RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: Nonfunctioning pituitary adenomas (NFPAs) present at a wide range of ages; it is possible that variable outcomes are based on patient age at presentation. This study aimed to explore long-term outcomes of patients with NFPAs following endonasal transsphenoidal surgery (ETS), considering age stratification. METHODS: This retrospective study included 228 patients with NFPAs who underwent ETS, with a median follow-up period of 63 months. The outcomes included progression-free survival (PFS) rates and neurological and endocrinological outcomes. Age-stratified Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazards analyses were performed. Patients were classified into four age groups: ≤ 49, 50-59, 60-69, and ≥ 70 years. RESULTS: Age-stratified analysis showed a significant correlation between age and PFS in NFPAs (5-year PFS rates: 63.0% in those ≤ 49 years, 76.7% in those 50-59 years, 85.0% in those 60-69 years, and 88.1% in those ≥ 70 years; p = 0.001, log-rank test). Bivariate (HR 1.03, 95% CI 1.01-1.05; p = 0.001) and multivariable (HR 1.03, 95% CI 1.02-1.05; p = 0.001) analyses demonstrated that older age was significantly associated with longer PFS. Multivariable analysis also demonstrated that smaller maximum tumor diameter (HR 0.77, 95% CI 0.60-0.99; p = 0.036) and gross-total resection (HR 8.55, 95% CI 3.90-18.75; p = 0.001) were significantly associated with longer PFS. Multivariable logistic regression analysis demonstrated that only younger age was associated with postoperative improvement of male hypogonadism (HR 0.91, 95% CI 0.84-0.99; p = 0.019). Other postoperative neurological and endocrinological outcomes were not significantly associated with age. CONCLUSIONS: Older patients with NFPAs treated with ETS demonstrated a longer PFS. Of endocrinological outcomes studied, only male hypogonadism improvement was associated with younger patient age.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Stress echocardiographic (SE) testing is an important modality in cardiovascular risk stratification and obstructive coronary artery disease assessment. Binary sex-based parameters are classically used for the interpretation of these studies, even among transgender women (TGW). Coronary artery disease is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality in this population. Yet, it remains unclear whether TGW exhibit a distinct stress testing profile from their cisgender counterparts. METHODS: Using a matched case-control study design, the authors compared the echocardiographic stress testing profiles of TGW (n = 43) with those of matched cisgender men (CGM; n = 84) and cisgender women (CGW; n = 86) at a single center. Relevant data, including demographics, comorbidities, and cardiac testing data, were manually extracted from the patients' charts. RESULTS: The prevalence of hypertension and dyslipidemia was similar between TGW and CGW and lower than that of CGM (P = .003 and P = .009, respectively). The majority of comorbidities and laboratory values were similar. On average, TGW had higher heart rates than CGM (P = .002) and had lower blood pressures than CGM and CGW (P < .05). TGW's double product and metabolic equivalents were similar to those among CGW and lower than those of CGM (P = .016 and P = .018, respectively). On echocardiography, left ventricular end-diastolic and end-systolic diameters among TGW were similar to those of CGW but lower than those of CGM (P = .023 and P = .018, respectively). Measures of systolic and diastolic function, except for exercise mitral valve E/e' ratio, which was lower in TGW than CGW (P = .029), were largely similar among the three groups. There was no difference in the wall motion score index, and therefore, no difference in the percentage of positive SE test results. CONCLUSIONS: This study shows, for the first time, that TGW have a SE profile that is distinct from that of their cisgender counterparts. Larger, multicenter, prospective studies are warranted to further characterize the SE profile of TGW.