Urinary endogenous peptides as biomarkers for prostate cancer.

Prostate cancer (PCa) is one of the most prevalent types of cancer in men worldwide; however, the main diagnostic tests available for PCa have limitations and a biopsy is required for histopathological confirmation of the disease. Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) is the main biomarker used for the early detection of PCa, but an elevated serum concentration is not cancer-specific. Therefore, there is a need for the discovery of new non-invasive biomarkers that can accurately diagnose PCa. The present study used trichloroacetic acid-induced protein precipitation and liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry to profile endogenous peptides in urine samples from patients with PCa (n=33), benign prostatic hyperplasia (n=25) and healthy individuals (n=28). Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was performed to evaluate the diagnostic performance of urinary peptides. In addition, Proteasix tool was used for in silico prediction of protease cleavage sites. Five urinary peptides derived from uromodulin were revealed to be significantly altered between the study groups, all of which were less abundant in the PCa group. This peptide panel showed a high potential to discriminate between the study groups, resulting in area under the curve (AUC) values between 0.788 and 0.951. In addition, urinary peptides outperformed PSA in discriminating between malignant and benign prostate conditions (AUC=0.847), showing high sensitivity (81.82%) and specificity (88%). From in silico analyses, the proteases HTRA2, KLK3, KLK4, KLK14 and MMP25 were identified as potentially involved in the degradation of uromodulin peptides in the urine of patients with PCa. In conclusion, the present study allowed the identification of urinary peptides with potential for use as non-invasive biomarkers in PCa diagnosis.

Proteomic Analysis of the Non-genetic Response to Cisplatin in Lung Cancer Cells.

Background: Drug resistance is the main cause of therapy failure in advanced lung cancer. Although non-genetic mechanisms play important roles in tumor chemoresistance, drug-induced epigenetic reprogramming is still poorly understood. Materials and Methods: The A549 cell line was used to generate cells with non-genetic resistance to cisplatin (CDDP), namely A549/CDDP cells. Bioorthogonal non-canonical amino acid tagging (BONCAT) and mass spectrometry were used to identify proteins modulated by CDDP in A549 and A549/CDDP cells. Results: Proteins related to proteostasis, telomere maintenance, cell adhesion, cytoskeletal remodeling, and cell redox homeostasis were found enriched in both cell lines upon CDDP exposure. On the other hand, proteins involved in drug response, metabolic pathways and mRNA processing and splicing were up-regulated by CDDP only in A549/CDDP cells. Conclusion: Our study revealed proteome dynamics involved in the non-genetic response to CDDP, pointing out potential targets to monitor and overcome epigenetic resistance in lung cancer.