Intravenous versus perineural dexamethasone to prolong analgesia after interscalene brachial plexus block: a systematic review with meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis.

BACKGROUND: The efficacy of perineural vs intravenous dexamethasone as a local anaesthetic adjunct to increase duration of analgesia could be particular to specific peripheral nerve blocks because of differences in systemic absorption depending on the injection site. Given this uncertainty, we performed a systematic review with meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis comparing dexamethasone administered perineurally or intravenously combined with local anaesthetic for interscalene brachial plexus block. METHODS: Following a search of various electronic databases, we included 11 trials (1145 patients). The primary outcome was the duration of analgesia defined as the time between peripheral nerve block or onset of sensory blockade and the time to first analgesic request or initial report of pain. RESULTS: The primary outcome, duration of analgesia, was greater in the perineural dexamethasone group, with a mean difference (95% confidence interval) of 122 (62-183) min, I2=73%, P<0.0001. Trial sequential analysis indicated that firm evidence had been reached. The quality of evidence was downgraded to low, mainly because of moderate inconsistency and serious publication bias. No significant differences were present for any of the secondary outcomes, except for onset time of sensory and motor blockade and resting pain score at 12 h, but the magnitude of differences was not clinically relevant. CONCLUSIONS: There is low-quality evidence that perineural administration of dexamethasone as a local anaesthetic adjunct increases duration of analgesia by an average of 2 h compared with intravenous injection for interscalene brachial plexus block. Given the limited clinical relevance of this difference, the off-label use of perineural administration, and the risk of drug crystallisation, we recommend intravenous dexamethasone administration. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW PROTOCOL: PROSPERO (CRD42023466147).

Comparison of different delivery modalities of epidural analgesia and intravenous analgesia in labour: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.

PURPOSE: In labour, neuraxial analgesia is the standard in the provision of pain relief. However, the optimal mode of delivering epidural solution has not been determined, and some parturients may need an alternative to epidural analgesia. We sought to conduct a systematic review and network meta-analysis to compare continuous epidural infusion (CEI), programmed intermittent epidural bolus (PIEB), computer-integrated CEI, computer-integrated PIEB, patient-controlled epidural bolus (PCEA), fentanyl patient-controlled analgesia (PCA), and remifentanil PCA, either alone or in combination. METHODS: We searched CENTRAL, CINAHL, Ovid Embase, Ovid Medline, and Web of Science for randomized controlled trials that included nulliparous and/or multiparous parturients in spontaneous or induced labour. The maintenance epidural solution had to include a low concentration local anesthetic and an opioid. Specific subgroups in the obstetric population such as preeclampsia were excluded. Network meta-analysis was performed with a frequentist method, and continuous and dichotomous outcomes are presented as mean differences and odds ratios, respectively, with 95% confidence intervals. RESULTS: Overall, 73 trials were included. For the first coprimary outcome, the need for rescue analgesia, CEI was inferior to PIEB and PIEB + PCEA was superior to PCEA alone, with a low certainty of evidence given the presence of serious limitations and imprecision. The second coprimary outcome, the maternal satisfaction, was improved by PIEB + PCEA compared with CEI + PCEA and PCEA alone, with a low quality of evidence in view of the presence of serious limitations and imprecision. Fentanyl PCA increased the requirement for rescue analgesia and decreased maternal satisfaction relative to many methods of delivering epidural solution. In terms of secondary outcomes, PIEB increased analgesic efficacy compared with CEI, and PCEA reduced local anesthetic consumption at the expense of inferior analgesia relative to CEI and PIEB. PIEB + PCEA was superior to CEI + PCEA in regard to the pain score at 2 h and 4 h, consumption of local anesthetic, incidence of lower lower limb motor blockade and the rate of spontaneous vaginal delivery. Fentanyl and remifentanil PCA did not provide the same level of analgesia as all epidural methods, resulted in increasing analgesic ineffectiveness with time spent in labour, and predisposed to a higher incidence of side effects such as nausea and/or vomiting and sedation. Remifentanil PCA was superior to fentanyl PCA for analgesia at an early time point, and it increased the incidence of oxygen desaturation relative to other strategies of delivering epidural solution. CONCLUSIONS: Opioid PCA did not provide the same level of analgesia as epidural methods with a higher incidence of side effects. We interpret the findings of our systematic review and network meta-analysis as suggesting PIEB + PCEA to be the optimal delivery mode of epidural solution. Nevertheless, the potential differing importance of the various maternal, fetal, and neonatal outcomes in determining which is optimal has not, to our knowledge, been elucidated yet. STUDY REGISTRATION: PROSPERO (CRD42021254978); registered 27 May 2021.

RéSUMé: OBJECTIF: Pendant le travail obstétrical, l'analgésie neuraxiale constitue la norme de soins pour soulager la douleur. Néanmoins, le mode optimal d'administration de la solution péridurale n'a pas été déterminé et certaines parturientes pourraient avoir besoin d'une alternative à l'analgésie péridurale. Nous avons cherché à réaliser une revue systématique et une méta-analyse en réseau pour comparer l'analgésie péridurale par perfusion continue (APPC), l'administration programmée de bolus périduraux (PIEB), l'APPC intégrée par ordinateur, l'analgésie péridurale contrôlée par la patiente (l'APCP), l'analgésie contrôlée par la patiente (ACP) de fentanyl et l'ACP de rémifentanil, soit seules ou en combinaison. MéTHODE: Nous avons effectué des recherches dans les bases de données CENTRAL, CINAHL, Ovid Embase, Ovid Medline et Web of Science pour en tirer les études randomisées contrôlées incluant des parturientes nullipares et/ou multipares en travail spontané ou induit. La solution péridurale de maintien devait inclure un anesthésique local à faible concentration et un opioïde. Des sous-groupes spécifiques dans la population obstétricale, comme par exemple les parturientes atteintes de prééclampsie, ont été exclus. Une méta-analyse en réseau a été réalisée à l'aide d'une méthode fréquentiste, et les résultats continus et dichotomiques sont présentés sous forme de différences moyennes et de rapports de cotes, respectivement, avec des intervalles de confiance à 95 %. RéSULTATS: Au total, 73 études ont été incluses. Concernant le premier critère d'évaluation coprincipal, soit le besoin d'analgésie de secours, l'APPC était inférieure à la PIEB, et la PIEB + APCP était supérieure à l'APCP seule, avec un faible niveau de fiabilité des données probantes compte tenu de la présence de limitations et d'imprécisions importantes. Le deuxième critère d'évaluation coprincipal, soit la satisfaction maternelle, a été amélioré avec la PIEB + APCP comparativement à l'APPC + APCP et à l'APCP seule, avec une faible qualité de données probantes compte tenu de la présence de limitations et d'imprécisions importantes. L'ACP à base de fentanyl a augmenté le besoin d'analgésie de secours et diminué la satisfaction maternelle par rapport à de nombreuses méthodes d'administration de la solution péridurale. En termes de critères d'évaluation secondaires, la PIEB a amélioré l'efficacité analgésique par rapport à l'APPC, et l'APCP a diminué la consommation d'anesthésiques locaux au détriment d'une analgésie inférieure par rapport à l'APPC et à la PIEB. La PIEB + APCP était supérieure à l'APPC + APCP en ce qui a trait aux scores de douleur à 2 h et 4 h, à la consommation d'anesthésiques locaux, à l'incidence de bloc moteur des membres inférieurs et au taux d'accouchement vaginal spontané. Les ACP de fentanyl et de rémifentanil n'ont pas fourni le même niveau d'analgésie que toutes les méthodes péridurales et ont entraîné une augmentation de l'inefficacité analgésique avec le temps passé en travail actif, en plus de prédisposer les parturientes à une incidence plus élevée d'effets secondaires tels que les nausées et/ou vomissements et la sédation. L'ACP de rémifentanil était supérieure à l'ACP de fentanyl en début d'analgésie mais a augmenté l'incidence de désaturation en oxygène par rapport aux stratégies de livraison de la solution péridurale. CONCLUSION: L'ACP à base d'opioïdes n'a pas fourni le même niveau d'analgésie que les méthodes péridurales, avec une incidence plus élevée d'effets secondaires. Nous interprétons les résultats de notre revue systématique et de notre méta-analyse en réseau comme suggérant que la PIEB + APCP constitue le mode d'administration optimal de la solution péridurale. Néanmoins, la différence potentielle en importance des divers devenirs maternels, fœtaux et néonataux pour déterminer la modalité optimale n'a pas encore été élucidée, à notre connaissance. ENREGISTREMENT DE L'éTUDE: PROSPERO (CRD42021254978); enregistrée le 27 mai 2021.

Increased complications rates and inferior patient reported outcomes following total knee arthroplasty due to post-traumatic osteoarthritis with previous fracture treatment: a systematic review.

PURPOSE: This study aims to present the existing literature relating to patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) and complications in patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty (TKA) due to posttraumatic osteoarthritis (PTOA) with prior fracture treatment around the knee compared with patients who underwent TKA because of primary osteoarthritis (OA). METHODS: A systematic review was undertaken and synthesised in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines by searching existing literature in the following databases: PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane Library and EMBASE. A search string according to the PECO was used. After analysing 2781 studies, 18 studies (5729 PTOA patients/149,843 OA patients) were included for a final review. An analysis revealed that 12 (67%) were retrospective cohort studies, four (22%) were register studies and the remaining two (11%) were prospective cohort studies. The mean Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP) score was 23.6 out of 28, signifying studies of moderate quality. RESULTS: The most frequently reported outcome measure were postoperative complications, reported in all eighteen studies. Intraoperative complications were reported in ten (4165 PTOA/124.511 OA) and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in six studies (210 PTOA/2768 OA). A total of nine different PROMs were evaluated. As far as PROMs were concerned, the scores were inferior for PTOA but did not differ statistically from OA, except for one study, which favoured the OA group. Across all studies, postoperative complications were higher in the PTOA group, reporting infections as the most common complication. Furthermore, a higher revision rate was reported in the PTOA group. CONCLUSION: PROM analysis suggests that both patient groups benefit from a TKA in terms of functional outcome and pain relief, however, patient-reported outcomes could be inferior for PTOA patients. There is consistent evidence for increased complication rates following PTOA TKA. Patients undergoing TKA due to PTOA after fracture treatment should be informed about the risk for inferior results and refrain from comparing their knee function to patients with TKA after OA. Surgeons should be aware of the challenges that PTOA TKA poses. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

High-level soccer players have a low rate of return to performance after hip arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement syndrome.

PURPOSE: Femoroacetabular impingement syndrome (FAIS) is a known cause of impaired sports performance in athletes and the relationship between FAIS and soccer players has previously been described. Hip arthroscopy is a viable treatment option that can facilitate athletes' return to sport (RTS). The aim of this study was to evaluate the RTS and return to performance (RTP) with objective measurements in high-level soccer players after hip arthroscopy for FAIS. METHOD: Soccer players, with a hip sports activity scale (HSAS) level of 7 or 8 before symptom onset and undergoing hip arthroscopy for FAIS between 2011 and 2019 were identified in the Gothenburg hip arthroscopic registry. A total of 83 high-level soccer players, with a mean age of 23.9 (SD 4.4) years at surgery, were included. To verify the activity level and further stratify players as elite or sub-elite, player statistics were collected from soccer-specific scout webpages and the Swedish national soccer association. The return to sport was defined as return to one game of soccer. Return to performance was defined as playing at the same level, or higher, and participating in at least 80% of the number of games played the season before symptom onset or the season before surgery either the first or second season after hip arthroscopy. RESULTS: In total, 71 (85.5%, 95% confidence interval (CI) 76.1-92.3%) of the players returned to sport the first or second season after surgery. Compared to the season before symptom onset, 31 (37.3%, 95% CI 27.0-48.7%) players returned to performance the first or second season after surgery, and 32 (38.6%, 95% CI 28.1-49.9%) players returned to performance the first or second season after surgery compared to the season before surgery. CONCLUSION: A high rate of elite and sub-elite soccer players return to soccer after hip arthroscopy for FAIS. However, less than half of the players RTP when evaluating performance through level of play and number of games played. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV.

