Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 120
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Bases de dados
País/Região como assunto
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Heart Vessels ; 38(8): 1056-1064, 2023 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36991137

RESUMO

Cardiac rehabilitation (CR) improves clinical and functional recovery in older patients after acute cardiac syndromes, whose outcome is influenced by cardiac disease severity, but also by comorbidity and frailty. The aim of the study was to analyze the predictors of physical frailty improvement during the CR program. Data were collected in all patients aged > 75 years consecutively admitted from 1 January to December 2017 to our CR, consisting of 5-day-per-week of 30-min session of biking or calisthenics on alternate days for 4 weeks. Physical frailty was measured with short physical performance battery (SPPB) at the entry and the end of CR. Outcome was represented by an increase of at least 1 point in the SPPB score from baseline to the end of the CR program. In our study population of 100 patients, mean age 81 years, we demonstrated that a strong predictor of improvement in SPPB score was the poorer performance in the test at baseline; for Δ-1 point of score, we registered an OR 2.50 (95% CI = 1.64-3.85; p = 0.001) of probability to improve the physical performance at the end of CR. Interestingly those patients with worse performance at SPPB balance and chair standing task showed greater probability of ameliorating their physical frailty profile at the end of CR. Our data strongly suggest that CR program after acute cardiac syndrome produces a significant physical frailty improvement in those patients with worse frailty phenotype with an impairment in chair standing or balance at entry.


Assuntos
Reabilitação Cardíaca , Fragilidade , Humanos , Fragilidade/diagnóstico , Recuperação de Função Fisiológica , Hospitalização , Desempenho Físico Funcional
2.
Aging Clin Exp Res ; 34(1): 113-120, 2022 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34398439

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Although the prevalence of sarcopenic obesity is increasing, nowadays a universally accepted definition still does not exist. Because, this clinical entity is defined as the combination of obesity and sarcopenia, the diagnosis appears to be strictly linked to criteria used for sarcopenia and the available prevalence data are not uniform. To investigate the prevalence of sarcopenic obesity in older persons according to EWGSOP2 and FNIH criteria. Second, to evaluate the prevalence of diabetes in patients with sarcopenia diagnosed by the two definitions. METHODS: Observational multicenter study performed in 2014 on older patients admitted to 12 Italian hospitals (GLISTEN Study). Data were collected through standardized questionnaires, which assessed: socio-demographic data, cognitive status, functional abilities, pharmacological therapy, comorbidities, and blood tests. Moreover, muscle mass and strength and physical performance were evaluated. RESULTS: Six hundred and ten were included in the analyses. Among sarcopenic patients, the prevalence of sarcopenic obesity was 30.8% with FNIH and 0% with EWGSOP2 criteria. According to EWGSOP2 criteria, 23.7% of sarcopenic and 30.8% of non-sarcopenic patients were affected by diabetes (p = 0.101); otherwise, using FNIH criteria, 36.3% of sarcopenic and 26.9% of non-sarcopenic patients were diabetic (p = 0.030). After adjustment for potential confounders, diabetic patients had a 73% higher probability of being sarcopenic according to FNIH criteria (OR 1.73; 95% CI 1.13-2.64). CONCLUSIONS: The EWGSOP2 and FNIH sarcopenia criteria are differently related to the prevalence of obesity and diabetes. The EWGSOP2 criteria seem to be not suitable to identify people with sarcopenic obesity.


Assuntos
Diabetes Mellitus , Sarcopenia , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Diabetes Mellitus/epidemiologia , Força da Mão , Humanos , Obesidade/epidemiologia , Prevalência , Sarcopenia/epidemiologia
3.
Epidemiol Prev ; 46(4): 268-272, 2022.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36259343

