Randomized trial of pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic effects of 13.2 mg intranasal epinephrine treatment in congestion.

BACKGROUND: Nasal congestion could affect the absorption of an epinephrine nasal spray (ENS). OBJECTIVE: To compare the pharmacokinetics of 13.2 mg ENS with nasal congestion vs without congestion and vs intramuscular (IM) treatments. METHODS: This phase I, open-label, 4-period randomized crossover study enrolled 51 healthy adults with seasonal allergies into cohorts that received a single dose of 13.2 mg ENS (NDS1C; Bryn Pharma, Lebanon, New Jersey) administered as 2 consecutive sprays in either opposite nostrils (cohort 1) or the same nostril (cohort 2). Both cohorts received 13.2 mg ENS with and without nasal allergen challenge (NAC), 0.3 mg IM epinephrine by autoinjector, and 0.5 mg IM epinephrine by manual syringe (MS). RESULTS: The ENS after NAC resulted in higher extent and peak exposures and more rapid time to maximum plasma concentration vs ENS without NAC and IM treatments. In cohort 1, the maximum observed baseline-adjusted epinephrine plasma concentration (pg/mL) of ENS with NAC, IM autoinjector, IM MS, or ENS without NAC was 458.0, 279.0, 364.2, and 270.1, respectively, and in cohort 2 was 436.3, 228.2, 322.3, and 250.8, respectively. The maximum observed baseline-adjusted epinephrine plasma concentration geometric mean ratio (90% CI) for ENS with NAC vs without NAC in cohort 1 was 170% (123%-234%), and in cohort 2 was 174% (115%-263%). In cohort 1, the time to maximum plasma concentration was 15, 21, 45, and 25 minutes, respectively, and in cohort 2 was 18, 20, 45, and 20 minutes, respectively (P < .01 for ENS with NAC vs IM MS). The postdose mean heart rate and blood pressure remained stable and relatively similar to predose values regardless of plasma epinephrine concentration. Mild nausea and headache were the most common adverse events with ENS. CONCLUSION: The 13.2 mg ENS with congestion exhibited enhanced absorption vs IM treatments and ENS without congestion and seemed to be well tolerated. There was no clinically impactful relationship between pharmacodynamic effects and plasma epinephrine concentration.

Evaluation of Doravirine Pharmacokinetics When Switching from Efavirenz to Doravirine in Healthy Subjects.

Doravirine is a novel, potent nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI) for the treatment of patients with human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) infection that demonstrates a high genetic barrier to resistance and that has been well tolerated in studies to date. Doravirine is a candidate for patients switching from less-well-tolerated NNRTIs, such as efavirenz. While doravirine is a cytochrome P450 3A4 (CYP3A4) substrate, efavirenz induces CYP3A4; therefore, the pharmacokinetics of both drugs following a switch from efavirenz to doravirine were assessed. This was a 3-period, fixed-sequence, open-label study. Healthy adults were dosed with doravirine at 100 mg for 5 days once daily (QD) (period 1). Following a 7-day washout, efavirenz was administered at 600 mg QD for 14 days (period 2). Subsequently, doravirine was administered at 100 mg QD for 14 days (period 3). Blood samples were collected for pharmacokinetic analyses. Twenty healthy subjects were enrolled, and 17 completed the study. One day after efavirenz cessation, the doravirine area under the concentration-time curve from predosing to 24 h postdosing (AUC0-24), maximum observed plasma concentration (Cmax), and observed plasma concentration at 24 h postdosing (C24) were reduced by 62%, 35%, and 85%, respectively, compared with the values with no efavirenz pretreatment. These decreases recovered to 32%, 14%, and 50% for AUC0-24, Cmax, and C24, respectively, by day 14 after efavirenz cessation. The doravirine C24 reached projected therapeutic trough concentrations, based on in vitro efficacy, on day 2 following efavirenz cessation. Geometric mean efavirenz concentrations were 3,180 ng/ml on day 1 and 95.7 ng/ml on day 15, and efavirenz was present at therapeutic concentrations (>1,000 ng/ml) until day 4. Though doravirine exposure was transiently decreased following efavirenz treatment cessation, dose adjustment may not be necessary to maintain therapeutic concentrations of at least one drug during switching in a virologically suppressed population.