Local anaesthetic adjuncts for peripheral nerve blockade.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Moderate-to-severe pain is common and remains a significant problem. Compared with opioid analgesia alone, single-shot peripheral nerve blockade has been associated with improved pain relief and the potential of decreased side effects. Single-shot nerve blockade, however, is limited by its relatively short duration of action. In this review, we aim to summarize the evidence related to local anaesthetic adjuncts for peripheral nerve blockade. RECENT FINDINGS: Dexamethasone and dexmedetomidine exhibit characteristics that most closely resemble the ideal local anaesthetic adjunct. In upper limb block, dexamethasone has been demonstrated to be superior to dexmedetomidine regardless of administration route for the duration of sensory and motor blockade as well as the duration of analgesia. No clinically significant differences between intravenous and perineural dexamethasone were found. Perineural and intravenous dexamethasone have the potential to prolong sensory blockade to a greater extent than motor blockade. The evidence indicates that the mechanism of action of perineural dexamethasone in upper limb block is systemic in nature. Unlike perineural dexmedetomidine, intravenous dexmedetomidine has not been shown to result in differences in the characteristics of regional blockade compared with local anaesthetic alone. SUMMARY: Intravenous dexamethasone is the local anaesthetic adjunct of choice, increasing the duration of sensory and motor blockade as well as the duration of analgesia by 477, 289 and 478 min, respectively. In view of this, we recommend consideration of the intravenous administration of dexamethasone at a dose of 0.1-0.2 mg/kg for all patients undergoing surgery whatever the level of postoperative pain, mild, moderate or severe. Further research should focus on the potential synergism of action between intravenous dexamethasone and perineural dexmedetomidine.

Influence of perioperative dexmedetomidine on the incidence of postoperative delirium in adult patients undergoing cardiac surgery.

BACKGROUND: Delirium is a common neurocognitive complication after cardiac surgery. The aim of this systematic review was to determine whether the administration of dexmedetomidine in the perioperative period decreases the incidence of postoperative delirium in adult patients undergoing cardiac surgery. METHODS: Central, CINAHL, Ovid Embase, Ovid Medline, and Web of Science databases were searched for RCTs of adult patients undergoing cardiac surgery where participants received i.v. dexmedetomidine or control in the perioperative period. The methods included systematic review, meta-analysis, and trial sequential analysis. The primary outcome was the incidence of postoperative delirium. Dichotomous outcomes were presented as risk ratio (RR) using the Mantel-Haenszel method, and continuous variables were presented as mean difference with the inverse variance method. RESULTS: Thirty trials, comprising 4090 patients, were included. With unselected inclusion of trials, dexmedetomidine vs control was associated with decreased incidence of postoperative delirium (12.4% vs 16.2%; RR=0.62; 95% confidence interval 0.44-0.86; P=0.005; I2=61%). If trials at high risk of bias were excluded, the incidence of postoperative delirium was not significantly different between groups (RR=0.71; 95% confidence interval 0.49-1.03; P=0.070; I2=58%). Postoperative delirium was not a reliably determined outcome across trials because of methodological and reporting limitations, including the heterogeneity of delirium diagnostic approach. Trial sequential analysis revealed that the optimal information size was not reached, and the Z-curve did not cross the trial sequential boundaries for benefit or futility. With respect to safety concerns, dexmedetomidine was not significantly associated with incident bradycardia or hypotension, or with the duration of mechanical ventilation. CONCLUSIONS: When trials at high risk of bias were excluded, the use of perioperative dexmedetomidine was not associated with decreased incidence of postoperative delirium. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD 42021252779.

Comparison of analgesic modalities for patients undergoing midline laparotomy: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Midline laparotomy is associated with severe pain. Epidural analgesia has been the established standard, but multiple alternative regional anesthesia modalities are now available. We aimed to compare continuous and single-shot regional anesthesia techniques in this systematic review and network meta-analysis. METHODS: We included randomized controlled trials on adults who were scheduled for laparotomy with solely a midline incision under general anesthesia and received neuraxial or regional anesthesia for pain. Network meta-analysis was performed with a frequentist method, and continuous and dichotomous outcomes were presented as mean differences and odds ratios, respectively, with 95% confidence intervals. The quality of evidence was rated with the  grading of recommendations, assessment, development, and evaluation system. RESULTS: Overall, 36 trials with 2,056 patients were included. None of the trials assessed erector spinae plane or quadratus lumborum block, and rectus sheath blocks and transversus abdominis plane blocks were combined into abdominal wall blocks (AWB). For the co-primary outcome of pain score at rest at 24 hr, with a minimal clinically important difference (MCID) of 1, epidural was clinically superior to control and single-shot AWB; epidural was statistically but not clinically superior to continuous wound infiltration (WI); and no statistical or clinical difference was found between control and single-shot AWB. For the co-primary outcome of cumulative morphine consumption at 24 hr, with a MCID of 10 mg, epidural and continuous AWB were clinically superior to control; epidural was clinically superior to continuous WI, single-shot AWB, single-shot WI, and spinal; and continuous AWB was clinically superior to single-shot AWB. The quality of evidence was low in view of serious limitations and imprecision. Other results of importance included: single-shot AWB did not provide clinically relevant analgesic benefit beyond two hr; continuous WI was clinically superior to single-shot WI by 8-12 hr; and clinical equivalence was found between epidural, continuous AWB, and continuous WI for the pain score at rest, and epidural and continuous WI for the cumulative morphine consumption at 48 hr. CONCLUSIONS: Single-shot AWB were only clinically effective for analgesia in the early postoperative period. Continuous regional anesthesia modalities increased the duration of analgesia relative to their single-shot counterparts. Epidural analgesia remained clinically superior to alternative continuous regional anesthesia techniques for the first 24 hr, but reached equivalence, at least with respect to static pain, with continuous AWB and WI by 48 hr. TRIAL REGISTRATION: PROSPERO (CRD42021238916); registered 25 February 2021.

