Patient-oriented education and visual-aid intervention are inadequate to identify patients with potential capsule retention: a prospective randomized study.

Background/aims: The key procedure-related risk with video capsule endoscopy (VCE) is capsule retention, which should be suspected in patients who have not reported capsule passage. The study aims were to determine the frequency of capsule passage visualization and the difference in self-reporting of capsule passage between patients who receive patient-oriented education (POE) and patients who receive POE and a visual aid intervention in the form of a wrist band (WB). Methods: This was a prospective randomized study that enrolled patients undergoing VCE. Patients were randomly assigned to a POE group versus a POE and WB group. POE consisted of verbal education and an information booklet. Both groups received instructions to notify the study team regarding capsule passage. Results: Sixty patients (mean age 57 ± 18 years; 61% female) were included. A total of 57 patients were included in the analysis (3 lost to follow-up; 28 in POE group; 29 in WB group). Capsule passage status was reported by 68% without significant difference between POE and WB groups (72% vs. 64%; p = .51). Capsule passage status was obtained from all 57 patients with the addition of a proactive follow-up. Only 56% (n = 32) reported visualizing capsule passage. Of the remaining patients who did not visualize capsule passage, 60% (n = 15) reported on this without significant difference between the POE and WB groups (p = .23). Conclusions: Lack of visualization of capsule passage is a poor indicator of retention. Self-reporting of VCE passage status is suboptimal and the addition of a visual aid did not improve this parameter.

Endoscopic ultrasound in the evaluation of chronic upper abdominal pain of unknown etiology: a retrospective chart review examining the efficacy of EUS in determining a new diagnosis.

GOALS: To explore the utility of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) in the evaluation of chronic upper abdominal pain (UAP) of undetermined etiology. BACKGROUND: Chronic UAP is a common problem with a challenging diagnosis and management. The role of EUS in the diagnosis of UAP may minimize additional testing; however, few studies describe the percentage of new diagnoses yielded in these patients. STUDY: We conducted a retrospective analysis by reviewing electronic medical records at Scott and White Memorial Hospital, Texas A&M Health Sciences Center for patients with abdominal pain for ≥ 12 months not explained by previous workup referred for EUS for chronic UAP from January 1, 1998 through October 1, 2007. Patients with previous EUS in past 12 months were excluded from the study. Patient demographic data and imaging performed 6 months before and 24 months after EUS were reviewed and results documented. RESULTS: EUS was successful at diagnosing a new clinical etiology of chronic UAP in 33 patients (8.89%) with previous workup that was unrevealing for a definitive diagnosis. The most frequent diagnoses included pancreaticobiliary tree abnormalities, chronic pancreatitis, and fatty liver disease. CONCLUSIONS: Our results support the fact that the majority of patients UAP with prior imaging will have no identifiable organic etiology found on EUS to explain their pain; however, we suggest that EUS be considered in patients with suspected pancreatic or biliary pathology.

Impact of surgery-radiation interval on locoregional outcome in patients receiving neo-adjuvant therapy and mastectomy.

Delays in the initiation of radiation are increasingly common for medically underserved patients. We evaluated the impact of delay in initiation of postmastectomy radiation (PMRT) in breast cancer patients treated with neo-adjuvant therapy (NAT) in a cohort of medically underserved patients with multiple barriers to timely care. We retrospectively reviewed medical records of 248 consecutively treated patients. Clinical stage was 34.4% II, 65.6% III. The median interval from surgery to PMRT was 11.9 weeks; 22.2% started PMRT within 8 weeks of surgery, 52% within 12 weeks, and 67.3% within 16 weeks. The cumulative 5-year incidence of locoregional recurrence (LRR) was 5.8% (95% CI: 3.2-9.7). There was no significant difference in locoregional outcome among patients starting PMRT within 8 weeks versus >8 weeks (p = 0.634), ≤ 12 versus >12 weeks (p = 0.332), or ≤ 16 versus >16 weeks (p = 0.549) after surgery. Although timely initiation of PMRT remains a priority, the locoregional control benefit of PMRT appears to be maintained up to at least 16 weeks, and in those without early locoregional recurrence, PMRT should be offered despite such a delay.

Primary rhabdomyosarcoma of the pineal gland.

OBJECTIVES: To report a case of primary rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS) of the pineal gland in an adult, as well as review the literature on this rare entity. METHODS: The case is compared with previous reports of similar entities, with emphasis on this patient's characteristics and clinical presentation, investigations, and management. RESULTS: Diagnosis of primary RMS of the pineal gland was based on the presence of strap cells and multinucleated myotube-like structures, as well as tumor cell expression of skeletal muscle markers consistent with myogenic differentiation. Multimodality treatment was initiated based on pediatric protocols. Unfortunately, the disease progressed on treatment, and the patient survived only 5 months from diagnosis. CONCLUSIONS: Pineal RMS is a rare disease with poor prognosis. Optimal management is unknown but likely to involve aggressive multimodality therapy.