Estrogen replacement therapy and non-hormonal medication use among patients with uterine cancer.

OBJECTIVE: As the prognosis for endometrial cancer is excellent, management of the effects of estrogen deprivation has an important influence on quality of life. We examined the trends in the use of estrogen replacement therapy (ERT) and non-hormonal medications among patients with uterine cancer following surgery. METHODS: The MarketScan Database was used to identify patients 18-49 years who underwent hysterectomy plus oophorectomy and those aged 50-75 years who underwent hysterectomy between 2008 and 2020. ERT and non-hormonal treatments of menopause were identified preoperatively and postoperatively. After propensity score balancing, difference-in-differences (DID) analyses were performed to compare the pre-and-postoperative changes in ERT and non-hormonal medication use between groups. The trends in postoperative use of ERT were assessed and tested using Cochran-Armitage trend tests. RESULTS: A total of 19,700 patients with uterine cancer and 185,150 controls were identified. Overall, postoperative ERT use decreased for both age groups and for patients with and without uterine cancer. The DID in ERT use between those with uterine cancer and those with benign pathology after hysterectomy was -37.1% (95% CI, -40.5 to -33.6%) for patients 18-49 years of age and - 10.4% (95% CI, -10.9 to -9.9%) for those 50-75 years. The DID for non-hormonal medication use between those with uterine cancer and those with benign pathology after hysterectomy was 11.2% (95% CI, 7.8 to 14.7%) for younger patients and 3.4% (95% CI, 2.9 to 4.0%) for those 50-75 years. The postoperative new ERT use has been declining over time in patients with uterine cancer in those 18-49 years of age (P = .02) and those 50-75 years of age (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: The use of ERT is uncommon and has declined over time in patients with uterine cancer. Conversely, non-hormonal medications are more commonly used among patients with uterine cancer.

Cost-effectiveness of lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab versus chemotherapy for recurrent mismatch repair-proficient endometrial cancer after platinum-based therapy.

OBJECTIVE: The recent Study 309-KEYNOTE-775 showed improved survival for lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab compared to chemotherapy in patients with recurrent endometrial cancer. We created a decision model to compare the cost-effectiveness of lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab in patients with recurrent mismatch repair-proficient (pMMR) endometrial cancer who had progressed after first-line chemotherapy. METHODS: A Markov model was created to simulate the clinical trajectory of 10,000 patients with recurrent pMMR endometrial cancer. The initial decision point in the model was treatment with ether lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab or chemotherapy (doxorubicin or dose-dense paclitaxel). Model probabilities, utility values and costs were derived with assumptions drawn from published literature. A cycle length of 3 months and a time horizon of 2 years was used. The effectiveness was calculated in terms of average quality adjusted life years (QALYs) gained. The primary outcome was incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs), expressed in 2020 US dollars/QALYs. One-way, two-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed. RESULTS: Chemotherapy was the least costly strategy at $66,693 followed by lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab ($193,590). Lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab resulted in more patients being alive at 2 years (lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab: 367, chemotherapy: 109). Chemotherapy was cost-effective compared with lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab (ICER: $164,493/QALYs). Lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab became cost-effective when its cost was reduced by $1553 per month (7.8% reduction). CONCLUSION: For patients with recurrent pMMR endometrial cancer Lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab is associated with greater survival but is more costly than chemotherapy. The cost of lenvatinib and pembrolizumab would have to be reduced by approximately 7% to be considered cost-effective.

Ambient particulate matter air pollution exposure and ovarian cancer incidence in the USA: An ecological study.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate associations between air particulate matter of ≤2.5 µm in diameter (PM2.5 ) and ovarian cancer. DESIGN: County-level ecological study. SETTING: Surveillance, epidemiology, and end results from a collection of state-level cancer registries across 744 counties. Data from the Environmental Protection Agency's network for PM2.5 monitoring was used to calculate trailing 5- and 10-year PM2.5 county-level values. County-level data on demographic characteristics were obtained from the American Community Survey. POPULATION: A total of 98 751 patients with histologically confirmed ovarian cancer as a primary malignancy from 2000 to 2016. METHODS: Generalised linear regression models were developed to estimate the association between PM2.5 and PM10 levels, over 5- and 10-year periods of exposure, and ovarian cancer risk, after accounting for county-level covariates. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Risk ratios for associations between ovarian cancer (both overall and specifically epithelial ovarian cancer) and PM2.5 levels. RESULTS: For the 744 counties included, the average PM2.5 level from 1990 through 2018 was 11.75 µg/m3 (SD = 3.7) and the average PM10 level was 22.7 µg/m3 (SD = 5.7). After adjusting for county-level covariates, the overall annualised ovarian cancer incidence was significantly associated with increases in 5-year PM2.5 (RR = 1.11 per 10 units (µg/m3 ) increase, 95% CI 1.06-1.16). Similarly, when the analysis was limited to epithelial cell tumours and adjusted for county-level covariates there was a significant association with trailing 5-year PM2.5 exposure models (RR = 1.12 per 10 units increase, 95% CI 1.08-1.17). Likewise, 10-year PM2.5 exposure was associated with ovarian cancer overall and with epithelial ovarian cancer. CONCLUSIONS: Higher county-level ambient PM2.5 levels are associated with 5- and 10-year incidences of ovarian cancer, as measurable in an ecological study.

