Langerhans cell histiocytosis: NACHO update on progress, chaos, and opportunity on the path to rational cures.

Langerhans cell histiocytosis (LCH) is a myeloid neoplastic disorder characterized by lesions with CD1a-positive/Langerin (CD207)-positive histiocytes and inflammatory infiltrate that can cause local tissue damage and systemic inflammation. Clinical presentations range from single lesions with minimal impact to life-threatening disseminated disease. Therapy for systemic LCH has been established through serial trials empirically testing different chemotherapy agents and durations of therapy. However, fewer than 50% of patients who have disseminated disease are cured with the current standard-of-care vinblastine/prednisone/(mercaptopurine), and treatment failure is associated with long-term morbidity, including the risk of LCH-associated neurodegeneration. Historically, the nature of LCH-whether a reactive condition versus a neoplastic/malignant condition-was uncertain. Over the past 15 years, seminal discoveries have broadly defined LCH pathogenesis; specifically, activating mitogen-activated protein kinase pathway mutations (most frequently, BRAFV600E) in myeloid precursors drive lesion formation. LCH therefore is a clonal neoplastic disorder, although secondary inflammatory features contribute to the disease. These paradigm-changing insights offer a promise of rational cures for patients based on individual mutations, clonal reservoirs, and extent of disease. However, the pace of clinical trial development behind lags the kinetics of translational discovery. In this review, the authors discuss the current understanding of LCH biology, clinical characteristics, therapeutic strategies, and opportunities to improve outcomes for every patient through coordinated agent prioritization and clinical trial efforts.

Acute Promyelocytic Leukemia With Torque Teno Mini Virus::RARA Fusion: An Approach to Screening and Diagnosis.

Acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL) with variant RARA translocation is linked to over 15 partner genes. Recent publications encompassing 6 cases have expanded the spectrum of RARA partners to torque teno mini virus (TTMV). This entity is likely underrecognized due to the lack of clinician and pathologist familiarity, inability to detect the fusion using routine testing modalities, and informatic challenges in its recognition within next-generation sequencing (NGS) data. We describe a clinicopathologic approach and provide the necessary tools to screen and diagnose APL with TTMV::RARA using existing clinical DNA- or RNA-based NGS assays, which led to the identification of 4 cases, all without other known cytogenetic/molecular drivers. One was identified prospectively and 3 retrospectively, including 2 from custom automated screening of multiple data sets (50,257 cases of hematopoietic malignancy, including 4809 acute myeloid leukemia/myeloid sarcoma/APL cases). Two cases presented as myeloid sarcoma, including 1 with multiple relapses after acute myeloid leukemia-type chemotherapy and hematopoietic stem cell transplant. Two cases presented as leukemia, had a poor response to induction chemotherapy, but achieved remission upon reinduction (including all-trans retinoic acid in 1 case) and subsequent hematopoietic stem cell transplant. Neoplastic cells demonstrated features of APL including frequent azurophilic granules and dim/absent CD34 and HLA-DR expression. RARA rearrangement was not detected by karyotype or fluorescent in situ hybridization. Custom analysis of NGS fusion panel data identified TTMV::RARA rearrangements and, in the prospectively identified case, facilitated monitoring in sequential bone marrow samples. APL with TTMV::RARA is a rare leukemia with a high rate of treatment failure in described cases. The diagnosis should be considered in leukemias with features of APL that lack detectable RARA fusions and other drivers, and may be confirmed by appropriate NGS tests with custom informatics. Incorporation of all-trans retinoic acid may have a role in treatment but requires accurate recognition of the fusion for appropriate classification as APL.

Pharmacogenomics, Race, and Treatment Outcome in Pediatric Acute Myeloid Leukemia.

