Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Bases de dados
País/Região como assunto
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Assunto da revista
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Transpl Infect Dis ; 22(6): e13442, 2020 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32780553

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) are at increased risk of infections. METHODS: The aims of this study were to describe the incidence of bloodstream infections (BSIs) by gram-negative bacteria in a cohort of KTRs, the risk factors for BSI due to multi-drug-resistant (MDR) gram-negative bacteria, and the predictors for unfavorable outcome, defined as death or nephrectomy or return to dialysis, within 30 days from BSI. We conducted a retrospective cohort study at the renal transplant unit of a tertiary care hospital in Athens, Greece. RESULTS: In a total of 1962 KTRs, we recorded 195 BSI episodes in 182 single patients (male/female = 97/85), with a median (interquartile range) age of 57.2 (44-64.9) years. The incidence was 1.393/100 patient-years. The most common source of infection was urinary tract (70.9%), and Escherichia coli (63.7%) was the most common pathogen. 19.2% of the infecting organisms were MDR; previous antibiotic use (OR 8.2; CI 2.1-32.9) and previous stay in the intensive care unit (OR 34.2; CI 1.6-730.2) were associated with MDR BSIs. 6% of patients died, and 2.2% underwent nephrectomy, while no patients had to return to dialysis. Diabetes mellitus (OR 8.1; 95% CI 1.3-50.3), Pseudomonas aeruginosa BSI (OR 46.1; 95% CI 3.9-552.3), and septic shock (OR 46.7; 95% CI 1.7-1304.9) were independent predictors of unfavorable outcome. CONCLUSION: Bloodstream infections in KTRs have a significant impact on allograft and patients outcome.


Assuntos
Bacteriemia , Infecções por Bactérias Gram-Negativas , Transplante de Rim , Sepse , Bacteriemia/epidemiologia , Feminino , Bactérias Gram-Negativas , Infecções por Bactérias Gram-Negativas/epidemiologia , Grécia , Humanos , Incidência , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Sepse/epidemiologia , Transplantados
2.
Int J Antimicrob Agents ; 31(5): 434-9, 2008 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18328674

RESUMO

The accuracy of disk susceptibility methods for colistin against 778 bacterial pathogens was evaluated in comparison with Etest using interpretive criteria available from the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI). Colistin exhibited excellent activity against Acinetobacter baumannii and Escherichia coli isolates (minimum inhibitory concentration for 90% of the organisms (MIC(90))=0.5 mg/L), whilst it was less active both against Enterobacter spp. and Klebsiella pneumoniae (MIC for 50% of the organisms (MIC(50))=0.5 mg/L, MIC(90)=16 mg/L). Colistin also showed good activity against Pseudomonas aeruginosa (MIC(90)=2 mg/L, MIC(50)=1 mg/L) but poor activity against Stenotrophomonas maltophilia (MIC(50)=8 mg/L, MIC(90)=128 mg/L). Only 0.8% of minor errors were observed between the studied methods for P. aeruginosa isolates when the CLSI criteria were applied. All A. baumannii isolates with a zone diameter < or =12 mm were resistant and those with a zone diameter > or =14 mm were susceptible according to MIC breakpoints established by the CLSI. Among nine isolates exhibiting a zone diameter of 13 mm, one was resistant to colistin (MIC=8 mg/L) and eight isolates were susceptible (MIC=0.5 mg/L). Applying a MIC breakpoint of < or =2 mg/L for susceptibility in Enterobacteriaceae, all isolates with a zone diameter > or =14 mm were susceptible, whilst all isolates with a zone diameter < or =11 mm were resistant. Among isolates with zone diameters of 12-13 mm, 59% were characterised as susceptible. Major errors were observed only in K. pneumoniae isolates at a rate of 0.8%. The poor agar diffusion characteristics of colistin limit the predictive accuracy of the disk diffusion test and consequently values of 12-13 mm should be confirmed with MIC determination by Etest or broth dilution method.


Assuntos
Antibacterianos/farmacologia , Colistina/farmacologia , Bactérias Gram-Negativas/efeitos dos fármacos , Testes de Sensibilidade Microbiana/métodos , Erros de Diagnóstico/estatística & dados numéricos , Bactérias Gram-Negativas/isolamento & purificação , Infecções por Bactérias Gram-Negativas/microbiologia , Humanos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA