RESUMO
BACKGROUND: The standard of care for patients with intermediate-to-high risk renal cell carcinoma is partial or radical nephrectomy followed by surveillance. We aimed to investigate use of nivolumab before nephrectomy followed by adjuvant nivolumab in patients with high-risk renal cell carcinoma to determine recurrence-free survival compared with surgery only. METHODS: In this open-label, randomised, phase 3 trial (PROSPER EA8143), patients were recruited from 183 community and academic sites across the USA and Canada. Eligible patients were aged 18 years or older with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0-1, with previously untreated clinical stage T2 or greater or Tany N+ renal cell carcinoma of clear cell or non-clear cell histology planned for partial or radical nephrectomy. Selected patients with oligometastatic disease, who were disease free at other disease sites within 12 weeks of surgery, were eligible for inclusion. We randomly assigned (1:1) patients using permuted blocks (block size of 4) within stratum (clinical TNM stage) to either nivolumab plus surgery, or surgery only followed by surveillance. In the nivolumab group, nivolumab 480 mg was administered before surgery, followed by nine adjuvant doses. The primary endpoint was investigator-reviewed recurrence-free survival in patients with renal cell carcinoma assessed in all randomly assigned patients regardless of histology. Safety was assessed in all randomly assigned patients who started the assigned protocol treatment. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03055013, and is closed to accrual. FINDINGS: Between Feb 2, 2017, and June 2, 2021, 819 patients were randomly assigned to nivolumab plus surgery (404 [49%]) or surgery only (415 [51%]). 366 (91%) of 404 patients assigned to nivolumab plus surgery and 387 (93%) of 415 patients assigned to surgery only group started treatment. Median age was 61 years (IQR 53-69), 248 (30%) of 819 patients were female, 571 (70%) were male, 672 (88%) were White, and 77 (10%) were Hispanic or Latino. The Data and Safety Monitoring Committee stopped the trial at a planned interim analysis (March 25, 2022) because of futility. Median follow-up was 30·4 months (IQR 21·5-42·4) in the nivolumab group and 30·1 months (21·9-41·8) in the surgery only group. 381 (94%) of 404 patients in the nivolumab plus surgery group and 399 (96%) of 415 in the surgery only group had renal cell carcinoma and were included in the recurrence-free survival analysis. As of data cutoff (May 24, 2023), recurrence-free survival was not significantly different between nivolumab (125 [33%] of 381 had recurrence-free survival events) versus surgery only (133 [33%] of 399; hazard ratio 0·94 [95% CI 0·74-1·21]; one-sided p=0·32). The most common treatment-related grade 3-4 adverse events were elevated lipase (17 [5%] of 366 patients in the nivolumab plus surgery group vs none in the surgery only group), anaemia (seven [2%] vs nine [2%]), increased alanine aminotransferase (ten [3%] vs one [<1%]), abdominal pain (four [1%] vs six [2%]), and increased serum amylase (nine [2%] vs none). 177 (48%) patients in the nivolumab plus surgery group and 93 (24%) in the surgery only group had grade 3-5 adverse events due to any cause, the most common of which were anaemia (23 [6%] vs 19 [5%]), hypertension (27 [7%] vs nine [2%]), and elevated lipase (18 [5%] vs six [2%]). 48 (12%) of 404 patients in the nivolumab group and 40 (10%) of 415 in the surgery only group died, of which eight (2%) and three (1%), respectively, were determined to be treatment-related. INTERPRETATION: Perioperative nivolumab before nephrectomy followed by adjuvant nivolumab did not improve recurrence-free survival versus surgery only followed by surveillance in patients with high-risk renal cell carcinoma. FUNDING: US National Institutes of Health National Cancer Institute and Bristol Myers Squibb.