RéSUMé: CONTEXTE: La laparotomie médiane est associée à une douleur sévère. L'analgésie péridurale est la norme de soins établie, mais plusieurs modalités alternatives d'anesthésie régionale sont aujourd'hui disponibles. Dans cette revue systématique et méta-analyse en réseau, nous avons cherché à comparer les techniques d'anesthésie régionale continue et par injection unique. MéTHODE: Nous avons inclus les études randomisées contrôlées portant sur des adultes devant bénéficier d'une laparotomie avec une simple incision médiane sous anesthésie générale et qui ont reçu une anesthésie neuraxiale ou régionale pour la douleur. Une méta-analyse en réseau a été réalisée avec une méthode fréquentiste, et les résultats continus et dichotomiques ont été présentés sous forme de différences moyennes et de rapports de cotes, respectivement, avec des intervalles de confiance à 95 %. La qualité des données probantes a été évaluée avec le système GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation). RéSULTATS: Au total, 36 études portant sur 2056 patients ont été incluses. Aucune des études n'a évalué le bloc du plan des muscles érecteurs du rachis ou du carré des lombes. Les blocs de la gaine des grands droits et du plan des muscles transverses de l'abdomen ont été combinés en blocs de la paroi abdominale (BPA). Concernant le critère d'évaluation principal de score de douleur au repos à 24 heures, avec une différence minimale cliniquement pertinente (DMCP) de 1, l'analgésie péridurale était cliniquement supérieure au BPA de contrôle et par injection unique; l'analgésie péridurale était statistiquement mais non cliniquement supérieure à l'infiltration continue de la plaie; et aucune différence statistique ou clinique n'a été constatée entre le BPA de contrôle et par injection unique. Pour le deuxième critère d'évaluation principal portant sur la consommation cumulative de morphine à 24 heures, avec une DMCP de 10 mg, la péridurale et le BPA continu étaient cliniquement supérieurs au groupe contrôle; la péridurale était cliniquement supérieure à l'infusion continue de la plaie, au BPA par injection unique, à l'infiltration par injection unique de la plaie et à la rachianesthésie; et le BPA continu était cliniquement supérieur au BPA par injection unique. La qualité des données probantes était faible compte tenu d'importantes limites et d'imprécisions. De plus, le BPA par injection unique n'a fourni aucun avantage analgésique cliniquement pertinent au-delà de deux heures; l'infiltration continue de la plaie était cliniquement supérieure de 8 à 12 heures à l'infiltration de la plaie en injection unique; et une équivalence clinique a été observée entre la péridurale, le BPA continu et l'infiltration continue de la plaie en ce qui avait trait au score de douleur au repos, et entre la péridurale et l'infiltration continue de la plaie en ce qui touchait à la consommation cumulative de morphine à 48 heures. CONCLUSION: Les BPA par injection unique n'étaient cliniquement efficaces pour procurer une analgésie qu'au début de la période postopératoire. Les modalités d'anesthésie régionale continue ont augmenté la durée de l'analgésie par rapport aux modalités équivalentes par injection unique. L'analgésie péridurale est demeurée cliniquement supérieure aux techniques alternatives d'anesthésie régionale continue pendant les 24 premières heures, mais a atteint l'équivalence, au moins en ce qui concerne la douleur statique, avec les BPA et les infiltrations de lésions continus à 48 heures. Enregistrement de l'étude : PROSPERO (CRD42021238916); enregistrée le 25 février 2021.

Protocol for a multicenter prospective cohort study evaluating arthroscopic and non-surgical treatment for microinstability of the hip joint.

BACKGROUND: Microinstability of the hip joint is a proposed cause of hip pain and reduced function in young individuals. The underlying mechanism is thought to be extraphysiological hip motion due to bony deficiency and/or soft tissue deficiency or decreased soft tissue function. Recently, the condition has gained increased attention, and despite the fact that treatment today includes both non-surgical and surgical approaches, there is limited evidence on diagnostic specificity and treatment effects. The aim of this study is to evaluate clinical outcomes of both non-surgical and surgical treatment for microinstability of the hip joint. METHODS: A multicenter prospective cohort study is planned to evaluating the outcome of physical therapy aimed at stabilizing the hip joint, as well as arthroscopic plication of the hip joint capsule, if the physical therapy fails. Outcomes will be evaluated using hip-specific patient-reported outcome measures: the short version of the International Hip Outcome Tool and the Copenhagen Hip and Groin Outcome Score, strength and function tests, health-related quality of life as determined using the European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions and the European Quality of Life-Visual Analog Scale, sports activity levels according to the Hip Sport Activity Scale, and reported complications. Patients will be evaluated at 6, 12 and 24 months after each treatment. DISCUSSION: It is important to evaluate the clinical outcomes of both non-surgical and surgical treatment for suspected microinstability of the hip joint, and the planned prospective evaluation will contribute to the understanding of non-surgical as well as surgical treatment outcomes, including complications. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT04934462 . Registered June 22 2021.

NetCellMatch: Multiscale Network-Based Matching of Cancer Cell Lines to Patients Using Graphical Wavelets.

Cancer cell lines serve as model in vitro systems for investigating therapeutic interventions. Recent advances in high-throughput genomic profiling have enabled the systematic comparison between cell lines and patient tumor samples. The highly interconnected nature of biological data, however, presents a challenge when mapping patient tumors to cell lines. Standard clustering methods can be particularly susceptible to the high level of noise present in these datasets and only output clusters at one unknown scale of the data. In light of these challenges, we present NetCellMatch, a robust framework for network-based matching of cell lines to patient tumors. NetCellMatch first constructs a global network across all cell line-patient samples using their genomic similarity. Then, a multi-scale community detection algorithm integrates information across topologically meaningful (clustering) scales to obtain Network-Based Matching Scores (NBMS). NBMS are measures of cluster robustness which map patient tumors to cell lines. We use NBMS to determine representative "avatar" cell lines for subgroups of patients. We apply NetCellMatch to reverse-phase protein array data obtained from The Cancer Genome Atlas for patients and the MD Anderson Cell Line Project for cell lines. Along with avatar cell line identification, we evaluate connectivity patterns for breast, lung, and colon cancer and explore the proteomic profiles of avatars and their corresponding top matching patients. Our results demonstrate our framework's ability to identify both patient-cell line matches and potential proteomic drivers of similarity. Our methods are general and can be easily adapted to other'omic datasets.

