Donation After Circulatory Death Heart Transplantation: A Narrative Review.

Heart transplantation is the definitive treatment for refractory, end-stage heart failure. The number of patients awaiting transplantation far exceeds available organs. In an effort to expand the donor pool, donation after circulatory death (DCD) heart transplantation has garnered renewed interest. Unlike donation after brain death, DCD donors do not meet the criteria for brain death and are dependent on life-sustaining therapies. Procurement can include a direct strategy or a normothermic regional perfusion, whereby there is restoration of perfusion to the organ before explantation. There are new developments in cold storage and ex vivo perfusion strategies. Since its inception, there has been a steady improvement in post-transplant outcomes, largely attributed to advancements in operative and procurement strategies. In this narrative review, the authors address the unique considerations of DCD heart transplantation, including withdrawal of care, the logistics of procuring and resuscitating organs, outcomes compared with standard donation after brain death, and ethical considerations.

Perioperative Doppler ultrasound assessment of portal vein flow pulsatility in high-risk cardiac surgery patients: a multicentre prospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Portal vein Doppler ultrasound pulsatility measured by transoesophageal echocardiography is a marker of the haemodynamic impact of venous congestion in cardiac surgery. We investigated whether the presence of abnormal portal vein flow pulsatility is associated with a longer duration of invasive life support and postoperative complications in high-risk patients. METHODS: In this multicentre cohort study, pulsed-wave Doppler ultrasound assessments of portal vein flow were performed during anaesthesia before initiation of cardiopulmonary bypass (before CPB) and after separation of cardiopulmonary bypass (after CPB). Abnormal pulsatility was defined as portal pulsatility fraction (PPF) ≥50% (PPF50). The primary outcome was the cumulative time in perioperative organ dysfunction (TPOD) requiring invasive life support during 28 days. Secondary outcomes included major postoperative complications. RESULTS: 373 patients, 71 (22.0%) had PPF50 before CPB and 77 (24.9%) after CPB. PPF50 was associated with longer duration of TPOD (median [inter-quartile range]; before CPB: 27 h [11-72] vs 19 h [8.5-42], P=0.02; after CPB: 27 h [11-61] vs 20 h [8-42], P=0.006). After adjusting for confounders, PPF50 before CPB showed significant association with TPOD. PPF50 after CPB was associated with a higher rate of major postoperative complications (36.4% vs 20.3%, P=0.006). CONCLUSIONS: Abnormal portal vein flow pulsatility before cardiopulmonary bypass was associated with longer duration of life support therapy after cardiac surgery in high-risk patients. Abnormal portal vein flow pulsatility after cardiopulmonary bypass separation was associated with a higher risk of major postoperative complications although this association was not independent of other factors. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT03656263.

Unilateral Pulmonary Edema After Robotically Assisted Mitral Valve Repair Requiring Veno-Venous Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation.

Unilateral pulmonary edema (UPE) is an uncommon yet potentially life-threatening complication of minimally invasive cardiac surgery (MICS). Most frequently described after robotically assisted mitral valve (MV) repair, it is characterized by right lung edema, hypoxemia, hypercapnia, pulmonary hypertension, and hemodynamic instability beginning minutes-to-hours after separation from cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). The authors describe a severe case with refractory hypoxemia requiring veno-venous (VV) extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) after robotically assisted MV repair.

Intrathecal Morphine for Analgesia in Minimally Invasive Cardiac Surgery: A Randomized, Placebo-controlled, Double-blinded Clinical Trial.

BACKGROUND: Intrathecal morphine decreases postoperative pain in standard cardiac surgery. Its safety and effectiveness have not been adequately evaluated in minimally invasive cardiac surgery. The authors hypothesized that intrathecal morphine would decrease postoperative morphine consumption after minimally invasive cardiac surgery. METHODS: In this randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blinded clinical trial, patients undergoing robotic totally endoscopic coronary artery bypass received either intrathecal morphine (5 mcg/kg) or intrathecal saline before surgery. The primary outcome was postoperative morphine equivalent consumption in the first 24 h after surgery; secondary outcomes included pain scores, side effects, and patient satisfaction. Pain was assessed via visual analog scale at 1, 2, 6, 12, 24, and 48 h after intensive care unit arrival. Opioid-related side effects (nausea/vomiting, pruritus, urinary retention, respiratory depression) were assessed daily. Patient satisfaction was evaluated with the Revised American Pain Society Outcome Questionnaire. RESULTS: Seventy-nine patients were randomized to receive intrathecal morphine (n = 37) or intrathecal placebo (n = 42), with 70 analyzed (morphine 33, placebo 37). Intrathecal morphine patients required significantly less median (25th to 75th percentile) morphine equivalents compared to placebo during first postoperative 24 h (28 [16 to 46] mg vs. 59 [41 to 79] mg; difference, -28 [95% CI, -40 to -18]; P < 0.001) and second postoperative 24 h (0 [0 to 2] mg vs. 5 [0 to 6] mg; difference, -3.3 [95% CI, -5 to 0]; P < 0.001), exhibited significantly lower visual analog scale pain scores at rest and cough at all postoperative timepoints (overall treatment effect, -4.1 [95% CI, -4.9 to -3.3] and -4.7 [95% CI, -5.5 to -3.9], respectively; P < 0.001), and percent time in severe pain (10 [0 to 40] vs. 40 [20 to 70]; P = 0.003) during the postoperative period. Mild nausea was more common in the intrathecal morphine group (36% vs. 8%; P = 0.004). CONCLUSIONS: When given before induction of anesthesia for totally endoscopic coronary artery bypass, intrathecal morphine decreases use of postoperative opioids and produces significant postoperative analgesia for 48 h.

FDG PET Imaging of Extremities in Rheumatoid Arthritis.

BACKGROUND: The primary objective of this study was to evaluate the utility of fluorodeoxyglucose positive emission tomography imaging in assessing the degree of joint inflammation and response to therapy in patients with rheumatoid arthritis using standard PET parameters. METHODS: Five subjects with newly diagnosed RA were enrolled in this IRB-approved prospective study. After standard conventional workup that included clinical and laboratory evaluation and disease activity score (DAS3v) calculation, subjects underwent baseline FDG PET scans of their hands and feet prior to initiation of treatment and after six months of standard treatment. The uptake of FDG in involved joints was assessed qualitatively (visual evaluation) as well as semi quantitatively using standardized uptake value (SUV). Findings from the FDG PET scans were correlated with clinical and laboratory parameters including DAS and ESR. RESULTS: In all five patients, increased FDG uptake was noted in various joints affected by RA. The intensity of uptake varied from mild to intense (SUVmax values from 3.10 to 6.0). Overall, these correlated well with the clinical evaluation of involved joints. FDG PET imaging provided additional information by showing involvement in joints that were difficult to evaluate clinically (e.g. mid foot joints). The PET data also provided a distribution of joint involvement with varying degrees of severity in the same subject. On objective analysis using Spearman rank correlation coefficient for statistical analysis, no significant correlations were observed (p>0.05) between DAS, ESR, and the different PET parameters at baseline (before treatment) despite large calculated positive correlation coefficients. This was due to the small sample size (n=5). At post-treatment, the significant correlations were those between DAS and Maximum metabolic disease burden (MDB max) (RS=0.9, p=0.04) and between ESR and MDB max (RS=0.9, p=0.04). The positive correlations between total metabolic disease burden (Total MDB) and DAS (RS=0.7) and between Total MDB and ESR were also large (RS=0.7) but not significant. The non-significance was due to the small sample size. CONCLUSIONS: FDG PET imaging provides a unique noninvasive quantitative method in assessing disease status and response to therapy and can serve as a useful adjunct to clinical evaluation in management of patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

Preoperative angiotensin system inhibitor use attenuates heparin-induced hypotension in patients undergoing cardiac surgery.

OBJECTIVE: Both angiotensin system inhibitor (ASI) use and heparin are associated with hypotension. This study attempted to determine whether preoperative ASI therapy affected the hemodynamic response to heparin administered to patients undergoing cardiac surgery. DESIGN: Sixty-two patients undergoing elective cardiac surgery requiring full (300 units/kg) systemic heparinization were studied prospectively. Thirty-three patients were receiving preoperative ASI therapy, whereas 29 patients were not. Anesthetic technique and mechanical ventilation parameters were standardized. Hemodynamics were recorded at 3 time points: baseline (just before the administration of heparin), 1-minute post-heparin administration, and 4-minute post-heparin administration. SETTING: Single university hospital. PARTICIPANTS: Patients undergoing elective cardiac surgery. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The 2 groups were similar regarding preoperative demographics and baseline hemodynamics. Baseline mean arterial pressure (MAP) in non-ASI patients was 82.0 mmHg, and it decreased significantly to 76.3 mmHg (1 min; p<0.05) and 70.7 mmHg (4 min; p<0.05) following heparin administration. MAP values in ASI patients were 81.9 mmHg, 81.8 mmHg, and 76.8 mmHg at baseline, 1-minute post-heparin, and 4-minute post-heparin administration, respectively (changes not significant).Within-group analysis revealed that non-ASI patients experienced significant decrease in MAP at 1-minute (-6.6%, p = 0.01) and 4-minute (-13.0%, p = 0.0011) post-heparin administration, whereas ASI patients did not (+1.9%, p = 0.52; -3.8%, p = 0.16, respectively). Between-group analysis revealed that differences in MAP values at 1 minute were significant (p = 0.03), whereas differences at 4 minutes were not significant (p = 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: This prospective clinical study indicated that preoperative ASI therapy until the day before surgery may attenuate heparin-induced hypotension. Definitive mechanistic insight requires further clinical study.