Assuntos
Carcinoma de Células Renais , Neoplasias Renais , Nefrectomia , Nivolumabe , Humanos , Nivolumabe/administração & dosagem , Nivolumabe/uso terapêutico , Nivolumabe/efeitos adversos , Carcinoma de Células Renais/cirurgia , Carcinoma de Células Renais/tratamento farmacológico , Carcinoma de Células Renais/patologia , Carcinoma de Células Renais/mortalidade , Masculino , Feminino , Neoplasias Renais/cirurgia , Neoplasias Renais/patologia , Neoplasias Renais/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias Renais/mortalidade , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Idoso , Canadá , Quimioterapia Adjuvante , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Antineoplásicos Imunológicos/uso terapêutico , Antineoplásicos Imunológicos/efeitos adversos , Antineoplásicos Imunológicos/administração & dosagemRESUMO
PURPOSE: CT-guided MWA is a safe and effective tool that should be utilized in the treatment of small renal masses (SRMs). We aim to clarify the utility of CT-guided MWA by examining patient outcomes such as recurrence, treatment success, changes in renal function, and complications. METHODS: A retrospective review of consecutive patients with SRMs who underwent same day renal mass biopsy (RMB) and CT-guided MWA between 2015 and 2022 was performed. Treatment safety was assessed by 30-day complications according to the Clavien-Dindo system and change in eGFR >30 days post-procedure. Treatment efficacy was defined by local recurrence and incomplete treatment rates and calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: A total of 108 renal masses were found in 104 patients. The overall complication rate was 7.4% (8/108), of which 4 were major complications (3.7%). For those with renal function available >30 days post ablation, the median eGFR was 47.2 (IQR: 36.0, 57), compared to 52.3 (IQR: 43.7, 61.5) pre-ablation, p<0.0001. 5-year local recurrence free survival was 86%. Among those with biopsy proven malignancy (n= 66), there were five local recurrences (7.54%) occurring at a median of 25.1 months (IQR 19.9, 36.2) and one case (1.5%) of incomplete treatment. CONCLUSIONS: As the medical field continues to evolve towards less invasive interventions, MWA offers a valuable tool in the management of renal masses. With low major complication and recurrence rates, our findings support the utility of CT-guided MWA as a tool for treatment of SRMs.
Assuntos
Técnicas de Ablação , Carcinoma de Células Renais , Ablação por Cateter , Neoplasias Renais , Humanos , Neoplasias Renais/patologia , Carcinoma de Células Renais/patologia , Micro-Ondas/uso terapêutico , Resultado do Tratamento , Técnicas de Ablação/efeitos adversos , Técnicas de Ablação/métodos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Ablação por Cateter/métodosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: The early diagnosis and treatment of depression are cancer care priorities. These priorities are critical for prostate cancer survivors because men rarely seek mental health care. However, little is known about the epidemiology of depression in this patient population. The goal of this study was to describe the prevalence and predictors of probable depression in prostate cancer survivors. METHODS: The data were from a population-based cohort of North Carolinian prostate cancer survivors who were enrolled from 2004 to 2007 in the North Carolina-Louisiana Prostate Cancer Project (n = 1031) and were prospectively followed annually from 2008 to 2011 in the Health Care Access and Prostate Cancer Treatment in North Carolina study (n = 805). Generalized estimating equations were used to evaluate an indicator of probable depression (Short Form 12 mental composite score ≤48.9; measured at enrollment and during the annual follow-up) as a function of individual-level characteristics within the longitudinal data set. RESULTS: The prevalence of probable depression fell from 38% in the year of the cancer diagnosis to 20% 6 to 7 years later. Risk factors for probable depression throughout the study were African American race, unemployment, low annual income, younger age, recency of cancer diagnosis, past depression, comorbidities, treatment decisional regret, and nonadherence to exercise recommendations. CONCLUSIONS: Depression is a major challenge for prostate cancer survivors, particularly in the first 5 years after the cancer diagnosis. To the authors' knowledge, this is the first study to demonstrate an association between treatment decisional regret and probable depression.
Assuntos
Sobreviventes de Câncer/psicologia , Depressão/epidemiologia , Neoplasias da Próstata/psicologia , Qualidade de Vida/psicologia , Adulto , Negro ou Afro-Americano/psicologia , Negro ou Afro-Americano/estatística & dados numéricos , Fatores Etários , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Sobreviventes de Câncer/estatística & dados numéricos , Tomada de Decisões , Depressão/diagnóstico , Depressão/etiologia , Depressão/psicologia , Emoções , Seguimentos , Humanos , Louisiana/epidemiologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , North Carolina/epidemiologia , Cooperação do Paciente/psicologia , Prevalência , Probabilidade , Estudos Prospectivos , Próstata , Neoplasias da Próstata/mortalidade , Neoplasias da Próstata/terapia , Escalas de Graduação Psiquiátrica/estatística & dados numéricos , Fatores de Risco , Desemprego/psicologia , Desemprego/estatística & dados numéricos , População Branca/psicologia , População Branca/estatística & dados numéricosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Supporting patients' decision making about clinical trials may enhance trial participation. To date, few theory-based interventions have been tested to address this issue. The objective of the current study was aimed to evaluate the effect of a multimedia psychoeducation (MP) intervention, relative to a print education (PE) intervention, on patients' decision support needs and attitudes about clinical trials. METHODS: Patients with cancer who were eligible for participation in a National Cancer Institute therapeutic cancer clinical trial were recruited through the nationwide University of Rochester Cancer Center National Cancer Institute Community Oncology Research Program from 2014 to 2016 and were randomized to the MP or PE intervention. Assessments at baseline (before intervention), postintervention, and at a 2-month follow-up visit included patients' decision support needs, attitudes regarding clinical trials, and clinical trial participation. RESULTS: In total, 418 patients with various types of cancer were recruited (ages 26-89 years). Relative to the PE intervention, the MP intervention did not significantly affect decision support needs. However, patients in the MP arm reported significantly more positive attitudes about clinical trials and were more likely to participate in a clinical trial than those in the PE arm (69% vs 62%; P = .01). Furthermore, an improvement in attitudes about clinical trials significantly mediated the effect of the intervention on participation in clinical trials. CONCLUSIONS: The MP intervention was able to improve patient attitudes toward clinical trials compared with the PE intervention, and this improvement led to increased rates of participation in trials. The MP intervention could be disseminated to improve attitudes about clinical trials among patients with cancer.
Assuntos
Neoplasias/psicologia , Educação de Pacientes como Assunto/métodos , Participação do Paciente/psicologia , Idoso , Tomada de Decisões , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Multimídia , National Cancer Institute (U.S.) , Folhetos , Estados UnidosRESUMO
Background: Androgen deprivation therapy, the mainstay of treatment for patients with advanced prostate cancer, can be either medical or surgical. Surgery has cost benefits compared to medical treatment. In this study, we evaluated the use of simple and epididymal-sparing orchiectomy in 2 different practice settings for the treatment of metastatic prostate cancer. Methods: We reviewed patients who underwent surgical castration for metastatic prostate cancer between 2011 and 2022. The primary outcome was achieving castration-level total testosterone of <50 ng/dL. We also compared the characteristics of patients who were seen at a public academic teaching hospital vs those who were seen at a private community hospital (oncology group practice), and we evaluated the impact of orchiectomy approach (simple vs epididymal-sparing orchiectomy) on patient outcomes. Results: We analyzed 101 patients who underwent orchiectomy: 40 (39.6%) at a public academic teaching hospital and 61 (60.4%) at a private community hospital (oncology group practice). Of these patients, 81 (80.2%) underwent simple orchiectomy and 20 (19.8%) underwent epididymal-sparing orchiectomy. Forty-nine patients (48.5%) had previously received medical androgen deprivation therapy, 9 (18.4%) of whom had medication adherence issues. Patient age, race, and marital status differed significantly between hospital facilities. The overall surgical complication rate was 3.0%. Postoperative total testosterone levels were available for 81 patients, drawn a median of 57 days after surgery [IQR 30, 123]. All patients had castrate-level total testosterone (median 10 ng/dL [IQR 9, 19]) postoperatively, with no differences seen between surgery location (P = 0.84) or surgical technique (P = 0.90). Conclusion: Simple or epididymal-sparing orchiectomy is safe and effective for surgical castration and is an alternative to medical androgen deprivation therapy for patients diagnosed with metastatic prostate cancer regardless of the practice demographics.
RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: We aim to determine the effect of region of residence (urban vs. rural) on the odds of receiving standard of care treatment for locally advanced BCa in Louisiana and its impact on survival outcomes. METHODS: Using the Louisiana Tumor Registry, we identified American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) stage II or III, BCa diagnoses in Louisiana residents between 2010 and 2020. Treatment received was classified as standard or non-standard of care according to American Urological Association (AUA) guidelines and location of residence was determined using Rural Urban Commuting Area-Tract-level 2010 (RUCA). Multivariable logistic regression analyses and multivariate cox proportional hazard analyses were performed. RESULTS: Of 983 eligible patients, 85.6% (841/983) lived in urban areas. Overall, only 37.5% received standard-of-care (SOC) for the definitive management of locally advanced bladder cancer. Individuals living in rural areas (OR 0.53, 95% CI: 0.31-0.91, p = 0.02) were less likely to receive standard of care treatment. Both rural residence and receipt of non-standard of care therapy were associated with an increased risk of bladder cancer-specific (adj HR 1.53, 95% CI: 1.09-2.14, p = 0.01 and adj HR: 1.85, 95% CI: 1.43-2.39, <0.0001) and overall mortality (adj HR: 1.28, 95% CI: 1.01-1.61, p = 0.04 and adj HR: 1.73 95% CI: 1.44-2.07, p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Most patients with locally advanced bladder cancer in Louisiana do not receive SOC therapy. Individuals living in rural locations are more likely to receive non-standard of care therapy than individuals in urban areas. Nonstandard of care treatment and rural residence are both associated with worse survival outcomes for Louisiana residents with locally advanced bladder cancer.
Assuntos
População Rural , Padrão de Cuidado , Neoplasias da Bexiga Urinária , Humanos , Neoplasias da Bexiga Urinária/terapia , Neoplasias da Bexiga Urinária/mortalidade , Neoplasias da Bexiga Urinária/patologia , Louisiana/epidemiologia , Feminino , Masculino , Idoso , População Rural/estatística & dados numéricos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Sistema de Registros , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , População Urbana/estatística & dados numéricosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Trimodality therapy (TMT) is a viable option for muscle-invasive localized bladder cancer, providing an alternative to radical cystectomy in properly selected patients. The approval of novel therapeutics in different stages of bladder cancer treatment has sparked interest in exploring concurrent systemic therapies with radiation in clinical trials to enhance long-term outcomes. Achieving uniformity in trial eligibility criteria and endpoint definitions is imperative in describing clinical significance, comparing trials, and changing standard of care guidelines. OBJECTIVE: To delineate eligibility criteria and appropriate endpoints for TMT clinical trials in an attempt to achieve uniformity in trial eligibility criteria and endpoint definitions which will then help move the field of bladder preservation forward and improve the current standard of care. METHODS: An expert panel, comprising individuals with extensive experience in bladder cancer clinical trials, clinical practice focused on bladder cancer treatment, and patient advocacy, was assembled. The panel systematically reviewed phase II/III clinical trials previously published and assessing the role of radiation in definitive therapy with the specific goal of preserving native bladder function during bladder cancer treatment. Recommendations were summarized based on review of these trials and past experiences of the investigators. To ensure a holistic perspective, the summary was further subjected to rigorous reevaluation by a patient advocate, who added valuable insights from a patient's standpoint. The resulting consensus statements were summarized in this publication to contribute to the evolving landscape of bladder cancer research and treatment. RESULTS: The eligibility criteria for TMT should be pragmatic to encompass patients with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0-2, bladder cancer stage T2-T4a N0±N1M0, unilateral tumor-associated hydronephrosis, attempted maximal transurethral resection of bladder tumor (TURBT), both pure urothelial carcinoma and/or mixed histologic subtypes (excluding rare and aggressive small cell variants) and patients who are non- cystectomy candidates. Bladder intact event-free survival (BIEFS) is proposed as a suitable endpoint for registration trials designed to compare two different treatment interventions, defined as the time from randomization to muscle-invasive or locoregional recurrence, systemic recurrence, radical cystectomy from any cause, or death from any cause. Overall survival is deemed an appropriate secondary endpoint or a co-primary end point as recent improvements in systemic therapy can produce significant improvement in long-term outcomes. Primary and secondary endpoints should be supported with patient-reported quality of life assessments, when available. CONCLUSIONS: The standardization of clinical trial design, eligibility criteria, and endpoints is essential for expediting progress in the field. Inclusivity, patient-centricity, and clinically meaningful endpoints will facilitate the analysis, comparison, and meta-analysis of different trials, fostering advancements in bladder cancer treatment.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (non-MIBC) that is high-grade and confined to the lamina propria (HGT1) often has an aggressive clinical course. Currently, there is limited data on the comparative effectiveness of RT vs. CRT for HGT1 non-MIBC. We hypothesized that CRT would be associated with improved overall survival (OS) vs. RT in HGT1 bladder cancer. METHODS: Patients diagnosed with HGT1 non-MIBC, and treated with transurethral resection of bladder tumor followed by either treatment with RT alone or CRT, were identified in the National Cancer Database. Inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) was employed and weight-adjusted multivariable analysis (MVA) using Cox regression modeling was used to compare overall survival (OS) hazard ratios. OS was the primary endpoint, and was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank tests. RESULTS: A total of 259 patients with HGT1 UC were treated with: (i) RT alone (n = 123) or (ii) CRT (n = 136). Propensity-weighted MVA showed that combined modality treatment with CRT was associated with improved OS relative to radiation alone (Hazard Ratio [HR]: 0.62, 95% Confidence Interval (95% CI): 0.44-0.88, P = .007). Four-year OS for the CRT vs. RT alone was 36% and 19%, respectively (log-rank P <.008). CONCLUSION: For patients with HGT1 bladder cancer, concurrent CRT was associated with improved OS compared with radiation alone in a retrospective cohort. These results are hypothesis-generating. The NRG is currently developing a phase II randomized clinical trial comparing CRT to other novel, bladder preservation strategies.
Assuntos
Carcinoma de Células de Transição , Neoplasias da Bexiga Urinária , Humanos , Neoplasias da Bexiga Urinária/patologia , Carcinoma de Células de Transição/terapia , Bexiga Urinária/cirurgia , Bexiga Urinária/patologia , Quimiorradioterapia/métodos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
PURPOSE: Patients with isolated regional nodal metastases from renal cell carcinoma are a distinct cohort for which resection of involved lymph nodes may be therapeutic. We assessed the outcomes of patients treated at our institution with pathological node positive renal cell carcinoma without concomitant metastatic disease (T(any)N+M0). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 2,521 patients with nonmetastatic renal cell carcinoma (T(any)N(any)M0) of any histological subtype treated with nephrectomy were identified between 1995 and 2009. Pathological regional node positive disease in the absence of clinically detectable metastases (T(any)N(1-2)M0) was present in 68 patients (2.7%) and these patients formed our study cohort. Patients were assessed for timing and location of recurrence, disease specific survival and overall survival. Multivariate Cox regression analysis was performed to define factors predictive of recurrence and overall survival. RESULTS: Of the 68 patients with T(any)N(1-2)M0 renal cell carcinoma 22.1% were free of disease at a median followup of 43.5 months. In those patients experiencing recurrence, disease was detected within the first 4 months after surgery in 51% and was most commonly detected at multiple organ sites. The Kaplan-Meier estimated 5-year overall survival and disease specific survival was 37% and 39%, respectively. Predictors of a favorable outcome included an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0, single node involvement, absence of sarcomatoid features and papillary histology. CONCLUSIONS: Nephrectomy with lymph node dissection can provide a durable disease-free survival in a proportion of patients with regionally advanced renal cell carcinoma and limited lymph node metastases.