Airway devices for awake tracheal intubation in adults: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Awake tracheal intubation is commonly performed with flexible bronchoscopes, but the emerging role of alternative airway devices, such as videolaryngoscopes, direct laryngoscopes, and optical stylets, has been recognised. METHODS: CENTRAL, CINAHL, EMBASE, MEDLINE, and Web of Science were searched for RCTs that compared flexible bronchoscopes, direct laryngoscopes, optical stylets and channelled or unchannelled videolaryngoscopes in adult patients having awake tracheal intubation were included. The co-primary outcomes were first-pass success rate and time to tracheal intubation. Continuous outcomes were extracted as mean and standard deviation, and dichotomous outcomes were converted to overall numbers of incidence. Frequentist network meta-analysis was conducted, and network plots and network league tables were produced. RESULTS: Twelve RCTs were included, none of which evaluated direct laryngoscopes. The first-pass success rate was not different between flexible bronchoscopes, optical stylets, and channelled and unchannelled videolaryngoscopes, with the quality of evidence rated as moderate in view of imprecision. Optical stylets, followed by unchannelled videolaryngoscopes and then felxible bronchoscopes resulted in the shortest time to tracheal intubation, with the quality of evidence rated as high. No differences were shown between the airway devices with respect to the incidence of oesophageal intubation, change of airway technique, oxygen desaturation, airway bleeding, or the rate of hoarseness and sore throat. CONCLUSIONS: Flexible bronchoscopes, optical stylets, and channelled and unchannelled videolaryngoscopes were clinically comparable airway devices in the setting of awake trachela intubation and the time to tracheal intubation was shortest with optical stylets and longest with flexible bronchoscopes.

Comparison of videolaryngoscopy and direct laryngoscopy for tracheal intubation in obstetrics: a mixed-methods systematic review and meta-analysis.

PURPOSE: The incidence of difficult and failed intubation is higher in obstetrical patients than in the general population because of anatomic and physiologic changes in pregnancy. Videolaryngoscopy improves the success rate of intubation and reduces complications when compared with direct laryngoscopy in adults; however, it is not known whether this extends to obstetrical surgery. The aim of this study was to examine the efficacy, efficiency, and safety of videolaryngoscopy compared with direct laryngoscopy in obstetrics. SOURCE: Central, CINAHL, Embase, MEDLINE and Web of Science databases were searched from inception to 27 May 2020 with no restrictions. Inclusion criteria included randomized-controlled trials (RCTs), observational studies, case series, and case reports that reported the application of videolaryngoscopy to intubate the trachea in pregnant patients having general anesthesia. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Overall, four RCTs with 428 participants, nine observational studies, and 35 case reports/series with 100 participants were included. On meta-analysis of three trials, the co-primary outcomes of first-attempt success rate (risk ratio, 1.02; 95% confidence intervals [CI], 0.98 to 1.06; P = 0.29; I2 = 0%) and time to tracheal intubation (mean difference, 1.20 sec; 95% CI, -6.63 to 9.04; P = 0.76; I2 = 95%) demonstrated no difference between videolaryngoscopy and direct laryngoscopy in parturients without difficult airways. Observational studies and case reports underline the role of videolaryngoscopy as a primary choice when difficulty with tracheal intubation is expected or as a rescue modality in difficult or failed intubations. CONCLUSIONS: Evidence for the utility of videolaryngoscopy continues to evolve but supports its increased adoption in obstetrics where videolaryngoscopes should be immediately available for use as a first-line device. TRIAL REGISTRATION: PROSPERO (CRD42020189521); registered 6 July 2020.

RéSUMé: OBJECTIF: L'incidence des intubations difficiles et de leur échec est plus élevée chez les patientes obstétricales que dans la population générale en raison des changements anatomiques et physiologiques liés à la grossesse. Chez l'adulte, la vidéolaryngoscopie améliore le taux de réussite de l'intubation et réduit les complications par rapport à la laryngoscopie directe; cependant, nous ne savons pas si ces avantages s'étendent également à la population obstétricale. L'objectif de cette étude était d'examiner l'efficacité, l'efficience et la sécurité de la vidéolaryngoscopie par rapport à la laryngoscopie directe en obstétrique. SOURCE: Les bases de données Central, CINAHL, Embase, MEDLINE et Web of Science ont été recherchées de leur création jusqu'au 27 mai 2020 sans restriction. Les critères d'inclusion comprenaient les études randomisées contrôlées (ERC), les études observationnelles, les séries de cas et les présentations de cas rapportant l'application de la vidéolaryngoscopie pour intuber la trachée de patientes enceintes recevant une anesthésie générale. CONSTATATIONS PRINCIPALES: Quatre ERC comptant 428 participantes, neuf études observationnelles et 35 présentations/séries de cas comptant 100 participantes ont été incluses. En effectuant une méta-analyse de trois études, les critères d'évaluation co-primaires du taux de réussite de l'intubation à la première tentative (risque relatif, 1,02; intervalle de confiance [IC] 95 %, 0,98 à 1,06; P = 0,29; I2 = 0 %) et le temps jusqu'à l'intubation endotrachéale (différence moyenne, 1,20 sec; IC 95 %, -6,63 à 9,04; P = 0,76; I2 = 95 %) n'ont démontré aucune différence entre la vidéolaryngoscopie et la laryngoscopie directe chez les parturientes ne présentant pas de difficultés au niveau des voies aériennes. Les études observationnelles et les présentations de cas soulignent le rôle de la vidéolaryngoscopie comme premier choix lorsque des difficultés sont anticipées pour l'intubation endotrachéale ou comme modalité de sauvetage dans les cas d'intubations difficiles ou ratées. CONCLUSION: Les données probantes concernant l'utilité de la vidéolaryngoscopie continuent d'évoluer mais appuient son adoption accrue en obstétrique, où des vidéolaryngoscopes devraient être immédiatement disponibles pour être utilisés comme dispositif de première ligne. ENREGISTREMENT DE L'éTUDE: PROSPERO (CRD42020189521); enregistrée le 6 juillet 2020.

