Vascular comorbidity is associated with lower brain volumes and lower neuroperformance in a large multiple sclerosis cohort.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study is to assess the association between vascular comorbidity burden with clinical and imaging features of disease burden in a large population of people with multiple sclerosis (MS). METHODS: We included participants from the MS Partners Advancing Technology Health Solutions (MS PATHS) cohort. We evaluated if vascular comorbidities (diabetes, hypertension, and dyslipidemia) or a composite sum of comorbidities was associated with MS characteristics, including objective neurologic function assessments and quantitative brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) measurements in propensity score-weighted models. RESULTS: In total, 11,506 participants (6409 (55%) with brain MRI) were included. Individuals with 2+ vascular comorbidities had slower walking speed (standard deviation (SD) = -0.49; 95% confidence interval (CI) = -0.78, -0.19; p = 0.001), slower manual dexterity (SD = -0.41; 95% CI = -0.57, -0.26; p < 0.0001), and fewer correct scores on cognitive processing speed (SD = -0.11; 95% CI = -0.20, -0.02; p = 0.02) versus those with no comorbidities. Those with 2+ had lower brain parenchymal (-0.41%, 95% CI = -0.64, -0.17) and gray matter fractions (-0.30%, 95% CI = -0.49, -0.10), including reduced cortical (-10.10 mL, 95% CI = -15.42, -4.78) and deep (-0.44 mL, 95% CI = -0.84, -0.04) gray matter volumes versus those with no comorbidity. CONCLUSION: Increased vascular comorbidity burden was associated with clinical and imaging markers of neurologic dysfunction and neurodegeneration in MS. Strategies to optimize comorbidity management in people with MS are warranted.

The Montreal Cognitive Assessment and the mini-mental state examination as screening instruments for cognitive impairment: item analyses and threshold scores.

AIMS: To perform an item analysis of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) versus the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) in the prediction of cognitive impairment, and to examine the characteristics of different MoCA threshold scores. METHODS: 135 subjects enrolled in a longitudinal clinicopathologic study were administered the MoCA by a single physician and the MMSE by a trained research assistant. Subjects were classified as cognitively impaired or cognitively normal based on independent neuropsychological testing. RESULTS: 89 subjects were found to be cognitively normal, and 46 cognitively impaired (20 with dementia, 26 with mild cognitive impairment). The MoCA was superior in both sensitivity and specificity to the MMSE, although not all MoCA tasks were of equal predictive value. A MoCA threshold score of 26 had a sensitivity of 98% and a specificity of 52% in this population. In a population with a 20% prevalence of cognitive impairment, a threshold of 24 was optimal (negative predictive value 96%, positive predictive value 47%). CONCLUSION: This analysis suggests the potential for creating an abbreviated MoCA. For screening in primary care, the MoCA threshold of 26 appears optimal. For testing in a memory disorders clinic, a lower threshold has better predictive value.

Autonomic function, as self-reported on the SCOPA-autonomic questionnaire, is normal in essential tremor but not in Parkinson's disease.

OBJECTIVE: To compare autonomic function of subjects with Parkinson's disease (PD) and essential tremor (ET) relative to controls. BACKGROUND: It has been reported that patients with PD have autonomic dysfunction while no literature exists regarding autonomic function in ET. METHODS: Subjects with PD, ET, and controls had autonomic function measured using the SCOPA-Autonomic questionnaire, with the total and domain scores transformed to a scale of 0-100 points. RESULTS: 62 subjects with PD, 84 with ET, and 291 controls were included. Women were more prevalent in control (69%) compared to PD (44%) and ET (44%) groups, and mean age was significantly younger in PD (73 yrs) and older in ET (83) compared to controls (81). The mean SCOPA-Aut Total score in PD was significantly higher than controls, with no difference in ET. No autonomic dysfunction was found in any domain in ET but in PD there were significant abnormalities in gastrointestinal, cardiovascular, urinary, and thermoregulatory domains. Individual question data revealed a significantly higher percentage of subjects with dysfunction on 11/23 questions in the PD group but only 1 question (sialorrhea) in the ET group compared with controls. CONCLUSION: Autonomic scores, particularly gastrointestinal, cardiovascular, urinary, and thermoregulatory were increased in patients with PD, as assessed by SCOPA-Aut. Patients with ET did not exhibit autonomic dysfunction, with the exception of sialorrhea.