Rational use of ultrasonography with triaging of patients to detect dengue plasma leakage in resource limited settings: a prospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVES: To compare the traditional haematocrit-based criteria (>20% rise above baseline) with ultrasonography for diagnosing plasma leakage in dengue fever and to identify clinical indicators for triaging patients in resource-limited settings when the demand for ultrasonography is high. METHODS: The Colombo Dengue Study is a prospective observational cohort study recruiting dengue patients in the first three days of dengue fever, before plasma leakage. Serial haematocrit assessments and ultrasonography were performed in patients recruited from October 2017 to February 2020. Clinical signs/symptoms and laboratory investigation results independently associated with ultrasound detected plasma leakage were identified with a derivation cohort and confirmed in a validation cohort. RESULTS: 129 of 426 patients had ultrasonography-confirmed plasma leakage while 146 had a haematocrit rise >20%. Those positive on ultrasonography were also likely to fulfil the haematocrit-based criteria (OR: 4.42, 95% CI: 2.85-6.86), but the two groups did not overlap fully. In the derivation cohort (n = 317), platelet count <97 000/µl, AST/ALT > 51 IU/l and having abdominal pain in the first three days of fever were independent predictors of ultrasound-detected plasma leakage. In the validation cohort (n = 109), the combination of low platelet count and high aminotransferase level had better predictive capacity in terms of sensitivity and specificity. CONCLUSION: Dengue patients should be monitored with both serial haematocrit and ultrasonography whenever possible and plasma leakage should be diagnosed by either one of these criteria. If accessibility to scans is limited, platelet count, serum transaminase levels and presence of abdominal pain are useful to triage patients.

Antibiotics for human toxoplasmosis: a systematic review of randomized trials.

The efficacy of different treatment regimens in clinical syndromes of toxoplasmosis were assessed by conducting a systematic review of published randomized clinical trials through extensive searches in MEDLINE, EMBASE, and SCOPUS with no date limits, as well as manual review of journals. Outcome measures varied depending on the clinical entity of toxoplasmosis. Risk of bias was evaluated and quality of evidence was graded. Fourteen randomized trials were included of which one was a non-comparative study. One well-designed trial showed that trimethoprim-sulphamethoxazole was more effective than placebo for clinical recovery of toxoplasmic lymphadenopathy in immunocompetent hosts. For toxoplasmic encephalopathy, efficacy of pyrimethamine+sulphadiazine and trimethoprim+sulphamethoxazole were similar, whereas pyrimethamine+sulphadiazine versus pyrimathamine+clindamycin showed no difference, irrespective of the outcome. Intravitreal clindamycin+dexamethasone and conventional treatment with oral pyrimethamine+sulphadiazine had similar efficacy with regard to all outcome measures in ocular toxoplasmosis, and intravitreal therapy was found to be safe. Adverse effects seemed more common with pyrimethamine+sulphadiazine. Most trials for encephalitis and ocular manifestations had a high risk of bias and were of poor methodological quality. There were no trials evaluating drugs for toxoplasmosis in pregnancy, or for congenital toxoplasmosis. Pyrimethamine+sulphadiazine is an effective therapy for treatment of toxoplasmic encephalitis; trimethoprim+sulphamethoxazole and pyrimethamine+clindamycin are possible alternatives. Treatment with either oral or intravitreal antibiotics seems reasonable for ocular toxoplasmosis. Overall, trial evidence for the efficacy of these drugs for toxoplasmosis is poor, and further well-designed trials are needed.