Assuntos
Carcinoma de Células Renais/cirurgia , Intervalo Livre de Doença , Neoplasias Renais/cirurgia , Excisão de Linfonodo , Nefrectomia , Carcinoma de Células Renais/mortalidade , Carcinoma de Células Renais/patologia , Carcinoma de Células Renais/secundário , Humanos , Neoplasias Renais/mortalidade , Neoplasias Renais/patologia , Metástase Linfática , Modelos de Riscos Proporcionais , Taxa de SobrevidaRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: The multimodality approach to treating both localized and metastatic renal cell carcinoma has led to a demand for improved imaging evaluation. We review the information needed from the radiologic studies used to determine treatment strategies. CONCLUSION: Adequate preoperative radiologic assessment provides the treating physician with information critical in determining the sequence of treatments, role of nephron-sparing surgery, surgical approach, and timing of systemic therapy for metastatic disease.
Assuntos
Carcinoma de Células Renais/diagnóstico , Carcinoma de Células Renais/terapia , Neoplasias Renais/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Renais/terapia , Carcinoma de Células Renais/patologia , Terapia Combinada , Humanos , Neoplasias Renais/patologia , Metástase Neoplásica , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Planejamento de Assistência ao Paciente , Guias de Prática Clínica como AssuntoRESUMO
Due to the relatively heterogeneous metastatic spread of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) through both hematogenous and lymphatogenous routes, the surgical extirpation of regional lymph nodes in the treatment of RCC has long been a controversial topic. Individual risk is dependent on multiple variables including tumor stage, grade, and histologic sub-type, in addition to many others. Controversy exists over whether lymph node dissection (LND) simply provides improved staging or whether removal of pathologic nodes offers a therapeutic advantage. Herein, we evaluate the available data regarding the use of LND in the treatment of RCC. While we believe that LND may provide an opportunity for cure in a select group of patients, there are many variables to consider when determining its applicability to an individual patient.
Assuntos
Carcinoma de Células Renais/secundário , Carcinoma de Células Renais/cirurgia , Neoplasias Renais/cirurgia , Excisão de Linfonodo/métodos , Linfonodos/cirurgia , Carcinoma de Células Renais/patologia , Humanos , Neoplasias Renais/patologia , Excisão de Linfonodo/mortalidade , Linfonodos/patologia , Metástase Linfática , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Nefrectomia , Estudos Prospectivos , Estudos RetrospectivosRESUMO
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: To critically appraise the current literature on the benefits of lymphadenectomy in patients with renal cell carcinoma. Many questions exist including: What is a 'standard' versus 'extended' lymph node dissection (LND)? What is the morbidity of a LND? What type of patient may derive the most benefit from LND? On the basis of preoperative staging, what is the benefit (therapeutic versus staging) for an individual patient? How does the performance of a LND impact current and future adjuvant and neoadjuvant studies? RECENT FINDINGS: Results from the EORTC 30881 trial did not show a therapeutic benefit to performing a 'standard' LND in patients with renal cell carcinoma, but the population predominantly comprised patients at the lowest risk of harboring lymph node metastasis. There are no prospective randomized trials with sufficient statistical power to analyze the therapeutic or staging effects in high-risk patients. SUMMARY: This review provides a synopsis of the available data regarding the therapeutic and staging benefits of lympadenectomy in the setting of renal cell carcinoma and should assist the urologist in educating affected patients as well as providing the urologist with the current evidenced-based data regarding this longstanding unanswered question.
