Real-World Moderate-to-Severe Hidradenitis Suppurativa: Decrease in Disease Burden With Adalimumab.

BACKGROUND: Real-world knowledge of the burden of hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) on patients remains limited. OBJECTIVES: To measure the impact of adalimumab on moderate-to-severe HS patients' health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and work productivity. METHODS: In 23 Canadian centres, 138 adults with moderate-to-severe HS requiring a change in ongoing therapy were treated with adalimumab for up to 52 weeks as per the physician's practice. Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) were obtained at baseline, weeks 24 and 52 to measure overall HRQoL, HS severity, levels of anxiety and depression, impact and symptoms of HS, work productivity and activity impairment. A post-hoc analysis further explored the PROMs by abscess and inflammatory nodule (AN) count at baseline (≤5, low; 6-10, medium; ≥11, high). RESULTS: From baseline to weeks 24 and 52, all PRO overall scores improved significantly (P ≤ .0023). The number of patients reporting "good disease control" and "complete disease control" increased from 9.7% to 66.4% over 52 weeks. The score in Health Utility Index Mark 3 (HUI3) pain attribute meaningfully decreased over 52 weeks (mean difference ≥.05). The HS symptoms skin "tenderness" and "itchiness" improved the most. Work productivity loss and activity impairment improved by approximately 20% over 52 weeks. Disease burden improved more in 24 week responders with low and medium AN counts at baseline than in those with high AN count or in 24 week nonresponders. CONCLUSION: At week 24 and maintained at week 52 in a real-world setting, adalimumab meaningfully improved HRQoL, work productivity, and activity impairment in moderate-to-severe HS patients.

Willingness to pay for a treatment for pain in multiple sclerosis.

BACKGROUND: Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a chronic neurological disease that affects 240 per 100 000 Canadians. Of these patients, 10-80% (average 70%) experience pain. Sativex is a cannabis-based drug recently approved for neuropathic pain. OBJECTIVES: In this study, we determine individuals' preferences between two treatment options as well as the willingness to pay (WTP) for Sativex, expressed as the amount they would pay in insurance premiums to have access to that treatment. METHODS: The WTP instrument comprised a decision board as a visual aid, and a questionnaire. A decision board helps clinicians standardize the presentation of treatment information. In this study, the decision board described two treatment options: a three-drug combination (gabapentin, amytriptyline, acetaminophen [paracetamol] {i.e. pills}) and the three-drug combination plus Sativex (i.e. 'pills and oral spray'). Information on efficacy and adverse effects was taken from trial data; wording was guided by a panel of neurologists and tested for clarity on lay people. The instrument was administered to 500 participants from Canada's general population using the bidding game approach. Descriptive statistics were calculated. RESULTS: Mean (SD) age of participants was 39 (13) years, with a female : male distribution of 56 : 44. The decision board was presented in both English (85%) and French (15%). Of 500 interviewees, 253 (50.6%) chose the 'pills and oral spray'. Mean monthly WTP for the insurance premium for those who chose the 'pills and oral spray' was Can dollars 8 (SD +/- 15, median 4, range 0-200). CONCLUSIONS: Assuming that 51% of the general population are willing to pay additional premiums as reported in this study, the premiums collected would cover the cost of Sativex for all Canadian MS patients experiencing pain, with a surplus.

Cost comparison of prostaglandin analogues: a Canadian population-based analysis.

OBJECTIVES: Glaucoma is a fairly common disease, however, little is known about the costs associated with prostaglandin analogues (PAs). The costs between the three available PAs (Lumigan (bimatoprost), Xalatan (latanoprost) and Travatan (travoprost)) were compared as monotherapy and when adjunctive therapy was used. METHODS: From the Québec drug claims database, all patients who used these drugs for 1 full year were identified. From the Ministry of Health (MoH) perspective, the average cost for all reimbursed costs (drug costs and pharmacist fees) were calculated. Those costs plus the patient out-of-pocket copayments were used for the payer + user (PU) perspective. RESULTS: Data from 4,653 patients were analysed (3,606 on monotherapy and 1,047 on combination treatment with adjunctive therapy), 59.7% were females, and the average age was 72.6 +/- 10.4 years. MoH perspective costs were $410 +/- $167 for bimatoprost, $381 +/- $145 for latanoprost and $298 +/- $121 for travoprost (all differences p<0.001), for patients on monotherapy. Costs of combination treatment with adjunctive therapy were $786 +/- $416, $686 +/- $313, and $623 +/- $521, respectively (travoprost significantly lower than each of the other two p<0.001, others=not significant). Results from the PU perspective were comparable. CONCLUSIONS: Travoprost had the lowest cost, both as monotherapy and in conjunction with other glaucoma treatments. Further comparative pharmacoeconomic evaluation is warranted.