Conventional landmark palpation versus preprocedural ultrasound for neuraxial procedures in nonobstetric patients: A systematic review with meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis of randomised controlled trials.

BACKGROUND: Central neuraxial modalities can occasionally be challenging to perform, particularly if the underlying anatomy is altered or obscured. OBJECTIVES: To compare the efficacy, efficiency and the safety of preprocedural ultrasound to landmark palpation in the nonobstetric adult population. DESIGN: Systematic review of randomised controlled trials with meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis. DATA SOURCES: Systematic search of Central, CINAHL, Embase, Global Health, MEDLINE, Scopus and Web of Science to 13th February 2020. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: Randomised controlled trials of nonobstetric adult patients having diagnostic and/or therapeutic neuraxial procedures using standard preprocedural ultrasound interpreted by the operator as the intervention and conventional landmark palpation as the comparator. KEY DEFINITIONS: A skin puncture was defined as the insertion or reinsertion of the needle through the skin; needle redirection was the backward followed by the forward movement of the needle without its removal from the skin; first skin puncture referred to a single skin puncture with or without needle redirections; and first pass was a single skin puncture with no needle redirection. RESULTS: In all, 18 randomised controlled trials with 1800 patients were included. The first pass success rate was not different between landmark and ultrasound methods [risk ratio 1.46; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.99 to 2.16; P = 0.06, I2 = 76%; moderate quality of evidence] and the trial sequential analysis demonstrated the futility of further randomisation of patients in modifying this finding. Preprocedural ultrasound increased the total time taken (mean difference 110.8 s; 95% CI, 31.01 to 190.65; P = 0.006; I2 = 96%; moderate quality of evidence). Subgroup analyses revealed no influence of the predicted difficulty of the neuraxial procedure on outcomes. Compared with the landmark method, ultrasound increased the first skin puncture success rate (risk ratio 1.36; 95% CI, 1.18 to 1.57; P < 0.001; I2 = 70%), and decreased the need for three or more skin punctures (risk ratio 0.46; 95% CI, 0.33 to 0.64; P < 0.001; I2 = 29%) and the number of needle redirections (mean difference -1.24; 95% CI, -2.32 to -0.17; P = 0.020; I2 = 83). The incidence of bloody tap was reduced with the use of ultrasound (risk ratio 0.61; 95% CI, 0.40 to 0.93; P = 0.020; I2 = 42%). CONCLUSIONS: The use of preprocedural ultrasound for neuraxial procedures in the nonobstetric adult population did not enhance the first pass success rate and increased the total time taken to a clinically insignificant extent. Improvement in secondary outcomes, including other markers of efficacy, should be interpreted with caution.

Good 5-year outcomes after arthroscopic treatment for femoroacetabular impingement syndrome.

PURPOSE: The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the outcome of arthroscopic treatment for femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) syndrome 5 years post-surgery using patient-reported outcome scores (PROMs) validated for a young and active population with hip complaints. METHODS: Patients were prospectively included in the study. A total of 184 patients [males = 110 (59.8%), females = 74 (40.2%)], with mean age 38.0, underwent arthroscopic treatment for FAI syndrome and were analysed. Preoperatively and at the 5-year follow-up, patients completed a set of self-administered web-based PROMs consisting of the International Hip Outcome Tool (iHOT-12), the Copenhagen Hip and Groin Outcome Score (HAGOS), the Hip Sports Activity Scale (HSAS), the EuroQoL-5 Dimension Questionnaire (EQ-5D), the EQ-Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) and the VAS for overall hip function and overall satisfaction. The Wilcoxon signed rank test was used to compare preoperative PROM values with those obtained at the 5-year follow-up. RESULTS: A comparison of preoperative PROM scores and those obtained at the 5-year follow-up revealed statistically significant improvements for all outcome scores (p < 0.05), except for the HSAS score, which were unchanged; iHOT-12 (42.9 vs 67.2), HAGOS different subscales (50.2 vs 69.6, 55.7 vs 76.1, 59.2 vs 72.3, 41.1 vs 66.4, 30.8 vs 60.2, 31.6 vs 60.4), EQ-5D (0.570 vs 0.742), EQ-VAS (66.6 vs 74.4), HSAS (3.13 vs 3.17) and VAS for overall hip function (47.9 vs 69.2). At the 5-year follow-up, 154 patients reported that they were satisfied with surgery (84.6%). Survivorship at the 5-year follow-up was 86.4%. CONCLUSION: Arthroscopic treatment for FAI syndrome yields good patient-reported outcome at the 5-year follow-up. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II.

Peripheral nerve blockade and novel analgesic modalities for ambulatory anesthesia.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Despite peripheral nerve blockade offering analgesic benefits and improving patient satisfaction, it has not been well adopted in ambulatory anesthesia. In this review, we aim to summarize the evidence underlying peripheral nerve blockade, local anesthetic adjuncts, continuous peripheral nerve blockade and novel analgesic modalities, with the objective to provide recommendations on postoperative analgesia optimization after peripheral nerve blockade in an ambulatory setting. RECENT FINDINGS: Barriers to the widespread use of peripheral nerve blockade in ambulatory anesthesia could include lack of education and training, and increased anesthetic induction time. Strategies that have demonstrated promise to increase duration of action and attenuate rebound pain phenomenon after peripheral nerve blockade include multimodal analgesia, local anesthetic adjuncts and continuous infusion of local anesthetic. Dexamethasone has been demonstrated to be the most effective local anesthetic adjunct. Continuous peripheral nerve blockade is a reasonable alternative but at the expense of additional costs and logistical reorganization. There is currently insufficient data to promote the ambulatory use of liposomal bupivacaine, cryoanalgesia and percutaneous peripheral nerve stimulation. SUMMARY: Educational programs and parallel processing may promote peripheral nerve blockade in an ambulatory setting, improving the patient experience in the postoperative period. Intravenous dexamethasone should be considered wherever appropriate as part of a multimodal analgesic strategy to optimize postoperative pain control.

Comparative evaluation of Airtraq™ and GlideScope® videolaryngoscopes for difficult pediatric intubation in a Pierre Robin manikin.

