review the potential value of expanded use of such growth factors in the current high-risk environment. Although recommendations are available on the NCCN website in the COVID-19 Resources Section (https://www.nccn.org/covid-19/), these suggestions are provided without substantial context or reference. Herein we review the rationale and data underlying the suggested alterations to the use of hematopoietic growth factors for patients with cancer in the COVID-19 era.

NCCN Guidelines Insights: Hematopoietic Growth Factors, Version 1.2020.

Management of febrile neutropenia (FN) is an integral part of supportive care for patients undergoing cancer treatment. The NCCN Guidelines for Hematopoietic Growth Factors provide suggestions for appropriate evaluation, risk determination, prophylaxis, and management of FN. These NCCN Guidelines are intended to guide clinicians in the appropriate use of growth factors for select patients undergoing treatment of nonmyeloid malignancies. These NCCN Guidelines Insights highlight important updates to the NCCN Guidelines regarding the incorporation of newly FDA-approved granulocyte-colony stimulating factor biosimilars for the prevention and treatment of FN.

ASBMT Practice Guidelines Committee Survey on Long-Term Follow-Up Clinics for Hematopoietic Cell Transplant Survivors.

Significant advances in hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) have increased the long-term survivorship of its recipients, but because of unique complications arising from radiation and chemotherapy, recipients require lifelong follow-up. To evaluate current survivorship or long-term follow-up (LTFU) clinics specifically for HCT survivors and to evaluate the potential barriers in their establishment, the American Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (ASBMT) Practice Guidelines Committee electronically surveyed 200 HCT programs to gather quantitative and qualitative data about models of care. Among 77 programs (38.5%) that responded, 45% indicated presence of an LTFU clinic; however, LTFU care models varied with respect to services provided, specialist availability, type of patients served, and staffing. Among 55% of programs without an LTFU clinic, 100% agreed that allogeneic HCT survivors have unique needs separate from graft-versus-host disease and that complications could arise during the transition of care either from pediatric to adult settings or away from the HCT center. Lack of expertise, logistics, financial issues, and the observation that 84% of individual practitioners prefer to provide survivorship care were the identified obstacles to establishing new LTFU clinics. The ASBMT hopes that policymakers, HCT providers, and institutions will benefit from the results of this survey and recommends that delivering guidelines-driven screening and expert management of late effects is the goal of first-rate HCT survivorship care.

Chronic Myeloid Leukemia, Version 1.2019, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology.

Chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) is defined by the presence of Philadelphia chromosome (Ph), resulting from a reciprocal translocation between chromosomes 9 and 22 [t(9;22] that gives rise to a BCR-ABL1 fusion gene. CML occurs in 3 different phases (chronic, accelerated, and blast phase) and is usually diagnosed in the chronic phase. Tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) therapy is a highly effective first-line treatment option for all patients with newly diagnosed chronic phase CML (CP-CML). The selection TKI therapy should be based on the risk score, toxicity profile of TKI, patient's age, ability to tolerate therapy, and the presence of comorbid conditions. This manuscript discusses the recommendations outlined in the NCCN Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of patients with CP-CML.

Myeloid Growth Factors, Version 2.2017, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology.

Myeloid growth factors (MGFs) are given as supportive care to patients receiving myelosuppressive chemotherapy to reduce the incidence of neutropenia. This selection from the NCCN Guidelines for MGFs focuses on the evaluation of regimen- and patient-specific risk factors for the development of febrile neutropenia (FN), the prophylactic use of MGFs for the prevention of chemotherapy-induced FN, and assessing the risks and benefits of MGF use in clinical practice.

NCCN Guidelines Insights: Chronic Myeloid Leukemia, Version 1.2017.

The NCCN Guidelines for Chronic Myeloid Leukemia (CML) provide recommendations for the management of chronic-phase and advanced-phase CML in adult patients. The median age of disease onset is 67 years. However, because CML occurs in all age groups, clinical care teams should be prepared to address issues relating to fertility and pregnancy with patients who are of reproductive age at the time of diagnosis. CML is relatively rare in children and there are no evidence-based recommendations for the management of CML in pediatric population. These NCCN Guidelines Insights discuss special considerations for the management of CML during pregnancy and for the management of CML in the pediatric population.

Nonmyeloablative allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant for the treatment of patients with hematologic malignancies using busulfan, fludarabine, and total body irradiation conditioning is effective in an elderly and infirm population.

The BuFluTBI conditioning regimen was designed with the primary goal of reducing non-relapse mortality (NRM) while maximizing primary disease control in patients ineligible for myeloablative conditioning. Patients with hematologic malignancies for whom limited long-term survival was expected with standard therapy were administered an outpatient conditioning regimen of busulfan 3.2 mg/kg IV on day -5, fludarabine 30 mg/m(2) IV on days -4, -3, -2, and 200 cGy of total body irradiation (TBI) followed by stem cell infusion from related or unrelated donors. GVHD prophylaxis included cyclosporine and mycophenolate mofetil. 147 patients were enrolled from 2005-2011; 59% with myeloid disease and 41% with lymphoid disease. The median age was 64, and the median comorbidity index (HCT-CI) score was 3. Overall survival (OS), with 3.2 years median follow-up, was 60% at 1 year and 48% at 2 years, with projected OS 37% at 5 years. Relapse rates were 29% at 1 year and 33% at 2 years, with relapse mortality of 13% at 1 year, and 20% at 2 years. Nonrelapse mortality (NRM) at 1 year was 27% and 33% at 2 years. 54% of patients developed grade II-IV aGVHD and 67% of patients developed cGVHD within 2 years. On multivariate analysis, HCT-CI score 4 or greater, pre-transplant KPS less than 90, delayed platelet engraftment of more than 15 days, and grade II-IV aGVHD were found to be independent predictors of poor survival. There was no difference in OS or PFS between lymphoid and myeloid malignancies. BuFluTBI is an efficacious NMA regimen, active in both myeloid and lymphoid disease, and is ideally suited for use in patients age 65 and older or with an HCT-CI of 4 or greater.

Chronic myelogenous leukemia, version 1.2015.

Chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML) is usually diagnosed in the chronic phase. Untreated chronic phase CML will eventually progress to advanced phase (accelerated or blast phase) CML. Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) have been shown to induce favorable response rates in patients with accelerated and blast phase CML. The addition of TKIs to chemotherapy has also been associated with improved outcomes in patients with blast phase CML. Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant remains a potentially curative option for patients with advanced phase CML, although treatment with a course of TKIs will be beneficial as a bridge to transplant. This manuscript discusses the recommendations outlined in the NCCN Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of patients with advanced phase CML.

Metabolic tumor profiling with pH, oxygen, and glucose chemosensors on a quantum dot scaffold.

Acidity, hypoxia, and glucose levels characterize the tumor microenvironment rendering pH, pO2, and pGlucose, respectively, important indicators of tumor health. To this end, understanding how these parameters change can be a powerful tool for the development of novel and effective therapeutics. We have designed optical chemosensors that feature a quantum dot and an analyte-responsive dye. These noninvasive chemosensors permit pH, oxygen, and glucose to be monitored dynamically within the tumor microenvironment by using multiphoton imaging.

Impact of spliceosome mutation on outcomes of myelodysplastic syndrome and chronic myelomonocytic leukemia patients undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation.