Assuntos
Carcinoma de Células Renais/cirurgia , Neoplasias Renais/cirurgia , Excisão de Linfonodo , Medicina Baseada em Evidências , Humanos , Excisão de Linfonodo/efeitos adversos , NomogramasRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Appropriate depression care is a cancer-care priority. However, many cancer survivors live with undiagnosed and untreated depression. Prostate cancer survivors may be particularly vulnerable, but little is known about their access to depression care. The goal of this study was to describe patterns and predictors of clinical diagnosis and treatment of depression in prostate cancer survivors. METHODS: Generalized estimating equations were used to evaluate indicators of self-reported clinical diagnosis and treatment depression as a function of individual-level characteristics within a longitudinal dataset. The data were from a population-based cohort of North Carolinian prostate cancer survivors who were enrolled from 2004 to 2007 on the North Carolina-Louisiana Prostate Cancer Project (N = 1,031), and prospectively followed annually from 2008 to 2011 on the Health Care Access and Prostate Cancer Treatment in North Carolina (N = 805). RESULTS: The average rate of self-reported clinical diagnosis of depression was 44% (95% CI: 39%-49%), which declined from 60% to 40% between prostate cancer diagnosis and 5-7 years later. Factors associated with lower odds of self-reported clinical diagnosis of depression include African-American race, employment, age at enrollment, low education, infrequent primary care visits, and living with a prostate cancer diagnosis for more than 2 years. The average rate of self-reported depression treatment was 62% (95% CI: 55%-69%). Factors associated with lower odds of self-reported depression treatment included employment and living with a prostate cancer diagnosis for 2 or more years. CONCLUSION: Prostate cancer survivors experience barriers when in need of depression care.
Assuntos
Sobreviventes de Câncer/psicologia , Depressão/epidemiologia , Depressão/etiologia , Padrões de Prática Médica , Neoplasias da Próstata/complicações , Neoplasias da Próstata/epidemiologia , Adulto , Idoso , Depressão/diagnóstico , Depressão/terapia , Gerenciamento Clínico , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Satisfação do Paciente , Prognóstico , Vigilância em Saúde Pública , Autorrelato , Inquéritos e QuestionáriosRESUMO
Retrospective observational studies support the utility of robotic-assisted radical cystectomy (RARC). Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have shown that RARC with extracorporeal urinary diversion may lead to decreased estimated blood loss, decreased rate of transfusion, similar oncologic outcomes, cost-effectiveness, and variable increased operative times. Although RCTs comparing RARC with open radical cystectomy are currently ongoing, it may be several years before the utility of RARC is known. The discussion on the role of cystectomy, indications, outcomes, care pathways, access to high-volume care centers, and efforts to decrease complications may prove as important as the technique itself.
Assuntos
Cistectomia/métodos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos , Neoplasias da Bexiga Urinária/cirurgia , Cistectomia/instrumentação , Cistectomia/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Curva de Aprendizado , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos/estatística & dados numéricosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) has recently emerged as a promising diagnostic imaging platform for prostate cancer. Several radiolabelled tracers have demonstrated efficacy for cancer detection in various clinical settings. In this review, we aim to illustrate the diverse use of PET/CT with different tracers for the detection of prostate cancer. METHODS: We searched MEDLINE using the terms 'prostate cancer', 'PET', 'PET/CT' and 'PET/MR'). The current review was limited to 18F-NaF PET/CT, choline-based PET/CT, fluciclovine PET/CT and PSMA-targeted PET/CT, as these modalities have been the most widely adopted. RESULTS: NaF PET/CT has shown efficacy in detecting bone metastases with high sensitivity, but relatively low specificity. Currently, choline PET/CT has been the most extensively studied modality. Although having superior specificity, choline PET/CT suffers from low sensitivity, especially at low PSA levels. Nevertheless, choline PET/CT was found to significantly improve upon conventional imaging modalities (CIM) in the detection of metastatic lesions at biochemical recurrence (BCR). Newer methods using fluciclovine and PSMA-targeted radiotracers have preliminarily demonstrated great promise in primary and recurrent staging of prostate cancer. However, their superior efficacy awaits confirmation in larger series. CONCLUSIONS: PET/CT has emerged as a promising staging modality for both primary and recurrent prostate cancer. Newer tracers have increased detection accuracies for small, incipient metastatic foci. The clinical implications of these occult PET/CT detected disease foci require organized evaluation. Efforts should be aimed at defining their natural history as well as responsiveness and impact of metastasis-directed therapy.