Importance: Disparities in outcomes exist between Black and White patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML), with Black patients experiencing poorer prognosis compared with their White counterparts. Objective: To assess whether varying intensity of induction therapy to treat pediatric AML is associated with reduced disparities in treatment outcome by race. Design, Setting, and Participants: A comparative effectiveness analysis was conducted of 86 Black and 359 White patients with newly diagnosed AML who were enrolled in the AML02 trial from 2002 to 2008 or the AML08 trial from 2008 to 2017. Statistical analysis was conducted from July 2023 through January 2024. Interventions: Patients in AML02 were randomly assigned to receive standard low-dose cytarabine-based induction therapy or augmented high-dose cytarabine-based induction therapy, whereas patients in AML08 received high-dose cytarabine-based therapy. Main Outcomes and Measures: Cytarabine pharmacogenomic 10-single-nucleotide variant (ACS10) scores were evaluated for association with outcome according to race and treatment arm. Results: This analysis included 86 Black patients (mean [SD] age, 8.8 [6.5] years; 54 boys [62.8%]; mean [SD] leukocyte count, 52 600 [74 000] cells/µL) and 359 White patients (mean [SD] age, 9.1 [6.2] years; 189 boys [52.6%]; mean [SD] leukocyte count, 54 500 [91 800] cells/µL); 70 individuals with other or unknown racial and ethnic backgrounds were not included. Among all patients without core binding factor AML who received standard induction therapy, Black patients had significantly worse outcomes compared with White patients (5-year event-free survival rate, 25% [95% CI, 9%-67%] compared with 56% [95% CI, 46%-70%]; P = .03). By contrast, among all patients who received augmented induction therapy, there were no differences in outcome according to race (5-year event-free survival rate, Black patients, 50% [95% CI, 38%-67%]; White patients, 48% [95% CI, 42%-55%]; P = .78). Among patients who received standard induction therapy, those with low ACS10 scores had a significantly worse 5-year event-free survival rate compared with those with high scores (42.4% [95% CI, 25.6%-59.3%] and 70.0% [95% CI, 56.6%-83.1%]; P = .004); however, among patients who received augmented induction therapy, there were no differences in 5-year event-free survival rates according to ACS10 score (low score, 60.6% [95% CI, 50.9%-70.2%] and high score, 54.8% [95% CI, 47.1%-62.5%]; P = .43). Conclusions and Relevance: In this comparative effectiveness study of pediatric patients with AML treated in 2 consecutive clinical trials, Black patients had worse outcomes compared with White patients after treatment with standard induction therapy, but this disparity was eliminated by treatment with augmented induction therapy. When accounting for ACS10 scores, no outcome disparities were seen between Black and White patients. Our results suggest that using pharmacogenomics parameters to tailor induction regimens for both Black and White patients may narrow the racial disparity gap in patients with AML.

Pharmacogenomic Score Effectively Personalizes Treatment of Acute Myeloid Leukemia.

PURPOSE: Cytarabine (also known as ara-C) has been the backbone of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) chemotherapy for over five decades. Recent pharmacogenomics-based 10-SNP ara-C score (ACS10) showed low ACS10 (£0) to be associated with poor outcome in AML patients treated with standard chemotherapy. Here, we evaluated ACS10 score in the context of three different induction 1 regimens in pediatric AML patients. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: ACS10 score groups (low,£0 or high,>0) were evaluated for association with event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS) by three randomized treatment arms in patients treated on the AML02 (NCT00136084) and AML08 (NCT00703820) clinical trials: AML02 low-dose cytarabine (LDAC arm, n=91), AML02+AML08 high-dose cytarabine (HDAC arm, n=194) and AML08 clofarabine+ cytarabine (Clo/Ara-C arm, n=105) induction 1 regimens. RESULTS: Within the low-ACS10 score (£0) group, significantly improved EFS and OS was observed among patients treated with Clo/Ara-C as compared to LDAC (EFS, HR=0.45, 95% CI, 0.23-0.88, p=0.020; OS, HR=0.44, 95% CI, 0.19-0.99, p=0.048). In contrast, within the high-ACS10 score group (score >0) augmentation with Clo/Ara-C was not favorable as compared to LDAC (Clo/Ara-C vs. LDAC, EFS, HR=1.95, 95% CI: 1.05-3.63, p=0.035; OS HR=2.17, 95%CI: 1.05-4.49; p=0.037). Personalization models predicted 9% improvement in outcome in ACS10 score-based tailored induction (Clo/Ara-C for low and LDAC for high-ACS10 groups) as compared to non-personalized approaches (p<0.002). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that tailoring induction regimens using ACS10 scores can significantly improve outcome in patients with AML. Given the SNPs are germline, preemptive genotyping can accelerate matching the most effective remission induction regimen.