INTRODUCTION: Allogeneic Hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) remains the only curative therapy for myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) and chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML). The impact of spliceosome mutations on allo-HCT outcome is unclear and further understanding is needed to assess the implications of this class of mutations on risk of relapse, overall survival (OS) and non-relapse mortality (NRM) in order to make decision regarding timing of allo-HCT. We examined the allo-HCT outcomes of MDS/CMML patients based on their spliceosome mutation profile to understand the impact of these mutations on transplant outcomes. OBJECTIVE: To compare outcomes of MDS/CMML patients with and without spliceosome mutations undergoing allo-HCT. METHODS: This is a single institution, retrospective study of MDS/CMML patients who underwent allo-HCT with myeloablative or reduced intensity conditioning (RIC) regimen at City of Hope from January 2016 to December 2021. Among them, patients who underwent molecular mutation profiling by NGS (Next Generation Sequencing) for a set of genes known to be mutated in myeloid neoplasms are included in this analysis. We compared OS, relapse free survival, NRM and acute/chronic graft versus host disease (GVHD) incidence between the spliceosome-mutated and unmutated groups. RESULTS: We identified 258 consecutive MDS/CMML patients who underwent allo-HCT. Of these, 126 (48.8 %) patients had molecular profiling done among whom 57 (45.2 %) patients carried a spliceosome mutation. 84.9 % of patients had MDS and 55.6 % underwent a matched unrelated donor transplant. The median age for the whole cohort was 66 years (range 12-77).78.6 % and 73.7 % received RIC in the spliceosome and non-spliceosome groups, respectively. The 2-year OS for the whole cohort was 66.5 % (95 %CI 0.55-0.75) with a day 100 NRM of 7.1 % and 2-year cumulative incidence of relapse of 20 %. Grade II-IV acute GVHD at day 100 was 36.3 % (95 % CI 0.27-0.44) and any chronic GVHD at 2-years was 48.4 % (95 % CI 0.37-0.58). Patients who carried a spliceosome mutation had a significantly better 2-year survival of 83.8 % vs 55.9 % in the non-spliceosome group (P=0.002) and a better PFS of 73.7 % vs 50.0 % (P=0.007). There was no difference in the cumulative incidence of relapse at 2-years 15.9 % vs 18.5 % (P=0.59) between two groups but the spliceosome group had a significantly lower NRM at 2-years 10.4 % vs 31.5 % (P=0.009). There was no difference in incidence of acute or chronic GVHD between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with MDS or CMML who underwent allo-HCT, our study shows better OS for patients who have spliceosome mutations due to lower NRM compared to those carrying non- spliceosome mutations. This favorable outcome of the spliceosome-mutated patients could have implications for timing of allo-HCT, particularly for patients in the intermediate MDS prognostic risk groups.

Total Body Irradiation and Fludarabine with Post-Transplantation Cyclophosphamide for Mismatched Related or Unrelated Donor Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation.

Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) remains the sole curative treatment for most patients with hematologic malignancies. A well-matched donor (related or unrelated) remains the preferred donor for patients undergoing allogeneic HCT; however, a large number of patients rely on alternative donor choices of mismatched related (haploidentical) or unrelated donors to access HCT. In this retrospective study, we investigated outcomes of patients who underwent mismatched donor (related or unrelated) HCT with a radiation-based myeloablative conditioning MAC regimen in combination with fludarabine, and post-transplantation cyclophosphamide (PTCy) as higher-intensity graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis. We retrospectively assessed HCT outcomes in 155 patients who underwent mismatched donor HCT (related/haploidentical versus unrelated [MMUD]) with fractionated-total body irradiation (fTBI) plus fludarabine and PTCy as GVHD prophylaxis at City of Hope from 2015 to 2021. Diagnoses included acute lymphoblastic leukemia (46.5%), acute myelogenous leukemia (36.1%), and myelodysplastic syndrome (6.5%). The median age at HCT was 38 years, and 126 patients (81.3%) were an ethnic minority. The Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation Comorbidity Index was ≥3 in 36.1% of the patients, and 29% had a Disease Risk Index (DRI) of high/very high. The donor type was haploidentical in 67.1% of cases and MMUD in 32.9%. At 2 years post-HCT, disease-free survival (DFS) was 75.4% and overall survival (OS) was 80.6% for all subjects. Donor type did not impact OS (hazard ratio [HR], .72; 95% confidence interval [CI], .35 to 1.49; P = .37) and DFS (HR, .78; 95% CI, .41 to 1.48; P = .44), but younger donors was associated with less grade III-IV acute GVHD (HR, 6.60; 95% CI, 1.80 to 24.19; P = .004) and less moderate or severe chronic GVHD (HR, 3.53; 95% CI, 1.70 to 7.34; P < .001), with a trend toward better survival (P = .099). The use of an MMUD was associated with significantly faster neutrophil recovery (median, 15 days versus 16 days; P = .014) and platelet recovery (median, 18 days versus 24 days; P = .029); however, there was no difference in GVHD outcomes between the haploidentical donor and MMUD groups. Nonrelapse mortality (HR, .86; 95% CI, .34 to 2.20; P = .76) and relapse risk (HR, .78; 95% CI, .33 to 1.85; P = .57) were comparable in the 2 groups. Patient age <40 years and low-intermediate DRI showed a DFS benefit (P = .004 and .029, respectively). High or very high DRI was the only predictor of increased relapse (HR, 2.89; 95% CI, 1.32 to 6.34; P = .008). In conclusion, fludarabine/fTBI with PTCy was well-tolerated in mismatched donor HCT, regardless of donor relationship to the patient, provided promising results, and increased access to HCT for patients without a matched donor, especially patients from ethnic minorities and patients of mixed race.

