Safety and immunogenicity of an acellular pertussis vaccine booster in 15- to 20-month-old children previously immunized with acellular or whole-cell pertussis vaccine as infants.

The objective of this study was to evaluate reactogenicity and immunogenicity of the recently US-licensed Connaught/BIKEN (C/B) acellular DTP (ADTP) vaccine as a booster for children aged 15 to 20 months after they had received either the C/B ADTP or the US-licensed Connaught whole-cell DTP (WDTP) vaccine as infants. After infants had received either three doses of C/B ADTP (n = 109) or three doses of WDTP vaccine (n = 30) at 2, 4, and 6 months of age according to a 3:1, randomized, prospective design, they all received booster doses at 15 to 20 months of age with C/B ADTP. Fever > 101 degrees F (38.3 degrees C), irritability, injection site redness > or = 1 inch, injection site swelling, and injection site pain, among other reactions, were monitored for 14 days after vaccination. IgG antibody to pertussis toxin (PT) and filamentous hemagglutinin were analyzed by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and neutralizing antibody to PT was measured by Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cell assay. No significant differences were observed between the WDTP- and ADTP-primed infants following their ADTP booster for any of the monitored reactions within 72 hours of vaccine administration or in the 4 to 14 days after vaccination. Prior to the ADTP booster, antibody levels were higher in children who had received ADTP compared with those who had received WDTP vaccine as infants for PT antibody as measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and CHO cell assay. Higher levels of IgG antibody following the ADTP booster were observed to filamentous hemagglutinin and to PT in ADTP-primed compared with WDTP-primed children.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Acellular pertussis vaccination of 2-month-old infants in the United States.

This is the first study in children from the United States that evaluates the immunogenicity of and adverse reactions to the Connaught/Biken two-component acellular pertussis vaccine compared with whole-cell pertussis vaccine when given as a primary immunization series at 2, 4, and 6 months of age. Three hundred eighty infants were studied; 285 received acellular diphtheria-tetanus toxoids-pertussis (DTP (ADTP)) and 95 received whole-cell DTP (WDTP). Following the third dose, ADTP vaccination produced higher antibody responses than WDTP to lymphocytosis-promoting factor (enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay IgG geometric mean titer (GMT) = 131 vs 9 and Chinese hamster ovary cell assay GMT = 273 vs 16) and to filamentous hemagglutinin (IgG GMT = 73 vs 10) (all P less than .0001). Agglutinin responses were higher in WDTP compared with ADTP recipients (GMT = 50 vs 37; P = .02). Local reactions were fewer for all three doses following ADTP vaccination. Fever, irritability, drowsiness, anorexia, vomiting, and unusual crying all occurred less frequently in ADTP compared with WDTP recipients for one or more of the three doses. We conclude that this two-component ADTP vaccine when given as a primary series produces greater immunogenicity and fewer adverse effects than the currently licensed WDTP vaccine.

Children with influenza A infection: treatment with rimantadine.

Treatment with rimantadine of influenza in children and the potential development of resistance in clinical isolates associated with therapy have not been previously studied. We compared rimantadine to acetaminophen therapy in a controlled, double-blind study of 91 children with influenza-like illness. Of 69 children with proven influenza A/H3N2 infection, 37 received rimantadine and 32 received acetaminophen for five days. Children receiving rimantadine showed significantly greater reduction in fever and improvement in daily scores for symptoms and severity of illness during the first three days. Viral shedding also diminished significantly during the first two days but subsequently increased such that by days 6 and 7 the proportion of children shedding virus, as well as the quantity of virus shed, was significantly greater in the rimantadine group. During the seven-day study, of the 22 children in the rimantadine group with serial isolates tested, ten (45.5%) had resistant isolates compared with two (12.5%) of those with serial isolates in the acetaminophen group (P less than .03). Thus, of the total 37 children in the rimantadine group, 27% were found to have resistant isolated compared with 6% in the total group receiving acetaminophen (P less than .04). Furthermore, the mean inhibitory concentration of rimantadine increased with time in the rimantadine group (r = .4, P = .002) but not in the acetaminophen group. Rimantadine therapy, thus, appears to be significantly more effective than acetaminophen in ameliorating the clinical signs and symptoms of influenza in children. Treatment with rimantadine was also associated with increased viral shedding after the medication was discontinued and with the development of resistance in the clinical isolates, the significance of which is unknown.