A 13.2 mg epinephrine intranasal spray demonstrates comparable pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and safety to a 0.3 mg epinephrine autoinjector.

Background: Recent acute anaphylaxis guideline updates have identified remaining unmet needs based on currently available therapeutic options as a critical focus. Objective: We compared the pharmacokinetic, pharmacodynamic, safety, and tolerability profiles of intranasal epinephrine with intramuscular epinephrine administered by autoinjector and manual syringe. Methods: An open-label, 3-period crossover study was conducted in 116 healthy adult volunteers to assess the bioavailability of a single 13.2 mg intranasal dose of epinephrine compared to a 0.3 mg intramuscular autoinjector and a 0.5 mg manual syringe. Patients with epinephrine concentrations of 50, 100, and 200 pg/mL at 10, 20, 30, and 60 minutes after dosing were also evaluated. Results: Pharmacokinetic parameters for the 13.2 mg intranasal dose exceeded those of the 0.3 mg autoinjector with a rapid and higher maximum observed concentration (intranasal, 429.4 pg/mL; autoinjector, 328.6 pg/mL) and greater systemic exposure (AUC0-360; intranasal, 39,060 pg∙min/mL; autoinjector, 17,440 pg∙min/mL). Similar results were observed compared to the 0.5 mg manual syringe. Pharmacokinetic parameters for opposite-nostril and same-nostril dosing were higher than both intramuscular doses, except time to reach maximum observed concentration, which was bracketed between the 2 intramuscular doses (intranasal opposite and same nostril, 20 minutes; autoinjector, 14.9 minutes; manual syringe, 45 minutes). Similar effects on blood pressure and heart rate were observed for intranasal and autoinjector administration. Intranasal epinephrine was safe and well tolerated. No serious or unexpected adverse events were reported, confirming results from earlier clinical studies. Conclusions: Bidose epinephrine spray addresses the unmet medical and patient needs for a needle-free, convenient, and effective dose-delivery system for self-administration of epinephrine that is as good as or better than the 0.3 mg autoinjector.

Pharmacokinetic profiles of controlled-release hydrogel polymer vaginal inserts containing misoprostol.

Misoprostol, a prostaglandin E1 analogue, is commonly administered intravaginally for cervical ripening and induction of labor. There is uncertainty regarding the correct dose because of the need to divide the tablets, and there is difficulty in removing the product when there is an adverse event. A proprietary hydrogel polymer containing a removable controlled-release reservoir dose of misoprostol is being developed for vaginal administration (misoprostol vaginal insert) to address these drawbacks while maintaining efficacy. This study investigated the pharmacokinetic profiles of these vaginal inserts and orally administered misoprostol. Twelve nonpregnant women received 100-, 200-, and 400-microg misoprostol vaginal inserts and separately received an oral dose of 200 microg of misoprostol. Values for area under the plasma concentration versus time curve, from time 0 to the last measurable concentration, were dose proportional with 481, 1026, and 2191 pg.h/mL for the 100-, 200-, and 400-microg misoprostol vaginal inserts, respectively. Maximum plasma concentrations were 33.1, 73.4, and 144 pg/mL for the 100-, 200-, and 400-microg misoprostol vaginal inserts, compared with 609 pg/mL for the 200 microg of oral misoprostol. After administration of the insert, plasma misoprostol acid levels increased gradually with time of the maximum measured plasma concentration at 5 to 9 hours. Following removal of the insert, misoprostol acid was eliminated rapidly from the systemic circulation with a mean half-life <1 hour.

Two open-label, randomized, crossover studies assessing the bioequivalence of ofloxacin administered as immediate-and extended-release formulations in healthy subjects.