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: to assess the occurrence of potentially inappropriate prescribing (PIP) in residents of Tuscany nursing homes (NHs) and its variation before and after NH entry. DESIGN: retrospective observational study using data from the Regional Administrative Database of Tuscany. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: the study involved residents of 67 Tuscan NHs identified between 2011 and 2012. To estimate PIP prevalence before and after NH, a subset of 10 indicators of the Screening Tool of Older Person's Prescriptions (STOPP) criteria were selected. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: prevalence of PIP. RESULTS: considering 2,801 NH residents, the proportion of PIP ranged from 0.0% to 55.2% and from 0.0% to 33.9% before and after the NH admission, respectively. Overall, this study showed a decrease in the occurrence of PIP after the NH admission for most of the indicators, reaching statistical significance for indicator 3 (tricyclic antidepressants in combination with an opiate or calcium channel blockers), 7 (prescription of NSAIDs in heart failure patients), and 9 (warfarin in combination with NSAIDs). CONCLUSIONS: although the reduction of PIP after NH admission may suggest greater awareness about the appropriateness of drug use, more efforts still need to be made.


Assuntos
Prescrição Inadequada , Alcaloides Opiáceos , Humanos , Idoso , Prescrição Inadequada/prevenção & controle , Bloqueadores dos Canais de Cálcio , Antidepressivos Tricíclicos , Varfarina , Itália/epidemiologia , Casas de Saúde , Anti-Inflamatórios não Esteroides
4.
Age Ageing ; 50(5): 1593-1599, 2021 09 11.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33792656

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: although frailty and delirium are among the most frequent and burdensome geriatric syndromes, little is known about their association and impact on short-term mortality. OBJECTIVE: to examine, in hospitalized older persons, whether frailty is associated with delirium, and whether these two conditions, alone or in combination, affect these patients' 30-day survival. DESIGN: observational study nested in the Delirium Day project, with 30-day follow-up. SETTING: acute medical wards (n = 118) and rehabilitation wards (n = 46) in Italy. SUBJECTS: a total of 2,065 individuals aged 65+ years hospitalized in acute medical (1,484 patients, 71.9%) or rehabilitation (581 patients, 28.1%) wards. METHODS: a 25-item Frailty Index (FI) was created. Delirium was assessed using the 4AT test. Vital status was ascertained at 30 days. RESULTS: overall, 469 (22.7%) patients experienced delirium on the index day and 82 (4.0%) died during follow-up. After adjustment for potential confounders, each FI score increase of 0.1 significantly increased the odds of delirium (odds ratio, OR: 1.66 [95% CI: 1.45-1.90]), with no difference between the acute (OR: 1.65 [95% CI: 1.41-1.93]) and rehabilitation ward patients (OR: 1.71 [95% CI: 1.27-2.30]). The risk of dying during follow-up also increased significantly for every FI increase of 0.1 in the overall population (OR: 1.65 [95% CI: 1.33-2.05]) and in the acute medical ward patients (OR: 1.61 [95% CI: 1.28-2.04]), but not in the rehabilitation patients. Delirium was not significantly associated with 30-day mortality in either hospital setting. CONCLUSIONS: in hospitalized older patients, frailty is associated with delirium and with an increased risk of short-term mortality.


Assuntos
Delírio , Fragilidade , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Delírio/diagnóstico , Delírio/epidemiologia , Fragilidade/diagnóstico , Avaliação Geriátrica , Humanos , Estudos Prospectivos , Fatores de Risco
5.
Aging Clin Exp Res ; 32(10): 2057-2064, 2020 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32227283