Conflicting views during gynecologic cancer care: a comparison of patients' and caregivers' perceptions of burden.

This study describes the experiences of cancer caregivers and compares these experiences with patients' assessment of cancer's toll on their caregiver. Participants (16 patient-caregiver dyads) were recruited from a NCI cancer center of excellence in the northeastern United States. Patients were in treatment for ovarian (n = 7), uterine (n = 2), or endometrial (n = 7) cancers. Caregivers included 7 women and 9 men who described themselves as spouse/partner (n = 7), adult child (n = 4), sister (n = 2), parent (n = 1), nephew (n = 1), and friend (n = 1). Participants completed semi-structured individual interviews that focused on perceptions of caregiver burden or the impact of the patient's diagnosis on the caregiver specifically. Data were coded inductively to identify themes present within participants' responses. This process included open and axial coding. Two overarching themes emerged: (1) patient-caregiver agreement and (2) patient-caregiver disagreement. Patient-caregiver agreement included two subthemes: (1) weight gain and (2) weight loss. Patient-caregiver disagreement consisted of two subthemes: (1) differing perspectives of quantity and quality of caregiving provided and (2) withholding of caregiver concerns. Overall, there was 56% agreement between patient and caregiver responses. The results may inform intervention development to address patient-caregiver communication, cancer caregiver needs, and ultimately improve caregiver quality of life.

Phase I trial of daily subcutaneous SPL-108 injections in combination with paclitaxel in patients with platinum resistant CD44+ advanced ovarian epithelial cancer.

OBJECTIVE: Preclinical evidence and early clinical trials have demonstrated the activity of SPL-108, a targeted agent that inhibits CD44 mediated induction of multidrug resistance specifically to paclitaxel and platinum agents. We conducted a phase I, open label, dose escalation study of the safety and tolerability of the combination of SPL-108 with weekly paclitaxel in patients with platinum resistant CD44+ ovarian, primary peritoneal, or fallopian tube cancer. METHODS: Patients with platinum resistant histologically proven epithelial ovarian, primary peritoneal, or fallopian tube cancers and measurable disease according to RECIST (Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours) version 1.1 were selected. Tumors were tested for CD44 expression for eligibility, defined as strong (+++) or moderate (++) staining in ≥20% of the tumor tissue or diffuse + staining. Patients were treated with daily and then twice daily SPL-108 subcutaneous injections and weekly intravenous paclitaxel on days 1, 8, and 15 of a 28 day cycle. Endpoints included safety, determination of maximum tolerated dose, and efficacy. Tumors underwent comprehensive genomic profiling, and cell lines and western blotting were used to study markers of response. RESULTS: We screened 16 patients, and 14 were enrolled based on CD44+ expression. A total of 86% of patients had high grade serous tumors and all had received multiple prior therapies. There were no grade 4-5 toxicities. One patient had grade 3 peripheral sensory neuropathy attributed to paclitaxel and one patient developed presumed colonic perforation attributed to the study drug. No dose reductions or treatment discontinuations were required. All patients tolerated the maximum planned dose; no maximum tolerated dose was reached. Overall response rate was 36%; 5 (36%) patients had partial response and 5 (36%) patients had stable disease. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of SPL-108 with weekly paclitaxel was safe and well tolerated. Encouraging antitumor activity was observed, with 72% of patients deriving a clinical benefit. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT03078400.

