Detalhe da pesquisa
1.
Standardized Definitions for Cardiogenic Shock Research and Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices: Scientific Expert Panel From the Shock Academic Research Consortium (SHARC).
Circulation
; 148(14): 1113-1126, 2023 10 03.
Artigo
em Inglês
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37782695
2.
Integrating Cost into Shared Decision-Making for Heart Failure with Reduced Ejection Fraction (POCKET-COST-HF): A Trial Providing Out-of-Pocket Costs for Heart Failure Medications during Clinical Encounters.
Am Heart J
; 269: 84-93, 2024 Mar.
Artigo
em Inglês
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38096946
3.
Racial Differences in Palliative Care Use in Heart Failure Decedents.
J Card Fail
; 2024 Mar 15.
Artigo
em Inglês
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38492771
4.
Poor Medication Access as a Driver of Excess Heart-Failure Readmissions Among Patients Living in Economically Deprived Neighborhoods.
J Card Fail
; 2024 Mar 06.
Artigo
em Inglês
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38458485
5.
Research involving the recently deceased: ethics questions that must be answered.
J Med Ethics
; 2023 Dec 08.
Artigo
em Inglês
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38071588
6.
Digging Deeper: Understanding Trajectories and Experiences of Shared Decision-Making for Primary Prevention ICD Implantation.
J Card Fail
; 28(9): 1437-1444, 2022 09.
Artigo
em Inglês
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35550427
7.
The impact of government-mandated shared decision-making for implantable defibrillators: A natural experiment.
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol
; 45(2): 274-280, 2022 Feb.
Artigo
em Inglês
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34843128
8.
Experimenting with modifications to consent forms in comparative effectiveness research: understanding the impact of language about financial implications and key information.
BMC Med Ethics
; 23(1): 34, 2022 03 27.
Artigo
em Inglês
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35346171
9.
Patient and Surrogate Postenrollment Perspectives on Research Using the Exception From Informed Consent: An Integrated Survey.
Ann Emerg Med
; 76(3): 343-349, 2020 09.
Artigo
em Inglês
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32446674
10.
Partnering With Patients to Bridge Gaps in Consent for Acute Care Research.
Am J Bioeth
; 20(5): 7-17, 2020 06.
Artigo
em Inglês
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32364468
11.
Evolving Understanding of Patients' Experiences in Acute Care Trials Without Prospective Consent.
Crit Care Med
; 52(5): 839-842, 2024 05 01.
Artigo
em Inglês
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38619341
12.
Uninformed refusals: objections to enrolment in clinical trials conducted under an Exception from Informed Consent for emergency research.
J Med Ethics
; 45(1): 18-21, 2019 Jan.
Artigo
em Inglês
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30219797
13.
CPR in the Covid-19 Era - An Ethical Framework.
N Engl J Med
; 383(2): e6, 2020 Jul 09.
Artigo
em Inglês
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32374958
14.
Understanding preferences regarding consent for pragmatic trials in acute care.
Clin Trials
; 15(6): 567-578, 2018 12.
Artigo
em Inglês
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30280582
15.
Significant Protection-Inclusion Tensions in Research on Medical Emergencies: A Practical Challenge for IRBs.
Am J Bioeth
; 23(6): 91-93, 2023 06.
Artigo
em Inglês
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37220362
16.
Targeted Consent for Research on Standard of Care Interventions in the Emergency Setting.
Crit Care Med
; 45(1): e105-e110, 2017 Jan.
Artigo
em Inglês
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27509386
17.
The use of hemodynamic support in massive pulmonary embolism.
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv
; 90(3): 516-520, 2017 Sep 01.
Artigo
em Inglês
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28101942
18.
Maximizing value and minimizing barriers: Patient-centered community consultation for research in emergency settings.
Clin Trials
; 14(1): 88-93, 2017 Feb.
Artigo
em Inglês
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27798377
19.
Impact of individual clinical outcomes on trial participants' perspectives on enrollment in emergency research without consent.
Clin Trials
; 14(2): 180-186, 2017 Apr.
Artigo
em Inglês
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28359192
20.
Patients' views of consent in clinical trials for acute myocardial infarction: impact of trial design.
J Med Ethics
; 43(8): 524-529, 2017 08.
Artigo
em Inglês
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28039285