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Optimal blood pressure (BP) control can prevent major adverse health events, but target values are still controversial, especially in older patients with comorbidities, frailty and disability. AIMS: To evaluate mortality according to BP values in a cohort of older adults enrolled in the Fiesole Misurata Study, after a 6-year follow-up. METHODS: Living status as of December 31, 2016 was obtained in 385 subjects participating in the Fiesole Misurata Study. Patients' characteristics were analysed to detect predictors of mortality. At baseline, all participants had undergone office BP measurement and a comprehensive geriatric assessment. RESULTS: After a 6-year follow-up, 97 participants had died (25.2%). After adjustment for comorbidities and comprehensive geriatric assessment, mortality was significantly lower for SBP 140-159 mmHg as compared with 120-139 mmHg (HR 0.54, 95% CI 0.33-0.89). This result was also confirmed in patients aged 75 + (HR 0.49, 95% CI 0.29-0.85), and in those with disability (HR 0.36, 95% CI 0.15-0.86) or taking antihypertensive medications (HR 0.49, 95% CI 0.28-0.86). DISCUSSION: An intensive BP control may lead to greater harm than benefit in older adults. Indeed, the European guidelines recommend caution in BP lowering in older patients, especially if functionally compromised, to minimize the risk of hypotension-related adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: After a 6-year follow-up, mortality risk was lower in participants with SBP 140-159 mmHg as compared with SBP 120-139 mmHg, in the overall population and in the subgroups of subjects aged 75 + , with a disability or taking anti-hypertensive medications.


Assuntos
Hipertensão , Idoso , Anti-Hipertensivos/uso terapêutico , Pressão Sanguínea/efeitos dos fármacos , Determinação da Pressão Arterial , Seguimentos , Humanos , Hipertensão/tratamento farmacológico , Fatores de Risco
6.
Aging Clin Exp Res ; 31(4): 557-559, 2019 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30778874

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Recently the Berlin Aging Study II (BASE-II) showed that polypharmacy is associated with clinically relevant sarcopenia among community-dwelling older persons. Here we report findings from the GLISTEN study about the association of polypharmacy with sarcopenia among older medical in-patients. METHODS: The GLISTEN study investigated prevalence and clinical correlates of sarcopenia in older patients admitted to geriatric and internal medicine acute care wards of 12 Italian hospitals. RESULTS: In this sample of older medical in-patients with high prevalence of sarcopenia (34.7%) and polypharmacy (70.2%) we did not observe a significant association of polypharmacy with sarcopenia. CONCLUSIONS: Present findings demonstrate that the association of polypharmacy with sarcopenia, observed in the BASE-II study, is not evident in the GLISTEN sample, being our patients significantly older, more multi-morbid, with high prevalence of sarcopenia and polypharmacy, suggesting that this association might vary according to the heterogeneous health, functional, and nutritional characteristics of older people.


Assuntos
Avaliação Geriátrica , Polimedicação , Sarcopenia/epidemiologia , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Humanos , Vida Independente/estatística & dados numéricos , Itália , Masculino , Prevalência , Fatores de Risco , Sarcopenia/etiologia
7.
Monaldi Arch Chest Dis ; 88(2): 957, 2018 Jun 07.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29877667

RESUMO

Atrial fibrillation (AF) and coronary artery disease requiring percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and stenting often coexist in older patients. This poses the difficult problem of concurrent anticoagulant and double antiplatelet therapy (triple therapy). Current treatment guidelines do recommend triple therapy, especially in the course of acute coronary syndrome (ACS), with limitations due to an excessive risk of bleeding associated with this therapeutic regimen. This review summarizes randomized clinical trials and observational studies that compared triple therapy with a variety of different therapeutic options. Although the available evidence is not completely satisfactory and other studies are urgently needed, alternative regimens to triple therapy in AF patients undergoing PCI and stenting are promising, at least in terms of safety.

8.
Aging Clin Exp Res ; 29(1): 35-42, 2017 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28181204

RESUMO

The identification of cost-effective interventions that improve the health status and prevent disability in old age is one of the most important public health challenges. Regular physical activity is the only intervention that has consistently been shown to improve functional health and energy balance and to reduce the risk of cardiovascular disease, stroke, diabetes, several cancers, depression and falls. In advanced age, physical activity is also effective at mitigating sarcopenia, restoring robustness, and preventing/delaying the development of disability. On the other hand, physical inactivity is recognized as one of the leading causes of several chronic degenerative diseases and is also a major contributing factor to sarcopenia and functional disability. This compelling evidence has prompted the World Health Organization to recommend engaging in regular physical activity throughout one's life course. The present review summarizes the available evidence in support of physical activity as a remedy against physical frailty and sarcopenia. The relevant pathways through which the benefits of physical activity are conveyed are also discussed.