Loracarbef (LY163892) vs. penicillin VK in the treatment of streptococcal pharyngitis and tonsillitis.

A double blind, randomized clinical trial compared loracarbef (LY163892) with penicillin VK. Two hundred thirty-three pediatric patients (less than or equal to 12 years) with a diagnosis of pharyngitis or tonsillitis resulting from Group A beta-hemolytic streptococci were randomized to treatment. Patients in the loracarbef group (n = 120) received loracarbef as a 15-mg/kg/day oral suspension or 200-mg capsule taken twice daily for 10 days. Patients in the penicillin group (n = 113) received penicillin VK as a 20-mg/kg/day oral suspension or 250-mg capsule taken four times daily for 10 days. Successful clinical responses were demonstrated in 101 of the 104 (97.1%) evaluable patients treated with loracarbef compared with 83 of 88 (94.3%) of evaluable patients treated with penicillin. The clinical relapse rate for the loracarbef group was 2.9% vs. 5.7% for the penicillin group. Bacteriologic response data approximated the clinical response data, as eradication of Group A beta-hemolytic streptococci was found in 86.5 and 81.8% of the loracarbef group and the penicillin group, respectively. No statistically significant difference in the incidence of treatment-emergent adverse reactions was noted between the two groups. The results indicate that loracarbef taken twice daily was comparable in safety and efficacy to penicillin VK taken four times daily in the treatment of Group A beta-hemolytic Streptococcus-associated pharyngitis and tonsillitis in children.

Adverse and beneficial effects of immediate treatment of Group A beta-hemolytic streptococcal pharyngitis with penicillin.

One hundred forty-two children with presumed Group A beta-hemolytic streptococcal (GABHS) pharyngitis were enrolled in a randomized double blind prospective study comparing the consequences of immediate penicillin treatment with treatment delayed for 48 to 56 hours. One hundred fourteen of the enrolled patients were culture-positive. An adverse impact of early antibiotic therapy was noted; the incidence of subsequent infections with GABHS was significantly greater in those treated at the initial office visit with penicillin. In the month following documented evaluation of GABHS, a recurrence occurred 2 times more frequently in those treated with penicillin immediately compared with those for whom treatment was delayed 48 to 56 hours. Late recurrences (beyond 1 month but in the same streptococcal season) occurred 8 times more frequently (P less than 0.035). Delay in penicillin treatment did not increase GABHS intrafamilial spread. Symptoms of both groups were assessed for 2 days following the initiation of treatment. Both placebo-treated and penicillin-treated groups used aspirin or acetaminophen ad libitum. Penicillin was shown to reduce fever and relieve sore throat, dysphagia, headache, abdominal pain, lethargy and anorexia significantly beyond that achieved with aspirin or acetaminophen alone. Penicillin had no effect on culture-negative cases.

Effect of dose and a comparison of measures of vaccine take for oral rhesus rotavirus vaccine. The Maryland Clinical Studies Group.

Ninety-six healthy infants ages 2 to 5 months received rhesus rotavirus vaccine serotype 3 (RRV) as a single dose of 10(3), 10(4) or 10(5) plaque-forming units (pfu) in this double-blinded, placebo-controlled study. Half of the infants in each dose group were also randomized to receive either 30 ml of infant formula as buffer before vaccination or were vaccinated on an empty stomach. The incidence of fever, increased stool frequency and decreased activity level was consistently higher among infants who received RRV than those who received placebo. There was no consistent increase in incidence of symptoms as the dose of RRV was increased. Possible vaccine-related side effects were increased in older vaccinees and in those with higher pre-vaccination antibody titers. The seroconversion rate and pre to postvaccination antibody rise, evaluated by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and by plaque reduction neutralization, correlated well. The 10(5) and 10(4) pfu RRV dose produced significantly higher rates of seroconversion and higher antibody rises than did placebo (P less than 0.001 for 10(5) and P = 0.005 for 10(4]. The 10(3) pfu dose was no more immunogenic than placebo. In the 10(4) pfu dose group 73% of infants receiving formula as a "buffer" seroconverted compared with 36% of those not receiving formula; 63% of infants partially breast-fed or formula-fed seroconverted compared with 17% of those exclusively breast-fed. These differences in seroconversion rate were largely overcome by increasing the RRV dose to 10(5) pfu. Stool (copro IgA) antibody responses were examined; of six infants showing a copro IgA response only one had seroconverted based on enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay or plaque reduction neutralization. RRV was recovered by tissue culture more frequently from the stool in those infants who received RRV 10(5) and 10(4) pfu than among those receiving 10(3) pfu or placebo (P less than 0.001).

A multicenter, randomized, single-blind evaluation of cefuroxime axetil and phenoxymethyl penicillin in the treatment of streptococcal pharyngitis.

Ninety-three children from four pediatric practices, with clinical and bacteriologic evidence of acute Group A beta-hemolytic streptococcal pharyngitis (GABHS) randomly received cefuroxime axetil (60 cases) or phenoxymethyl penicillin (33 cases). Cefuroxime axetil was given twice daily (125 mg). Phenoxymethyl penicillin was given three times daily (250 mg). The treatment groups were similar. Throat cultures were routine 2 to 7 days after the start of therapy and 2 days and 14 days after the end of therapy. The bacterial cure rates were 85 percent (51/60) for cefuroxime axetil, and 88 percent (29/33) for phenoxymethyl penicillin treated patients. Clinical results were comparable in both treatment groups. It was concluded that cefuroxime axetil given twice daily is as effective as phenoxymethyl penicillin given three times daily in producing bacteriologic eradication and clinical symptomatic improvement in children with GABHS.

Cephalexin in the treatment of upper respiratory tract infections.

Cephalexin, a semisynthetic cephalosporin antibiotic, has wide clinical application in respiratory infections of children and adults. In pharyngitis and tonsillitis due to beta-haemolytic streptococci, it is comparable to penicillin, cyclocillin, and cephaloglycin, as measured by clinical response, bacteriological cure rate, and incidence of relapse and reinfection. In otitis media, it is effective at dosages of 50-100 mg/kg/day except in those infections caused by Haemophilus influenzae, in which there is failure in 50% of the cases. In other infections of the upper respiratory tract, it appears to be effective except, again, in those caused by H. influenzae. Dosages of 1-2 g/day have been used in adults and 20-100 mg/kg/day in children. Adverse effects, mostly gastrointestinal upsets, rash, and urticaria, have been relatively infrequent and have not required discontinuance of the drug.

Treatment of Staphylococcus aureus infections in children in office practice.

One hundred five Staphylococcus aureus infections occurring in 79 children who were seen in a private office practice were evaluated for response to antibiotic therapy. The value of in vitro disk susceptibility testing in directing antibiotic selection in treatment failures was also examined. Of the total episodes studied, the types of infection studied included vesicular pyoderma (48%), secondary pyoderma (13%), bullous pyoderma (5%), furunculosis (14%), carbunculosis (12%), cellulitis (3%), suppurative otitis media (4%), and paronychia (2%). Comparative treatment efficacy was obtained with perioral erythromycin estolate and erythromycin ethylsuccinate, cefaclor and cephalexin, and clindamycin hydrochloride and dicloxacillin sodium. Penicillin V potassium, ampicillin, and topical bacitracin were generally ineffective. In 23 patients, 27/105 infections were initial treatment failures. Antibiotic disk susceptibility testing predicted these clinical failures and/or the antibiotic that would produce a clinical response in 21 of these 23 patients, suggesting that this office procedure can be of considerable value.

Comparison of a diphtheria and tetanus toxoids and bicomponent acellular pertussis vaccine with diphtheria and tetanus toxoids and whole-cell pertussis vaccine in infants.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the reactogenicity and immunogenicity of a diphtheria and tetanus toxoids and two-component acellular pertussis (ADTP) vaccine with a US-licensed whole-cell (WDTP) vaccine. SETTING: General pediatric practice in suburban Rochester, NY. DESIGN: Prospective, double-blind, randomized study. PARTICIPANTS: One hundred ten infants were studied; 88 (80%) received ADTP and 22 (20%) received WDTP at ages 2, 4, and 6 months. INTERVENTION: Vaccination. MEASUREMENTS/MAIN RESULTS: Temperature of 38.3 degrees C or higher (P = .03) and moderate or severe injection-site pain (P = .02) occurred less frequently in infants receiving ADTP than those receiving WDTP for the combined three doses. Following the third dose, ADTP vaccination produced higher antibody responses than WDTP to pertussis toxin (geometric mean enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay IgG was 52.2 vs 12.5; P < .001) and to filamentous hemagglutinin (geometric mean IgG was 182.8 vs 3.5; P < .001). No interference in the diphtheria or tetanus antibody responses was observed in recipients of the ADTP vaccine. CONCLUSIONS: This two-component ADTP vaccine, when given as a primary infant series, produces fewer adverse effects and greater immunogenicity to the two pertussis components that it contains than US-licensed WDTP vaccine.

Randomized, single-blind evaluation of cefadroxil and phenoxymethyl penicillin in the treatment of streptococcal pharyngitis.

A total of 150 children from two pediatric practices with clinical and bacteriologic evidence of acute group A beta-hemolytic streptococcal (GABHS) pharyngitis randomly received cefadroxil monohydrate (75 children) or phenoxymethyl penicillin (75 children). Cefadroxil was given once daily, while penicillin was given three times daily. The treatment groups were similar in age, sex, race, illness severity, and acute GABHS symptomatology. Throat cultures were routine 3 to 5 days after the start of therapy and 2 and 14 days after the end of therapy. The bacterial cure rates were 90% (62 of 69) for cefadroxil-treated patients and 76% (52 of 68) for penicillin-treated patients. This difference was significant (P less than 0.04). The clinical response was satisfactory in 91% of cefadroxil-treated patients and 89% of penicillin-treated patients. We conclude that once-daily cefadroxil is at least as effective as three-times-daily penicillin in producing bacteriologic eradication and clinical symptomatic improvement in children with GABHS pharyngitis.

The use of cefaclor in the treatment of beta-haemolytic streptococcal throat infections in children.

Cefaclor was used as a therapeutic agent in beta-haemolytic streptococcal throat infections in children in 3 separate studies. Although the numbers of patients in these ongoing studies are too small for valid statistical analysis, cefaclor was found to be (1) an effective agent in a dose of 20 mg/kg/day, (2) as effective as phenoxymethyl penicillin at identical dosages, and (3) equally effective at doses administered twice daily or thrice daily. It was well accepted by the patients, had minimal side effects, and produced no adverse effects in the peripheral blood.

Cephalexin and penicillin in the treatment of group A beta-hemolytic streptococcal throat infections.

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether cephalexin or penicillin is more effective in the treatment of group A beta-hemolytic streptococcal tonsillopharyngitis in children. DESIGN: Randomized, double-blind, crossover study conducted from 1981 to 1984. SETTING: Seven pediatric practices in the United States, including private offices and pediatric clinics. PARTICIPANTS: Of the 654 patients, 525 children and adolescents with clinical evidence of tonsillitis or pharyngitis and throat cultures positive for group A beta-hemolytic streptococcal infection were evaluable. Eighty percent of patients completed the study; none were withdrawn because of adverse reaction. SELECTION CRITERIA: Children and adolescents who had acute illness suggestive of group A beta-hemolytic streptococcal infection were enrolled in the study. Treatment was continued if the throat culture was positive for group A beta-hemolytic streptococcal infection. INTERVENTIONS: Four doses of cephalexin and penicillin (27 mg/kg per day) were prescribed to be taken on an empty stomach for 10 days. MEASUREMENTS/MAIN RESULTS: Symptomatic clinical failure occurred in 8% of penicillin-treated patients and in 3% of cephalexin-treated patients. Bacteriologic failure rates were 11% in the penicillin treatment group and 7% in the cephalexin treatment group. The combined treatment failure rate of clinical relapse plus asymptomatic bacteriologic failure was 19% in the penicillin treatment group and 10% in the cephalexin treatment group. Paired antistreptolysin-O titer increased significantly in 62.3% of penicillin-treated patients and in 64.2% of cephalexin-treated patients. Similarly, anti-DNase B titers rose 52.2% in penicillin-treated patients and 52.4% in cephalexin-treated patients. CONCLUSION: Cephalexin is a more effective drug than penicillin in the treatment of group A beta-hemolytic streptococcal throat infection in children.