Evaluating unplanned readmission and prolonged length of stay following minimally invasive surgery for endometrial cancer.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate risk factors for 30-day unplanned readmission and increased length of stay (LOS) following minimally invasive surgery (MIS) for endometrial cancer. METHODS: This was a retrospective, case-control study using the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS NSQIP). Multivariable logistic regression was used to assess perioperative variables associated with readmission and increased LOS after MIS for endometrial cancer. RESULTS: The study population included 10,840 patients who met the criteria of having undergone MIS with a resultant endometrial malignancy confirmed on postoperative pathology. Common reasons for readmission included organ/space surgical site infection (65 cases), sepsis/septic shock (19 cases), and venous thromboembolism (20 cases). Notable risk factors for readmission included (Odds Ratio, Confidence Interval, p-value): dialysis dependence (6.77, 2.51-17.80, <0.01), increased length of stay (3.00, 2.10-4.10, <0.01), and preoperative weight loss (2.80, 1.06-7.17, 0.03); notable risk factors for increased LOS: ascites (8.51, 2.00-36.33, <0.01), operation duration >5 h (6.93, 5.29-9.25, <0.01), and preoperative blood transfusion (5.37, 2.05-14.04, <0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Identification of risk factors for adverse postoperative outcomes is necessary to inform and improve standards of care in MIS for endometrial cancer. Using nationally reported data from the ACS NSQIP, this study identifies independent risk factors for unplanned readmission and prolonged LOS, and in doing so, highlights potential avenues for quality improvement.

Systemic Progestins and Progestin-Releasing Intrauterine Device Therapy for Premenopausal Patients With Endometrial Intraepithelial Neoplasia.

OBJECTIVE: To estimate trends in use and outcomes of progestin therapy for premenopausal patients with endometrial intraepithelial neoplasia. METHODS: The MarketScan Database was used to identify patients aged 18-50 years with endometrial intraepithelial neoplasia from 2008 to 2020. Primary treatment was classified as hysterectomy or progestin-based therapy. Within the progestin group, treatment was classified as systemic therapy or progestin-releasing intrauterine device (IUD). The trends in use of progestins and the pattern of progestin use were examined. A multivariable logistic regression model was fit to examine the association between baseline characteristics and the use of progestins. The cumulative incidence of hysterectomy, uterine cancer, and pregnancy since initiation of progestin therapy was analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 3,947 patients were identified. Hysterectomy was performed in 2,149 (54.4%); progestins were used in 1,798 (45.6%). Use of progestins increased from 44.2% in 2008 to 63.4% in 2020 ( P =.002). Among the progestin users, 1,530 (85.1%) were treated with systemic progestin, and 268 (14.9%) were treated with progestin-releasing IUD. Among progestin users, use of IUD increased from 7.7% in 2008 to 35.6% in 2020 ( P <.001). Hysterectomy was ultimately performed in 36.0% (95% CI 32.8-39.3%) of those who received systemic progestins compared with 22.9% (95% CI 16.5-30.0%) of those treated with progestin-releasing IUD ( P <.001). Subsequent uterine cancer was documented in 10.5% (95% CI 7.6-13.8%) of those who received systemic progestins compared with 8.2% (95% CI 3.1-16.6%) of those treated with progestin-releasing IUD ( P =.24). Venous thromboembolic complications occurred in 27 (1.5%) of those treated with progestins; the venous thromboembolism (VTE) rate was similar for oral progestins and progestin-releasing IUD. CONCLUSION: The rate of conservative treatment with progestins in premenopausal individuals with endometrial intraepithelial neoplasia has increased over time, and among progestin users, progestin-releasing IUD use is increasing. Progestin-releasing IUD use may be associated with a lower rate of hysterectomy and a similar rate of VTE compared with oral progestin therapy.

Educational Intervention to Improve Code Status Discussion Proficiency Among Obstetrics and Gynecology Residents.

BACKGROUND: Obstetrics and gynecology (OB/GYN) residents receive little formal training in conducting code status discussions (CSDs). OBJECTIVE: We piloted an educational intervention to improve resident confidence and competence at conducting CSDs. DESIGN: The OB/GYN residents at a single institution participated in a 3-part educational program. First, participants reviewed a journal article and completed an online module. Second, they received a didactic lecture followed by a resident-to-resident mock CSD. Finally, participants had a videotaped CSD with a standardized patient (SP). Pre- and postintervention surveys and performance evaluations were analyzed. A subgroup analysis was performed on those with completed data sets. RESULTS: Participants included 24 residents in postgraduate years (PGY) 1 to 4: 85% were female with a mean age of 29 years; 83% completed the entrance survey; 63% completed the SP CSD; and 42% completed of all parts of the intervention. Residents initially felt most prepared to discuss treatment options (3.3/5 on a Likert scale) and less prepared to discuss hospice, end-of-life care, and code status (2.2/5, 2.2/5, and 2.3/5, respectively). Performance during the resident-to-resident CSD was variable with scores (% of skills achieved) ranging from 27% to 93% (mean 64%). Performance at the SP encounter was similar with scores ranging from 40% to 73% (mean 56%). After intervention, residents felt more prepared for CSDs (3.7/5) and end-of-life care (3.9/5). The subgroup analysis failed to show a significant change in skill performance from the first to the second CSD. CONCLUSION: Participants found the components of this intervention helpful and reported improved confidence at conducting CSDs.