BACKGROUND: Ofloxacin is a fluoroquinolone agent available as an immediate-release (IR) tablet formulation administered twice daily. An extended-release (ER) formulation of ofloxacin has been developed for oncedaily administration. OBJECTIVES: The present studies compared the pharmacokinetic (PK) and safety profiles of the ER and IR formulations of ofloxacin. METHODS: Based on specific inclusion and exclusion criteria, healthy adult male and female volunteers were selected to receive single and multiple oral doses of ofloxacin ER 400 mg QD and ofloxacin IR 200 mg BID in 2 separate open-label, randomized, crossover studies. Multiple blood samples were collected, and plasma concentrations of ofloxacin were analyzed using a high-throughput liquid chromatography system. PK parameters were calculated using noncompartmental methods. Safety was assessed in the clinical pharmacology unit based on vital signs, electrocardiograms (ECGs), and reported adverse events. The relationship of an adverse event to study drugs (definitely, probably, possibly, remotely, or unrelated) was assessed by the principal investigator. RESULTS: Forty healthy subjects were included in each study. Thirty-seven subjects (28 men, 9 women; mean age, 37 years; mean weight, 71.2 kg) completed the single-dose study, and 38 subjects (33 men, 5 women; mean age, 36 years; mean weight, 72.2 kg) completed the multiple-dose study. With the exception of 3 black subjects in each study of African-American origin, all subjects in both studies were white. The mean AUC(0-24) values for the ER formulation in the single-and multiple-dose studies (18.6 and 21.4 mg . h/L, respectively) were similar to those for the IR formulation (17.7 and 22.8 mg x h/L), with the 90% CIs falling between 80.0 and 125.0. Mean C(max) values for the ER formulation in the single- and multiple-dose studies (2.02 and 2.12 mg/L) were also similar to those for the IR formulation (1.74 and 1.85 mg/L). Under steady-state conditions, median T(max) values for the ER formulation were significantly longer than those for the IR formulation (5.00 vs 2.00 hours, respectively; P < 0.05). All vital signs and ECGs were within normal ranges during the single- and multipledose studies. Adverse events probably related to study drugs (eg, nausea, loose stools, emesis) were similar in nature and frequency between the 2 formulations. No serious adverse events were reported during either study. CONCLUSION: In these 2 trials in a selected group of healthy adult male and female volunteers, the ER and IR formulations of ofloxacin displayed a similar rate and extent of bioavailability and comparable safety profiles.

Pharmacokinetics of a controlled-release misoprostol vaginal insert at term.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this investigation was to report the pharmacokinetic properties of misoprostol administered intravaginally to women at term via a controlled-release hydrogel polymer insert. METHODS: This open-label, dose escalation trial consisted of 31 nulliparous women at term who were treated intravaginally in cohorts of six with inserts containing reservoirs from 25 through 300 microg (7 at 200 microg) of misoprostol. Inserts remained intravaginally until the patient went into labor, developed adverse events, or completed 24 hours of treatment. Complete data about residual drug in the inserts and plasma concentrations of misoprostol acid were gathered for 27 and 25 patients, respectively. RESULTS: Misoprostol was released at a constant rate (5.1% total dose per hour) with the amount absorbed being directly proportional to the dose reservoir. For the 25-, 50-, 100-, 200-, and 300-microg reservoir doses, the maximum median plasma concentrations were 6.4, 11.3, 21.7, 40.8, and 74.2 pg/mL, respectively, and the area under the curve until drug removal was 39, 117, 223, 269, and 477 pg x h/mL. Regardless of dose, the peak plasma concentration occurred at approximately 7 hours after insertion and the elimination half-life of the misoprostol acid was 0.55 hours (95% confidence interval, 0.36 to 1.32 hours). CONCLUSIONS: Misoprostol is released from the vaginal insert in a controlled manner and is eliminated rapidly after removal. Pharmacokinetic parameters are proportional to the reservoir dose.