Assuntos
Terapia por Exercício/métodos , Exercício Físico/fisiologia , Idoso Fragilizado , Sarcopenia/prevenção & controle , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Humanos , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto , Fatores de Tempo
9.
Aging Clin Exp Res ; 29(1): 11-17, 2017 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28155183

RESUMO

Sarcopenia, the age-dependent loss of muscle mass and function, is a common condition among older adults, and is associated with several adverse health outcomes. Owing to the impact of sarcopenia on quality of life, disability and mortality, a greater awareness is necessary in order to correctly identify the condition both in community and geriatric settings. Research on sarcopenia prevention and treatment is developing quickly, but many questions are still unanswered. The core of the sarcopenia condition involves quantitative and qualitative losses of skeletal muscle. These two dimensions should therefore be considered when designing and testing preventive and therapeutic interventions. The recently released operationalization of sarcopenia by the Foundation for the National Institutes of Health (FNIH) Sarcopenia Project allows for the framing of an objective, standardized, and clinically relevant condition, which should facilitate its translation into the clinical arena as well as its adoption by public health and regulatory agencies. Such a conceptualization might eventually encourage key stakeholders to combine their efforts in approaching the sarcopenia condition. Bearing these considerations in mind, the "Sarcopenia and Physical fRailty IN older people: multi-componenT Treatment strategies" project has operationalized a specific condition, named physical frailty and sarcopenia (PF&S), characterized by the combination of low physical performance (based on the Short Physical Performance Battery) and low muscle mass (according to the FNIH cut-points). A randomized controlled trial will be conducted to evaluate the efficacy of a multi-component intervention for preventing mobility disability and other adverse health outcomes in older adults with PF&S.


Assuntos
Idoso Fragilizado , Avaliação Geriátrica/métodos , Músculo Esquelético/patologia , Sarcopenia/prevenção & controle , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Humanos , Qualidade de Vida , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto , Fatores de Risco , Sarcopenia/complicações , Sarcopenia/fisiopatologia
10.
Aging Clin Exp Res ; 29(1): 81-88, 2017 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28188558

RESUMO

In the present article, the rationale that guided the operationalization of the theoretical concept of physical frailty and sarcopenia (PF&S), the condition of interest for the "Sarcopenia and Physical Frailty in Older People: Multicomponent Treatment Strategies" (SPRINTT) trial, is presented. In particular, the decisions lead to the choice of the adopted instruments, and the reasons for setting the relevant thresholds are explained. In SPRINTT, the concept of physical frailty is translated with a Short Physical Performance Battery score of ≥3 and ≤9. Concurrently, sarcopenia is defined according to the recent definitions of low muscle mass proposed by the Foundation for the National Institutes of Health-Sarcopenia Project. Given the preventive purpose of SPRINTT, older persons with mobility disability (operationalized as incapacity to complete a 400-m walk test within 15 min; primary outcome of the trial) at the baseline are not included within the diagnostic spectrum of PF&S.


Assuntos
Pessoas com Deficiência/classificação , Idoso Fragilizado , Exame Físico/métodos , Sarcopenia/diagnóstico , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Humanos
11.
Aging Clin Exp Res ; 29(1): 89-100, 2017 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28144914