Comparing transplant outcomes in ALL patients after myeloablative conditioning in mismatch-related or unrelated donor settings.

The optimal myeloablative conditioning regimen for ALL patients undergoing hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT) with an alternative donor is unknown. We analyzed HCT outcomes ALL patients (n = 269) who underwent HCT at our center from 2010 to 2020 in complete remission (CR) after FTBI-etoposide and CNI-based GvHD prophylaxis for matched donor HCT (ETOP-package; n = 196) or FTBI-Fludarabine and post-transplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy)-based prophylaxis for HLA- mismatched (related or unrelated) donors (FLU-package; n = 64). Patients in FLU-package showed a significant delay in engraftment (p < 0.001) and lower cumulative incidence (CI) of any and extensive chronic GVHD (p = 0.009 and 0.001, respectively). At the median follow up of 4.6 years (range 1-12 years); non-relapse mortality, overall or leukemia-free survival and GVHD-free/relapse-free survival were not significantly impacted by the choice of conditioning. However, in patients at CR2 or with measurable residual disease (MRD+), there was a trend towards higher relapse after FLU-package (p = 0.08 and p = 0.07, respectively), while patients at CR1 regardless of MRD status had similar outcomes despite the package/donor type (p = 0.9 and 0.7, respectively). Our data suggests that FLU-package for alternative donors offers comparable outcomes to ETOP-package for matched donor HCT to treat ALL. Disease status and depth of remission at HCT were independent predictors for better outcomes.

Precision sirolimus dosing in children: The potential for model-informed dosing and novel drug monitoring.

The mTOR inhibitor sirolimus is prescribed to treat children with varying diseases, ranging from vascular anomalies to sporadic lymphangioleiomyomatosis to transplantation (solid organ or hematopoietic cell). Precision dosing of sirolimus using therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of sirolimus concentrations in whole blood drawn at the trough (before the next dose) time-point is the current standard of care. For sirolimus, trough concentrations are only modestly correlated with the area under the curve, with R 2 values ranging from 0.52 to 0.84. Thus, it should not be surprising, even with the use of sirolimus TDM, that patients treated with sirolimus have variable pharmacokinetics, toxicity, and effectiveness. Model-informed precision dosing (MIPD) will be beneficial and should be implemented. The data do not suggest dried blood spots point-of-care sampling of sirolimus concentrations for precision dosing of sirolimus. Future research on precision dosing of sirolimus should focus on pharmacogenomic and pharmacometabolomic tools to predict sirolimus pharmacokinetics and wearables for point-of-care quantitation and MIPD.

Tocilizumab for Cytokine Release Syndrome Management After Haploidentical Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation With Post-Transplantation Cyclophosphamide-Based Graft-Versus-Host Disease Prophylaxis.