Pain due to multiple sclerosis: analysis of the prevalence and economic burden in Canada.

BACKGROUND: Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a neurological disease affecting approximately 50,000 Canadians. Although studies have described overall MS costs, none have focused specifically on MS-related pain. OBJECTIVES: To estimate the prevalence of MS-related pain in Canada, the proportion of patients treated and responding to treatment for MS-related pain, and the associated economic burden. METHODS: Results were captured through physician and patient surveys. Patients were recruited through MS clinics and the MS Society. Patient-reported outcomes and resource utilization over the previous six months were collected by telephone interview. Costs were measured in 2004 Canadian dollars. The economic burden was extrapolated to the population using national demographics and prevalence. Spearman's rho assessed the relationship between cost and pain severity. RESULTS: Physicians estimated that 46% of their MS patients experienced MS-related pain, and that 35% received treatment for pain. Pain was reported to be relieved somewhat in 29%+/-10% of their patients, adequately in 26%+/-19% and poorly in 27%+/-13%, while 17%+/-9% received no relief. Two hundred ninety-seven participants completed the patient survey. Seventy-one per cent (211 of 297 patients) experienced MS-related pain. Eighty per cent of patients reported taking some type of medication to manage their pain, and of these, 82% reported some reduction in pain. The mean +/- SD direct cost per patient of MS-related pain was dollars 2,528+/-5,695. The mean +/- SD indirect cost per patient was dollars 669+/-875. Total costs were positively correlated with levels of self-reported pain (rho=0.291, rho<0.0001). The estimated six-month burden of pain of MS patients in Canada was dollars 79,444,888. CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of pain is high in MS patients. This condition may be underdiagnosed and undertreated, and results in a significant economic burden on society.

Comparative safety of antipsychotics: another look at the risk of diabetes.

OBJECTIVE: The association between the use of antipsychotics and diabetes mellitus (DM) is still unclear, as depicted by several conflicting reports. Our study aims to assess the risk of DM in new users of antipsychotics. METHODS: Our nested case-control study used the Quebec Health Insurance Board databases. People in the source cohort were DM-free and had initiated an antipsychotic treatment. Subjects were cohort members who initiated an antidiabetic or had a diagnosis of DM during their follow-up period. Three variables were used to assess antipsychotic exposure: the antipsychotic used (any typical, clozapine, olanzapine, quetiapine, risperidone, or more than 1 drug); the number of 30-day periods of use; and antipsychotic use at index date (current or past). A paired multivariate logistic regression model was used to calculate adjusted odds ratios. RESULTS: Among the 88 467 people included in the cohort, 6109 subjects with DM were identified and were matched to 61 090 control subjects. New users of quetiapine were less likely to develop DM than new users of typical antipsychotics (OR, 0.89; 95% CI 0.81 to 0.99). The risk of DM was not statistically different across the atypical antipsychotics. A longer exposure to any antipsychotic (for each 30-day period, OR 1.009; 95% CI 1.006 to 1.011) and current use of antipsychotics (OR 1.26; 95% CI 1.17 to 1.36) were associated with DM. CONCLUSION: These results suggest that metabolic parameters of people exposed to antipsychotics should be monitored, irrespective of the drug taken, among the drugs available at the time of analysis.

Comparison of scores derived from the box score-11 scale and the pain attribute of the health utilities index-3.

BACKGROUND: Pain is widespread, but has not yet been the focus of measurement in terms of patient preferences. This type of measure is needed for pharmacoeconomic analyses of pain medications. OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to compare scores from the Box Score (BS)-11 scale and the pain attribute of the Health Utilities Index (HUI)-3. METHODS: English- and/or French-speaking adult patients (aged ≥ 18 years) were recruited from pain clinics in four Canadian metropolitan areas (Toronto, Ottawa, Edmonton, Vancouver). Those providing informed consent completed both pain scales, assessing their average pain level over the previous 4 weeks. Kendall's Tau-b was calculated between score sets. Answers provided by patients were then used to determine the proportions of each of the BS-11 scores that mapped onto each of the five HUI-3 pain scores. RESULTS: Six of the 516 completed questionnaires had missing information, leaving 510 for analysis. The average age of patients was 49.5 ± 11.9 years; 70% were female. Tau-b was reasonably large and statistically significant between the scales (τ = 0.685; p < 0.001). No patients had zero scores on BS-11, and two patients scored 1, yielding inconclusive results for that score. Eight of the remaining nine BS-11 scores mapped ≥ 60% onto HUI-3 pain scores. BS-11 scores 2 and 10 had the best mapping (88% and 94%, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: BS-11 scores can be mapped onto the pain attribute of the HUI-3 with a high degree of correlation.