RESUMO

The sustainability of health and social care systems is threatened by a growing population of older persons with heterogeneous needs related to multimorbidity, frailty, and increased risk of functional impairment. Since disability is difficult to reverse in old age and is extremely burdensome for individuals and society, novel strategies should be devised to preserve adequate levels of function and independence in late life. The development of mobility disability, an early event in the disablement process, precedes and predicts more severe forms of inability. Its prevention is, therefore, critical to impede the transition to overt disability. For this reason, the Sarcopenia and Physical fRailty IN older people: multi-componenT Treatment strategies (SPRINTT) project is conducting a randomized controlled trial (RCT) to test a multicomponent intervention (MCI) specifically designed to prevent mobility disability in high-risk older persons. SPRINTT is a phase III, multicenter RCT aimed at comparing the efficacy of a MCI, based on long-term structured physical activity, nutritional counseling/dietary intervention, and an information and communication technology intervention, versus a healthy aging lifestyle education program designed to prevent mobility disability in 1500 older persons with physical frailty and sarcopenia who will be followed for up to 36 months. The primary outcome of the SPRINTT trial is mobility disability, operationalized as the inability to walk for 400 m within 15 min, without sitting, help of another person, or the use of a walker. Secondary outcomes include changes in muscle mass and strength, persistent mobility disability, falls and injurious falls, disability in activities of daily living, nutritional status, cognition, mood, the use of healthcare resources, cost-effectiveness analysis, quality of life, and mortality rate. SPRINTT results are expected to promote significant advancements in the management of frail older persons at high risk of disability from both clinical and regulatory perspectives. The findings are also projected to pave the way for major investments in the field of disability prevention in old age.


Assuntos
Exercício Físico , Idoso Fragilizado , Limitação da Mobilidade , Sarcopenia/prevenção & controle , Acidentes por Quedas/prevenção & controle , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Envelhecimento , Análise Custo-Benefício , Humanos , Qualidade de Vida , Projetos de Pesquisa , Sarcopenia/terapia
12.
BMC Med ; 14(1): 215, 2016 Dec 22.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28003033

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB) is a well-established tool to assess lower extremity physical performance status. Its predictive ability for all-cause mortality has been sparsely reported, but with conflicting results in different subsets of participants. The aim of this study was to perform a meta-analysis investigating the relationship between SPPB score and all-cause mortality. METHODS: Articles were searched in MEDLINE, the Cochrane Library, Google Scholar, and BioMed Central between July and September 2015 and updated in January 2016. Inclusion criteria were observational studies; >50 participants; stratification of population according to SPPB value; data on all-cause mortality; English language publications. Twenty-four articles were selected from available evidence. Data of interest (i.e., clinical characteristics, information after stratification of the sample into four SPPB groups [0-3, 4-6, 7-9, 10-12]) were retrieved from the articles and/or obtained by the study authors. The odds ratio (OR) and/or hazard ratio (HR) was obtained for all-cause mortality according to SPPB category (with SPPB scores 10-12 considered as reference) with adjustment for age, sex, and body mass index. RESULTS: Standardized data were obtained for 17 studies (n = 16,534, mean age 76 ± 3 years). As compared to SPPB scores 10-12, values of 0-3 (OR 3.25, 95%CI 2.86-3.79), 4-6 (OR 2.14, 95%CI 1.92-2.39), and 7-9 (OR 1.50, 95%CI 1.32-1.71) were each associated with an increased risk of all-cause mortality. The association between poor performance on SPPB and all-cause mortality remained highly consistent independent of follow-up length, subsets of participants, geographic area, and age of the population. Random effects meta-regression showed that OR for all-cause mortality with SPPB values 7-9 was higher in the younger population, diabetics, and men. CONCLUSIONS: An SPPB score lower than 10 is predictive of all-cause mortality. The systematic implementation of the SPPB in clinical practice settings may provide useful prognostic information about the risk of all-cause mortality. Moreover, the SPPB could be used as a surrogate endpoint of all-cause mortality in trials needing to quantify benefit and health improvements of specific treatments or rehabilitation programs. The study protocol was published on PROSPERO (CRD42015024916).