Assuntos
Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/diagnóstico por imagem , Tomografia por Emissão de Pósitrons combinada à Tomografia Computadorizada/tendências , Neoplasias da Próstata/diagnóstico por imagem , Ácidos Carboxílicos/uso terapêutico , Colina/uso terapêutico , Ciclobutanos/uso terapêutico , Humanos , Masculino , Imagem Multimodal/tendências , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/patologia , Antígeno Prostático Específico/sangue , Neoplasias da Próstata/sangue , Neoplasias da Próstata/patologia , Traçadores RadioativosRESUMO
Germ cell tumors are the most common malignancy in men aged 15-35 years old, with a small percentage presenting in an extragonadal location. These tumors are seldom identified in the gastrointestinal tract. There is increased risk of extragonadal germ cell tumors (EGCT) in men with Klinefelter syndrome (KS). We report a rare case of a 37-year-old male with KS and EGCT discovered in the duodenum and pelvis. After treatment with Bleomycin-Etoposide-Cisplatin (BEP), he developed growing teratoma syndrome (GTS) and myelodysplasia. Despite surgical excision of the pelvic growing teratoma, he unfortunately died secondary to complications of severe bone marrow suppression.
RESUMO
PURPOSE: Patients with urothelial cancer with nodal metastasis have a poor prognosis, with many deemed incurable. We report outcomes of a prospective clinical protocol of patients with clinically node-positive disease treated via a multimodality treatment approach. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 55 patients with bladder urothelial carcinoma with concurrent node-positive disease including pelvic nodal and retroperitoneal lymph node (RPLN) involvement underwent preoperative chemotherapy followed by consolidative surgery between 1995 and 2010. Associations between clinicopathologic factors and outcomes were analyzed using log-rank test and Cox regression analysis. RESULTS: Median cancer-specific survival (CSS) was 26 months (95% CI: 12.9-not applicable) for all patients. A total of 30 (55%) patients had pN0 category disease at the time of surgical extirpation. Despite radiologic complete response after chemotherapy, 6 of 21 patients (29%) had pN+category disease. The 5-year CSS rate was 66% for pN0 category disease vs. 12% for pN+category disease (P<0.001). Radiologic complete response to chemotherapy was associated with a 5-year CSS rate of 60% vs. 33% for a partial response (P = 0.038). Although no recurrences occurred within the lymphadenectomy template, 2 (14%) patients with cM1 RPLN disease who did not undergo RPLN dissection had recurrences in the RPLN basin and died within 6 months. CONCLUSION: Multimodality treatment approach with upfront chemotherapy followed by surgery can result in a 66% 5-year CSS rate for patients rendered as having pN0 category disease despite initially presenting with node-positive disease. However, as those with residual disease do so poorly, further efforts in refining selection of patients for surgical consolidation are needed.
Assuntos
Neoplasias da Bexiga Urinária/cirurgia , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Estudos de Coortes , Tratamento Farmacológico , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Período Pré-Operatório , Prognóstico , Taxa de Sobrevida , Resultado do Tratamento , Estados Unidos , Neoplasias da Bexiga Urinária/patologiaRESUMO
The role of lymph node dissection (LND) in the staging and treatment of renal cell carcinoma has long been a topic of debate. The controversy has focused on whether LND is purely an adjunctive staging procedure or has a therapeutic role in the management of this disease. Potential benefits include enhanced staging, better selection for adjuvant therapies/clinical trials, a decrease in recurrence rates, and improved disease-specific and overall survival. This article reviews the available literature on LND in renal cell carcinoma and discusses the potential benefits of aggressive surgical resection in select high-risk patients.