Airway management in children is associated with anatomical and physiological challenges compared with adults. Pierre Robin sequence (PRS) is a condition characterized by micrognathia, glossoptosis, and cleft palate and related to a difficult airway. Both the Airtraq™ and GlideScope® have never been previously directly compared in PRS. Our aim was to evaluate the performance of these two airway devices in a PRS manikin for ethical and practical reasons. Between April and July 2017, 26, pediatric intensive care clinical fellows or trainees from a tertiary pediatric center were recruited to participate. In this prospective and randomized crossover trial, all participants first set up the Airtraq™ and the GlideScope® and then used these videolaryngoscopes to intubate an AirSim® PRS manikin. Our primary outcome measure was the duration of the successful intubation attempt. Duration of the successful intubation attempt was 18.1 (14.2-34.9 [10.2-51.3]) s for the Airtraq™ compared to 31.1 (18.7-55.6 [6.2-119]) s for the GlideScope® (p = 0.045). Setup time was 50.0 ± 6.9 s for the Airtraq™ and 27.8 ± 8.6 s for the GlideScope® (p < 0.001).Conclusion: Even though setup time was longer, the characteristics of intubation performance were superior with the Airtraq™ relative to the GlideScope® in an AirSim® PRS manikin. What is Known: • Several case reports have described the successful use of Airtraq™ to intubate children with Pierre Robin sequence. • The GlideScope® has demonstrated similar rates of first-attempt successful intubation to flexible fiberoptic bronchoscopy in a Pierre Robin sequence manikin. What is New: • In the hands of pediatric non-airway specialists, the characteristics of intubation performance, including the duration of the successful intubation attempt, are superior with the Airtraq™ compared with the GlideScope® in a Pierre Robin sequence manikin. • Setup time for the Airtraq™ is, however, longer relative to that for the GlideScope®.

Perioperative Patient Blood Management to Improve Outcomes.

Anemia is common in elective surgery and is an independent risk factor for morbidity and mortality. Historical management of anemia has focused on the use of allogeneic blood transfusion but this in itself is not without risk. It too has been independently associated with morbidity and mortality, let alone the costs and relative shortage of this resource. In recognition of this, patient blood management (PBM) shifts the focus from the product to the patient and views the patient's own blood as a resource that should be conserved and managed appropriately as a standard of care. It consists of 3 pillars: the optimization of red blood cell mass; reduction of blood loss and bleeding; and optimization of the patient's physiological tolerance toward anemia. Integration of these 3 pillars in the form of multimodal care bundles and strategies into perioperative pathways should improve care processes and patient outcome. Preoperative anemia is most commonly caused by functional iron deficiency and should be treated with oral iron, intravenous iron, and/or recombinant erythropoietin. An individualized assessment of the thrombotic risk of discontinuing anticoagulant and antiplatelet medication should be balanced against the risk of perioperative bleeding. Neuraxial anesthetic techniques should be considered and minimally invasive surgery undertaken where appropriate. Cell salvage should be used if significant blood loss is anticipated and pharmacological treatments such as tranexamic acid and fibrin sealants have been shown to reduce blood loss. Point of care tests can guide the perioperative management of dynamic coagulopathy. Blood testing sampling should be performed only when indicated and when taken, sample volume and waste should be minimized. Restrictive blood transfusion thresholds and reassessment after single unit transfusion should be incorporated into clinical practice where appropriate. For PBM to become standard practice in routine surgical care, national health care quality change initiatives must set the agenda for change but the patient-centered approach to PBM should be delivered in a way that is also hospital centered. Characterization of the current practice of PBM at each hospital is crucial to facilitate the benchmarking of performance. Barriers to effective implementation such as lack of knowledge should be identified and acted on. Continuous audit of practice with a focus on transfusion rates and patient outcomes can identify areas in need of improvement and provide iterative feedback to motivate and inspire the main stakeholders.

Increased odds of patient-reported success at 2 years after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in patients without cartilage lesions: a cohort study from the Swedish National Knee Ligament Register.

PURPOSE: To investigate whether the surgical technique of single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction, the visualization of anatomic surgical factors and the presence or absence of concomitant injuries at primary ACL reconstruction are able to predict patient-reported success and failure. The hypothesis of this study was that anatomic single-bundle surgical procedures would be predictive of patient-reported success. METHODS: This cohort study was based on data from the Swedish National Knee Ligament Register during the period of 1 January 2005 through 31 December 2014. Patients who underwent primary single-bundle ACL reconstruction with hamstring tendons were included. Details on surgical technique were collected using an online questionnaire comprising essential anatomic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction scoring checklist items, defined as the utilization of accessory medial portal drilling, anatomic tunnel placement, the visualization of insertion sites and pertinent landmarks. A univariate logistic regression model adjusted for age and gender was used to determine predictors of patient-reported success and failure, i.e. 20th and 80th percentile, respectively, in the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), 2 years after ACL reconstruction. RESULTS: In the 6889 included patients, the surgical technique used for single-bundle ACL reconstruction did not predict the predefined patient-reported success or patient-reported failure in the KOOS4. Patient-reported success was predicted by the absence of concomitant injury to the meniscus (OR = 0.81 [95% CI, 0.72-0.92], p = 0.001) and articular cartilage (OR = 0.70 [95% CI, 0.61-0.81], p < 0.001). Patient-reported failure was predicted by the presence of a concomitant injury to the articular cartilage (OR = 1.27 [95% CI, 1.11-1.44], p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Surgical techniques used in primary single-bundle ACL reconstruction did not predict the KOOS 2 years after the reconstruction. However, the absence of concomitant injuries at index surgery predicted patient-reported success in the KOOS. The results provide further evidence that concomitant injuries at ACL reconstruction affect subjective knee function and a detailed knowledge of the treatment of these concomitant injuries is needed. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Retrospective cohort study, Level III.

Revision surgery in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a cohort study of 17,682 patients from the Swedish National Knee Ligament Register.