Assuntos
Teste de Esforço , Extremidade Inferior/fisiologia , Mortalidade , Idoso , Teste de Esforço/métodos , Feminino , Avaliação Geriátrica/métodos , Humanos , Masculino , Razão de Chances , Prognóstico , Medição de Risco
13.
Age Ageing ; 45(4): 469-74, 2016 07.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27013497

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: identification of older individuals at risk for health-related adverse outcomes (HRAO) is necessary for population-based preventive interventions. Aim of this study was to improve a previously validated postal screening questionnaire for frailty in non-disabled older subjects and to test its prognostic validity in a vast sample of older community-dwellers. METHODS: individuals aged 70+ underwent a mass postal screening. Physical frailty phenotype (PFP) was assessed in the unselected subsample of the first responders. After a 1-year follow-up, HRAO were recorded in the whole sample, including survival, access to Emergency Department, hospitalisation and Long-Term Care admission. RESULTS: the questionnaire was mailed to 17,273 subjects, whose response rate was 55%. Among the first 1,037 responders without overt disability, the revised questionnaire was 75% sensitive and 69% specific for PFP (ROC 0.772). Non-disabled subjects who screened positive had a higher risk of HRAO in comparison with those who screened negative and similar to non-responders. Risk of adverse outcome was highest among disabled subjects. CONCLUSIONS: a simple questionnaire delivered by mail has good accuracy in detecting PFP in non-disabled older subjects and is able to predict HRAO.


Assuntos
Envelhecimento , Idoso Fragilizado , Fragilidade/diagnóstico , Avaliação Geriátrica/métodos , Programas de Rastreamento/métodos , Serviços Postais , Inquéritos e Questionários , Fatores Etários , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Fragilidade/epidemiologia , Fragilidade/terapia , Recursos em Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Itália/epidemiologia , Assistência de Longa Duração/estatística & dados numéricos , Estudos Longitudinais , Masculino , Admissão do Paciente , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Prognóstico , Estudos Prospectivos , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Fatores de Tempo
15.
BMC Health Serv Res ; 15: 223, 2015 Jun 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26047610

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Previous studies have investigated process and structure indicators of nutritional care as well as their use in nursing homes (NHs), but the relative weight of these indicators in predicting the risk of malnutrition remains unclear. Aims of the present study are to describe the quality indicators of nutritional care in older residents in a sample of NHs in Tuscany, Italy, and to evaluate the predictors of protein-energy malnutrition risk. METHODS: A cross-sectional survey was conducted in 67 NHs. Information was collected to evaluate quality indicators of nutritional care and the individual risk factors for malnutrition, which was assessed using the Malnutrition Universal Screening Tool. A multilevel model was used to analyse the association between risk and predictors. RESULTS: Out of 2395 participants, 23.7 % were at high, 11 % at medium, and 65.3 % at low risk for malnutrition. Forty-two percent of the NHs had only a personal scale to weigh residents; 88 % did not routinely use a screening test/tool for malnutrition; 60 % used some standardized approach for weight measurement; 43 % did not assess the severity of dysphagia; 12 % were not staffed with dietitians. Patients living in NHs where a chair or platform scale was available had a significantly lower risk of malnutrition (OR = 0.73; 95 % CI = 0.56-0.94). None of the other structural or process quality indicators showed a statistically significant association with malnutrition risk. CONCLUSIONS: Of all the process and structural indicators considered, only the absence of an adequate scale to weigh residents predicted the risk of malnutrition, after adjusting for case mix. These findings prompt the conduction of further investigations on the effectiveness of structural and process indicators that are used to describe quality of nutritional care in NHs.


Assuntos
Casas de Saúde/normas , Avaliação Nutricional , Indicadores de Qualidade em Assistência à Saúde/normas , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Humanos , Itália , Masculino , Avaliação de Processos e Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde , Medicina Estatal , Inquéritos e Questionários
16.
Eur J Clin Pharmacol ; 70(9): 1129-37, 2014 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24951915