Cytokine release syndrome (CRS) is a common complication after haploidentical hematopoietic cell transplantation (HaploHCT). Severe CRS after haploHCT leads to higher risk of non-relapse mortality (NRM) and worse overall survival (OS). Tocilizumab (TOCI) is an interleukin-6 receptor inhibitor and is commonly used as first-line for CRS management after chimeric antigen receptor T cell therapy, but the impact of TOCI administration for CRS management on Haplo HCT outcomes is not known. In this single center retrospective analysis, we compared HCT outcomes in patients treated with or without TOCI for CRS management after HaploHCT with post-transplantation cyclophosphamide- (PTCy-) based graft-versus-host disease (GvHD) prophylaxis. Of the 115 patients eligible patients who underwent HaploHCT at City of Hope between 2019 to 2021 and developed CRS, we identified 11 patients who received tocilizumab for CRS management (TOCI). These patients were matched with 21 patients who developed CRS but did not receive tocilizumab (NO-TOCI) based on age at the time of HCT (≤64 years or >65 years or older), conditioning intensity (myeloablative versus reduced-intensity/nonmyeloablative), and CRS grading (1, 2, versus 3-4). Instead of 22 controls, we chose 21 patients because there was only 1 control matched with 1 TOCI treatment patient in 1 stratum. With only 11 patients in receiving tocilizumab for CRS treatment, matching with 21 patients who developed CRS but did not receive tocilizumab, we had 80% power to detect big differences (hazard ratio [HR] = 3.4 or higher) in transplantation outcomes using a 2-sided 0.05 test. The power would be reduced to about 20% to 30% if the difference was moderate (HR = 2.0) using the same test. No CRS-related deaths were recorded in either group. Median time to neutrophil engraftment was 21 days (range 16-43) in TOCI and 18 days (range 14-23) in NO-TOCI group (HR = 0.55; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.28-1.06, P = .08). Median time to platelet engraftment was 34 days (range 20-81) in TOCI and 28 days (range 12-94) in NO-TOCI group (HR = 0.56; 95% CI = 0.25-1.22, P = .19). Cumulative incidences of day 100 acute GvHD grades II-IV (P = .97) and grades III-IV (P = .47) were similar between the 2 groups. However, cumulative incidence of chronic GvHD at 1 year was significantly higher in patients receiving TOCI (64% versus 24%; P = .05). Rates of NRM (P = .66), relapse (P = .83), disease-free survival (P = .86), and overall survival (P = .73) were similar at 1 year after HCT between the 2 groups. Tocilizumab administration for CRS management after HaploHCT appears to be safe with no short-term adverse effect and no effect on relapse rate. However, the significantly higher cumulative incidence of chronic GvHD, negates the high efficacy of PTCy on GvHD prophylaxis in this patient population. Therefore using tocilizumab for CRS management in the HaploHCT population with PTCy maybe kept only for patients with severe CRS. The impact on such approach on long term outcome in HaploHCT with PTCy will need to be evaluated in a larger retrospective study or a prospective manner.

Post-Transplantation Sinusoidal Obstruction Syndrome in Adult Patients with B Cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia Treated with Pretransplantation Inotuzumab.

Sinusoidal obstruction syndrome (SOS) is a potentially life-threatening complication that can be observed after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT). Inotuzumab ozogamicin is an anti-CD22 monoclonal antibody-drug conjugate that has demonstrated high efficacy in relapsed/refractory (R/R) acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) but is associated with an increased risk of SOS in HCT recipients. Here we aimed to examine the incidence and outcomes of SOS in 47 adult patients with R/R ALL who received inotuzumab therapy and subsequently underwent HCT at our institution. All patients received prophylactic therapy with ursodiol, and continuous low-dose heparin also was administered to patients receiving myeloablative conditioning (MAC). SOS occurred in 12 patients (26%) post-HCT, at a median onset of 11 days (range, 3 to 41 days). SOS was graded as very severe in 50% (n = 6), severe in 25% (n = 3), and mild in 25% (n = 3). All patients diagnosed with SOS received treatment with defibrotide for a median of 21 days (range, 3 to 34 days), with resolution of SOS occurring in 8 patients (67%). Mortality from SOS was 33% (n = 4) and occurred at a median of 10 days from diagnosis (range, 3 to 31 days) in patients graded as very severe (n = 3) or severe (n = 1). There were no significant differences between patients who developed SOS and those who did not develop SOS in the median time from the last dose of inotuzumab to transplantation (46 days versus 53 days; P = .37), use of an MAC regimen (42% versus 49%; P = .75), number of lines of therapy prior to inotuzumab (P = .79), median number of administered cycles of inotuzumab (2 versus 2; P = .14), or receipt of inotuzumab as the last therapy prior to HCT (67% versus 66%; P = 1.0). Sirolimus-based graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis was used more frequently in the SOS group (75% versus 29%; P < .01), but there was no between-group difference in the peak sirolimus level (P = .81) or the median time to peak sirolimus level (7 days versus 3.5 days; P = .39). In univariable analysis, only the use of sirolimus-based GVHD prophylaxis was significantly associated with an increased risk of SOS (hazard ratio [HR], 7.50; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.7 to 33.6; P < .01). In the SOS group, the 100-day mortality rate was 33% (n = 4), and median overall survival (OS) post-HCT was 4.3 months (range, 0.2 to 57.2 months). In the group without SOS, the 100-day mortality rate was 14% (n = 5) and the median OS post-HCT was 10.7 months (range, .52 to 39.6 months). In this study cohort, SOS was prevalent in HCT recipients who had been treated with inotuzumab prior to transplantation, and sirolimus-based GVHD prophylaxis was a risk factor for SOS in inotuzumab recipients.