PURPOSE: To investigate the association between surgical variables and the risk of revision surgery after ACL reconstruction in the Swedish National Knee Ligament Register. METHODS: This cohort study was based on data from the Swedish National Knee Ligament Register. Patients who underwent primary single-bundle ACL reconstruction with hamstring tendon were included. Follow-up started with primary ACL reconstruction and ended with ACL revision surgery or on 31 December, 2014, whichever occurred first. Details on surgical technique were collected using an online questionnaire. All group comparisons were made in relation to an "anatomic" reference group, comprised of essential AARSC items, defined as utilization of accessory medial portal drilling, anatomic tunnel placement, visualization of insertion sites and pertinent landmarks. Study end-point was revision surgery. RESULTS: A total of 108 surgeons (61.7%) replied to the questionnaire. A total of 17,682 patients were included [n = 10,013 males (56.6%) and 7669 females (43.4%)]. The overall revision rate was 3.1%. Older age as well as cartilage injury evident at index surgery was associated with a decreased risk of revision surgery. The group using transtibial drilling and non-anatomic bone tunnel placement was associated with a lower risk of revision surgery [HR 0.694 (95% CI 0.490-0.984); P = 0.041] compared with the anatomic reference group. The anatomic reference group showed no difference in risk of revision surgery compared with the transtibial drilling groups with partial anatomic [HR 0.759 (95% CI 0.548-1.051), n.s.] and anatomic tunnel placement [HR 0.944 (95% CI 0.718-1.241), n.s.]. The anatomic reference group showed a decreased risk of revision surgery compared with the transportal drilling group with anatomic placement [HR 1.310 (95% CI 1.047-1.640); P = 0.018]. CONCLUSION: Non-anatomic bone tunnel placement via transtibial drilling resulted in the lowest risk of revision surgery after ACL reconstruction. The risk of revision surgery increased when using transportal drilling. Performing anatomic ACL reconstruction utilizing eight selected essential items from the AARSC lowered the risk of revision surgery associated with transportal drilling and anatomic bone tunnel placement. Detailed knowledge of surgical technique using the AARSC predicts the risk of ACL revision surgery. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction is superior to single-bundle reconstruction in terms of revision frequency: a study of 22,460 patients from the Swedish National Knee Ligament Register.

PURPOSE: Studies comparing single- and double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstructions often include a combined analysis of anatomic and non-anatomic techniques. The purpose of this study was to compare the revision rates between single- and double-bundle ACL reconstructions in the Swedish National Knee Ligament Register with regard to surgical variables as determined by the anatomic ACL reconstruction scoring checklist (AARSC). METHODS: Patients from the Swedish National Knee Ligament Register who underwent either single- or double-bundle ACL reconstruction with hamstring tendon autograft during the period 2007-2014 were included. The follow-up period started with primary ACL reconstruction, and the outcome measure was set as revision surgery. An online questionnaire based on the items of the AARSC was used to determine the surgical technique implemented in the single-bundle procedures. These were organized into subgroups based on surgical variables, and the revision rates were compared with the double-bundle ACL reconstruction. Hazard ratios (HR) with 95% confidence interval (CI) was calculated and adjusted for confounders by Cox regression. RESULTS: A total of 22,460 patients were included in the study, of which 21,846 were single-bundle and 614 were double-bundle ACL reconstruction. Double-bundle ACL reconstruction had a revision frequency of 2.0% (n = 12) and single-bundle 3.2% (n = 689). Single-bundle reconstruction had an increased risk of revision surgery compared with double-bundle [adjusted HR 1.98 (95% CI 1.12-3.51), p = 0.019]. The subgroup analysis showed a significantly increased risk of revision surgery in patients undergoing single-bundle with anatomic technique using transportal drilling [adjusted HR 2.51 (95% CI 1.39-4.54), p = 0.002] compared with double-bundle ACL reconstruction. Utilizing a more complete anatomic technique according to the AARSC lowered the hazard rate considerably when transportal drilling was performed but still resulted in significantly increased risk of revision surgery compared with double-bundle ACL reconstruction [adjusted HR 1.87 (95% CI 1.04-3.38), p = 0.037]. CONCLUSIONS: Double-bundle ACL reconstruction is associated with a lower risk of revision surgery than single-bundle ACL reconstruction. Single-bundle procedures performed using transportal femoral drilling technique had significantly higher risk of revision surgery compared with double-bundle. However, a reference reconstruction with transportal drilling defined as a more complete anatomic reconstruction reduces the risk of revision surgery considerably. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

No differences in subjective knee function between surgical techniques of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction at 2-year follow-up: a cohort study from the Swedish National Knee Ligament Register.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to investigate how different techniques of single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction affect subjective knee function via the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) evaluation 2 years after surgery. It was hypothesized that the surgical techniques of single-bundle ACL reconstruction would result in equivalent results with respect to subjective knee function 2 years after surgery. METHODS: This cohort study was based on data from the Swedish National Knee Ligament Register during the 10-year period of 1 January 2005 through 31 December 2014. Patients who underwent primary single-bundle ACL reconstruction with hamstrings tendon autograft were included. Details on surgical technique were collected using a web-based questionnaire comprised of essential AARSC items, including utilization of accessory medial portal drilling, anatomic tunnel placement, and visualization of insertion sites and landmarks. A repeated measures ANOVA and an additional linear mixed model analysis were used to investigate the effect of surgical technique on the KOOS4 from the pre-operative period to 2-year follow-up. RESULTS: A total of 13,636 patients who had undergone single-bundle ACL reconstruction comprised the study group for this analysis. A repeated measures ANOVA determined that mean subjective knee function differed between the pre-operative time period and at 2-year follow-up (p < 0.001). No differences were found with respect to the interaction between KOOS4 and surgical technique or gender. Additionally, the linear mixed model adjusted for age at reconstruction, gender, and concomitant injuries showed no difference between surgical techniques in KOOS4 improvement from baseline to 2-year follow-up. However, KOOS4 improved significantly in patients for all surgical techniques of single-bundle ACL reconstruction (p < 0.001); the largest improvement was seen between the pre-operative time period and at 1-year follow-up. CONCLUSION: Surgical techniques of primary single-bundle ACL reconstruction did not demonstrate differences in the improvement in baseline subjective knee function as measured with the KOOS4 during the first 2 years after surgery. However, subjective knee function improved from pre-operative baseline to 2-year follow-up independently of surgical technique.