RESUMO

PURPOSE: Osteoporosis is a chronic disease of the bone, whose incidence increases progressively with aging. The main consequences of osteoporosis are fragility fractures, which have considerable medical, social, and economic implications. Adequate treatment of osteoporosis must be considered as a compelling public health intervention. Bisphosphonates (BPs) represent the most significant advance in this field in the past decade, and they are widely used in the treatment of osteoporosis. However, evidence for their effectiveness is limited to secondary prevention, whereas their effect in primary prevention is uncertain and needs further investigation. METHODS: Using administrative data collected in the "Biphosphonates Efficacy-Safety Tradeoff" (BEST) study, a nested case-control study was conducted by including 56,058 participants, aged 55 years who were started on oral BPs from 2003 to 2005. Cases were the 1,710 participants who were hospitalized for osteoporotic fractures until 2007. Up to 20 controls were randomly selected for each case. Conditional logistic regression model was used to estimate odds ratio of fracture associated with categories of treatment duration. RESULTS: Compared with participants assuming BPs for less than 1 year, those who remained on therapy for at least 2 years had a 21% (95% confidence interval (CI) 7 to 33%) fracture risk reduction. CONCLUSION: This study provides evidence that BPs, dispensed for primary prevention of osteoporotic fractures, are associated with a reduced risk of osteoporotic fractures after at least 2 years of treatment.


Assuntos
Conservadores da Densidade Óssea/uso terapêutico , Difosfonatos/uso terapêutico , Fraturas por Osteoporose/prevenção & controle , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Humanos , Itália/epidemiologia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Razão de Chances , Fraturas por Osteoporose/epidemiologia , Prevenção Primária , Resultado do Tratamento
17.
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf ; 23(8): 859-67, 2014 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24911392

RESUMO

PURPOSE: Different strategies applicable to control for confounding by indication in observational studies were compared in a large population-based study regarding the effect of bisphosphonates (BPs) for secondary prevention of fractures. METHODS: The cohort was drawn from healthcare utilization databases of 13 Italian territorial units. Patients aged 55 years or more who were hospitalized for fracture during 2003-2005 entered into the cohort. A nested case-control design was used to compare BPs use in cohort members who did (cases) and who did not experience (controls) a new fracture until 2007 (outcome). Three designs were employed: conventional-matching (D1 ), propensity score-matching (D2 ), and user-only (D3 ) designs. They differed for (i) cohort composition, restricted to patients who received BPs straight after cohort entry (D3 ); (ii) using propensity score for case-control matching (D2 ); and (iii) compared groups of BPs users versus no users (D1 and D2 ) and long-term versus short-term users (D3 ). RESULTS: Bisphosphonate users had odds ratios (95% confidence interval) of 1.20 (1.01 to 1.44) and 0.95 (0.74 to 1.24) by applying D1 and D2 designs, respectively. Statistical evidence that long-term BPs use protects the outcome onset with respect to short-term use was observed for user-only design (D3 ) being the corresponding odds ratio (95% confidence interval) 0.64 (0.44 to 0.93). CONCLUSIONS: User-only design yielded closer results to those seen in RCTs. This approach is one possible strategy to account for confounding by indication.


Assuntos
Bases de Dados Factuais/estatística & dados numéricos , Difosfonatos/uso terapêutico , Fraturas Ósseas/prevenção & controle , Estudos Observacionais como Assunto/métodos , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Conservadores da Densidade Óssea/administração & dosagem , Conservadores da Densidade Óssea/uso terapêutico , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Fatores de Confusão Epidemiológicos , Difosfonatos/administração & dosagem , Feminino , Hospitalização , Humanos , Itália , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Pontuação de Propensão , Projetos de Pesquisa , Estudos Retrospectivos , Prevenção Secundária/métodos , Fatores de Tempo
18.
Clin Cases Miner Bone Metab ; 11(3): 181-4, 2014 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25568650

RESUMO

Sarcopenia is an age-related process of skeletal muscle loss associated with declining physical performance, highly prevalent among older subjects, with a negative prognostic effect on falls, disability and mortality risk. Modern approaches to sarcopenia case finding and diagnosis are based on physical performance measures, while assessment of muscle mass represents the second diagnostic step. Muscle mass can be quantified at different levels of body composition, with a complexity increasing from atomic detection to anatomic measure. In the choice of measuring method, different factors have to be taken into account, including validity, simplicity, cost and specific purpose (clinical versus research). Some methods, such as MRI and CT, have high validity but are complex and costly. Bioelectrical impedance analysis is inexpensive and easy to perform in most settings, being the preferred method for clinical practice. Dual energy X-ray absorptiometry has intermediate cost and complexity with good reproducibility, and is more reliable for research setting. Other methods, such as administration of tritium (D3)-marked creatine and measurement of urinary D3-creatinine, are still in a preclinical phase of development. For all methods the issue of normative data does exist and needs to be solved, in order to reliably identify homogeneous populations with sarcopenia, to be targeted in clinical practice and intervention studies.

