High efficacy of CD19 CAR T cells in patients with transformed Waldenström macroglobulinemia.

ABSTRACT: Histologic transformation of Waldenström macroglobulinemia (HT-WM) carries a poor prognosis with standard treatments. Here, we report the first series of HT-WM treated with chimeric antigen receptor T cells showing a high efficacy and no unexpected toxicity.

Tolerance of radiotherapy with concomitant glofitamab in diffuse large B cell lymphoma: a case report.

Glofitamab, an anti-CD20 antibody, is approved as a third-line treatment for relapsed or refractory (r/r) diffuse large-cell B lymphoma (DLBCL), achieving a complete response in nearly 40% of patients. This humanized IgG1 bispecific monoclonal antibody binds to CD20 on malignant B lymphocytes and to CD3 on cytotoxic T cells. This dual binding forms an immunological synapse, activating T lymphocytes and leading to the lysis of tumor cells. Salvage radiotherapy is also effective for r/r DLBCL, but its combination with systemic treatments like glofitamab may increase radiation-induced toxicity. We report the first case of a patient with r/r DLBCL receiving concurrent salvage radiotherapy and glofitamab. A 68-year-old female diagnosed with stage IV DLBCL underwent initial treatment with R-CHOP, then Car-T cell therapy, followed by glofitamab for recurrence. Upon early metabolic progression detected by 18FDG-PET/CT, salvage radiotherapy was administered to the refractory site concurrently with glofitamab. The patient experienced mild para-spinal pain post-radiotherapy but no other significant toxicities. Three months post-treatment, she showed a complete metabolic response with no radiotherapy toxicity, as evidenced by PET-CT, and no signs of radiation pneumonitis. This case indicates that combining glofitamab with salvage radiotherapy is tolerable and suggests potential efficacy, warranting further investigation in prospective studies for r/r DLBCL.

Outcomes of acute myeloid leukemia patients who responded to venetoclax and azacitidine and stopped treatment.

Venetoclax-azacitidine is the standard of treatment for unfit acute myeloid leukemia patients. In the VIALE-A study, treatment was given until progression but there are no data on its optimal duration for responding patients who do not tolerate indefinite therapy. We retrospectively analyzed the outcome of patients who discontinued venetoclax or venetoclax-azacitidine due to poor tolerance. Sixty-two newly diagnosed (ND) AML patients and 22 patients with morphological relapse or refractory AML were included. In the ND cohort (n = 62), 28 patients stopped venetoclax and azacitidine and 34 patients continued azacitidine monotherapy. With a median follow-up of 23 months (IQR, 20-32), median overall survival and treatment-free survival were 44 (IQR, 16-NR) and 16 (IQR, 8-27) months, respectively. Patients who stopped both treatments and those who continued azacitidine monotherapy had the same outcomes. Negative minimal residual disease was associated with a 2-year treatment-free survival of 80%. In the RR cohort (n = 22), median overall survival and treatment-free survival were 19 (IQR, 17-31) and 10 (IQR, 5-NR) months, respectively. Prior number of venetoclax-azacitidine cycles and IDH mutations were associated with increased overall survival. The only factor significantly impacting treatment-free survival was the number of prior cycles. This study suggests that patients who discontinued treatment in remission have favorable outcomes supporting the rationale for prospective controlled trials.

Proton Therapy Reduces the Effective Dose to Immune Cells in Mediastinal Hodgkin Lymphoma Patients.

Purpose: Effective dose to circulating immune cells (EDIC) is associated with survival in lung and esophageal cancer patients. This study aimed to evaluate the benefit of intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT) for EDIC reduction compared with volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) in mediastinal Hodgkin lymphoma (mHL) patients. Materials and Methods: Ten consecutive mHL patients treated with involved-site IMPT after frontline chemotherapy were included. The mean dose to the heart, lung, and liver and the integral dose to the body were obtained, and we calculated EDIC based on these variables. The effective dose to circulating immune cells was compared between IMPT and VMAT schedules. Results: The median EDIC was reduced from 1.93 Gy (range: 1.31-3.87) with VMAT to 1.08 Gy (0.53-2.09) with IMPT (P < .01). Integral dose reduction was the main driver of EDIC reduction with IMPT, followed by lung sparing. Conclusion: Intensity-modulated proton therapy significantly reduced EDIC in mHL patients undergoing consolidation involved-site radiation therapy. Integral dose reduction combined with improved lung sparing was the main driver of EDIC reduction with IMPT.

Outcome of large B-cell lymphoma patients treated with tafasitamab plus lenalidomide either before or after CAR-T-cells.

Tafasitamab plus lenalidomide (TAFA-LEN) treatment relevance pre- or post-anti-CD19 CAR T-cell is currently debated. We analyzed large B-cell lymphoma patients in the DESCAR-T registry treated with axi-cel or tisa-cel in ≥3rd line (L3+) and TAFA-LEN before (n=15, 'TL-pre-CAR-T' set) or directly after (n=52, 'TL-post-CAR-T' set) CAR T-cell. We compared TAFA-LEN v. other treatments using inverse probability weighting in the TL-post-CAR-T set. In the TL-post-CAR-T' set, the median follow-up duration (mFUD) was 7 months, and the median progression-free survival, overall survival and duration of response since the 1st treatment for progression (mPFS2/mOS2/mDOR2) were 3, 4.7 and 8.1 months, respectively. The best overall response rate (bORR) and best complete response rate (bCRR) after TAFA-LEN were 13.5% and 7.7%, respectively. Outcomes were better for patients who relapsed >6 months after CAR T-cell (mPFS2: 5.6 vs. 2 months, p=0.0138; mOS2: not reached vs. 3.8 months, p=0.0034). bORR and bCRR between TAFA-LEN and other treatments were 20.6% vs. 24.9% and 11.6% vs. 15.6%, respectively. Outcomes were similar between TAFA-LEN and other treatments (mPFS2: 2.9 [2-2.6] vs. 2.4 [1.5-4.2] months, p=0.91; mOS2: 3.3 [1.8-6.4] vs. 5.5 [4.4-6.3] months, p=0.06). In an exploratory analysis of the TL-pre-CAR-T set (mFUD since CAR T-cell: 2.8 months), the median TAFA-LEN treatment duration prior to CAR-T was 3.7 months and no patients were reported to become CD19 negative. The bORR, bCRR, 6-month PFS and OS rates after CAR T-cell infusion were 45.5%, 36.4%, 20.1% and 58.2%, respectively. Neither TAFA-LEN nor comparative salvage treatments improved outcomes of patients who relapsed after CAR T-cell.