Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Bases de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Athl Train ; 49(6): 723-32, 2014.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25144599

RESUMO

CONTEXT: Ankle-dorsiflexion (DF) range of motion (ROM) may influence movement variables that are known to affect anterior cruciate ligament loading, such as knee valgus and knee flexion. To our knowledge, researchers have not studied individuals with limited or normal ankle DF-ROM to investigate the relationship between those factors and the lower extremity movement patterns associated with anterior cruciate ligament injury. OBJECTIVE: To determine, using 2 different measurement techniques, whether knee- and ankle-joint kinematics differ between participants with limited and normal ankle DF-ROM. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. SETTING: Sports medicine research laboratory. PATIENTS OR OTHER PARTICIPANTS: Forty physically active adults (20 with limited ankle DF-ROM, 20 with normal ankle DF-ROM). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Ankle DF-ROM was assessed using 2 techniques: (1) nonweight-bearing ankle DF-ROM with the knee straight, and (2) weight-bearing lunge (WBL). Knee flexion, knee valgus-varus, knee internal-external rotation, and ankle DF displacements were assessed during the overhead-squat, single-legged squat, and jump-landing tasks. Separate 1-way analyses of variance were performed to determine whether differences in knee- and ankle-joint kinematics existed between the normal and limited groups for each assessment. RESULTS: We observed no differences between the normal and limited groups when classifying groups based on nonweight-bearing passive-ankle DF-ROM. However, individuals with greater ankle DF-ROM during the WBL displayed greater knee-flexion and ankle-DF displacement and peak knee flexion during the overhead-squat and single-legged squat tasks. In addition, those individuals also demonstrated greater knee-varus displacement during the single-legged squat. CONCLUSIONS: Greater ankle DF-ROM assessed during the WBL was associated with greater knee-flexion and ankle-DF displacement during both squatting tasks as well as greater knee-varus displacement during the single-legged squat. Assessment of ankle DF-ROM using the WBL provided important insight into compensatory movement patterns during squatting, whereas nonweight-bearing passive ankle DF-ROM did not. Improving ankle DF-ROM during the WBL may be an important intervention for altering high-risk movement patterns commonly associated with noncontact anterior cruciate ligament injury.


Assuntos
Articulação do Tornozelo/fisiopatologia , Tornozelo/fisiopatologia , Lesões do Ligamento Cruzado Anterior , Artropatias/diagnóstico , Traumatismos do Joelho/complicações , Joelho/fisiopatologia , Adulto , Fenômenos Biomecânicos , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Humanos , Artropatias/etiologia , Artropatias/fisiopatologia , Masculino , Fenômenos Fisiológicos Musculoesqueléticos , Amplitude de Movimento Articular , Medicina Esportiva/métodos , Suporte de Carga
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA