Regulation of Bone Morphogenetic Protein Receptor Type II Expression by FMR1/Fragile X Mental Retardation Protein in Human Granulosa Cells in the Context of Poor Ovarian Response.

Fragile X mental retardation protein (FMRP) is a translational repressor encoded by FMR1. It targets bone morphogenetic protein receptor type II (BMPR2), which regulates granulosa cell (GC) function and follicle development. However, whether this interaction affects folliculogenesis remains unclear. Therefore, this study investigated the potential effect of FMRP-BMPR2 dysregulation in ovarian reserves and infertility. COV434 cells and patient-derived GCs were used to evaluate FMRP and BMPR2 expression. Similarly, FMR1, BMPR2, LIMK1, and SMAD expression were evaluated in GCs with normal (NOR) and poor (POR) ovarian responses. FMRP and BMPR2 were expressed in both cell types. They were co-localized to the nuclear membrane of COV434 cells and cytoplasm of primary GCs. FMR1 silencing increased the mRNA and protein levels of BMPR2. However, the mRNA levels of FMR1 and BMPR2 were significantly lower in the POR group. FMR1 and BMPR2 levels were strongly positively correlated in the NOR group but weakly correlated in the POR group. Additionally, SMAD9 expression was significantly reduced in the POR group. This study highlights the crucial role of FMR1/FMRP in the regulation of BMPR2 expression and its impact on ovarian function. These findings indicate that the disruption of FMRP-BMPR2 interactions may cause poor ovarian responses and infertility.

FMR1 expression in human granulosa cells and variable ovarian response: control by epigenetic mechanisms.

In humans, FMR1 (fragile X mental retardation 1) is strongly expressed in granulosa cells (GCs) of the female germline and apparently controls efficiency of folliculogenesis. Major control mechanism(s) of the gene transcription rate seem to be based on the rate of CpG-methylation along the CpG island promoter. Conducting CpG-methylation-specific bisulfite-treated PCR assays and subsequent sequence analyses of both gene alleles, revealed three variably methylated CpG domains (FMR1-VMR (variably methylated region) 1, -2, -3) and one completely unmethylated CpG-region (FMR1-UMR) in this extended FMR1-promoter-region. FMR1-UMR in the core promoter was exclusively present only in female GCs, suggesting expression from both gene alleles, i.e., escaping the female-specific X-inactivation mechanism for the second gene allele. Screening for putative target sites of transcription factors binding with CpG methylation dependence, we identified a target site for the transcriptional activator E2F1 in FMR1-VMR3. Using specific electrophoretic mobility shift assays, we found E2F1 binding efficiency to be dependent on CpG-site methylation in its target sequence. Comparative analysis of these CpGs revealed that CpG 94-methylation in primary GCs of women with normal and reduced efficiency of folliculogenesis statistically significant differences. We therefore conclude that E2F1 binding to FMR1-VMR3 in human GCs is part of an epigenetic mechanism regulating the efficiency of human folliculogenesis. Our data indicate that epigenetic mechanisms may control GC FMR1-expression rates.

FMR1 expression in human granulosa cells increases with exon 1 CGG repeat length depending on ovarian reserve.

BACKGROUND: Fragile-X-Mental-Retardation-1- (FMR1)-gene is supposed to be a key gene for ovarian reserve and folliculogenesis. It contains in its 5'-UTR a triplet-base-repeat (CGG), that varies between 26 and 34 in general population. CGG-repeat-lengths with 55-200 repeats (pre-mutation = PM) show instable heredity with a tendency to increase and are associated with premature-ovarian-insufficiency or failure (POI/POF) in about 20%. FMR1-mRNA-expression in leucocytes and granulosa cells (GCs) increases with CGG-repeat-length in PM-carriers, but variable FMR1-expression profiles were also described in women with POI without PM-FMR1 repeat-length. Additionally, associations between low numbers of retrieved oocytes and elevated FMR1-expression levels have been shown in GCs of females with mid-range PM-CGG-repeats without POI. Effects of FMR1-repeat-lengths-deviations (n < 26 or n > 34) below the PM range (n < 55) on ovarian reserve and response to ovarian stimulation remain controversial. METHODS: We enrolled 229 women undergoing controlled ovarian hyperstimulation for IVF/ICSI-treatment and devided them in three ovarian-response-subgroups: Poor responder (POR) after Bologna Criteria, polycystic ovary syndrome (PCO) after Rotterdam Criteria, or normal responder (NOR, control group). Subjects were subdivided into six genotypes according to their be-allelic CGG-repeat length. FMR1-CGG-repeat-length was determined using ALF-express-DNA-sequencer or ABI 3100/3130 × 1-sequencer. mRNA was extracted from GCs after follicular aspiration and quantitative FMR1-expression was determined using specific TaqMan-Assay and applying the ΔΔCT method. Kruskall-Wallis-Test or ANOVA were used for simple comparison between ovarian reserve (NOR, POR or PCO) and CGG-subgroups or cohort demographic data. All statistical analysis were performed with SPSS and statistical significance was set at p ≤ 0.05. RESULTS: A statistically significant increase in FMR1-mRNA-expression-levels was detected in GCs of PORs with heterozygous normal/low-CGG-repeat-length compared with other genotypes (p = 0.044). CONCLUSION: Female ovarian response may be negatively affected by low CGG-alleles during stimulation. In addition, due to a low-allele-effect, folliculogenesis may be impaired already prior to stimulation leading to diminished ovarian reserve and poor ovarian response. A better understanding of FMR1 expression-regulation in GCs may help to elucidate pathomechanisms of folliculogenesis disorders and to develop risk-adjusted treatments for IVF/ICSI-therapy. Herewith FMR1-genotyping potentially provides a better estimatation of treatment outcome and allows the optimal adaptation of stimulation protocols in future.

Expression of FMRpolyG in Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Cells of Women with Fragile X Mental Retardation 1 Gene Premutation.

Fragile X-associated primary ovarian insufficiency (FXPOI) is characterized by oligo/amenorrhea and hypergonadotropic hypogonadism and is caused by the expansion of the CGG repeat in the 5'UTR of Fragile X Mental Retardation 1 (FMR1). Approximately 20% of women carrying an FMR1 premutation (PM) allele (55-200 CGG repeat) develop FXPOI. Repeat Associated Non-AUG (RAN)-translation dependent on the variable CGG-repeat length is thought to cause FXPOI, due to the production of a polyglycine-containing FMR1 protein, FMRpolyG. Peripheral blood monocyte cells (PBMCs) and granulosa cells (GCs) were collected to detect FMRpolyG and its cell type-specific expression in FMR1 PM carriers by immunofluorescence staining (IF), Western blotting (WB), and flow cytometric analysis (FACS). For the first time, FMRpolyG aggregates were detected as ubiquitin-positive inclusions in PBMCs from PM carriers, whereas only a weak signal without inclusions was detected in the controls. The expression pattern of FMRpolyG in GCs was comparable to that in the lymphocytes. We detected FMRpolyG as a 15- to 25-kDa protein in the PBMCs from two FMR1 PM carriers, with 124 and 81 CGG repeats. Flow cytometric analysis revealed that FMRpolyG was significantly higher in the T cells from PM carriers than in those from non-PM carriers. The detection of FMRpolyG aggregates in the peripheral blood and granulosa cells of PM carriers suggests that it may have a toxic potential and an immunological role in ovarian damage in the development of FXPOI.

Intraindividual Embryo Morphokinetics Are Not Affected by a Switch of the Ovarian Stimulation Protocol Between GnRH Agonist vs. Antagonist Regimens in Consecutive Cycles.

Background: The impact of controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) during medically assisted reproduction (MAR) on human embryogenesis is still unclear. Therefore, we investigated if early embryonic development is affected by the type of gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) analog used to prevent a premature LH surge. We compared embryo morphology and morphokinetics between GnRH agonist and antagonist cycles, both involving human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG)-trigger. To reduce possible confounding factors, we used intraindividual comparison of embryo morphokinetics in consecutive treatment cycles of the same patients that underwent a switch in the COS protocol. Methods: This retrospective cohort study analyzed morphokinetics of embryos from patients (n = 49) undergoing a switch in COS protocols between GnRH agonists followed by GnRH antagonists, or vice versa, after culture in a time-lapse incubator (EmbryoScope®, Vitrolife) in our clinic between 06/2011 and 11/2016 (n = 49 GnRH agonist cycles with n = 172 embryos; n = 49 GnRH antagonist cycles with n = 163 embryos). Among time-lapse cycles we included all embryos of the two consecutive cycles before and after a switch in the type of COS in the same patient. In-vitro fertilization (IVF) or intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) was performed and embryos were imaged up to day 5. Data were analyzed using Mann-Whitney U test or Fisher's exact test. The significance level was set to p = 0.05. Patients with preimplantation genetic screening cycles were excluded. Results: The mean age (years ± standard deviation) of patients at the time of treatment was 35.7 ± 4.3 (GnRH agonist) and 35.8 ± 4.0 (GnRH antagonist) (p = 0.94). There was no statistically significant difference in the number of oocytes collected or the fertilization rate. The numbers of top quality embryos (TQE), good-quality embryos (GQE), or poor-quality embryos (PQE) were also not different in GnRH agonist vs. antagonist cycles. We found no statistically significant difference between the analyzed morphokinetic parameters between the study groups. Conclusions: Our finding supports the flexible use of GnRH analogs to optimize patient treatment for COS without affecting embryo morphokinetics.