19.
Physiotherapy ; 124: 164-179, 2024 Feb 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38943718

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Work-related burnout is a significant concern amongst healthcare professionals, including physiotherapists. It can negatively impact on both staff well-being and the quality of care delivered to patients. OBJECTIVES: To estimate the prevalence of burnout among physiotherapists. DATA SOURCES: PubMed, CINAHL, Web of Science, Embase, Scopus and PsycINFO, from inception to February 1st, 2022. STUDY SELECTION OR ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: Studies reporting burnout prevalence among physiotherapists. DATA EXTRACTION AND DATA SYNTHESIS: Prevalence of burnout. Sub-analyses were performed grouping studies based on countries where surveys were conducted, classified as developed or developing countries. The risk of bias was assessed using a modified version of the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. RESULTS: 32 studies were included in the systematic review and 31 in the meta-analysis, enrolling a total of 5984 physiotherapists from 17 countries. Pooled prevalence (95% confidence interval) of burnout was 8% (4-15). Prevalence figures for Maslach Burnout Inventory dimensions were: (i) emotional exhaustion, 27% (21-34) (ii) depersonalization, 23% (15-32) (iii) low personal accomplishment, 25% (15-40). Both overall and single components prevalence was higher, although not significantly, in studies from developing than in developed countries. LIMITATIONS: Tools used to assess burnout and cut-off scores chosen to identify the burnout prevalence differed across studies. CONCLUSION AND IMPLICATIONS OF KEY FINDINGS: Prevalence of burnout reported by physiotherapists appears high worldwide, in particular in developing countries, and compares with that reported by nurses and physicians. Substantial heterogeneity in the prevalence of burnout, in its definition and assessment methods across studies, and limited quality of most studies precludes drawing definitive conclusions. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION NUMBER: PROSPERO CRD42022307876 CONTRIBUTION OF THE PAPER.

20.
J Clin Epidemiol ; 169: 111303, 2024 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38402999

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: To assess the confidence in the results of systematic reviews on the effectiveness of physiotherapy for musculoskeletal conditions in the past 10 years and to analyze trends and factors associated. METHODS: This is a metaepidemiological study on systematic reviews (SRs) with meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs). MEDLINE, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, CINAHL, and PEDro were searched for SRs of RCT on physiotherapy interventions for musculoskeletal disorders from December 2012 to December 2022. Two researchers independently screened the records based on the inclusion criteria; a random sample of 100 studies was selected, and each journal, author, and study variable was extracted. The methodological quality of SRs was independently assessed with the AMSTAR 2 tool. Any disagreement was solved by consensus. RESULTS: The confidence in SRs results was critically low in 90% of the studies, and it did not increase over time. Cochrane reviews are predominantly represented in the higher AMSTAR 2 confidence levels, with a statistically significant difference compared to non-Cochrane reviews. The last author's H-index is the only predictor of higher confidence among the variables analyzed (OR 1.04; 95% CI: 1.01, 1.06). CONCLUSION: The confidence in SRs results is unacceptably low. Given the relevance of musculoskeletal disorders and the impact of evidence synthesis on the clinical decision-making process, there is an urgent need to improve the quality of secondary research by adopting more rigorous methods.


Assuntos
Estudos Epidemiológicos , Doenças Musculoesqueléticas , Modalidades de Fisioterapia , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto , Revisões Sistemáticas como Assunto , Humanos , Doenças Musculoesqueléticas/terapia , Doenças Musculoesqueléticas/epidemiologia , Doenças Musculoesqueléticas/reabilitação , Modalidades de Fisioterapia/estatística & dados numéricos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA